About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Attn Beck: Bush's "'Leninist' Strategy" for Social Security Reform

October 15, 2009 6:46 pm ET by Matt Gertz

2005: LA Times cited 1983 CATO Journal article as "the groundwork" for Bush's Social Security reform push

Back in 1997, proponents of overhauling Social Security met with the man who would become their most powerful convert: Texas Gov. George W. Bush, whose presidential ambitions were beginning to gel.

The governor dined with Jose Piñera, architect of Chile's 1981 shift from government pensions to worker-owned retirement accounts, in a meeting that helped bring Bush a big step closer to embracing a similar plan for Social Security in his emerging presidential platform.

"I think he wanted to support the idea but needed to be convinced," said Edward H. Crane, president of the libertarian Cato Institute, who was at the dinner. "I really think Jose convinced him."

This week, President Bush's plan to allow younger workers to divert Social Security taxes into personal investment accounts will be a centerpiece of his State of the Union address and a barnstorming tour of the country. It is a tough sell to an uncertain public, but Bush has a secret weapon: A generation of free-market conservatives like Crane and Piñera has been laying the groundwork for this debate.

"It could be many years before the conditions are such that a radical reform of Social Security is possible," wrote Stuart Butler and Peter Germanis, Heritage Foundation analysts, in a 1983 article in the Cato Journal. "But then, as Lenin well knew, to be a successful revolutionary, one must also be patient and consistently plan for real reform."

Now, Bush is drawing on a deep reservoir of resources - including policy research, ready-to-hire experts and polling on how to discuss the issue - that conservatives have created over the last 20 years.

Heritage Foundation scholars Butler and Germanis' article headlined "Achieving a 'Leninist' Strategy."

In their 1983 article, Butler and Germanis write:

As we contemplate basic reform of the Social Security system, we would do well to draw a few lessons from the Leninist strategy. Many critics of the present system believe, as Marx and Lenin did of capitalism, that the system's days are numbered because of its contradictory objectives or attempting to provide both welfare and insurance. All that really needs to be done, they contend, is to point out these inherent flaws to the taxpayers and to show them that Social Security would be vastly improved if it were restructure into a predominantly private system. Convinced by the undeniable facts and logic, individuals supposedly would then rise up and demand that their representatives make the appropriate reforms.

Cato Institute and Heritage Foundation experts frequently appear on Beck's show.

According to a Nexis search, Cato and Heritage experts have appeared on Beck's show at least seven times apiece in the last six months. Beck is hosting people that work for organizations that employed or published people who called for the use of a Leninist strategy. That's only five degrees of separation between Beck and Lenin!

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by demsckdck (October 15, 2009 7:36 pm ET)
         
      It sickens me to see just how STUPID both Dems (you websites focus) as well as Rep. When is this country going to wake up and realize both sides are driven by self interest and not the people they serve. The funny thing is, we keep voting them in and in my opinion, we throw our vote away every election. One example, Obama wants free healthcare (completely ignoring solutions that allow capitalism and starting with going after lawyers and ins companies breaking their grip on us) and the Rep stand there throwing stones at Obama when they have had far more years in office to address the issue. There are several examples of this kind of "picking sides" by the American voter. The point is, neither side is right and both Dem and Rep politicians are interested in their own agendas and not a real solution. Moral of the story, we can't keep giving money away to things like free health care (at least not at this point in our economic condition) in the country but what we can do is force our government to do what they promise (and both Bush and Obama sold us on their promises and we defended the lies from both sides) and hold them accountable as well as force a Fed audit every year. Also, please don't tell me that the American people no longer accept politicians voting on bills that don't even exist and you are willing to call this intelligent!!! By the way I am a reformed Rep and not a moderate partiless voter for the record. My hope is that more Dems and Reps will join.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Hume's Ghost (October 15, 2009 7:50 pm ET)
         
      I left this link in another post about Beck's rant; but it seems more appropriate here. That's about David Horowitz's book The Art of Political Warfare being endorsed by Tom DeLay and Karl Rove despite it advising Republicans to take Lenin's advice to try to wipe their political opponents off the face of the Earth.

      During the 2000 presidential and congressional elections, every Republican member of the U.S. Congress received a free pamphlet, compliments of Congressman Tom DeLay, the party's majority whip. Written by conservative activist David Horowitz, the pamphlet was called The Art of Political War: How Republicans Can Fight to Win. It came with an endorsement on the cover by Karl Rove, the senior advisor to then-candidate George W. Bush. According to Rove, The Art of Political Warwas "a perfect pocket guide to winning on the political battlefield from an experienced warrior." In addition to DeLay's gift to members of Congress, the Heritage Foundation, one of the leading conservative think tanks in Washington, found Horowitz's advice so impressive that it sent another 2,300 copies to conservative activists around the country.

      ...

      Of course, Horowitz is not the only disillusioned leftist from the sixties. What makes him significant is that his militancy has remained constant, even as his worldview has changed. In a strange way, he remains a Leninist, right down to his appearance (balding, with a Lenin-like goatee). He even continues to offer Lenin's words as advice. "You cannot cripple an opponent by outwitting him in a political debate," he explains in The Art of Political War. "You can do it only by following Lenin's injunction: 'In political conflicts, the goal is not to refute your opponent's argument, but to wipe him from the face of the earth.'"
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.