About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

So desperate they'll believe anything -- the fake Obama thesis debunked

October 23, 2009 2:43 pm ET by Simon Maloy

It really gets to be pretty pathetic sometimes, watching the conservatives grasp at every straw they can in order to attack and discredit a president they don't like.

If you listened to Rush Limbaugh today or visited Fox Nation, then you might have heard about President Obama's supposed college thesis in which the college-aged commander in chief allegedly wrote: "The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy."

Now, you might be thinking: "Wait a minute, I thought conservatives didn't like Obama's elusive thesis because it was on nuclear disarmament." Well, this is a different thesis, it would seem, and blogger Michael Ledeen wrote about it two days ago:

I missed this first time around.  Brian Lancaster at Jumping in Pools reported on Obama's college thesis, written when he was at Columbia. The paper was called "Aristocracy Reborn," and in the first ten pages (which were all that reporter Joe Klein -- who wrote about it for Time -- was permitted to see).

So Ledeen sources this bombshell to another, more obscure conservative blogger, who wrote -- back on August 25, mind you -- that Time's Joe Klein had seen Obama's damning thesis and was going to report on it for "an upcoming special edition about the President." No indication was given as to how this obscure blogger came to know that one of America's premiere journalists had obtained this information. There was no indication as to how this blogger was able to quote material only Klein had had access to. Oh, and let's not forget that this very same blogger was busted by PolitiFact.com for fabricating stories about President Obama.

But hey, why speculate on whether it's true or not? Let's go to the source. Mr. Klein? "A report is circulating among the wingnuts that I had a peek at Barack Obama's senior thesis. It is completely false. I've never seen Obama's thesis. I have no idea where this report comes from -- but I can assure you that it's complete nonsense."

This story is fake and falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. Corrections and apologies are due from Ledeen, Limbaugh, and Fox Nation, but if you believe you'll get an apology from pathological liars of that sort, then you're more gullible than they are.

UPDATE: Very well-hidden at the bottom of the Jumping in Pools blog post that started all this stupidity is a "satire" tag:

LATER UPDATE: It gets even better -- according to the PolitiFact article that called out the Jumping in Pools blogger, Matthew Avitabile, for making up outlandish Obama stories:

Avitabile, a Republican who had previously poked fun at Obama with a tongue-in-cheek article that said scientists had determined that he was "genetically superior," is thankful for all the traffic it generated for his blog Jumping in Pools. In the past he was lucky to get 1,000 hits on a story, but this one got more than 50,000. Yet he's disappointed that so many people published his work without verifying it.

"Out of the 50,000 who looked at it, only three had the good sense to contact me and see if it was true," he told us (PolitiFact was one of the three).

Avitabile described himself as a moderate Republican - "I'm pro-gay rights, pro-wind energy" - but said he was surprised that so many in his party had such negative feelings about Obama.

"People wanted to believe this about the president so bad, that he would really go toward a dictatorship so much that they would go with it without checking it," he said.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (October 23, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
      14 2
      This is really offensive, especially since Rush called Obama "this little boy" and said that a man who taught Constitutional Law at the college level had great "disdain" for the Constitution!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by 1776 (October 23, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
          1
        You don't have to admire Hitler to teach the history of Nazi Germany. In fact I took a history class from Dr. Cleinfelter at the University of Northern Colorado in my undergraduate studies, and she despised Hitler (always claimed he had only one testical, but that's not the half of it)...yet her PhD research and dissertation were about Nazi Germany. What I learned about modern European history, especailly Nazi Germany, I learned from her--history was my minor.

        Don't confuse teaching something with admiring it!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 26, 2009 11:36 am ET)
             
          Don't confuse teaching something with admiring it!

          The only confusion on this issue is coming from your side, so cut it out with the lectures. It was Limbaugh and his ilk that claimed that Obama had disdain for the constitution. They were wrong. Someone wrote a satirical piece, playing on that kind of ignorance, and sure enough, they fell for it anew. Every step along the way, the right-wing comes out looking worse.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (October 23, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
        10 4
        David Duke, Rush Limbaugh & News Corp "The Three Amigos of Hate"


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (October 23, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
          4 4
          Human Resources is suppose to be the Gate Keeper of a Corporation.
          They are suppose to keep the Perverts & Convicted Felons from Achieving Penetration.
          But for some reason they are giving Bill O'Reilly "A Known Phone Sexual Preditor" of Andrea Mackris a Pass.
          News Corp. "A Racist Enterprise" Renowned for Gay Bashing & having a complete lack of Class.

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
        • Author by 1776 (October 23, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
            1
          Be careful who you accuse unless you are willing to claim that Rev. Wright, Keith Olberman and MSNBC have never said 'anything' hateful, insulting or disparaging.

          It's amazing to me that the insulting, comical and satirical treatment of a sitting president, just a few years ago, was so accepted...now it is soooooo offensive. I guess the rules change when the President changes, huh?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 26, 2009 11:39 am ET)
               
            It's amazing to me that the insulting, comical and satirical treatment of a sitting president, just a few years ago, was so accepted...now it is soooooo offensive. I guess the rules change when the President changes, huh?

            Yeah, only when it was done in the past (and it was done a great deal more against Clinton than against G.W.), it was done by comedians. Now it's being done by people who claim to be journalists.

