About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Glenn Beck's revisionist history of Glenn Beck

November 04, 2009 1:01 pm ET by Simon Maloy

In case you missed it the other day, on his Fox News program Glenn Beck linked health care reform to 9-11, likening legislation designed to better the lives of Americans to a fuel-laden passenger jet striking the World Trade Center, and casting himself, as the leader of his 9-12 cult, as the only person standing in the way of disaster.

It's the type of deluded and offensive narcissism that we've come to expect from Beck, and normally I wouldn't have given it a whole lot of thought afterwards, but something else caught my ear in the middle of Beck's rant as he tried to cast himself as some sort of latter-day Cassandra whose prophetic warnings about bin Laden fell on deaf ears: "In the 1990s, I was on the radio warning people about Osama bin Laden, not because I was some super-smart genius. I just listened to the man's words. I really believed him. But that wasn't the top of the priority list in America -- no, no, no. We were dealing with the fat interns and the definition of is, and I like the rest of America went back to sleep on the terrorist threat."

It just so happens that Glenn Beck has on his website a section called "Classic Beck," which contains selected audio recordings of Beck's radio programs going back several years. One of those recordings is from August 22, 1998, and is described as follows: "Glenn debuts on the WABC in New York City. Glenn discusses the recent U.S. attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan and if the American people are ready for the upcoming War on Terrorism." And it just so happens that near the beginning of this recording, Beck comments on Osama bin Laden:

BECK: Now, another newspaper in Pakistan says that it received a statement for the--from the spokesperson for Azma bin Ladin [sic]. Is that is name? Bin Ladin? Bin Ladeen? Bin jelly bean, green bean, Mr. Clean? I love him. He's hot. He says he's ready for war with the U.S. Oh yes? Thank you Mr. Baked Bean.

A respected newspaper quotes the statement as follows: "The war has just started, and Americans should wait for the answer." Now, Mr. Ozma Dig-my-scene, I don't even know what the question was! Was the question "is my turban on too tight?" Yes! I think it is. The blood's not pumping around the whole brain. Loosen the turban, Mr. Clean, dig my scene. Oh yes, let's look at the latrine.

Does this sound like Beck was "warning" about bin Laden and taking his words seriously? Now, consider the time period - it's late August 1998, just a few weeks after the Al Qaeda bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and President Clinton just launched cruise missiles into Afghanistan and Sudan in retaliation. If there was ever a time in the '90s when terrorism was the focus of America's attention, this was it. And Glenn Beck, debuting on WABC, used that time to make silly jokes about bin Laden's name and dismiss his threats as a symptom of an overly tight turban.

But the Glenn Beck of August 1998 doesn't jibe with the Glenn Beck of 2009, who desperately wants to be taken seriously as the last remaining bulwark against the rising tide of socialism or fascism or statism or whatever. So Beck simply rewrote his own history. Ironically, it was the actual historical records that Beck maintains on his own website that undermined his attempt at revisionism.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (November 04, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
      6  
      This is pretty offensive stuff to the fabric of history.

      Osama bin Laden was a danger, clearly. Clinton did what he could to fight against terrorists like bin Laden, including finding the guys who did the first WTC bombing and jailing them, retaliating against those who bombed our embassies, stopping the Millennium attacks, and uncovering who did the USS Cole bombing, just to name 4 things associated with Osama and terrorism.

      Rightwingers made fun of Clinton. Beck made fun of him above - throwing red meat to his listeners with the "what the definition of "is" is" smear.

      Beck says that all of America went to sleep WRT terrorism. But that's not true. Clinton didn't. Richard Clarke didn't. They tried to tell Bush to worry about terrorism. Clinton told Bush that it would be the most important thing he had to deal with. He ignored that for many months. Richard Clarke and others came to Bush directly and to higher ups in his administration repeatedly with "hair on fire" warnings, but the principals involved in the fight against terrorism had their first meeting scheduled for when everyone would be back from summer vacation, on 9/12. 8 months after Clinton told him that the highest priority he should have would be terrorism. How can it take you more than 200 days to have a meeting on the top priority?????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (November 04, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
      3  
      Pimpslapped raw by his own words! Again and again. What is it about the level of a right wing mind that refuses to realize their radio rants are archived? How many times do they have to be humiliated by their very own words, their own contradictions, before they learn to zip it and get an education?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (November 04, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
      5  
      BECK: "Bin Ladin? Bin Ladeen? ...I love him. He's hot."

