Crazy comparison of the day
November 06, 2009 10:35 am ET by Jamison Foser
Linda Chavez compares President Obama's statement about the Ft. Hood shootings to his predecessor's deer-in-the-headlights decision to keep reading a children's book during the 9/11 attacks:
Before he got to the issue on everyone's mind - namely the deaths of Americans in uniform - the president gave a "shout-out" to government bureaucrats gathered for a previously scheduled conference at the Interior Department, complete with appreciative chuckles. He treated the event like a pep rally rather than a tragic occasion with a wider audience than those gathered in the room. I wonder how many media outlets will compare Obama's performance to President Bush's "Pet Goat" moment on 9/11. I won't hold my breath.
I'm always amused when right-wingers take a break from angrily accusing everyone else of "forgetting the horrors of 9/11" and instead grossly understate what happened happened that day in order to try to score cheap political points.
Anyway: on September 11, 2001, George Bush was told the nation was under attack, and responded by reading a children's book.
Now, one might reasonably argue that the best thing for Bush to do during a crisis was, in fact, to keep himself busy reading My Pet Goat rather than screwing up important decisions. But in any case, that is not even remotely like anything that happened yesterday.











Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular




Oh, that's cruel, Jamison. That is SO cruel. Point very well taken, but cruel.
Oh, that's cruel, Jamison. That is SO cruel. Point very well taken, but cruel.
The reverse is also true, naturally.
Now as for the Obama bashing regarding Fort Hood- we all know the wingnuts were going to blame/attact/put down President Obama over what happened.
Good post. But did you also predict that all the leftwing lemmings, amply represented on this site, would attack Bush for sitting there "a few minutes longer . . ." Just as Obama's comments are entirely inconsequential in this case, so was Bush's decision to sit there a few extra minutes. But true to form, and for reasons they can't explain, the sheep all agreed that sitting there a few minutes longer than their shepard michael moore thought proper, somehow had some significance . .. Baaaa. . .
Good post. But did you also predict that all the leftwing lemmings, amply represented on this site, would attack Bush for sitting there "a few minutes longer . . ." Just as Obama's comments are entirely inconsequential in this case, so was Bush's decision to sit there a few extra minutes. But true to form, and for reasons they can't explain, the sheep all agreed that sitting there a few minutes longer than their shepard michael moore thought proper, somehow had some significance . .. Baaaa. . .
What do you think Bush could've done within those 7 minutes to save lives or kill terrorists? Do you not think that people of all walks of life -- be they politicians, generals, cops, or dare I say, our Holy One. . . --reacted awkwardly upon hearing that news? Most very likely were incredulous. . . . His policies that followed of course are fair game for criticism, but to harp on something as petty as the "my pet goat" episode, as so many lemmings did, reveals only their superficiality.
The reason we criticize Bush is because the correct course of action is so blindingly obvious: leave quietly right away.
Geez, people step out of meetings at work when their friggin' cell phone starts vibrating. It's not that hard.
So yeah, the President could have and should have gotten himself up and out of that room, calmly, but immediately.