About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

UPDATED: How Chris Wallace became irrelevant

November 03, 2009 9:20 am ET by Eric Boehlert

In September, I detailed how Fox's Chris Wallace, who used to enjoy sort of hold himself up being part from the boisterous Fox News, how Wallace like to present himself as the adult supervising the Fox News romper room, had gulped the kool-aid and embraced the Glenn Beck era of Fox Land.

So just a couple thoughts re: Wallace's recent Limbaugh interview. Watching a Sunday morning talk show host leaving his D.C. studio and flying half way across the country to interview a AM talk show host really told us all we needed to know about the state of Wallace's journalism career, and how he had completely abdicated any sense of professionalism. It also told us all we needed to know about Wallace's last place Sunday morning show, which has been in the cellar longer than the Oakland Raiders. Meaning, going to kiss Limbaugh ring, to me at least, certainly had the air of desperation to it, as Wallace practically groveled for a one-time ratings spike via Limbaugh's large radio audience.

As for the interview itself? You expected actual journalism on display? Didn't think so. The whole thing was just a 30-minute Obama-bashing infomercial for Limbaugh. But this comment by Wallace, made to to the Fox online audience as Wallace tried to drum up interest in the softball interview, caught my attention [emphasis original]:

I was surprised by the strength of his feelings about this president.

Got that? Chris Wallace sat down to interview Rush Limbaugh who, in 2009, has literally run out of way to express his unabiding contempt, disgust and outright hatred for the President of the United States, and the tuned-out Fox anchor was surprised to find out Limbaugh really didn't like Obama.

-Limbaugh repeatedly refers to Obama as a "boy" and a "man-child"

-Limbaugh says Obama, Democrats are "targeting their own country," "purposefully destroying this country"

-Limbaugh calls Obama "this little boy, this little man-child president"

-Limbaugh: Obama ordered "rape" of bailed out executives, or "those who achieve"

-Limbaugh blames Obama for "circle of strife," claims Obama has "created about a dozen miniature civil wars"

-Limbaugh: Obama "trashing," "destroying," "emasculating," America; Nobel committee "applauded"

-Limbaugh: Obama has put "child abusers" and "perverts" like Jennings in power

-Limbaugh compares Obama health care plan to Nazi policies

 -Limbaugh on Obama: "We're dealing with a guy who is out to destroy the whole concept of the West, Western civilization"

 -Limbaugh: "The guy's [Obama] a menace. He's a dangerous, dangerous naïve soul."

Chris Wallace is a supposedly serious journalist, and Chris Wallace was surprised to find out that Rush Limbaugh really dislikes Obama?  

That's just another example of how Chris Wallace has become irrelevant.

UPDATED: Crooks and Liars' John Amato did a nice job dismantling Wallace Sunday performance:

Chris Wallace had a chance to prove to America that he actually has journalistic integrity and is not part of the Fox Sphere of phony reporting when he interviewed Rush Limbaugh on Fox News Sunday. What we got was FOX News #1, fair and balanced reporter acting like a bowl of jelly for Limbaugh's rants.

Like we said, in terms of serous journalism, Chris Wallace has become irrelevant.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bilbo_dies (November 03, 2009 9:39 am ET)
      1  
      First, Rush is just the talk radio version of Howard Stern.
      It isn't about talent as much as it is people tuning in to listen to the radio version of a car crash.

      Second, Chris had Rush on because he could and also because you can't have the same Repubs on every Sunday of the month, you have to find someone or something different. (not the Rush is different than any of the other hate spouters)

      Third, since Rush supposedly has an audience of 20 million, this somehow makes him "relevent" as a commentator on the current political situation.


      As Rush has said himself, he is an "entertainer". He has identified his audience and he works at keeping that audience happy. If this was the 1860's his show would be about secession, states rights, and slavery. Since this is 2009 his show is about,,,,,,,,,, well, I will let you draw your own conclusions on what his show is about.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 03, 2009 9:39 am ET)
      2  
      My question for the viewers who tuned in...what did you expect to hear differently? Is it just an excuse to have your anti-Obama mantra actualized in the media? Where could I go for a similar Bush whipping in the first year of his admin, the kind based on insults and half-truths? That would be no where.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (November 03, 2009 9:55 am ET)
        2  
        And do you remember when conservatives used to shout that it was UNPATRIOTIC to criticize the president in a time of war?

        Of course, what they really meant was that it is unpatriotic to criticize a REPUBLICAN president.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (November 03, 2009 9:53 am ET)
      1  
      Until they got a few 'entertainers' of their own, like John Voight and Chuck Norris, the Republicans/right wingers were always mockingly derisive of anything celebrities had to say, especially for the progressive cause. Guess what, Republicans? Rush Limbaugh is a celebrity. He is an on-air personality. That means his opinion is irrelevant, and anyone who treats anything that comes out of his mouth as news is irrelevant, too.

      Right? Yeah. Very very very far right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (November 03, 2009 10:00 am ET)
      2  
      Captain Renault-Wallace:
      I was surprised by the strength of his feelings about this president.

      Your winnings, sir.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 03, 2009 11:53 am ET)
        1  
        Except that Wallace may actually have been dense enough to really be surprised.

        In other words, "Chrissy, this may be the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 03, 2009 11:54 am ET)
        1  
        Except that Wallace may actually have been dense enough to really be surprised.

        In other words, "Chrissy, this may be the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (November 03, 2009 10:05 am ET)
      1  
      Like we said, in terms of serous journalism, Chris Wallace has become irrelevant.

      He became irrelevant the minute he accepted the job at Faux News. There's only one journalist with integrity in the Wallace Family - and that's Mike Wallace.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.