Is Politico becoming too dumb for Drudge?
October 28, 2009 6:18 pm ET by Jamison Foser
Politico is trying to make a scandal out of a "defaced flag" video submitted to an Organizing for America health care video contest. Why? Because someone who entered the contest is bitter about not being named a finalist. No, really: that's the whole story.
One of the 20 finalists in health care video contest run by Barack Obama's campaign arm features a mural of an America flag splattered with health care graffiti until it's covered completely by black paint.
In the video - which is accompanied by the sound of a heart monitor pumping and then flat-lining - words such as "pre-existing conditions," "homeless" and "death panel" ultimately obliterate the flag, which reappears on screen seconds later with the words "Health Will Bring Our Country Back to Life" on the blue field where the 50 stars usually are.
According to the Organizing for American Web site, the 20 finalists in the "Health Reform Video Challenge" were chosen by a panel of "qualified" Democratic National Committee "employee judges."
A contestant whose video didn't make the final-20 cut complains that a video "defacing the flag" won't do much to help President Barack Obama or the Democrats sell health care reform.
"They should never pick that," said the contestant, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "It makes the Democrats look really, really bad."
That's literally all it takes to get a Politico hit piece these days: an anonymous complaint from a contest loser. And a fairly tepid complaint, at that.
I'm not sure what's more pathetic -- that Politico published this obvious (and so far unsuccessful) bit of Drudge-bait, or that it took two people (Jonathan Allen and Daniel Libit) to write it.
But you have to wonder why Politico thought this nonsense was newsworthy after having ignored the blatantly racist photo hosted on the RNC's Facebook page.
UPDATE: Looks like -- in this case, at least -- Politico isn't too dumb for Drudge, after all; he finally gave this "story" a link.
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular
As for the article and doing a hit job on Dems....well, we all know there is a massive double standard with deh Village.
The Supreme Court (which at the time included 3 Reagan appointees and Reagan-elevated Chief Justice Renquist) ruled in the Texas v. Johnson decision that burning an American flag is constitutionally protected expression of free speech.
Now conservative defenders of freedom of speech and the Constitution are thowing a fit over 20 second video (I saw it, and I rated it, so sue me) which depicts the painting of a flag facsimile on a brick wall; which is then subjected to rapid-fire changing grafitti (much too quickly to read, by the way) characterizing anti-health care talking points until the flag facsimile disappears. It was a well- produced,constitutionally protected expression of free speech.
Why does the Constitution and the Supreme Court hate America?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxp_PKsmWKs