About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

UPDATED: Limbaugh and the NFL: Let the pity party begin!

October 15, 2009 9:49 am ET by Eric Boehlert

We assume today's Limbaugh program will be insufferable as the host wallows in his humiliating NFL defeat, emphasizing that his long history of hateful speech had nothing to do with the football league resoundingly rejecting his bid presence, and that he's simply a victim in this play; that he's the victim of misinformation! In fact, if you hear the sound of pounding in the background of the radio show today, it's probably Limbaugh trying to nail himself to the cross.

Of course, the talker already has lots of support within the GOP Noise Machine, which has decided that multi-millionaire Limbaugh's failed attempt at a vanity business deal represents the most pressing matter facing the conservative movement and America today. They've whipped themselves into a frenzy as they work overtime to convince themselves that Limbaugh's humiliating failure doesn't say anything about how the radical right in perceived by mainstream America. And that Limbaugh's humiliating rejection shouldn't for a moment be considered a slap in the face of the right-wing hate movement that Limbaugh leads.

Good luck with that.

UPDATED: To get a true sense of the incoherent right-wing reaction to the NFL public rejection of Limbaugh, please go read professional Palin pal John Ziegler's name-calling screed at Big Hollywood. It's priceless, as Ziegler asserts that everyone/anyone who dislikes Limbaugh's brand of hate is ignorant. (And yes, that includes pretty much the entire NFL.) And nobody has permission to criticize Oh Mighty Rush because he has free speech rights....or something. (Note to Ziegler: Free speech protects your right to say things. That doesn't mean people have to agree. Just sayin'.)  

Here's what's so satisfying about watching the screaming and foot-stomping on the right: Limbaugh makes his living smearing and insulting anyone who disagrees with him. And then when he ventures out of his protected right-wing talk radio bubble and tries to become a player in mainstream American culture and he's resoundingly told to get lost because people don't like the the type of smears and insults he wallows in for a living, his allies announce it's not fair. They claim nobody is allowed to question Rush or his motives.

Oh brother.

UPDATED: In an effort to explain away Limbaugh's failed bid, conservatives are now depicting the NFL (owners, players, etc.) as a collection of brain-dead fools. Specifically, writers like Andy McCarthy at NRO claim it was Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson who alone turned the tide against Limbaugh in the NFL, and that the multi-billion dollar football industry was completely hoodwinked by a pair of "race baiters."

Hey, if makes you feel better Andy, then by all means keep believing it was Sharpton (who belatedly penned a single letter to the NFL) and Jackson (who also belatedly wrote a letter in protest) who ultimately convinced NFL millionaires to tell Rush to get lost.

P.S. McCarthy has no idea why people think Rush has a problem with race, because he treats people just like Martin Luther King did.

Right. And which MLK quote does this Limbaugh quip remind you of:

"We are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black."

UPDATED: More from the right-wing's stellar, the-NFL-are-a-bunch-of-jerks-anyway defense.

UPDATED: Notes Salon's Joan Walsh:

Even as he denies it, Limbaugh is making himself the face of the Republican opposition, and today that face is puffy and tear-streaked and red with self-pitying rage.

UPDATED: Surprise! Limbaugh is serving a vintage whine this afternoon. And suddenly, the NFL, that GOP bastion which Limbaugh praised earlier this week as the undying object of his love and admiration, is a nothing more than a snake pit. It's "an outpost of liberalism and racism."

Now he tells us!

UPDATED: Rush dips into the classic rock archives and announces he's been the victim of a "high-tech lynching."

UPDATED: No, wait. It's all Bob Costas' fault!

UPDATED: And for the record, Limbaugh on his program today also blamed sports writers, Democrats, the players union, Al Sharpton, and Obama (among others) for the talker's humiliating purchase fiasco.

Like I mentioned at the top, that pounding you heard in the background of Limbaugh's show today was the sound of him trying to nail himself to the cross.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by kfraz43 (October 15, 2009 10:01 am ET)
      10  
      oh. effing. waaah.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (October 15, 2009 11:25 am ET)
        10 1
        "The United States needed to return to Racially Segregated Buses" Hmm, Now there's a Statement of Note.
        Bill O'Reilly's Cracker Box Team couldn't seem to find that Racist Quote.
        Rush Limbaugh made this statement with full knowledge of its Racial Division.
        Now he wants us all to believe he never mady any Racist Statements in his latest Revision?

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by studmuffin404 (October 15, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
          1 8
          Well my friends here at media matters ,you have gone to far . Do you think that you can smear hard working honest americans, day after day after day LOL. It's your time now... You cant lie anymore, no one will listen to you once all your closets are opened and we see what falls out. We are watching you now , every move. The hugging of trees will soon come to an end , your idols in office are on borrowed time- soon the voting will begin ,
          I cant wait to see the tears flow down your sad little pathetic faces lol
          Report Abuse
          • Author by LKL (October 15, 2009 4:02 pm ET)
            4  
            Ummm, is this serious or sarcastic? Please say it's the latter.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by carlcc54 (October 15, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
            1  
            Rush is a racist. This is your proof!

            1. I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

            2. You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

            3. Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

            4. Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa , you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia . You do the same thing.

            5. Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

            6. The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.

            7. They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?

            8. Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African American female caller).

            9. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.

            10. Limbaugh attacks on Obama. Limbaugh has called Obama a ‘halfrican
            American’ has said that Obama was not black but Arab because Kenya is an Arab region, even though Arabs are less than one percent of Kenya . Since mainstream America has become more accepting of African-Americans, Limbaugh has decided to play against its new racial fears, Arabs and Muslims. Despite the fact Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School , Limbaugh has called him an ‘affirmative action candidate.’ Limbaugh even has repeatedly played a song on his radio show ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ using an antiquated Jim Crow era term for black a man who many Americans are supporting for president. Way to go Rush.

            11. I think the guy's wrong. I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism. I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses -- it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama's America .

            Report Abuse
          • Author by williamf (October 15, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
               
            Find a cruel man and you see a coward. You lot hide behind your apparent Christian values, we are not watching you we are going to eradicate your lies and myopic opinions

            Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 10:02 am ET)
      3 46
      Glad to see MMFA patting itself on the back for its complicity in the media hatchet job on Limbaugh. The majority of the opposition was based on made-up racist comments attributed to Limbaugh. MMFA has shown its true colors in failing to retract the story it trumpeted here that listed those false comments. MMFA can continue to portray itself as a purveyor of media integrity, but its failure to retract the story proves MMFA has no journalistic integrity, only a left-wing propaganda agenda.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (October 15, 2009 10:12 am ET)
        21 1
        Feel free to get into the actual details of what lies MMfa pushed. I saw several mentions of some questionable statements and MMfa said they were questionable. That you can defend Limbic against statements known to be questionable and ignore the real documented statements shows you know how to pick your battles.
        On second thought, why don't you just foam at the mouth some more.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:02 am ET)
          1 23
          If MMFA is going to attack everyone it says doesn't appropriate fact check a story, then MMFA needs to admit when it was wrong to do the same thing and issue a retraction.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:25 am ET)
            18  
            You said "the majority of the opposition is based on made-up" quotations from Limbaugh. Still waiting for proof of what you said. One comment in a book, quoted by someone else, doesn't come close to doing that.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:28 am ET)
              1 16
              There were three quotes: the slavery comment about how the streets were safer after dark; awarding the medal of honor to James Earl Ray; and the NCAA should practice robberies. These are the famous "quotes" that have been repeated as the basis for opposition to Limbaugh owning and NFL team.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 11:42 am ET)
                9  
                so take the bone out of your nose and Sonia Sotomyor is a racist latina are made up to? Your continued harping on a few quotations while ignoring the tons of other instances rings shallow, and irrational. We get you don't like MMFA and resigned from the Democratic Party because of Bush. Fine ! But Your reaching and you know it. The evidence is there and abundant, not even close.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
                4 1
                Along with a gazillion others, kydem. READ the article that MMFA posted. You are completely offbase on this and so is whatever blog site you've picked it up from. MMFA quite clearly put the entire article on its site showing that there were quotes from a book which were not properly cited and that these quotes were UNDER INVESTIGATION. That doesn't mean they are false, kydem. Why print a retraction of something which has already been qualified?

                Your point is specious.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
              4 2
              I've heard many of the quotes with my own ears, including the James Earl Ray quote that goes back to his early days. Any of the ones I haven't I attribute to the fact that I don't listen to his show and rely on audio, that's right AUDIO clips usually with Rushcam at work from other sources. Rush needs to own up to what he says. He makes a living being "provocative" and whines like a baby when he's called on it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (October 16, 2009 12:26 am ET)
                1  
                He makes a living being "provocative" and whines like a baby when he's called on it.
                We have a bingo. You can't tap-dance on the edge and then complain that the people who don't want to associate themselves with controversy don't like you.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by carlileb5935 (October 16, 2009 2:47 am ET)
                  1  
                  The thought of an opinionated guy like Limbaugh getting outraged because someone else has gone after him is not just hypocrisy on his part, it's insanity.

                  He can dish it out, but he can't ......
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 10:20 am ET)
        13  
        Poor Rush! Booooohoooooo....

        Do you have a link to the story here on MMFA with the false comments? Eagerly awaiting your response (not).
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 10:54 am ET)
            14
          Here you go: http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910070009
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:16 am ET)
            8  
            Can you read?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:22 am ET)
              1 21
              Tacking Limbaugh's objection to the comment at the end of a previously published article is not the same thing as printing a retraction. If you have to go look for it, it's not a proper retraction.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:26 am ET)
                15 1
                It's NOT a retraction and I bet that the quote will soon be verified, but I highly doubt that will open your eyes to the DOZENS of VERIFIED racist comments he's made through the years becuase you're BLIND to them anyway. It's an EPIC RUSH FAIL. Yay!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (October 15, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
                  3  
                  kydem just worships the ground RUSH walks on.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by therick (October 15, 2009 6:31 pm ET)
                    5 1
                    I worry about people who worship a mysogenistic, 3 times divorced, draft dodging, drug addicted, racist, college drop out. If Rush is the best hero someone can come up with, that person must have an IQ of 17.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
              2  
              Obviously not.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by all your eyes (October 15, 2009 11:17 am ET)
            14 1
            Nice try. MMFA reported that story accurately, and they reported that the one quote, printed in a book, is still being investigated.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
              5  
              I wouldn't call it a "nice try" (but thumbs-up, anyway). In fact, the closest that ky-dim ever came to saying anything nice was when he said that he was "Glad to see MMFA patting itself on the back..."; and then he was lying about it. The guy is both delusional and nasty; little wonder that he supports Limbaugh.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
            5  
            Thanks. That was a link to an article with a disputed quote, which subsequently is being verified, and POINTED OUT as being from a book, and not from Limbaugh's own archives. Meanwhile, the OTHER quotes are NOT in dispute.

            You'll have to try harder to accuse MMFA (which didn't even write the quote in question) of making "false comments".
            Report Abuse
      • Author by walstib (October 15, 2009 10:26 am ET)
        16 1
        What?

        Your racist hero has been hoisted on his own petard?

        How dare America repudiate the fetid puss-filled spewings of the your rhetorical messiah!

        Why, it's almost as if America - both side of the political spectrum no less - want no part of you and your ilk.

        Rise up and shake your tea-bags you lovers of Rush! Show us who you really are! Please?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 10:57 am ET)
          2 25
          I'm not a Rush fan, but I think this is a despicable moment in "journalism." The left wing media pounced on this story with such fervor and they relied upon several false comments attributed to Limbaugh. I think it demonstrates what many of us rational thinking people have know for years, that the media has no integrity. They rely on false comments perpetuated by blogs to go after a political foe.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Übermensch (October 15, 2009 11:12 am ET)
            12 1
            What comments specifically were false?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Übermensch (October 15, 2009 11:14 am ET)
            15 1
            YOu know what...nevermind...you don't need any more attention
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:19 am ET)
              11 1
              Agreed!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 11:53 am ET)
                6 1
                That's what happens when they come out of their right wing bubble. Requests for facts and backup go right out the other ear, as they try to use the same mindless repetition that worked on them to convince those who aren't buying the slop.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by marcusnj (October 15, 2009 11:35 am ET)
            4 1
            I'm sure that some the criticism of Rush is exagerated and not all the statements attributed to him are true. However, he makes a living from half truths, exagerations and smears so I can't feel sorry for him for being on the receiveing end of exactly what he does to others.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by spittinghotfireonrepukes (October 15, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
            5 1
            rational thinking

            WOW!!! YOU'RE KIDDING RIGHT? Those two words have never described anyone in the Republican Party!!! Good try, try again!!! If you were the least bit rational, you wouldn't be defending with such fervor a man who uses incendiary commentary to make a dollar.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
              4  
              I thought that was a standout too. Not unusual though, the cons who are the most confused and having trouble keeping up with the subject or applying logic love to tell everybody how rational and smart they are. I think it's cute.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
                2 1
                I prefer the fuller quote: "us rational thinking people have know [sic] for years"; ky-dim gives a perfect Freudian slip by bragging about his intellect and immediately making an error. Priceless!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Should it be "we" rational people? Not to nitpick or anything. :0)
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by 000l (October 15, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
            3  
            Gee, kind of reminds me of faux personalities jumping all over Van Jones and Jennings with blatant lies.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
              2 6
              I don't know enough about the Jennings controversy to comment on it, but Van Jones' own words, which were all documented, are what sunk his ship.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
            3  
            One=several? There's that tricky math confounding conservatives again.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by srichardson (October 15, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
            3 2
            Even taking away every racial comment Limbaugh made, he's still a hateful, mean, spiteful man with whom the NFL doubtfully wants to be associated. This had nothing to do with the media, it had to do with Limbaugh himself. Why is everything the fault of the liberals? Limbaugh is an ass and it's finally caught up with him.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 10:27 am ET)
        11 1
        Two comments out of THOUSANDS, kydem09. Get REAL.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:00 am ET)
          1 18
          When are you going to admit that MMFA was wrong to go with the Burwell story without fact checking the sources? The "quotes" attributed to Rush in that story are the primary sources of criticism against him over the past week and the quotes are not true. He never said them. Like I stated yesterday, MMFA needs to man up and admit it made a mistake. But I won't hold my breath for that to happen. Nor will I hold my breath waiting for any of the regular lefties at this site to acknowledge that MMFA did anything wrong.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 11:26 am ET)
            10 1
            MMFA did nothing wrong. When is Rush going to apologize for calling Sonia Sotomyor a racist?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Cheney2012 (October 15, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
              1 13
              No need to apologize for a TRUE statement.

              When will all the media and MMFA apoloize for calling Limbaugh a racist?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
                8  
                Did somebody ask you to write two contradictory sentences?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
                2 1
                Gee, Rush, I apoloize.

                I'm sure he'll feel better now.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (October 15, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
                6 1
                When will all the media and MMFA apoloize for calling Limbaugh a racist?


                When H*LL freezes over!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
                  4 1
                  When people apologize to Hitler for accusing him of being a murderous dictator.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
                3  
                Why should anyone apologize when it's true that Rush is a Racist. Proof: the song he made "Barack the magic N---o" and plays it on his show. And that's just 1 example!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by MrPlow99 (October 15, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
                2  
                Ummmm, you just answered your own question. Usually you put the answer after the question, not before, but we'll let this one slide.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                2  
                Holy cats!!!! You're own standards of what constitutes a racist (A la Sotomayor) more than proves that Rush is a serial racist to the extreme!!!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by kfraz43 (October 15, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
                1 1

                When will all the media and MMFA apoloize for calling Limbaugh a racist?

                How bout when it's no longer true?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:31 am ET)
            16 1
            kydem, I don't CARE about MMFA, that seems to be the bee in your bonnet. I don't give a rip about MMFA one way or the other. I listen to Rush, I KNOW what a racist he is.

            What I'm saying is that you are gripping about TWO QUOTES which may or may not be true and which MMFA has reported, accurately, are UNDER INVESTIGATION. It's the man's entire BODY of work which has created his problems and he alone is responsible for them. His racist comments have been available for all to hear on a daily basis. When those TWO QUOTES are determined to be false or true, I'm sure MMFA will do what you've asked. They REPORTED that there were two quotes under investigation, I'm really not sure what else you want them to do at this point.

            BTW, this isn't a "leftie" v. a "rightie" issue, no matter how much Rush and his Rushbots want it to be. The man said stupid, racist things throughout his career and the NFL wants NO part of him. I mean, he got FIRED for one of his televised racist comments.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:37 am ET)
              2 12
              I find many of his comments to be offensive, but I don't think he's a racist.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:40 am ET)
                7 1
                You don't think he's a racist because the veracity of 2 out of 6 dozen quotes are being called into question.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 11:50 am ET)
                  5  
                  and he asked if I'am stupid! :-)
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:50 am ET)
                  1 13
                  No, I just don't think he's a racist. Period. Offensive commentary does equate to racism in my book.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:04 pm ET)
                    12  
                    I'd suggest reading another book.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Übermensch (October 17, 2009 12:34 am ET)
                         
                      by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:50 am ET) 1 13
                      No, I just don't think he's a racist. Period. Offensive commentary does equate to racism in my book.

                      please insert foot into mouth
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
                    5 1
                    Offensive commentary about race, which Limbaugh has done many times, is racism. Your book needs to be replaced with a dictionary.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by catfish1968 (October 15, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
                      2 1
                      If it supports the system of racism, which his offensive commentary clearly does, then it is racist. He benefits from a racist system.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by kfraz43 (October 15, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Dictionaries are elitist, biased toward the intellectual.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
                    2 1
                    Offensive commentary does equate to racism in my book.

                    DOES equate?

                    And you are that thick to not think Rush is a racist?
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                   
                "I find many of his comments to be offensive, but I don't think he's a racist."

                Do you really think at all?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
            3  
            There was one quote that is in dispute.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (October 15, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
            6 1
            Gee, most of the stuff that I have seen on the "news", meaning T.V. and local (St. Louis) papers has mostly been about his ESPN stint and how his comments about McNabb cost him his job as a football commentator.

            I have yet to see anything quoted anywhere about anything that MMFA has said about good ole Rush.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (October 15, 2009 10:36 am ET)
        12 1
        Somehow, I don't think MMFA has that much influence on the owners and players of the NFL. Those are the people who have pretty much put a stop to Limbaugh's bid to being part owner of the Rams.

        I think most of the people who frequent MMFA will be the first ones to defends Limbaugh's right to free speech, in the same way they also point out that a lot of his speech is at least devisive and sometimes possibly racist.

        What we should not forget is that Limbaugh is an entertainer (I know that is really stretching the term) who has identified his core audience and works at keeping them tuned in. He does not have a problem with the fact that his core audience is perfectly happy with the devisive and sometimes racist rhetoric that he spews and he will not be changing this format, as long as the money keeps rolling in.
        For all the pure capitalist out there this is nirvana. Finding a product, selling it to the market place, and getting rich.

        Now, if Limbaugh, or anyone else, wants to complain that he isn't allowed to purchase the Rams, because of the product he has been selling, then they only have themselves to blame.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 10:51 am ET)
        9 1
        Basically, rush shouted "fire" in a crowded theater...now, he pays the price for that freedom of speech.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (October 15, 2009 10:55 am ET)
        10 1
        '...made-up racist comments attributed to Limbaugh." Such as? And, where were there comments that MMfA attributed to Limbaugh that he didn't actually make?


        "...failing to retract the story it trumpeted here that listed those false comments." Again, what false comments? Where? No link, no citation, no evidence. Just pouting.

        Did you mean this story? Because, each quote is directly attributable to Limbaugh, and each is shown in context.

        Please show evidence of MMfA touting or creating propaganda, if you can, kydem09. It's quite a charge, but it is also completely baseless.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:03 am ET)
          1 12
          http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910070009
          Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (October 15, 2009 11:21 am ET)
            14  
            So, of all the quotes attributed to Mr. Limbaugh, you're referring to the one quote from a book that turned out not to be properly sourced in a newspaper article. I see.

            Well, all the other quotes that MMfA compiled from Rush's own lips still stand. There is this one quote from a newspaper article, which Rush denies and is still being researched, and you think that this lone quote is the only reason the NFL have decided they want nothing to do with him? Take a step back, gain a little perspective, and ask yourself if you really believe that to be true.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:23 am ET)
              1 21
              Typical. Let's give MMFA a pass because we agree with their ideology.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Lord of Light (October 15, 2009 11:27 am ET)
                12 1
                Typical. Right-winger changes subject after being shown up. So one quote was wrong? Big deal. The rest are all accurate and abound with race-baiting.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
                  3 1
                  it wasn't even "wrong", it's just not properly verified. If someone can't properly verify it, it should not have been used however.

                  But can someone honestly say that it sounds FALSE?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by catfish1968 (October 15, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
                    1  
                    This comment undermines Kydem's thesis, you have stated, quite clearly, that a quote that is unverified shouldn't have been used.
                    Kydem repeatedly states that no-one here has said that the quote shouldn't have been used.
                    So here it is.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:33 am ET)
                7  
                No, they posted a statement which had legitimate and documented quotes . . . there were two which are being questioned and investigated. MMFA has posted that information.

                You don't seem to be able to comprehend what was written.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Ecotopian (October 15, 2009 11:28 am ET)
            7  
            The article is mostly quoted material, and that quoted material clearly notes uncertainties over the alleged slavery quote. So what's your problem?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by trelan1701 (October 15, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
            8  
            So MMFA quotes a book. Then, when the quote is called into question MMFA SAYS the quote has been called into question and it is currently (as in right now) being researched. How, EXACTLY, is this what conservative sites do? When was the last time Beck O'Hannity even SUGGESTED a quote they used was made up?

            And if you're just talking about the fact they didn't fact check it, think about the why?

            Why fact check every quote attributed to a racist scumbag if those quotes are DIRECTLY in line with his normal dialogue? If O'Reilly is quoted as saying "Obama is a plague on this country", do you REALLY need to fact check it? Of course not!

            Conversely, if Olbermann was quoted on Fox as saying "Conservatives are a bunch of whiny hypocrites" I wouldn't need to check that either. Even if he didn't say it, it's EXACTLY in line with his usual commentary.

            Now, if Rush didn't have a loooooong history of racism and that quote wasn't checked, yeah I would totally agree with you that MMFA blew it. But he does. And you're well aware of it.

            The fact that MMFA is bothering to verify it after it was called into question and will (I guarantee) print a retraction if the quote turns out not to be correct puts them far above the right wing media you're trying (and failing) to compare them to.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (October 15, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
            8  
            So, If I have understand you correctly, you believe that MMFA needs to publish a retraction of the blog item that you posted the link to(?).

            Let's see, after reading the whole thing what I find is a blog entry that then quotes a local (St Louis) sports writers column.
            This column puts forth, in no uncertain terms, how that sports writer feels about the whole Limbaugh Rams bid. In this column he does mention the whole "slavery/streets are safer" item that was linked to Limbaugh.

            Then, in the blog item, there are several updates.
            One is a quote from the sports writer where he notes, in his column, that the attributed quotes in the previous column may not be true statements. Also, there are other updates where the blog notes that the paper also made the same note.

            I don't know where you came from but; that sounds like good journalism to me.
            They posted a quote and noted who, where, and when.
            When it was noted that there might be an issue with some of the items in the quote, they posted an update that listed these issues, and kept updating as the story changed.

            The only way MMFA would need to post a retraction was if they had made the erronous statement themselves, not because they quoted someone else.

            By stepping up and updating the story, as it evolved, MMFA has done what was right. Can you say that Rush, or Fox News, have been shown to live up to this simple standard? I think not.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
              3  
              An excellent summary, b_d. I rather doubt that he will even attempt a response; it's too air-tight.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:11 am ET)
        9 1
        MMFA: Limbaugh's "color-blind" history of racially charged comments

        Dear Kydem09,

        Please cite a single falsehood from the above link. Can you find just ONE....
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:24 am ET)
          1 19
          You're deflecting. The fact is that MMFA does what it famously accuses others of doing -- not fact checking sources BEFORE running with a story. I would think you want a web site you rely on for information to live up to the same journalistic standards it holds others to, but I guess I'm wrong about that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:27 am ET)
            12 1
            No, you said that the majority of the opposition was from comments he didn't make. That's clearly not true. MMFA didn't make the accusation in that one case you are citing anyway, so your argument doesn't hold water. As usual.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:31 am ET)
              1 12
              Unbelievable that you all will defend MMFA's failure to do a proper job of reporting a story. I suppose I should have expected that.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:34 am ET)
                8 1
                Hon, nobody is defending MMFA's failure . . . you seem to be having difficulty comprehending.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Lord of Light (October 15, 2009 11:28 am ET)
            8  
            You didn't even acknowledge Victor Colorado's point.

            Again, one wrong quote is irrelevant to the big picture: Rush has a history of racist remarks demeaning African-Americans. You haven't refuted that.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:32 am ET)
              1 8
              Again, it's a deflection from the point I'm making.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:35 am ET)
                5  
                Yes or No; does Limbaugh have a history of making racially charged comments?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:39 am ET)
                  1 9
                  I find many of his comments offensive, but I do not think he is a racist, anymore than I believe Obama is a racist.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 11:40 am ET)
                    7  
                    This game is over.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
                      9 1
                      You're deflecting from kydem's point, Victor. Can't you ignore the scores of racist comments Rush is documented as making, and focus on the one unverified quote (that MMFA reported as disputed)and see that this one quote made up the majority of media "attacks" on Rush, and is proof of MMFA's sloppiness because they didn't make the part about the dispute in big red letters that kydem could find easily enough?

                      It's as if you expect people to provide some sort of evidence to back up their misguided ideas. That's not the way it works in the Excellence in Broadcasting world.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
                        6  
                        You raise several valid points, which, when added to kydem09's blockbuster "stated words can never be racist" really close the book on this one. I now humbly apogogize for Gumping things up.

                        Kydem09: I'm sorry I had to fight in the middle of your Rush Pity party.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
                        1 5
                        It's sloppy on MMFA's part.
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:35 am ET)
                3  
                But, you have no point. I've read the site and I knew that there were two quotes which were questionable and under investigation. Didn't read that anywhere else. So, what has MMFA done wrong?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
               
            They printed a Quote that was in a book, which would have to be verified before going into the book.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 11:27 am ET)
        12 1
        What FALSE comments? He MADE all of the comments that MMFA has ever listed here, you moron. I've heard the audio! He's a greedy, bitter, hateful, hack and a right-wing whack-job to boot. That ain't bias or even misifnormation: it's the only reasonable conlusion that any sentient human being can draw, based on the man's own words.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------Why don't you call into his show and cry along with him, you fool.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:34 am ET)
          2 8
          You've never heard the so-called quotes that the streets were safer after dark during slavery, or that the NCAA should practice robberies or that James Earl Ray should get the medal of honor, because those things were never said. So, you're either unaware of the comments I'm referring to or you're just a liar.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:36 am ET)
            4  
            I read about those two quotes being questioned ON THIS SITE . . . nowhere else, so I'm not sure why your knickers are in a twist.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Übermensch (October 15, 2009 11:42 am ET)
              10 1
              For not being a Limbaugh fan...kydem09 sure knows an awful lot about what Rush said and when he said it.

              Just ignore
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:53 am ET)
                2 8
                I watch a variety of news and look at a variety of sites. I know that the quotes have been debunked. You obviously have limited sources for your information. You rely too much on this site apparently and are probably a rabid Olbermann watcher. Which would explain a lot . . .
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
                  6  
                  Actually, you are incorrect. The two or three quotes you are speaking of have NOT been debunked, yet. They are still being investigated.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 12:58 pm ET)
                    3 1
                    Plus, whether it's real or not, kydem09 does NOT even thing the slavery quote is racist!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by all your eyes (October 15, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
                      4 1
                      I wonder, if someone does eventually dig up a tape of Limbaugh making one or more of these statements, will kydem apologize and issue a retraction?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
                      1 4
                      I never said the slavery quote wasn't racist. I just said it was a made-up quote attributed to Limbaugh.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 3:09 pm ET)
                        3 1
                        So the slavery statement is racist but Limbaugh singing "Barack, The Magic Negro" isn't racist?

                        The slavery statement is racist but Limbaugh saying the "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips" isn't racist?

                        The slavery statement is racist but Limbaugh calling illegal immigrants an "invasive species" isn't racist?