            You're really going to have to try harder. Idiotic false equivalencies are very easy to shoot down.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (October 23, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
          4  
          David Duke, Rush Limbaugh & News Corp "The Three Amigos of Hate"

          And they form our "personal El Guapo".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (October 23, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
      4 1
      Who cares! I certainly don't. Just the same old same old from the party of pathological liars!

      Not to belittle the outstanding work done here at mediamatters. Too bad the reich nutjobs aren't giving them anything of more substance to disassemble.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (October 23, 2009 8:04 pm ET)
        2  
        Yes, not to belittle MMFA, I agree. But Halloween is still over a week away. And that picture of the mendacious one is a little too damn SCARY! Shudder....;-)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (October 23, 2009 10:41 pm ET)
            1
          For Halloween Fox News will repot, if enough Obama costumes are sold, 'see he is duping everyone', if they are not 'see nobody likes obama'.
          And they consider themselves a news outlet. Worse, people defend their self appointed label.
          Only in America.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 23, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
      3 1
      Mr. Obama received an 'A' for his paper . .

      [rolls eyes]

      I'm sure Fatso never got an 'A' in school . .
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (October 23, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
      2 1
      So now we know for sure Boss BlunderRush has been on both sides of the faked quotes situation.

      And Mr. Ledeen apparently is a fellow who knows a thing or two about fake documents. Yellowcake, anyone?

      I heard BlunderRush pontificating this morning about what the Founding Fathers thought. Including what he certainly made sound like quotes from the Federalist Papers - only the quotes were from 1816 and 1801, respectively.

      Granting that the Federalist Papers were written because Americans were not settled in their views of what our government and nation should look like (a point always forgotten by the right wing nutz who selectively quote from them), they were penned well before the turn of the 18th Century.

      And, of course, the Federalist Papers, in due course, led us to the Articles of Confederation. A failure because the Federal government they established just wasn't strong enough to function.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by robeauch (October 23, 2009 9:53 pm ET)
           
        The Federalist Papers came after the Articles of Confederation, not before. They were written in support of the recently drafted, but not yet ratified, Constitution.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (October 23, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
      4  
      Why is it that Sheer "Am I An Idiot?" InSannity calls President Obama "naive" for working to rid the world of nuclear weapons - when InSannity's hero President Reagan made this effort an essential part of this Presidency?

      Perhaps if InSannity saw the tv movie that persuaded Mr. Reagan this would be a good idea, he would also see the light. Read "The Dead Hand" for more on this - particularly how the movie "Dr. Strangelove" reflected Cold War real life (The Doomsday Machine).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by slowtyper (October 23, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
      1  
      limpburger is just trying to get the attention back from beck..and in his true form competes to tell the bigger lie...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bradmann42 (October 23, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
      1 8
      Maybe if Obama would release things like papers he wrote in college, his transcripts etc. then stories like these wouldn't be able to proliferate.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tangaroa (October 23, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
        2  
        Who keeps copies of every paper they wrote in college decades ago? But it might be kind of fun to read George W's.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (October 23, 2009 8:10 pm ET)
          3  
          I bet W's mum, the George Washington in drag look alike, the Marie Antoinette with the "beautiful mind" (sic) kept every single paper that little Georgie Porgie ever wrote.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (October 23, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
          5  
          Doesn't crayon fade after awhile?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Jollymon (October 23, 2009 8:58 pm ET)
             
          You are making quite a broad assumption that George W was literate enough to actually write something without help. Ever see his "sovereign" speech. That is not a literate, well educated man.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (October 23, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
          3  
          And even if you did, no elected politician would be dumb enough to release it all while he was in office so the cranks can throw darts at it and distract from what you want to accomplish.

          Even republicans aren't that stupid.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jjcomet514 (October 24, 2009 9:34 am ET)
        2  
        What a spectacularly stupid comment. Can you produce any papers you wrote 30 years ago? Of course, from the level of intelligence hinted at by your comment, we can damn well assume you don't have any from college...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 26, 2009 11:43 am ET)
           
        Maybe if Obama would release things like papers he wrote in college, his transcripts etc. then stories like these wouldn't be able to proliferate.

        You mean that people who lie professionally will suddenly stop lying? Wow, I wish I had your faith.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Steve in CO (October 23, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
         
      If that were President Obama's thesis, I'd have to say, wow, he's almost as cynical as I am about the current "distribution of wealth," in modern America, and recognizing the phoenix-like rise of the neuvo-aristocrat super rich families on the backs of corporations begging to be labeled monopolies and treated as such.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jscam87 (October 23, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
         
      So a false reference is printed about Rush Limbaugh, and with him denying it for a week no research is done to support or verify his claim. Fox gets scammed for a little over two hours, retracts and apologizes and this is news? Having two standards is having no standards. Most media is in the bag for Obama. It is a shame that a FOX mistake proves how skewed most media can be.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by reconcile (October 25, 2009 5:22 pm ET)
         
      Rush Limbaugh and Lou Dobbs are just ridiculous to me. They are both so racist. God I pray for both of them, it is so sad that they use the airways to espound their racist views. Thanks for MM as an avenue to express our views and discuss with these men.
      Report Abuse