About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

So who's still advertising on Beck? October 28 edition ...

October 28, 2009 6:38 pm ET by Media Matters staff

Eighty advertisers have reportedly dropped their ads from Glenn Beck's Fox News program since he called President Obama a "racist" who has a "deep-seated hatred of white people." Here are his October 28 sponsors, in the order they appeared:

  • Tony Chachere's
  • Fox News College Challenge
  • Rosland Capital
  • Charlie Rose on Bloomberg Television
  • Superior Gold Group
  • Tax Masters
  • TeaPartyExpress.org
  • ZeroWater
  • Hydrolyze
  • National Review
  • Goldline International
  • LifeLock
  • EasyWater
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce (ResponsibleHealthReform.org)
  • Superior Gold Group
  • SeniorPeopleMeet.com
  • IRSTaxAgreements.com
  • Rosland Capital
  • The Weekly Standard
  • ZeroWater

Tags: Fox News Channel, Glenn Beck, Glenn Beck show

Support Our Work


Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MickD (October 28, 2009 8:59 pm ET)
      2  
      Charlie Rose would be proud to hear that he could possibly get a Beck audience.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (October 28, 2009 9:53 pm ET)
      1 5
      So who's still watching Beck?

      3.1 million on Tuesday...with a full slate of advertisers...while CoC/mmfa continue to hit their fist with their face with an impotent boycott.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (October 28, 2009 10:13 pm ET)
        5  
        So who's bailed-out on Glenn "Obama is a white-hating racist" Beck?

        80 advertisers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (October 28, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
        5  
        Wes, darling, you are precious. You still haven't managed to acknowledge that more people tune into NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, and PBS. Since I am sure you will tell us that the mainstream media is liberal, then you need to man up and admit that you are grossly ounumbered.

        Can you do that, or will you continue with your meaningless 3 million viewers.

        You are in a fringe, baby. Embrace the fringe. love the fringe. Make it yours. And enjoy your losses in the next election, babydoll. You and the Impotent Right should start picking out furniture for your nursery because you are screwed.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (October 29, 2009 7:57 am ET)
        1  
        A full slate of advertisers paying a lot less money for their advertising no doubt.

        You fail to realize that ratings don't equal money coming into the show. Ratings doesn't = quality either.

        The blue chip advertisers are gone, and it's hurting FoxNews no doubt about it, because even with your great ratings numbers you keep espousing (where did you get 3.1 million from anyway, because I have my doubts), the big advertisers are not there.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 29, 2009 11:07 am ET)
             
          Some individual shows do get 3.1 million viewers on some nights.

          5PM October 27th, Glenn Beck – 3,111,000 viewers
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (October 29, 2009 11:09 am ET)
               
            I swear. The hyphen in the original source material between Glenn Beck and 3.1 million baffled MMFA's software!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 29, 2009 8:06 am ET)
        1  
        ...an impotent boycott. ???

        Glenn Beck is impotent? I suspected Rush Limbaugh was...but Beck, too?

        For the record I am against these "impotent boycotts". These poor people have enough misery, not being able to get a stiffy, without having to deal with boycotts, too.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (October 28, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
        3
      media matters (for very little),

      Thanks for helping with filling out my Kwanzaa list!

      Speaking truth to/about progressives
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (October 29, 2009 12:24 am ET)
        4  
        You, too? You and Wes ought to join a lonely hearts club.

        Oh, and we are still waiting for you to speak some truth.

        Ever wonder why we are called "progressives". It is because we are in favor of progress. The opposite of that would, I suppose, be people who are against progress. That says a lot, don't you think?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (October 29, 2009 9:53 am ET)
            4
          Ever wonder why we are called "progressives". It is because we are in favor of progress.

          Then I must ask why is it your policies are 'regressive'

          -- Going backward to socialism that has failed for 150 years.
          -- Nature of the taxes those policies will impose on the people.

          Progressives Aren't
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (October 29, 2009 11:22 am ET)
            2  
            Well, mostly because we're not going back to socialism, which has worked pretty well in some countries in Europe (Sweden, Denmark, Norway to name a few).

            The nature of the taxes are such that, we'd be going back to the level of taxation represented during the Clinton years, as in, the good years where our economy was booming, and doing pretty well, and still far far far below the rates of taxation that were seen in the decades before, even lower than during St. Ronnie's 2 terms.

            We are progressive, we're not the party that wants to return to the 1950's.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (October 29, 2009 9:06 am ET)
           
        Do you really celebrate Kwanzaa.If not are you doing what you accuse other people of doing????Your slip is showing.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (October 29, 2009 9:35 am ET)
        2  
        Thanks for helping with filling out my Kwanzaa list!

        You see, 'cuz he's not really black and yet--and yet--he has a... are you ready for it? He has a Kwanzaa list!!! Don't you get it?!?
        Report Abuse