                        Is that it?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
                          1 5
                          Barack the Magic Negro is satire and was in response to a ridiculous item in the LA Times. No, I don't think it's racist.

                          The bloods and crips thing -- I've read the transcript and I don't think it was racist either.

                          The invasive species comment was certainly politically incorrect, but again, I don't think it was racist.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
                            5 1
                            This is truly amazing, Limbaugh has made hundreds of racially charged statements and the one and only statement that you deem to be racist is the one statement that's yet to be verified as being from him. Wow, those were tough odds!
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by Übermensch (October 15, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
                  4  
                  My point remains.

                  And thanks for telling me how I live my life.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
                  6 1
                  You rely too much on this site apparently and are probably a rabid Olbermann watcher. Which would explain a lot...

                  This statement says more about you than anyone else.

                  And it says, "You're a moron."

                  ---------------------------------------------------------
                  Rather clearly.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
                    1 4
                    Thank you. <bowing>
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
                      2 2
                      LOL.

                      OK, now you rock.

                      As long as we can all have fun with it, keep it all in perspective, it's all good.

                      ----------------------------------------------------
                      You're OK in my book. LOL
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                        1 3
                        I try not to take this too seriously. I'd go crazy otherwise.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                          2 1
                          And yes, I know most of you already think I'm crazy. But that's OK.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
                            4 1
                            Too serious or not too serious, your insistence that Limbaugh has not made any racist statements leaves you with ZERO credibility. You're an empty poster with absolutely nothing of merit to add to the discussion. Keep in mind, it's not personal, it's just a fact based on your insistence that Limbaugh has not made a single racist statement.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
                              1 2
                              I said I don't think he's a racist. That's my opinion. You don't have to like it or agree with it. I really don't care.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Max Credits (October 15, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
                                2  
                                Of COURSE you don't care, why else would you provide us with 136 posts in 2 days defending Limbaugh. It's because you don't care! My oh my, you really are empty.
                                Report Abuse
                        • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
                          1  
                          I try not to take this too seriously. I'd go crazy otherwise. And yes, I know most of you already think I'm crazy. But that's OK.

                          LIKEWISE! ;)

                          -------------------------------------------------
                          LOL
                          Report Abuse
              • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
                   
                And what he didn't say.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
            4 2
            because those things were never said


            How do you know these things were never said, Kydem ? I'm not asking you to prove a negative here, if there is no tape, they should be treated as unverified, or ignored.You don't know that they're false any more than anybody knows them to be true.To say that they were never said makes you a liar.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
              3 1
              Kydem must listen to Rush 24/7 to back up that he never said that. I think that would be hear say.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
              1 6
              Considering that every single word Limbaugh utters is transcribed immediately by folks like MMFA, you really think if he said those things that the transcript and/or audio wouldn't have surfaced? Get real.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
                5 1
                MMFA hasn't been around for the majority of Rush's career. How many times are you planning to fail on one thread? Is there some sort of record you're getting close to? Good luck.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 15, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
            2 1
            So show me where MMFA ever called him out for saying those things! You can't, because they didn't!

            You said MMFA was "patting itself on the back for its complicity in the media hatchet job on Limbaugh."

            So HOW were they complicit? They have NEVER misquoted the man. (If you can find so much as one example, that wasn't immediatley retracted if there even WAS one, then I'll take it all back.) Find. Me. ONE.

            The misquotes you provided are totally superluos here. Limbuagh has more than enough ACTUAL, DOCUMENTED verbal coprophagia to get himself in hot water with ANY industry that 70% Black. (Or, really, any industry that not decidated to spewing right-wing b*llsh!t 24/7/365.)

            ---------------------------------------------------------------
            He reapt what he sewed. Screw 'im.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by overmars jr. (October 15, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
            3  
            Erm... NAACP, not NCAA. But nice try building that straw man.

            (torches it)

            Burning MAN!!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by skatscan5624 (October 15, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
            3 1
            I've heard the James Earl Ray quote. It goes back many a year so the audio isn't as easily available. He was on a MLK was a communist rant that he stole from Bob Grant and expanded on it. He did say the streets were safer during the days of slavery but I can't remember exactly how the quote went but his intent was clear.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (October 15, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
          3 10
          "greedy, bitter, hateful, hack "

          That describes just about everybody in the Democrap (sorry for the typo) party, mainstream media, union leadership, and left-wing posters to this web site!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by lede39571545 (October 15, 2009 11:45 am ET)
        2 1
        Stop the whining and take it like a man. Rush got what he has worked very hard to earn. Turnabout is fair-play.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DoubleDown (October 15, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
        9 2
        "I do believe" Obama is an "angry black guy"
        "In Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering"
        "Obama's entire economic program is reparations"
        Obama is "more African in his roots than he is American" and is "behaving like an African colonial despot"
        Obama "wants us to have the same health care and plan that he had in Kenya" and "wants to be the black FDR"
        Limbaugh suggests Obama would not have acted on Somali pirates if he'd known they were "actually young, black Muslim teenagers"
        "you can't criticize the little black man-child"
        "The days of minorities not having any power are over, and they are angry"
        "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips"
        Limbaugh called illegal immigrants an "invasive species"
        Limbaugh repeatedly calls Native Americans "Injuns"

        To name a few
        Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (October 15, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
        5  
        And you, sir or madame, are a bald-faced liar. Which makes everyone else feel just fine about your pity party catterwalling.

        If there's no crying in baseball, you can damn sure bet your rear there ain't any in football.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by manofmystique (October 15, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
        2 1
        Even if no one can't tie many of those notorious past incendiary comments to Rush, what does it matter? Look at all the recent comments, on a daily bases, this racist idiot said since Obama came on the scene. "Obama the magic Negro".
        "In Obama world white kids get beat up by black kids while other black kids cheer them on".
        Come on folks, Rush made so many racist comments in JUST this year alone. Too numerous to count
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (October 15, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
        4 5
        MMFA did this same crap during the Duke lacrosse team nonsense by advising that the right called the hooker a "lying ho", but when she turned out to be one, there was no retraction there, either.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
          6  
          You haven't read the article that kydem keeps quoting. It is a newspaper article which mentions two quotes that came from a book. Those quotes were not properly sourced, some folks questioned them, and they are "under investigation." MMFA did not say these quotes were true or not true because the article quite clearly states that they are UNDER INVESTIGATION. The remaining quotes were all documentd and were not in question. READING is a wonderful thing, you should try it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
            1 6
            The article, when posted, said nothing about the quotes being under investigation.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
        2 1
        ky-dim, don't you even have any imagination? You made this asinine statement on an earlier thread (http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910140046; and I tore it to shreds then), and now you cut-and-paste it over here as well. Repeating yourself makes you look even worse, if that's possible.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Jeremy Danials (October 15, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
        3  
        Hey! I know how to cut-and-paste too!

        Y'know, this repeat until true tactic no longer works, bub. When you can actually show proof that what you say is true, we might listen. Until then, why don't you go and hide under your Glenn Beck sheets and wait for the liberals to make America work again.

        Big bag full of mashed-up jackass, here.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 10:26 am ET)
      13 1
      And this is the crux of the matter to me...

      when he ventures out of his protected right-wing talk radio bubble and tries to become a player in mainstream American culture and he's resoundingly told to get lost because people don't like the the type of smears and insults he wallows in for a living


      Even though the Dittoheads tell themselves otherwise, Rush and his ilk are listened to and liked by a tiny, tiny portion of Americans. They believe their own rhetoric and convince themselves that they are somehow "mainstream"... until they appear in other areas and get ridiculed and chased off the stage. And then, of course, THEY are the victims (in their own minds).

      It's a really, really pathetic group of people - they go on and on about personal responsibility etc, but as soon as they are made to actually stand up for what they say and believe, they run screaming and yell about "free speech!" as if that meant "You have to accept what I say!".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 11:18 am ET)
      2 14
      Do any of you lemming leftists even know Rush's Program Director is black? Has been for over 20 years. Or that he has substitute hosts that are black? Now, do you think the Reverends Jackson or Sharpton have any key people in important positions? Leftists literally drip with hypocrisy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 11:20 am ET)
        1 13
        Correction. Now, do you think the Reverends Jackson or Sharpton have any key white people in important positions
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Lord of Light (October 15, 2009 11:25 am ET)
        10 1
        Racism is an attitude. Having black friends doesn't mean you're not a racist. Most people who don't understand that are racists themselves.

        But beyond that, are the many black activists and NFL players who called out Rush just stupid? No -- they know racism when they see it. Rush and his minions might want to believe it was a liberal conspiracy that undid his effort to buy the Rams, but the players and the league (namely Commissioner Roger Goodell) whose words spoke loudest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:44 am ET)
          2 7
          When asked, NFL players and others who were questioned about Limbaugh owning an NFL team always went back to racist quotes that were never uttered by Limbaugh. These quotes were repeated over and over again by the mainstream media without any investigation into them. The quotes were false. I believe this NFL thing was the result of a frothing media attempting to bring down someone they see as opposition. Plain and simple. It's like the Beck boycott. An organized attempt to punish someone for exercising his right to free speech.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
            7 1
            Nope, not even close. If I wanted to "punish" someone for exercising his right to free speech, I'd petition the government to "punish" them. [The Constitution prevents that, however.] See, the free speech guaranteed in the First Amendment refers to the GOVERNMENT abridging a person's right to speak freely. What you are proposing here is preventing Rush and Beck's critics from criticizing Rush and Beck for their stupidity, their lies and their racist comments.

