About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

UPDATED: CBS News premise: What if Democrats lose next week? (Politico, too)

October 30, 2009 11:00 am ET by Eric Boehlert

CBS ponders the implications of next week's off-year elections in NJ, NY and VA. But CBS only ponders the implications of Republicans winning. Seems odd.

From CBS News blog [emphasis added]:

If both Christie in New Jersey and McDonnell in Virginia win, expect vocal celebrations from the Republican Party and maybe some swagger suggesting that the Democrats are slipping.

Former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove suggested the worst for Democrats in his Wall Street Journal column Thursday: "Tuesday's election will provide the most tangible evidence so far of how strong a backlash is building—and just how frightened centrist Democrats should be of 2010. For Republicans, it looks as if hope and change are on the way."

In reality, while Republicans will undoubtedly be energized, Democrats still have a year to fire up their voters to prevent Republican gains in 2010.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with looking at the possibility of Democrats losing all three elections next week. And I guess there's nothing wrong with quoting uber-partisan Karl Rove giving his doomsday scenario for Dems.

However, there is something wrong with the fact that the CBS article never imagines the flip side. It never ponders the implications of Dems doing well next week by retaining the NJ governorship and pulling off an upset in the Upstate New York Congressional race, both of which, according to recent polling, remain a real possibility. 

Next week's elections are already being framed as bad news for Democrats and a boon for the GOP. Might be nice if the press considered that the opposite remains a possibility as well.

UPDATED: Right on cue, Mike Allen at the GOP bulletin board (i.e. Politico) publishes this gem today:

COULD DEMS GET BLOWN OUT ON TUESDAY?

Keep in mind that the headline is for an item about how the NJ race is too close to call. Y'know, the race in which the GOP candidate enjoyed a double-digit lead just a few months ago and his now fading in the polls to Dem. John Corzine. But Allen only has one question: Will Dems will get "blown out."

UPDATED: More Allen idiocy:

New Poll Shows Corzine Could Lose

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (October 30, 2009 11:09 am ET)
      3  
      Since they have not imagined the flip side, it makes me very impatient to see what the results of the elections will be. If they indeed both go to Democrats, what will the spin be? There must be spin, of course, because it's just not possible in the mind of Mainstream right-wing media that people have perhaps had enough of Republican "No-ism" and wish for actual change. But what will it be? How will they couch the Republican defeats as anything else but defeats?

      This kind of one-sided reporting was resurrected by FOX Propaganda, CBS News. Watch out.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (October 30, 2009 11:31 am ET)
        3  
        My feeling is that the media nets fear a Repub meltdown. Who would them news then? Would they have to find it themselves?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (October 30, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
      2  
      "BLOWN OUT!" ???

      Riiiiight ... by losing 3 elections after taking the majority and the presidency AWAY from the GOP the last 2 election cycles ...

      It's all just tabloid fun & games at America's "political" news sites. No actual perspective needed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (October 30, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
        3  
        Let's remember, when the Repubs win, it is considered a "mandate".
        When the Dems win, it has to be because of vote stealing by ACORN.








        (only being "slightly" sarcastic)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by letsbefair (October 30, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
        1
      The reason the news is posed this way is because any GOP rebound "should" be unthinkable. Most liberals I know have been celebrating the death of the GOP and conservatism for over a year now. Guess what? It's Alive - and it's coming to get you
      HAPPY HALLOWEEN
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (October 30, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
        1  
        Not really a liberal, not really a conservative. I tend to disagree with both sometimes, and agree with both sometimes. Depends on the issue, letsbefair.

        That said, all I've been celebrating this last year now is the end of Bush/Cheney. There is still a great deal of legacy damage to deal with, but at least no further damage is being done at the moment.

        I want a strong conservative movement and a strong progressive movement in this country. I want a plurality of voices, so that when policy is debated, the best possible solution can be found to benefit ALL of America. With just one party, it becomes endless bickering and in-fighting, which helps no one.

        If you were honest, you would admit that it was not a Democrat, but a Republican who spoke dreamily of the possibility of a permanent Republican majority in this country, and bent and twisted the Justice Department to that dark end.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by letsbefair (October 30, 2009 6:27 pm ET)
             
          I am honest, and if you think only Republicans have "dreamily" pondered the idea of being a forever majority, then you need to review your own bias. What I don't understand is how you can say that it is bad for one party to be in complete power (controls white house, house, and senate) and then say that "no further damage is being done at the moment." When it comes to assessing damage done, I guess it depends if you view this country as our founders did, or if you view it through a more progressive worldview - a hybrid between a democracy, a republic, a dictatorship, and socialism.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (October 30, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
      1  
      The "liberal" MSM strikes again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (October 30, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
      1  
      I don't see how an off year race is a referendum on a party. Of either side.
      Everyone I know votes for the candidate and not what hidden message their vote will be seen as.

      Deeds is a terrible candidate and if anything, it is a knock down of the Virginia democrats who chose him! duh.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (October 30, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
        1  
        In upstate NY, there's no way a Democrat should win. If he does, it's a clear sign of chaos and mismanagement in the Republican Party.

        For a news story to fail to bring up that potential outcome and the effects is obscene and very inadequate reporting.

        Liberal-leaning MSM my butt.

        Here's more evidence of how "nonsense" getting too much credibility taints the information the public receives! We need to stop that from happening. That's why the White House slammed FoxNews for not being a credible news organization. When Karl Rove can lead the news media by the nose with talking points like this, that's wrong. It poisons the news our nation gets, and doesn't let the reading and viewing public talk about the things that really need to be discussed. It hurts our nation.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by liberalXtian (October 30, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
          1  
          The Republicans have already lost in NY 23. The race is between the Conservative party candidate and the Democratic candidate. If the clueless ideologue Conservative (who does not even live in NY 23)actually wins, it will further marginalize the GOP and make them put up far right candidates in much more liberal districts and races where they can't win. This race will further marginalize and diminish the Republican party.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.