About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Instapundit's Glenn Reynolds plays dumb on an epic scale

November 05, 2009 2:09 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

And the guy teaches law. It's so embarrassing.

In today's WSJ, Reynolds, part of the right-wing blogosphere which cheered press-bashing for eight years during the Bush years, is suddenly very, very concerned that the White House has critiqued Fox News and called it out as being not a legitimate news outlet. Suddenly Reynolds is terrified by the fact that White House officials have publicly expressed an opinion about Fox News. 

Playing dumb, Reynolds pretends the White House is trying to "dictate" what's news. But that's standard practice by now. That's been the clichéd talking point for weeks. On that front, Reynold is merely saying whatever everyone else has already said. (Congratulations!)

To actually prove his point about how terribly dangerous it is for White House aides to have an opinion about the press, Reynolds points to a controversy unfolding in Chicago [emphasis added]:  

For the past several months, students at The Innocence Project, a program at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, have come under fire from Cook County, Ill. Prosecutors aren't happy with their habit of turning up evidence demonstrating that defendants have been wrongly convicted. They've allegedly exposed the wrongful conviction of Anthony McKinney, a Chicago man jailed for 31 years on a false confession.

Discomfited prosecutors have responded by subpoenaing everything related to the students' investigation about the McKinney case: notes, interview records and even classroom grades. According to the prosecutors, the students aren't journalists, but an "investigative agency." This is a distinction that has legal bite because journalists' notes are protected under an Illinois journalist shield law.

Wow, that is troubling. Students at a journalism program are uncovering important information and local law enforcement are hitting them with subpoenas.

But how is that apparent over-reach connected to the Obama administration? What on earth does that have to do with White House officials expressing an opinion about Fox News? Behold as the law professor plays dumb on an epic scale:

But they [prosecutors] may be excused for thinking that attacks on media critics are, in today's political era, business as usual. Indeed, they need look no farther than the White House, whose occupant has sometimes styled himself the nation's chief media critic. It is, after all, the Obama administration that declared that its critics at Fox News Channel are not real journalists, and that Fox is not a "legitimate news organization."

Got that? The administration has expressed an opinion about Fox News, and that's just like Chicago prosecutors issuing subpoenas and demanding journalism students turn over their notes and interview records. But how? Because the administration actually has a super-secret plan to criminalize journalism.

So dumb it hurts.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by achorn316 (November 05, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
      3  
      It's like history for these people began January 20th, 2009.

      Bush's presidency has been erased from THEIR historical record.

      Bush planted reporters at briefings (male prostitute reporter actually), tried to shut down MSNBC, his attorney general told people they "need to be careful what they say", etc, etc etc.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Hellcakes (November 05, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, 'Bush did it', fantastic argument. Who was the one that's forgetting the historical record, again?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 05, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
      1  
      It is, after all, the Obama administration that declared that its critics at Fox News Channel are not real journalists, and that Fox is not a "legitimate news organization."

      It's not an opinion about FoxNews. It's demonstrable with facts. And that's an important distinction. They aren't just declaring it without proof.

      FoxNews has been that way for a while - the Obama White House has decided to call them out on their dishonest behavior, sure, but it didn't just start happening!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 05, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
      1  
      Its the usual insinuendo. But he [Reynolds] may be excused for thinking that its a fair comparison. After all, neither the students nor Fox are journalists
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jim Lindgren (November 05, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
        1
      Eric:

      Those who are cheering you on obviously didn't read Reynolds's op-ed.

      You didn't quote the relevant passage in his op-ed, so your argument makes sense only to those whom you have misled.

      It's too bad that some fair-minded media watchdog organization couldn't take up this exchange between you and Reynolds.

      If you aren't going to even try to be fair, what's the point of Media Matters?

      (The sad thing is that deep down I suspect you know you are in the wrong on this one.)


      Jim Lindgren
      Professor of Law
      Northwestern University
      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (November 06, 2009 1:51 am ET)
         
      I think MMFA is out on a limb here. Glenn Reynolds "playing" dumb?

      Oh, he is not playing. Check Instaputz on yer google.
      Report Abuse