            Oh, and you can believe what you want, the NFL made the comments on their own. MMFA and other media outlets simply reported what they were saying.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
            8  
            When asked, NFL players and others who were questioned about Limbaugh owning an NFL team always went back to racist quotes that were never uttered by Limbaugh.
            kydem

            I call BS on that. Almost every NFL player I saw speak about this or read quotes of, referred to his comments about McNabb. I think that comment alone would have the vast majority of players lining up against any bid by Rush to own a team.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
              7 1
              Exactly. In the "mainstream media", the main point has been Rush's comments about how the media wanted McNabb to succeed because he was black (clearly an inference that blacks get undeserved preferential treatment - yeah, right).

              These "false quotes" played little or no role in the whole thing, it's the divisive and racially insensitive persona that Rush has cultivated over the years that did him in. The NFL doesn't WANT controversy. And if you don't want controversy, you don't want Rush.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by manofmystique (October 15, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
            4 1
            Even if no one can't tie many of those notorious past incendiary comments to Rush, what does it matter? Look at all the recent comments, on a daily bases, this racist idiot said since Obama came on the scene. "Obama the magic Negro".
            "In Obama world white kids get beat up by black kids while other black kids cheer them on".
            Come on folks, Rush made so many racist comments in JUST this year alone. Too numerous to count
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
            4 2
            ..racist quotes that were never uttered by Limbaugh. These quotes were repeated over and over again by the mainstream media....(kydem)

            Why do you wingnuts always have plenty of time to repeat yourselves over and over, but seem too busy to offer any evidence for the thing you're mindlessly repeating?

            You've been asked several times here. Got anything yet? (Look at the part I put in bold in your quote, if you're still having trouble understanding this)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by manofmystique (October 15, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
              3 1
              How stupid can you be?
              Even if no one can't tie many of those notorious past incendiary comments to Rush, what does it matter? Look at all the recent comments, on a daily bases, this racist idiot said since Obama came on the scene. "Obama the magic Negro".
              "In Obama world white kids get beat up by black kids while other black kids cheer them on".
              Come on folks, Rush made so many racist comments in JUST this year alone. Too numerous to count
              Report Abuse
          • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
            4 1
            Most of the players I heard mentioned the McNabb quote, which we all know he said. No one is punishing him for exercising his right to free speech. He has the freedom to say what he wants, so does his opposition. And the NFL and its team owners have the power to decide who can buy a team. And the players have a right to decide who they want or don't want to play for. Get over it. It's all his own doing.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 15, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
            1 1
            Isn't one quote enough? I don't recall the slavery quote. I do recall these quite well: "NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips"

            As I'm sure some football players do. If you're parsing, it just doesn't work. Beck, as well, is the sum of all his scum. They have the right to say what they want but people may fight back. Fox has been spewing lies for years and they seem so aghast that people are calling them on it.

            Perhaps this type of entertainment is over. Perhaps it was all a publicity stunt. If so, I think it backfired.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
          1 6
          Oh, I get it now! Black employees are actually black friends and/or tokens, as one of your libby friends said.

          Of course not one mention on this link about Jackson's or Sharpton's horrible pasts which include much more abrasive racial comments than Rush has "supposedly" said. Like I said, go to Webster’s (for you lefties this is a dictionary), look up the word hypocrisy and you'll see the synonym is liberal.

          Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
            3  
            If Sharpton or Jackson tries to become NFL team owners, do you think the NFL would embrace that or reject it?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotshark (October 15, 2009 11:29 am ET)
        4  
        No I did not know that.

        But that still dose not give him the right to yell fire or scream his hate right!?

        just asking.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 11:37 am ET)
        5  
        None of that matters. Some of the most racist people I know have "black" friends. His comments are racially offensive.

        Oh, and they are racially offensive to this conservative white woman. Racism really doesn't have a political ideology. It is what it is.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
        5 1
        Leftists literally drip with hypocrisy.


        That would be figuratively, if you had shown it to be true in any way. Sorry, I know you probably picked up that misuse of the word from Hannity, but it's a pet peeve of mine.

        Do you know what a token is, retardedinsf? Even one who has been black for over 20 years?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
        5 1
        and he has a latina housekeeper too! He used her to buy his oxycotin. So what is your point?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (October 15, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
        5 1
        Do any of you lemming leftists even know Rush's Program Director is black?

        AND?????
        Is that suppose to be some type of proof that Limbo can't be a racist because he employs ONE Black man?


        Has been for over 20 years.

        The man's been Black for 20 years?

        Or that he has substitute hosts that are black?

        Once again, is that suppose to be proof that Limbo isn't a racist?

        The fact that YOU think that knowing Black folks and employing ONE Black man excuses the outrageous, racist comments Limbo has made, says you couldn't buy a clue!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
          2 9
          Look folks. All of you gotta lighten up just a bit, eh? I was just letting you lefties know that Rush walks the talk when it comes to disregarding the color of ones skin. Just as I do. In fact, why is it so politically incorrect to say you have friends who happen to be black, or brown, or any color anyways? When I was in VN most of my friends were black and I have no problem saying this. I was often the only light colored skin guy in the bar and more than once my buddies came to my rescue when someone messed with me. I also have very close black and brown family members and am proud of this as well!

          And back to Rush, he has always endorsed hard work as the way to success so what's wrong with this? He also has given millions to charity as opposed to Joe Biden, Al Gore, and countless other liberal hypocrites who give a few hundred dollars.

          I'll skip the mmmm, mmmm, mmmm this time.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
            6 1
            I was just letting you lefties know that Rush walks the talk when it comes to disregarding the color of ones skin.


            Is that why he brings it up so often?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
              4 3
              Come on, Fawlty, retiredinsf is a veteran with black friends and family members.He has all of the make-believe credentials that all of the phony conservative representatives here do. Oh, and he "walks the talk", just as Boss Hogg does, whatever that means.

              The wingnuts just seem to be getting lazier and dumber all the time.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by retiredinsf (October 15, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
                2 6
                Whoops. It appears I inflamed the "Col's" sensitivity. So sorry to expose your obvious closet racism "Col" by having the courage to say I have "people of color" as family and friends and proud of it.

                You leftists are so transparent. Like taking candy from babies (literally).

                Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
                  3 2
                  You have a pretty vivid imagination, I'll give you that.I don't understand why it would take courage to admit you have non-white family and friends, considering you're proud of it.

                  Talk about transparent.Literally. Mmmm mmmm good.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (October 15, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
            4 1
            "Sorry to say this, I don't think he's been that good from the get-go. I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team." (Here)

            "Barack Obama has picked up another endorsement: Halfrican American actress Halle Berry." (Here)

            "[I]n Obama's Amercan, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering." (Here)

            See how Rush Limbaugh disregards skin color, retiredinsf? I mean, race never ever even appears in any of his comments, right?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
            3  
            Maybe mentioning the color of a friend's skin isn't wrong...but why bother? Are you keeping score?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (October 15, 2009 8:00 pm ET)
            4 1
            In fact, why is it so politically incorrect to say you have friends who happen to be black, or brown, or any color anyways?


            Oh, I don't know if it's "political incorrect" but it's telling, when a person defending Limbo, feels the need to state they have Black/Brown friends and family members.

            Let's experiment. Why don't you sing Barack the Magic Negro to your Black/Brown friends and family and see how they react.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 15, 2009 11:21 am ET)
      12  
      Gosh, we have seen a neverending string of victims, haven't we? Rep Joe Wilson was a victim of our hatred. Never mind that we would have preferred that he never say "You LIE" in a joint Congressional speech from the nation's President - somehow he thought he was the victim when we said that he was out of line and should apologize to Obama and Congress both. I could give several other examples too. Now Rush is a victim. Never mind that he is the person who said the offensive things for which he is being held to account for - the offender here is somehow those people penalizing him for his behavior!

      It's too bad that too many people don't see this for what it is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lede39571545 (October 15, 2009 11:43 am ET)
      3  
      To quote words from a Frank Sinatra song...."Losing is not a happy thing when the stakes are high"...."It's over, it's over, it's over"
      Rush....KARMA...you've earned it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 11:45 am ET)
      7  
      What's ironic is that without the fortune Limbaugh has made directly from his ugly, divisive speech, sometimes directed at the the players of the NFL, he wouldn't be able to afford to buy into an NFL team.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (October 15, 2009 11:51 am ET)
      5 1
      Do you see Rush try to deny most of the racist statements attributed to him. He actually said he did not say these things.
      How dumb is Rush and how dumb do he think people are? Rush never denied making these comments, UNTIL NOW.
      Even if no one can't tie many of those notorious past incendiary comments to Rush, what does it matter? Look at all the recent comments, on a daily bases, this racist idiot said since Obama came on the scene. "Obama the magic Negro".
      "In Obama world white kids get beat up by black kids while other black kids cheer them on".
      Come on folks, Rush made so many racist comments in this year alone. Too numerous to count. Feel free to add to my list.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kydem09 (October 15, 2009 11:56 am ET)
        1 11
        Much of what he says is satire. Taken out of context, these quotes can be deemed racist. But again, I don't believe Limbaugh is a racist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
          6 2
          Intelligent people understand that some [not much] of Rush's schtick is satire, but his dittoheads believe it is true, they don't understand satire. That's why so many of them believe that Stephen Colbert is really a conservative commentator who is the anti-Stewart on Comedy Central. They don't get satire.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Lord of Light (October 15, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
          7 1
          This may be the dumbest thing you've said yet, and that's saying something.

