So desperate they'll believe anything -- the fake Obama thesis debunked
October 23, 2009 2:43 pm ET by Simon Maloy
It really gets to be pretty pathetic sometimes, watching the conservatives grasp at every straw they can in order to attack and discredit a president they don't like.
If you listened to Rush Limbaugh today or visited Fox Nation, then you might have heard about President Obama's supposed college thesis in which the college-aged commander in chief allegedly wrote: "The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy."
Now, you might be thinking: "Wait a minute, I thought conservatives didn't like Obama's elusive thesis because it was on nuclear disarmament." Well, this is a different thesis, it would seem, and blogger Michael Ledeen wrote about it two days ago:
I missed this first time around. Brian Lancaster at Jumping in Pools reported on Obama's college thesis, written when he was at Columbia. The paper was called "Aristocracy Reborn," and in the first ten pages (which were all that reporter Joe Klein -- who wrote about it for Time -- was permitted to see).
So Ledeen sources this bombshell to another, more obscure conservative blogger, who wrote -- back on August 25, mind you -- that Time's Joe Klein had seen Obama's damning thesis and was going to report on it for "an upcoming special edition about the President." No indication was given as to how this obscure blogger came to know that one of America's premiere journalists had obtained this information. There was no indication as to how this blogger was able to quote material only Klein had had access to. Oh, and let's not forget that this very same blogger was busted by PolitiFact.com for fabricating stories about President Obama.
But hey, why speculate on whether it's true or not? Let's go to the source. Mr. Klein? "A report is circulating among the wingnuts that I had a peek at Barack Obama's senior thesis. It is completely false. I've never seen Obama's thesis. I have no idea where this report comes from -- but I can assure you that it's complete nonsense."
This story is fake and falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. Corrections and apologies are due from Ledeen, Limbaugh, and Fox Nation, but if you believe you'll get an apology from pathological liars of that sort, then you're more gullible than they are.
UPDATE: Very well-hidden at the bottom of the Jumping in Pools blog post that started all this stupidity is a "satire" tag:

LATER UPDATE: It gets even better -- according to the PolitiFact article that called out the Jumping in Pools blogger, Matthew Avitabile, for making up outlandish Obama stories:
Avitabile, a Republican who had previously poked fun at Obama with a tongue-in-cheek article that said scientists had determined that he was "genetically superior," is thankful for all the traffic it generated for his blog Jumping in Pools. In the past he was lucky to get 1,000 hits on a story, but this one got more than 50,000. Yet he's disappointed that so many people published his work without verifying it.
"Out of the 50,000 who looked at it, only three had the good sense to contact me and see if it was true," he told us (PolitiFact was one of the three).
Avitabile described himself as a moderate Republican - "I'm pro-gay rights, pro-wind energy" - but said he was surprised that so many in his party had such negative feelings about Obama.
"People wanted to believe this about the president so bad, that he would really go toward a dictatorship so much that they would go with it without checking it," he said.











Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




Don't confuse teaching something with admiring it!
The only confusion on this issue is coming from your side, so cut it out with the lectures. It was Limbaugh and his ilk that claimed that Obama had disdain for the constitution. They were wrong. Someone wrote a satirical piece, playing on that kind of ignorance, and sure enough, they fell for it anew. Every step along the way, the right-wing comes out looking worse.
Mr. News
They are suppose to keep the Perverts & Convicted Felons from Achieving Penetration.
But for some reason they are giving Bill O'Reilly "A Known Phone Sexual Preditor" of Andrea Mackris a Pass.
News Corp. "A Racist Enterprise" Renowned for Gay Bashing & having a complete lack of Class.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
It's amazing to me that the insulting, comical and satirical treatment of a sitting president, just a few years ago, was so accepted...now it is soooooo offensive. I guess the rules change when the President changes, huh?
Yeah, only when it was done in the past (and it was done a great deal more against Clinton than against G.W.), it was done by comedians. Now it's being done by people who claim to be journalists.
You're really going to have to try harder. Idiotic false equivalencies are very easy to shoot down.
And they form our "personal El Guapo".
Not to belittle the outstanding work done here at mediamatters. Too bad the reich nutjobs aren't giving them anything of more substance to disassemble.
And they consider themselves a news outlet. Worse, people defend their self appointed label.
Only in America.
[rolls eyes]
I'm sure Fatso never got an 'A' in school . .
And Mr. Ledeen apparently is a fellow who knows a thing or two about fake documents. Yellowcake, anyone?
I heard BlunderRush pontificating this morning about what the Founding Fathers thought. Including what he certainly made sound like quotes from the Federalist Papers - only the quotes were from 1816 and 1801, respectively.
Granting that the Federalist Papers were written because Americans were not settled in their views of what our government and nation should look like (a point always forgotten by the right wing nutz who selectively quote from them), they were penned well before the turn of the 18th Century.
And, of course, the Federalist Papers, in due course, led us to the Articles of Confederation. A failure because the Federal government they established just wasn't strong enough to function.
Perhaps if InSannity saw the tv movie that persuaded Mr. Reagan this would be a good idea, he would also see the light. Read "The Dead Hand" for more on this - particularly how the movie "Dr. Strangelove" reflected Cold War real life (The Doomsday Machine).
Even republicans aren't that stupid.
You mean that people who lie professionally will suddenly stop lying? Wow, I wish I had your faith.