About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Murdoch meltdown: Now Fox News spokesperson says Murdoch "does not ... think the president is a racist"

November 10, 2009 9:45 pm ET by MMFA Staff

Michael Calderone's November 10 Politico blog post:

News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch has drawn criticism following an interview with Sky News Australia, where his comments were interpreted by some as being in agreement with Glenn Beck's view that President Obama's "a racist."

But News Corp. spokesperson Gary Ginsberg tells POLITICO that Murdoch did not intend to suggest that he had the same opinion as Beck.

"He does not at all, for a minute, think the president is a racist," Ginsberg said.

Murdoch, in the interview, said that the president "did make a very racist comment" and seemed to indicate he thought Beck was right in making the controversial claim. Media Matters, and others, quickly seized upon the interview as evidence that Murdoch shared the same view as the Fox News host.

Ginsberg said that's not the case, but did not comment further on the interview.

In his interview with Sky News Australia, Murdoch said of Beck's comment that President Obama is a racist, "that was something which perhaps shouldn't have been said about the president, but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he was right":

SPEERS: The Glenn Beck, who you mentioned, has called Barack Obama a racist, and he helped organize a protest against him. Others on Fox have likened him --

MURDOCH: Yeah.

SPEERS: -- to Stalin. Is that defensible?

MURDOCH: No, no, no, not Stalin, I don't think. I don't know who that -- not one of our people. On the racist thing, that caused a [unintelligible]. But he did make a very racist comment, about, you know, blacks and whites and so on, and which he said in his campaign he would be completely above. And, you know, that was something which perhaps shouldn't have been said about the president, but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he was right.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MickD (November 10, 2009 10:13 pm ET)
      5  
      The in-box of a News Corps(e) spokesperson must be a mile high.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by News Corpse (November 11, 2009 4:03 am ET)
        6  
        Hey...watch you say about News Corpse.

        I have just one question for Mr. Ginsberg: If Rupert Murdoch doesn't think Obama is a racist, then why did he agree with Glenn Beck that Obama is a racist?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 11, 2009 8:16 am ET)
          2  
          Cool site. Never saw that before!

          As for Mister Murdoch? It always seems to be the case that conservatives only tolerate cognitive dissonance when it involves their own hypocrisy, double standards and the inheretn contradictions in their platform. In those cases, their tolerance for congnitive dissonance in nigh infininte.

          In every other case, it's ZERO.

          ----------------------------------------------------------------
          Neither case is good.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by sodium (November 11, 2009 8:58 am ET)
          2  
          < News Corpse >




          Great site, tnx for the link
          Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (November 10, 2009 10:25 pm ET)
      13  
      This guy has exposed himself as a guy, over and over and over again who has a deep-seated hatred for non-white people, or the non-white cultures.

      I'm not saying he doesn't like non-white people, I'm saying he has a problem
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Quixote (November 10, 2009 11:59 pm ET)
        4  
        Nice one.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (November 11, 2009 12:03 am ET)
        7  
        Well, John P...

        Totally!! Murdoch did not mean the president was a racist. He may have "said" the president was a racist, and all he really "meant" was that the president hates white people. Not that the president is a racist, per se.


        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (November 11, 2009 1:15 am ET)
          3  
          Big difference between being a racist and hating white people...big, big difference. Two entirely different things... Yep...big difference.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by stopmurdoch (November 10, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
         
      We commend Media Matters for this call to action. We too are organizing to put financial pressure on the Murdoch empire to force him to be a more responsible citizen, or at least keep his halluciantions to himself. The venom he releases on society is truly a destructive force working against all of us who wish to build a more harmonious society. We can do better than Rupert Murdoch's world! Please join us on facebook at the facebook page "StopMurdoch This must End" or email us at stopmurdoch@gmail.com.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (November 10, 2009 11:12 pm ET)
      5 1
      Rupert Murdoch: No, I'm not a racist. I just give a platform to many racists on my shows.

      This leads to more money in my pocket.

      Thanks to the lower income tax rates enacted by the politicians voted into office by the racist whackjobs that my Media Corporation enables.

      If Amurka crumbles and dies as a result of my greedy lying, well suck it up, suckers!

      </greedy old killer bee from Aussieland>
      ~
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (November 11, 2009 12:08 am ET)
        2  
        Look, I watch Fock News. (I mean Fox News.) I love cable! I love the give and take, the to and fro! The exchange of ideas.

        And I can tell you this: Rumpert Birdshit loves Amurka!! You can take that to the bank.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by west0605 (November 11, 2009 8:38 am ET)
        5
      he said Obama made a racist comment and he was correct in the strictest sense of the term racist. he then said that, despite that gaffe, he doesnt believe obama to be a racist. thanks rupert for sensibility, thanks left for making race such a linguistic speed bump, and thanks all races for not giving two s***ts how people interpret racism because we've all been on the Earth for thousands of years prior to the hypersensitivity
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (November 11, 2009 8:52 am ET)
        4  
        Thing is, Obama did NOT make a racist comment. What is your definition of the strictest term of racism? I'd like to know how you view it.

        Rupert is not sensible on this topic, because again, Obama didn't make a racist statement.

        The left has not made race such a linguistic speed bump, it's the people who utter racist words, and or even worse, racist code words (black people portrayed as a cleaning lady anyone? Or Barack the Magic Negro courtesy of Rush L).

        It's not hypersensitivity, it's called, doing what's right.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by west0605 (November 11, 2009 9:48 am ET)
            4
          in the strictest sense of the term, if you say 'black' or 'white' youre racist. in reality, if you exist and have the ability to discern between varying stimuli - specifically you can discern differences in color, youre racist. if you are leftist and want to include ethnicity, you only have to assume that anyone can attach features to genotype, not a quantum leap for humans. if you want to get into muddy water and start talking about value judgments in any relation to the above, then youre likely a Democrat, you likely spend a lot of time worrying and arguing about unprovable points, and your positions are on sociological quicksand.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (November 11, 2009 10:39 am ET)
            2  
            if you want to get into muddy water and start talking about value judgments in any relation to the above, then youre likely a Democrat, you likely spend a lot of time worrying and arguing about unprovable points, and your positions are on sociological quicksand.--west0605

            What exactly are you refering to? Can you give some useful examples of "value judgments in any relation to the above" that "Democrat[s]" supposedly make? What "unprovable points" are you talking about?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (November 12, 2009 11:12 am ET)
              1  
              No specifics yet? Still waiting on west0605 to respond...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 12, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
                   
                Don't hold your breath. The guy tries to convince us of his intellectual capacity by using words like "stimuli" and "sociological," yet can't spell words like "you're" and hasn't figured out the shift key. No way is he going to actually give a reasonable response to your question.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bewildered (November 11, 2009 10:40 am ET)
            4  
            Let me get this straight. You first agree that comments made by President Obama were racist. Then by the end of your paragraph blast people for being hypersensitive. If I truly believed that you support those who, in your words, do "not giving(give) two s***ts how people interpret racism" then by your own accord why do you give two s***ts?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (November 11, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
            2  
            If that's supposed to be a legitimate use for the word "racism", then what the hell does the word "racial" exist for? Do you have any source to support this usage, or does "strictest" translate to "most extreme definition I could think up"?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (November 11, 2009 9:29 am ET)
      2  
      Really Rupert? You couldn't have seen this one coming a mile away? Crikey.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (November 11, 2009 9:35 am ET)
      4  
      Excellent!

      [http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/061121/061121_simpsons_vmed.widec.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (November 11, 2009 9:36 am ET)
      2  
      Murdoch's back must be killing him. He. can't tie yourself up in knots like this without hurting himself.

      Now...what will he do about Hannity and the faked footage from the Bachmann rally???
      Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (November 11, 2009 9:48 am ET)
      2  
      Hahaha wow Murdoch flatly agreed with Beck's assertion and now they say he doesn't agree. Talk about double speak.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 11, 2009 10:20 am ET)
      4  
      Well, he's saying that a non-racist made a racist comment. Obama's not a racist, but he said a racist thing.

      Because, don't you know, people who aren't racist make racist comments all the time. I mean, why would you assume that Murdoch thinks the guy is a racist just because he says that Obama made a racist comment?

      <end sarcasm>
      Report Abuse