          Yes, Bloods Vs. Crips, McNabb only highly regarded because the media wanted a black quarterback to do well ... genius stuff. Hilarious! <SARCASM>
          Report Abuse
        • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
          1  
          Ok ok. Rush may not be a racist. But he is divisive and he words always do strike a cord with minorities. For that reason alone, he should not want to or be allowed to be part of something that is dominated by minorities
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NothingButTheTruth (October 15, 2009 11:52 am ET)
      5 1
      I find it really odd that "Rushers" will clamor about the few (I guess) unsubstantiated racially-motivated quotes that Rush has said, but will forget about the 15+ that he HAS said..

      The guy has elitist racism painted on the inside of his skull. I try to give everyone a fair shot, but he's used stereotypes to make fun of Blacks, Native Americans, Women...you name it, he's done it.

      The wild thing is, that MMFA has these quotes in their context on this very site!

      I found them in literally 30 seconds...granted I think they were just re-cataloged today, so that may have helped me out, but they're right here:
      http://mediamatters.org/research/200910130049

      Just because you like someone, that doesn't mean they're infallible.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
        1 1
        You find it odd? These people would follow Rush to the depths of hell.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
        1 1
        You find it odd? These people would follow Rush to the depths of hell.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Media Mumblings (October 15, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
      2 10
      Wasn't this socialist site originally started to critique and "expose" conservative and libertarian lies? What does a guy bidding for part ownership of a professional football team have to do with the dissemination of news? Answer: nothing. You guys have such a seething, myopic hatred for the guy. It's really just bizarre. You people just need your daily "Two Minutes of Hate." That's all it is.
      I imagine Mr. Limbaugh, sans ownership of a pro football team, will be just find at his castle residence in sunny south Florida.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
        8 1
        Socialist? Truth is "socialism"?

        Unbelievable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
          6  
          Give the reich-wingers time and eventually the truth will be "fascism" to them...they never can keep the two ideologies straight.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Media Mumblings (October 15, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
            2 1
            I don't know why you guys are so hostile to fascism. One of the patron saints of 20th century liberalism, FDR, blatantly copied from the so-called Italian Experiment. Most of the New Deal intellectuals were educated in Europe(esp. Germany) during the early part of the 20th century. It's how they got their collectivist bonafides. They were soaked in the same anti-liberal(liberal in the classical sense)intellectual soup that Benito and Adolph were. You guys have alot more in common with these men than you are aware of. They hated free markets, too, you see. They spat out the word capitalism. They wanted a heavily planned centralized economy as well.
            Economic Fascism is just another branch of collectivism. I think some of the confusion stems from the fact that the fascist and the communist were trying to recruit the same types of minds. This does not mean they were opposites,though. One day an Italian man was a Marxist and the next week he was a National Socialist. This is only possible when you are recruiting the same TYPE of mind. As Hitler said, " The communists are the purest of socialism." The Nazi intellectuals claimed that they were, in fact, not fascists. They preferred to be identified as National Socialists. That aside, the Italian and German states were, in fact, the same from a strictly economic perspective.
            National Socialism was actually a response to the International Socialism of Marx and Lenin. The International Socialists didn't recognize "artificial nation-states," but, rather, they saw a man in terms of class and profession. Because of this, it was very hard to recruit new members who were, quite often, very nationalistic. This is where National Socialism filled the void. It was still a collectivist ideology like International Socialism, but it relied heavily on race and national identity rather than class or professional identity. The National Socialists were not "purest of socialsim," as Hitler put it, though. They didn't want to entirely get rid of the concept of private property. They did nationalize some parts of the economy outright, however, but the rest of it was just heavily directed, taxed and regulated. They enacted numerous socialist programs and set up various cartel arrangements.
            The fascist bargain works something like this for the large business: the state will allow you to keep your private property, but it will be heavily regulated and directed. Your market share will be protected through various regulations and subsidies. In return, the business is expected to go along with the social agenda of the state in return. It's a great deal if you can get it. Companies like Archer Daniels Midland(ethanol lobby), Halliburtion (military industrial congressional complex), and General Electric(parent company of MSNBC) come to mind when I think of fascist arrangements in this country.
            General Electric is an especially egregious example of a modern day fascist arrangement. They invested heavily in various "green" projects that failed in the market place and now they look to the government to bail them out with subsidies and mandates. I noticed that G.E. was able to get themselves classified as a bank in less than a week to be eligible for the TARP money. Other companies have tried for years without success to get permission to engage in banking activity. I wonder if G.E.'s close ties to the Obama administration has anyhting to do with that? G.E. cynically goes along with the government's social agenda( "green energy," global warming, etc.) and in return they get their market share protected by bailouts and favorable regulations that hurt smaller market participants disproportionately.
            The regulations are always justified in the name of consumer safety, the children, or the environment. It makes it harder to oppose the regulations when they are couched in this way. Our political capitalists, as oppoosed to market capitalists like Steve Jobs or Bill Gates, understand mass psychology very well, you see. Some of you are getting played(again). You're just not aware of it.

            Cheers!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (October 16, 2009 4:24 am ET)
                2
              Awsome post Welfare- warfare

              Hannity meat head Mark Lavin bla bla radio drivel they can,t handle the truth.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
                   
                owsum post, libetry or death! crabalocker fishwife in a gadda da vida supercalifragilistic gabba gabba hey LOL you had me at hello go ahead make my day !
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Media Mumblings (October 15, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
          4 10
          Truth? You mean your version of it. Why do you deranged lefties think that you have such an airtight grip on reality? And don't deny that you people are socialists. Your Democratic politicians will never admit to it because they could never get elected. this is why I actually do have alot of respect for Senator Bernie Sanders. He's a socialist, but at least he's upfront about it. If most so-called progressives were truthful about what they were actually selling they would never get elected. I didn't identify you wingnuts as communists, by the way; I correctly identified you guys as socialists.
          I'll never forget the quote from the failed Socialist Party candidate Norman Thomas:
          "We will achieve every plank of the Socialist Party platform under the banner of liberalism."
          He was almost right. Not everything in the platform has gotten through, but most of it has. None of you are liberals in the classical sense of the word anyway. Your intellectual heirs in the "progressive" movement hijacked the term and turned its original meaning on its head. Your statist ideology didn't spring from the enlightenment. It came out of the ideas of late 19th-early 20th century European and American intellectuals. You collectivist drones don't give a damn about the truth. If your leaders cared about honesty, they wouldn't be so deceptive in their selling of socialism.
          The socialism has been sold to the American people gradually over many decades and it has been done piecemeal. It's always given another name like so-called single payer health insurance. Don't correctly identify government-run Ponzi schemes(Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security)as socialism, either. Musn't be upfront about the nature of these programs.
          So spare me the lectures about truth and honesty.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
            6 1
            ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. We're going to conquer the world.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
              5 1
              Har! Nothing like a rambling lecture from a Hannitized meathead. Those talking points are so fresh and interesting.

              I second you, Congero...Zzzzzzzzz. Wingnuts, if you're going to be ridiculous, at least try to be entertaining about it.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 2:24 pm ET)
            3  
            No, truth. I've read your posts . . . go visit Beck or Alex Jones.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Tiredog (October 15, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
            2  
            You wouldn't understand those lectures anyway.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 15, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
            2  
            Welfare-Warfare - statist ideology, etc. Let me guess: Mark Levin Graduate. Bring back privately owned fire departments! Please explain to my dying father how bad Medicare and Medicaid is once again, please?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Media Mumblings (October 15, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
              1 3
              One of you said to explain what your father would do without medicare. As it stands right now, he would probably be screwed. I am not advocating getting rid of these socialist programs overnight. They will have to be phased out over many years. Your father has had money taken from him all his adult life to pay for these ponzi scheme and now the current elderly generation is dependent on your precious Leviathan State. Some of this has alot to do with our immoral fiat monetary system that makes it almost impossible for an individual to save the product of her labor in a currency that is constantly being debased by our glorious central planners at the FED. Healthcare costs weren't out of control relative to people's wages until the state got so heavily involved a couple of generations back. The state pushes out private charity and replaces much of it with force.
              Healthcare was still affordable when we had something approaching a free market a couple of generations back. When there were people who couldn't afford healthcare or insurance(health insurance was affordale then too absent all the mandates)a moral civil society made up of charitable doctors, fraternal organizations, families, charitable hospitals and local communities stepped in to fill the void. The state has crowded much of this out. People have been programmed to think that the Levaithan State will take care of it. Now people think that they are doing there part for their fellow man by filling out a couple of lines on a tax form.
              The caring, efficient civil society that springs up naturally out of society has been replaced by the cold, inefficient coercion of the state.
              Congratulations leftists! You've done a great job!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 15, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
                3  
                Thanks for response, and yes, he has worked all his life and fought in a world war. But do you really think if we tossed it all to the free market, people would be taken care of? I think TR's father said the same thing and yet there were the slums of Jacob Riis' lovely fotos. I just don't see whats wrong with taking care of the health of citizens BY THE GOVERNMENT whom we all pay into for roads, and fire depts, and schools, why is health care treated any differently than ROADS. We all need it. If you think that private charity would take care of things, hmm. I am skeptical. I have never used Unemployment Insurance in my life but I will gladly pay it to help a brother or sister in need - gladly. And if my taxes are raised to help the poor and needy and sick, fine. Just seems that the philosophy of Free Market is so pre-1900 and greedy to me.What would have happened to Social Security if it went public pre-crash? But I appreciate your response. We are all in this country together. Why not all chip in? Am I rose-colored glasses? Sure. I'm a Californian. I remember Enron and deregulation. Picture your granny sitting in the dark just because someone wanted a rolex. I know that's extreme but Health Care should be right up there with ROADS and FIRE DEPT. Pay more and help your fellow man. Amen.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 15, 2009 9:58 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Oh and having said that, I also agree with your point about not being able to save as much, which is why I advocate taxing Churches. Particularly money-making enterprises like the "church" of Scientology etc.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
        8 1
        What does a guy bidding for part ownership of a professional football team have to do with the dissemination of news? Answer: nothing.(welfarewarrior)


        You're never going to learn anything if you keep answering your own questions. This is about the continuing victim mentality of the right, and how Rush is using his failure to successfully negotiate a business deal to promote his liberal "media" myth, and, as usual, whine for some sympathy.

