For cablers, Fox is big news. Swine flu not so much
October 28, 2009 9:00 am ET by Eric Boehlert
Greg Sargent notes that last week the inside baseball dispute between the White House and Fox News grabbed as much overall news coverage as the swine flu. You know, that thing that the president recently labeled a national emergency.
No doubt it's depressing to watch journalists spend so much time navel gazing. (BTW, it's our job and Media Matters to watch the press, what journalists' excuse?) But it actually gets worse when you break down the recent Pew Research data by media sector and see just how much time cable TV devoted to the Fox News story.
Behold:

That's right, last week cable news channels devoted nearly three times more coverage to Fox News as they did the swine flu, which has killed more than 1,000 Americans this year.












Media Matters: On health care reform, the Fox News noise machine is cranked to 11
The media myth of Obama's "falling poll numbers"
How to annoy Glenn Beck in five minutes or less




----------------------------------------
The Midnight Review
Mum Is The Word
Okay, it's snarky but... how many Americans has Faux News killed?
Maybe that's why.
The most troubling part is the young people dying from this virus. Everyone's going to die eventually, but senior citizens with underlying health issues deaths are not near so troubling as the elementary school kids and pregnant women who are dying now. This fact alone, the people terribly affected by this virus, is worthy of exceptional news coverage.
BTW, thanks for the post (I think it was you) on the woman who claimed she had a horrific adverse reaction to the flu shot, noting that her claims have been dismissed by the medical community. I had a friend tell me she had seen the story on the news and was questioning whether or not to get vaccinated.