Despite God-awful polling results, WashPost's Cillizza claims Republicans have had a "good year"
October 20, 2009 1:11 pm ET by Eric Boehlert
The amazing part is that pundit Chris Cillizza makes that claim today after detailing how the GOP just got slaughtered in the latest WashPost survey: [emphasis added]:
And, perhaps most troubling for GOP hopes is the fact that just 20 percent of the Post sample identified themselves as Republicans, the lowest that number has been in Post polling since 1983. (No, that is not a typo.)
I noted earlier today how the dismal GOP poll results do not fit in with the preferred Beltway narrative. And sure enough, Cillizza seemed to do his best to assure Republicans that the news wasn't that bad:
That's not to say that 2009 hasn't been a good year for Republicans. By and large, it has been.
Imagine what the those poll results would have looked like if the GOP had had a bad year?


















He's merely typing the b.s. his editor pays him to, over at the liberal-biased Washington Post.
~
No reason to let silly facts and poll numbers get in the way of a good media theme ...
"considering how low the GOP poll numbers should be, it is evidence of a good year that 20% of the people still find them acceptable."
Yeah mean after the GOP media outlets hyped death panels & teabaggers ?
And the GOP accomplished .............what ?
Sorry, couldn't type that with a straight face.
As the Rajun Cajun said..."it's the economy stupid".
Look at it this way there is 20% of the country's populace that is just stone cold crazy !
The less that they "accomplish"...the better off we are. And that encompasses both democrats and republicans.
That should cover a few thousand words of "analysis" in the biggest newspapers. Maybe they can replace it with weather reports from every town in the country with population over 10000. That's about the only thing left the media can be trusted with.
"A good year for Republicans?" Does good in this case mean bad? Is it opposite day?