        Sometimes propaganda is a little more subtle than "2 + 2 = 5". If you're confused in the future here, try to resist answering your own question (after all, if you weren't ignorant, you wouldn't be asking) and have a friendly "socialist" help you out.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
        2 1
        Wasn't this socialist site originally started to critique and "expose" conservative and libertarian lies?
        wws

        Sort of. Have you read the mission statement?

        Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.


        What does a guy bidding for part ownership of a professional football team have to do with the dissemination of news?
        wws

        media vs. news...

        Media:
        (usually used with a plural verb) the means of communication, as radio and television, newspapers, and magazines, that reach or influence people widely


        News:
        the presentation of a report on recent or new events in a newspaper or other periodical or on radio or television.


        Now compare and contrast.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Media Mumblings (October 15, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
          2 3
          I must have gotten a little too close to the truth to get so many responses. The truth can be a very painful thing for the in the closet socialist. Stop hiding behind phony political identifiers like progressive and liberal. Again, to purposefully belabor the point, you guys aren't liberals in the classical sense of the world. Your ideology is a collectivist/statist philosophy which is hostile to the concept of the individual. No less a socialist than Mrs. Rodham was quoted as saying that, "we must destroy the concept of the individual." That's right. If collectivism is to succeed, the concept of the individual must be replaced with the concept of the collective.
          She seems to understand the nature of socialism better than the rest of you.
          One last thing. I noticed one of the collectivist drones mentioned that this site was a nonprofit. I imagine that they have a staff that gets payed. Are they not profitting from this arrangement? I notice with sites like this one on the left and the right that the individuals who operate and run them inevitably get a seat at the table of power when their side gains the White House. That is a kind of profit as well. Is it not?
          By the way, a poster misidentified me as welfare-warrior. That kind of amused me. I chose welfare-warfare state because the welfare-warfare state proceeds apace regardless of the gang in power. For proof of that, I would site the current administration as exhibit A.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
            1  
            WE HEARD YOU ! You've exposed our evil plot. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz !
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
            2  
            I must have gotten a little too close to the truth to get so many responses.
            wws

            Narcissist much?

            Sometimes a post is soooo silly it gets a lot of responses to poit out the silliness.

            Now tell me that you know the difference btween "media" & "the news".
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 7:20 pm ET)
              3 2
              That's one of my favorite wacky wingnut responses. They post a bunch of low-level am radio drivel, and other posters have a laugh at it, and point out how lame it is, so they somehow come to the bizarre conclusion that they were too truthy.

              It's the walking-down-the-street-peeing-your-pants conservative view of the world. "People are pointing and laughing, I must be doing something great!"
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Cheney2012 (October 15, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
            2 4
            Welfare,

            You really are wasting your time debating the liberal morons here. After racism and other name-calling, they have absolutely nothing.

            They do not think, they just act on the orders of demagogues like Obama. And they act against their self-interest (and claim the right does that) as their leaders have no regard for them whatsoever.

            If it were electricity, the collective smarts of the dozen or so regulars here wouldn't run a toaster for more than 2 minutes.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 12:56 am ET)
              3 1
              Attaboy, Cheney. You and welfare keep pumping each other up. Never mind you're getting your azzes handed to you left and right, just keep sticking to what Rush tells you about reality.

              Have you noticed that just about everything you post here gets exposed as utter BS, and you lose every argument? You probably haven't.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by LKL (October 16, 2009 10:34 am ET)
                   
                Oh Colonel, I bet Obama just told you to say that. You should really follow the shining example of Cheney, who doesn't believe in name calling, unlike the rest of the liberal morons who apparently can't operate a toaster.

                Oh, and W/W? Nonprofit doesn't mean that the employees don't get paid. That would be volunteering.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 11:37 am ET)
                  2  
                  I know, LKL, you caught me delivering my Obama talking points. I always look forward to this part of the troll party, when they give up trying to have a conversation, and just start feeding each other self-esteem building delusions.

                  It must be so frustrating for these wise men to try to debate the moronic leftist lemming name-callers.

                  I hadn't read welfare whiner's entire post the first time, I was so bored after the first few words, but I'm glad you mentioned the "non-profit" confusion.I read the rest of it, It was more unintentionally funny than I expected it to be.

                  Apparently, any non-profit organization that provides some benefit to anybody is, by definition, not a non-profit.Brilliant.I guess in the world of these numbnuts, in order to qualify for NP status, a group must prove they're absolutely worthless as far as making a positive difference for anybody.

                  Sounds like they're trying to skew it towards right wing groups.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (October 16, 2009 2:33 pm ET)
                       
                    .I guess in the world of these numbnuts, in order to qualify for NP status, a group must prove they're absolutely worthless as far as making a positive difference for anybody.

                    Sounds like they're trying to skew it towards right wing groups.


                    Oh, then I guess his analysis did make sense after all! :)

                    Doesn't it seem that it's always the people who have the least idea what they're talking about who sound the most confident that they've made a really excellent and original point? Maybe it's the mentality you described above - if everyone disagrees with me, I must be on to something!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
                         
                      Seems to be very popular among right wing nuts. During W's term, I used to listen to righty radio, and any time his approval ratings were tanking, it was explained that he must be doing something right.

                      Other variations seen here from the wingnuts, when their metaphorical trouser-dousing is noted and laughed at;

                      "Looks like I struck a nerve!"
                      "Wow, you all are really obsessed with me !"
                      " Looks like the truth hurts !"
                      "I notice none of you have refuted my wet pants !"
                      " I can't believe the vitriol, intolerance and name-calling directed at my pants-pizzing.Where are those tolerant liberals I'm always hearing about?"
                      " I notice you pointing at my wet pants, but none of you has engaged me by addressing the substance of my wet pants"

                      All of the above may include some "lol"s
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by LKL (October 16, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
                           
                        Hee!

                        Posters who LOL at their own jokes is my personal favorite . . .
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
                             
                          Especially when they're the biggest joke on the thread. Or when they're LOLing at some hallucination or strawman, like;

                          Human: I believe our health care system is badly in neeed of reform.

                          Wingnut: LOL ! So you're saying that you want to steal hard-working taxpayers money to pay for face lifts for welfare queens on drugs just to punish real Americans ????? LOLOLOLOL!!!
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by LKL (October 16, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
                               
                            Exactly! I only wish your example wasn't so spot on. (lol?)

                            Have a great weekend!
                            Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
        5  
        Wasn't this socialist site originally started to critique and "expose" conservative and libertarian lies?

        Nope. (1) This site isn't socialistic, (2) it is dedicated to exposing conservative misinformation in the media, and (3) has never claimed to do anything regarding the lies of libertarians.

        If you can be that fantastically wrong in your first sentence, I guess we can safely dismiss the rest of whatever thoughts you manage to assemble.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (October 15, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
      6 1
      Why did Boss BlunderRush announce that he was part of a group trying to buy the Lambs?

      If his goal was success, and not more self-promotion, bragging, and general blow-hard noise-making, he would have kept it quiet until it was a done deal.

      But nooooooooo, that's just not Boss BlunderRush's way...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by racistsexistbigothomophobe (October 15, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
      3 10
      The statements about Rush are all untrue and fabricated. You work for George Soros, well-known lefty, so why should I believe this crap?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
        5  
        you shouldn't so leave
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
        6 2
        Who are you talking to, crazy person? Do you think the statements made by Rush and documented on audio and video here are all computer generated? Call your nurse.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 15, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
        6  
        "The statements by Rush are all untrue and fabricated."

        There, all fixed for you. You're welcome.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
        5 2
        Soros has nothing to do with Media Matters . . . that lie was debunked so many years ago and the people like Rush, O'Reilly, et al, who keep spouting it KNOW there is no connection, the documentation proving it was hand delivered to them.

        As for Soros . . . his real crime was bailing GWB out of his last business failure and knowing what an incompetent he was. Since he actively tried to keep Bush from being re-elected in 2004, he's become a devil with horns.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (October 15, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
          2 5
          Actually Soros is a devil with horns because he helped parade fellow jews to their deaths under the Nazis back home Hungary.

          And he justified it to 60 minutes because 'it would have happened anyway.'

          He is a self-hating anti-semite.

          What was that about the Nazis being right wing? Yeah right!

          By the way, Soros has worked to destoy the dollar and has done quite while. More proof that the left who has thrown in with Soros -- MMFA, Think Progress, MoveOn.org -- are destroying America ON PURPOSE. That is the true mission statement.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 16, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
            1  
            Remember, folks, this is the mind-set of a standard Dick Cheney fan.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle ads65sheppard (October 15, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
      4 3
      We have to be at least half as aggressive as the repuglicans in getting these cretins out of our public media. Rush, et al are not just participating in "polite discourse" but deliberately using the media to confuse and recrute people without sufficient information to refute crazy ideas.

      Now this neanderthal chauvanistic pig is going to judge the Miss America Pagent? Can you imagine having to walk around in a swim suit (and high heels) in front of him? These women will be subjected to Mr. Drool's most hideous leers and sneers. And what will happen off camera?