      Unbelievable...Glenn Beck WORSHIPS Osama Bin Laden! He absolutely ADORES this terrorist who is responsible for the bloody deaths of thousands of innocent Americans!

      These are Glenn Beck's own words, so he can't deny it. We have the tape to prove that Glenn Beck is one step removed from Osama Bin Laden.

      WAKE UP, AMERICA...! Do something about this...!

      BTW, Glenn...my red phone is right here by my side in case you want to refute anything I've said.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RedChocobo (November 04, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
        1  
        Yes! Use his own techniques against him, this is the best way to fight the Becks, Hannitys and Limbaughs. Crop their own quotes and make false assumptions and equivalents about them.

        So yes, Beck definitely loves Osama Bin Laden and from that we can assume that Beck supports Islamic militants and terrorists.

        We have terrorists right here in our own media people, wake up!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (November 04, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
      3  
      I see a money-making opportunity here. All you've got to do is splash a photo of a teary-eyed Glenn Beck onto a t-shirt, with the words "Beck's in love with bin Laden: 'He's hot!'"

      Not only would you make a million dollars (I'll order five BTW), but you also use Glenn Beck to destroy ... Glenn Beck.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 04, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
        2  
        That sounds like a sweet scenario, but you're overestimating the intelligence of the typical Glenn Beck acolyte. If they had a collective I.Q. higher than that of a doorknob, revealing Beck's dishonesty and hypocrisy might drive a few of them out of his tent.

        As it is, they just don't care. He validates their bigotry and ignorance... and that's all they require of him.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by The New Pilgrims (November 04, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
          2  
          You are correct, my comment was overstated. But at the same time, there's no reason why some good liberal can't have a little fun at Glenn's expense, and make a pile of money in doing so.

          Heck, we might be able to convince his fans to buy the t-shirt as a badge of honor.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotshark (November 04, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
            2  
            yes even go to a tea 9/12 bagger party and sell them as a 9/12 project shirt, the tea baggers would actually think that make scenes.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by goesto11 (November 04, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
          2  
          Exactly. His audience is not a group that's going to be influenced by rational thinking.

          They respond to emotions, and Beck's a master manipulator of that sort of person. Fear is his tool, and he knows his audience responds to it.


          Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (November 04, 2009 1:56 pm ET)
      1  
      I thought Ladeen's first name is Michael.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (November 04, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
      2  
      You know, the fact that there are actually people out there who believe this man knows anything about anything is frightening. He is a very, very, very bad, very scary joke.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (November 04, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
      2  
      Well suuuuure, if Media Matters is gonna do a sneaky thing like look at what Beck's said in the past.... But Beck's only interested in the here and now!

      Unless that is, you're Van Jones. Or Bill Ayers. Etc.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by davidsanantonio (November 04, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
        1
      First of all, from the article: "One of those recordings is from August 22, 1998...". You use one commentary from 1998 to describe everything he ever said about Bin Laden in the 90's. More evidence please.

      Secondly, he's always used comedy and snark to present his point. For a while he referred to Ahmadinejad as "President Tom", because he didn't feel like saying his name and figured it was just easier to call him Tom. But he still vocalized his opinion against Ahmadinejad. Comedy doesn't discount severity.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 05, 2009 11:14 am ET)
           
        You use one commentary from 1998 to describe everything he ever said about Bin Laden in the 90's. More evidence please.

        That's a pretty weak defense. Beck is claiming to have taken bin Ladin seriously; let him produce the evidence that that's the case. Or find some yourself from Beck's archives. We'll wait.

        Comedy doesn't discount severity.

        Of course, when it comes to Beck's brand of "humor," comedy doesn't count for anything at all.

        Change that to "a very weak defense."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by scriptbabe451 (November 04, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
      1  
      Remember also that Clinton was accused by both the right wing and Republicans of having sent those missiles in order to distract from the developing Lewinsky scandal. Bin Laden and the issue of stateless terrorism was not on the radar of any righwingers or any Republicans. They were gearing up for another cold war, this time with "communist" China, and for another go at Iraq, this time taking down Saddam and taking over Iraq - their eventual strategy which Geroge Bush's stolen election and 9/11, plus a certain percentage of gutlessness on the part of Democrats, made possible, and we all know how well that turned out.

      I'd be willing to bet that eventually Beck followed the lead of his right-wing comrades and downplayed the entire issue of failed states as the breeding ground for stateless terrorism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (November 04, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
      1  
      Before 9/11 there wasn't a single conservative, anywhere, who paid the slightest attention to terrorism.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon