What "very racist" Obama comment is Rupert Murdoch talking about? 

So now know that the CEO of News Corp thinks President Obama is racist. The rather shocking revelation came from a recent interview, where Murdoch was asked specifically about Fox News' Glenn Beck, who famously called Obama (or, "this guy") a "racist."

This was Murdoch's response [emphasis added]:  

On the racist thing, that caused a grilling. But he [Obama] did make a very racist comment. Ahhh...about, you know, blacks and whites and so on, and which he said in his campaign he would be completely above. And um, that was something which perhaps shouldn't have been said about the President, but if you actually assess what he [Beck] was talking about, he was right.

Beck's "racist" attack was made in the wake of the Prof. Gates/Sgt. Crowley controversy in Cambridge, MA., in July. After Obama addressed the issue and made news with his comments during a July 22, press conference, Beck then called Obama a "racist." And today Murdoch claims that in that context, Obama made "a very racist comment."

I'll put this bluntly: What the hell is Rupert Murdoch talking about?

Because these were Obama's remarks, in full, from his July 22, press conference. Good luck finding the "very racist comment":  

Well, I should say at the outset that "Skip" Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here.  I don't know all the facts.  What's been reported, though, is that the guy forgot his keys, jimmied his way to get into the house, there was a report called into the police station that there might be a burglary taking place -- so far, so good, right?  I mean, if I was trying to jigger into -- well, I guess this is my house now so -- (laughter) -- it probably wouldn't happen.  But let's say my old house in Chicago -- (laughter) -- here I'd get shot.  (Laughter.)

But so far, so good.  They're reporting -- the police are doing what they should.  There's a call, they go investigate what happens.  My understanding is at that point Professor Gates is already in his house.  The police officer comes in, I'm sure there's some exchange of words, but my understanding is, is that Professor Gates then shows his ID to show that this is his house.  And at that point, he gets arrested for disorderly conduct -- charges which are later dropped.

Now, I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that, but I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge Police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there is a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately.  That's just a fact. 

As you know, Lynn, when I was in the state legislature in Illinois, we worked on a racial profiling bill because there was indisputable evidence that blacks and Hispanics were being stopped disproportionately.  And that is a sign, an example of how, you know, race remains a factor in this society.  That doesn't lessen the incredible progress that has been made.  I am standing here as testimony to the progress that's been made. 

And yet the fact of the matter is, is that this still haunts us.  And even when there are honest misunderstandings, the fact that blacks and Hispanics are picked up more frequently and oftentime for no cause casts suspicion even when there is good cause.  And that's why I think the more that we're working with local law enforcement to improve policing techniques so that we're eliminating potential bias, the safer everybody is going to be.