      Eeeeeeeyouuuuuuuu! Dog this dog!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave (October 15, 2009 12:57 pm ET)
      1 4
      Got to hand it to the NFL and Goodell....they do have balls. To make a statement that they don't want to be divisive, but allow felons like Vick back, and have a bunch of "Thank God I was a football player or I would have been locked up" types on the rosters, nothing but pure unadulterated hypocracy, but still ballzy. But Rush making divisive statements, most of which, I don't agree with, keep him out? Nice
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
        6 1
        It's a business decision. See, people pay money to attend games to watch those "I would have been locked up types" play and buy their team shirts and what not. People aren't going to buy a "boss hog - owner" shirt, IMO. And if having Rush as an owner is going to detract from their brand, why would they allow him into the club?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dave (October 15, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
          2 6
          True, but football fans in St Louis aren't going to attend games because Rush is a partial owner? C'mon. They will go to the games, buy the shirts, support the team, etc. This is just the NFL trying to claim the moral high ground, and the left celebrating, for once, a small defeat of Limbaugh. It makes you guys happy....you can't get him off of the air, so anything else is a plus.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 15, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
            2  
            Yey!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by blindmoose (October 15, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
            3 1
            Dave, do you know anything about NFL owners? Two-thirds of the owners in the league are Republicans who donate money to Republican politicians and Republican causes. They don't want moral high ground; they just don't want a fat, blubbering idiot giving them bad press.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dave (October 15, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
                1
              Can't say that that I know any NFL owners, but I would guess they would want stable ownership from any team, as they have to split the profits now, and I would think that they would want to make as much money as possible, regardless of party affiliation. If Rush could provide both, I'm sure that they would have no problem. Its Goodell's nonsense that's killing me.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pilotx (October 16, 2009 4:07 am ET)
                   
                Dave, Rush regularly spouts off and gets into "trouble". The NFL doesn;t want controversial owners, they want quiet and stable money men. If he really wants an NFL team he should 1. stop saying controversial stuff on his program 2. buy a minor league team and run it successfully for a few years and 3. start talking sports or even turn his show into an all sports show. If he truly wants a team and does these things he might just get his wish buuuuuuuuttttttt if he keeps talking politics and other devicive topics the NFL, NBA and MLB won't touch him with a 9.8m pole. IMHO
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 15, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
            2  
            I wouldn't.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
            1  
            Business decision. If you have a number of the top players in the league saying they won't play for Rush, they will have to end up putting an inferior team on the field. This equals low ticket sales, low jersey sales.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dave (October 15, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
                3
              Top players? Brady, Peterson, and Manning won't play in St Louis? Really? Or are there other top players? Which ones are you referring to?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by sleepy joe (October 15, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
                1  
                So those are the only top players you know? If that was the case the league would be making no money.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 15, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
        7  
        Interesting how all the people here defending Rush Limbaugh don't agree with Rush and aren't fans of him. Funny that.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
          4 1
          They never are. The wingnuts constantly brag about his huge (phony) audience numbers, they repeat all of Rush's BS almost verbatim, and they all deny that they ever listen to him.It's eerie!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
          1  
          Maybe they paid by him to monitor and defend. I'll give you a bottle a week of Oxy for defending me on the blogs.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by studmuffin404 (October 15, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
             
          ya think because the decision was wrong twink!!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
        2  
        "...a bunch of "Thank God I was a football player or I would have been locked up" types on the rosters..."

        Tell that to Plaxico Burress. And...Michael Vick did go to prison for his crime, too.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (October 15, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
           
        Letting Vick back was probably a mistake IMO from a "PR viewpoint", but I do believe that they sincerely felt that Vick would be an asset as a player and that he would be personally helped (not just monetarily) by it. I think it was a tough decision, but I'm not sure it was right.

        But there is NO such benefit for Rush to take into consideration here - he's doing just fine on his own, and neither his nor the team's success hinges on this deal's completion. It was a lose-lose for the NFL to allow Limbaugh to become part owner, so a much easier decision.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (October 15, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
      11 1
      I totally agree with kydem09. Rush is obviously not racist. He proved it when he sang "Barack the Magic Negro."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by today's blessing (October 15, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
      4 1
      rush is whining because he lost a sports bid? hmmm, hmmm, hmmm.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rikrox (October 15, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
        8 1
        As a lifelong liberal and Democrat, AND a Rush listener since 1988, my take on all this is that he's getting exaclty what he deserves but will never understand why. I believe he's sincere in what he says and does and does not believe that he is a racist! Sort of like the 9/11 terrorists that flew airplanes into buildings. They believed in what they were doing as much as Rush believes in what he does and says. What a shame that he failed in his bid for the Rams, much as he verbalized his hope that President Obama fails in his presidency. Rush fails, Obama succeeds! Don't you love it!!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Aunty M (October 15, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
      2 9
      Sorry you guys, I listened to Rush today and there was no
      pity party. In fact, I have listen to Rush since he started.
      After we retired, having lived in Europe for many years running our own business, we found that when we returned to the states we developed "Culture Shock" due to listening to the main stream media. We couldn't believe all the lies that were fed to us. All the time that we have listened to Rush we have really not heard any racist comments. His sidekick is black (Snerdly) and often he has Walter Williams substituting for him. the liberal media hate him, just as they hate Sarah Palin, and do their best to tear him down. What a bunch of hypocrites! I do know that any time the media does their dirty work, he becomes more popular.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 15, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
        4 1
        All the time that we have listened to Rush we have really not heard any racist comments

        Maybe you need to get your hearing checked...

        BTW, have you ever actually seen Snerdly?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Aunty M (October 15, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
          1 4
          I have seen Snerdly, and he is definitely black. See what I mean?
          The libs just make up things all the time.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
            2  
            I have seen Snerdly, and he is definitely black. See what I mean?

            Ummm... I'm not sure, Aunty M. Do you mean that Snerdly is black? That's super.


            The libs just make up things all the time.

            For example?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 1:03 am ET)
                 
              No examples? OK, go sit on the bench with Cheney2012, Realtired, and the other trolls, human piñatas and failures. This would really be more fun if one of you was halfway competent.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by blindmoose (October 15, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
        1  
        Great story.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by phifties (October 15, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
        2 1
        Wow he can count the number of black people he knows on 1 hand. When people start saying I have a black friend and go into detail defending it and how many, Clue they're probably a racist!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
        3 1
        After we retired, having lived in Europe for many years running our own business, we found that when we returned to the states we developed "Culture Shock" due to listening to the main stream media.


        Really? That seems a little out of whack. What did you use for a source of information while in Europe?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 15, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
          4  
          I'm guessing Aunty M was in Germany, late 1930s to 1940s, and couldn't find comparable media here until she discovered Rush.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 15, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
            2  
            Could be.

            But that leads to uncomfortable questions about what type of business she was running there at that time.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 15, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
            1  
            LOL - Colonel! I don't believe Auntie M was ever outside of Kansas...Lots of funny posters/posers today.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by 000l (October 15, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
          1
        Please go back to Europe then.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (October 16, 2009 3:58 am ET)
        3  
        Well Auntie I am Black too and I listen to Rush occasionally and almost everytime without fail he says something I would consider racist. Maybe I am sensitive but I can only go by my experiences. If 9 out of 10 people say something is racist then it might just be racist. This reminds me of the old saying that you can find somebody to defend anything but that doesn't make it right. So by your logic if I find a Black person to defend the KKK then they are no longer racist? Interesting.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by John Hoffman (October 15, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
      5  
      Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! (Catches breath) Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!(Catches breath) Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!(Catches breath) Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by moe (October 15, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
      5  
      Poor lil guy. He's so misunderstood.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aasaint (October 15, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
        2
      You know what they say about assuming anything!!! Douchebags!! Rush doesn't feel sorry for himself, why should he?? He'll be around when media manure is long gone. I do agree that Costas is not a diva though......he's just another NBC weasel!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LagalLeft (October 15, 2009 6:04 pm ET)
      1  
      Poor, poor Rushie, is now attacking the everybody. Wallow on in the trough. How does it feel to be the recieving end of the attack machine? And cease with the childish whining. Money cannot buy class. Shut up and keep driving the lunatic bus. Sacked!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AZ (October 15, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
      1  
      Seriously... What does it say about what people think of you as an individual when a former cocaine dealer (Sean Carter, alias Jay-Z partial owner NJ Nets) dealer can make his way into the world of sports franchise ownership and you and your brand of "telling it like it is" can't?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (October 15, 2009 7:31 pm ET)
      1 1
      Seems the author of the book with the phony Rush quotes has cited media matters as his source.

      C'mon Boehlert, Brock and the rest of you weasels, you now must prove the comments were never posted here. Can you prove it??
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (October 16, 2009 12:28 am ET)
        2  
        Seems like you would have provided some proof about your claim that the author cited MMFA. That should be easy compared to proving the negative that the comments were not posted here.

        In fact , it would probably be pretty reasonable to expect you to provide that first, especially if you're going to call other people weasels.

        You're not even really trying to be a first string troll anymore, are you?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (October 15, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
      1 1
      According to Limbaugh he's not upset but his staff is just furious about not buying the rams. He says he has a mechanism to deal with the letdown. He didn't elaborate on it but I'm pretty sure a handfull of oxys figured into his strategy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Thetruthhurtz (October 15, 2009 11:52 pm ET)
        1
      Dont any of you think the Tawana Brawley hoax "Reverend" Sharpton pulled was worse racially than anything Rush ever said or did? Or did you lose the ability to think for yourselves?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (October 17, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
           
        What would the relevance be? Would that make Limbaugh's history of commentary automatically benign or something?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dvdburner22 (October 16, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
         
      sour grapes,sour grapes,sour grapes .... You got Rejected by the NFL Rush get over it and stop crying like a baby... lol
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.