About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Lou Dobbs: "Quit or Pushed?"

November 12, 2009 3:49 pm ET by Matt Gertz

In his penultimate broadcast, Lou Dobbs ran a story on White House communications director Anita Dunn's decision to leave the administration at the end of the month. In what now seems to be an ironic twist, much of the report ran over the caption, "QUIT OR PUSHED?" a question that today reporters must be asking about Dobbs himself.

It was a quintessential Dobbs report, featuring almost all the facets we have come to expect from his program. It was based on a conspiracy theory: At no point did Dobbs or reporter Lisa Sylvester present even the slightest bit of evidence that Dunn had left on anything other than her own volition, and neither mentioned that she was originally hired as communications director on only an interim basis, making her decision entirely expected. It included falsehoods: Dobbs, Sylvester, and Politico's Craig Gordon all mischaracterized comments Dunn made about Mao Zedong during a high school graduation speech earlier this year. It included a misleading claim intended to establish a pattern: Sylvester provided a list of four other "administration officials to leave recently," which included former WH communications director Ellen Moran -- whom Dunn replaced -- and Louis Caldera, the former director of the WH Military Office, both of whom left the White House in May.

If only the segment had included an attack on immigrants, we could have sent it straight to the Newseum as the absolute paragon of Dobbs reporting.

It's worth noting that there's significantly more evidence that Dobbs was pushed out than that Dunn was. Dunn had drawn fire from right-wing media figures like Glenn Beck who mischaracterized Dunn's remarks about Mao -- which were similar to comments numerous conservatives have made over the years; even Ann Coulter didn't think Dunn's statements were worth attacking. Dobbs, meanwhile, was criticized by two wide-ranging coalitions -- the DropDobbs campaign, which included Media Matters, NDN, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and NCLR, among other groups, and BastaDobbs.com, a network organized by Presente.org -- in response to his long history of using his CNN platform to spread hatred, fear, and conspiracy theories. Dunn leaving the White House was long-expected and doesn't take effect until the end of the month; Dobbs leaving CNN was unanticipated and effective almost immediately -- he announced he was leaving at the top of his final broadcast, and his staff was reportedly told he was on his way out only hours before yesterday's show.

And of course, there's this little tidbit from today's New York Times: "Months ago the president of CNN/U.S., Jonathan Klein, offered a choice to Lou Dobbs ... [he] could vent his opinions on radio and anchor an objective newscast on television, or he could leave CNN."

Luckily, CNN already has the graphics made up for its Reliable Sources segment on Dobbs leaving -- they just need to swap Dunn's head for Dobbs'

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by juliajayne1 (November 12, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
      3  
      NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) - Controversial CNN host Lou Dobbs bade the people of Earth farewell today as he embarked on a long voyage back to his planet of origin.

      Standing on a launching pad with his rocket ship at the ready, Mr. Dobbs addressed a crowd of dozens who came to wish him a safe trip and godspeed.

      "People of Earth, farewell," he said. "My work here is done."

      In his farewell speech, Mr. Dobbs acknowledged the irony of his being an alien but insisted that he had been on Earth legally.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 12, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
      2 1
      Howard Kurtz did write about this in today's Washington Post.

      Framing his move as a response to the urging of "some leaders in media, politics and business," Dobbs struck a populist tone, attempting to position himself as a political leader who would mount a campaign "to overcome the lack of true representation in Washington, D.C." He said that public debate was now defined by "partisanship and ideology" and that he would continue to speak out "in the most honest and direct language possible."

      Continue? Don't you have to be doing something already to continue it?

      Here's a clear sign that Dobbs doesn't have a clue, despite apparently being a smart man.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (November 12, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
         
      The answer for Lou Dobbs is he was pushed out. Good for CNN.

      As for Anita, I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if she got pushed out just like Van Jones. As soon as Beck or someone mounts a campaign against someone in the administration, instead of standing up to them Obama just gets rid of the problem. I guess he is choosing his fights wisely, but you'd like to see more of a backbone sometimes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LiberallySpiced (November 12, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
          1
        Choosing his fights wisely? Please. Even a blind man could see that Van Jones was a liability, not to mention a legitimate left wing kook. Think about it - would you actually want Van Jones advising the administration on policy? "Problem" is a very good adjective for you to use with the likes of Jones. Now as for Anita Dunn, let the cards fall where they will. Her contribution amounted to nothing more than yet another bobble head in an administration already overstuffed with spin doctors... et al, spending stimulates economies, unemployment has slowed, debt will create wealth, etc, etc. Explain to me her "Value Added" contribution anyway. When you listen to most of this crew it reminds me of the Stepford Wives.
        When Obama was promising me transparency, little did I know he really meant the crystal clear spin produced by his full blitz propaganda machine. Wish I had my vote back?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (November 12, 2009 11:22 pm ET)
             
          When Obama was promising me transparency, little did I know he really meant the crystal clear spin produced by his full blitz propaganda machine. Wish I had my vote back?

          The "Obama voter" (cough cough) is very concerned.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 13, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
               
            Does he really expect us to buy that nonsense? Why do these people come on here and pretend to be concerned Obama voters? What silliness.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by PolicyThree (November 12, 2009 6:47 pm ET)
        1
      I understand the objection to Dobbs at least in as much as his views are the radical antithesis of the Left. I don't clearly understand the eagerness to silence him a la Limbaugh, or what exactly constituted "hate" in the list of offenses on the DropDobbs site.

      Like,
      - What was "racially-charged" or hateful about questioning Obama's 'documents'? The mere fact of the question, or something more?

      - Why was it hateful to say the selection of Sotomayor was pandering to hispanics? It's his opinion, and whether it's true or not is debatable, but it's not out of the question. Or does Media Matters think they're the sole arbiter of what constitutes an 'acceptible' opinion? Hopefully not, because obviously (I hope), that would be not only dangerious, but sick.

      So, perhaps someone here could add some insight, at least those couple of items. Did CNN drop him in part because of Media Matters' efforts? Hard to tell. Did Media Matters push for such an outcome merely because he represented radical opposition to views that Media Matters finds acceptible? Also hard to tell. But maybe someone here could clear that up with a well-articulated explanation to the contrary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nooner (November 13, 2009 2:42 am ET)
           
        I suppose Lou probably wanted to be on a network that actually has viewers and is "fair and balanced". So, I'm guessing we'll be seeing Lou over at FoxBusiness News or Fox News. Viva La Fox!! Gotta love them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 8:18 am ET)
           
        I don't clearly understand the eagerness to silence him
        You do realize the campaign was for CNN to "drop Dobbs", and that Dobbs quit, don't you? As much as the right needs to feel persecuted, no one tried to "silence" Dobbs.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 13, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
           
        "- What was "racially-charged" or hateful about questioning Obama's 'documents'? The mere fact of the question, or something more?"

        Yeah, that couldn't possibly be racially charged. Every time a new president is elected we go through a time where every crazy white person screams that we need to see their actual long-form birth certificate. And that they need to pet it and kiss it. Please. Such foolishness. Grow up. This new Beck way of pretending you're only asking questions fools no one with any level of independent thought.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.