This is not journalism
October 19, 2009 3:18 pm ET by Jamison Foser
This Politico headline tells you pretty much everything you need to know about the article that follows: "Palin offers calm critique of Baucus bill." Politico's Andy Barr goes on to cut-and-paste from Palin's Facebook post about the Baucus health care bill, pausing occasionally to describe the post as "tough but wonky," tout her citation of an actual economist to "make her argument" and marvel that Palin's approach was "more tempered" than her "Death Panel" claims earlier this year.
Not mentioned: Whether Palin's "calm critique" is accurate and fair, or whether anyone disagrees with anything she wrote.
"He said/She said" journalism is bad enough. But this is worse: This is just "She said."











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles




Why didn't Politico just interview former Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin in person? And, Facebook is owned by whom? Makes no sense as to why this was important Politico, just saying LOL.
Amazing Palin tranformation, huh? Now let me know when she can manage the same feats in a debate or interview.
No, it's worse than that. It's a supposed journalist editing a politician and cherry picking to make them look good, and then talking about how good they are.
It will be fascinating and frightening to watch.