About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Wash. Times' Kuhner -- who published madrassa smear -- accuses Obama of creating "racial" division

November 01, 2009 12:28 pm ET by Jeremy Schulman

Washington Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner asserted today that President Obama's "socialist policies are fracturing the country along ideological, racial and class lines":

The then-candidate said he was inheriting a spiraling economy and two wars but nonetheless could promise to bring a new era of "hope," "change" and "economic renewal." Moreover, his seminal pledge was to transcend America's bitter political divisions and become a "post-partisan" president who would unify all voters.

By contrast, Mr. Obama is the most radical president in U.S. history, whose socialist policies are fracturing the country along ideological, racial and class lines. He is a dogmatic divider. The angry town-hall meetings, the "tea party" protests and his dwindling poll numbers are not because of Mr. Bush. Rather, they are the direct result of Mr. Obama's big-government liberalism.

The sowing of "racial" division is certainly something Kuhner knows a lot about. In early 2007, Kuhner was the editor of Insight when it famously published a fabricated smear that unnamed researchers connected to the Hillary Clinton campaign had discovered that Obama had attended a madrassa and was raised as a Muslim. The false report was trumpeted by Fox News and right-wing radio. Kuhner defended the story long after it had been discredited.

Among other highlights on Kuhner's résumé is his service as a fill-in host for Michael Savage. On one such occasion, Kuhner praised Savage for making the point that "it is white males that helped build this country, and it's about time that people stopped discriminating against them" and said that "the last discriminated group in the United States ... is now the white male."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by roland (November 01, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
      6  
      "Dwindling poll numbers"? Hasn't Obama pretty much settled into the mid-50s approval range in recent months? (Other than Rasmussen, of course). And doesn't Obama trump the Republicans when the public is asked who they trust more on various key issues like health care and the economy?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (November 01, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
        4  
        Yes, but Kuhner lives in Moonie World, which looks an awful lot like Orwell's Oceania...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (November 01, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
      2  
      The far right-wingers never met a fact they couldn't distort for political gain and/or use to line their pockets with other people's money.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (November 01, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
      5  
      GWB was 'a uniter, not a divider'

      He [President Obama] is a dogmatic divider.

      The 'Clear Skies' bill supported pollution.
      etc.

      Why do Neocons always use the term that means the exact opposite of what they intend? Orwell?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (November 01, 2009 9:35 pm ET)
      1  
      C'mon son, it's the Wash Times.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 02, 2009 10:19 am ET)
      1  
      It always makes me laugh out loud when someone brands Obama as some sort of left ring radical. When actually going back, and reviewing the policies he's pursued, and the avenues he's gone down, he's about as middle of the right as Clinton was, maybe slightly left of Clinton, but not much.

      The conservative media finds it to their benefit to brand Obama as a left wing radical, but they can't really prove it at all.
      Report Abuse