Lou Dobbs: "Quit or Pushed?"
November 12, 2009 3:49 pm ET by Matt Gertz
In his penultimate broadcast, Lou Dobbs ran a story on White House communications director Anita Dunn's decision to leave the administration at the end of the month. In what now seems to be an ironic twist, much of the report ran over the caption, "QUIT OR PUSHED?" a question that today reporters must be asking about Dobbs himself.
It was a quintessential Dobbs report, featuring almost all the facets we have
come to expect from his program. It was based on a conspiracy theory: At no point did Dobbs or
reporter Lisa Sylvester present even the slightest bit of evidence that Dunn
had left on anything other than her own volition, and neither mentioned that
she was originally hired
as communications director on only an interim basis, making her decision
entirely expected. It included falsehoods: Dobbs, Sylvester, and Politico's Craig Gordon all
mischaracterized comments Dunn made about Mao Zedong during a high school
graduation speech earlier this year. It included a misleading claim intended to
establish a pattern: Sylvester provided a list of four other
"administration officials to leave recently," which included former
WH communications director Ellen Moran -- whom Dunn replaced -- and Louis Caldera, the former director of the WH Military
Office, both of whom left the White House in May.
If only the segment had included an attack on immigrants, we could have sent it
straight to the Newseum as the absolute paragon of Dobbs reporting.
It's worth noting that there's significantly more evidence that Dobbs was
pushed out than that Dunn was. Dunn had drawn fire from right-wing media
figures like Glenn Beck who mischaracterized
Dunn's remarks
about Mao --
which were similar to comments numerous conservatives have made over
the years; even Ann Coulter didn't think Dunn's statements were worth
attacking. Dobbs, meanwhile, was criticized by two wide-ranging coalitions -- the DropDobbs campaign, which included Media Matters, NDN, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and
NCLR, among other groups, and BastaDobbs.com, a network organized by Presente.org -- in response to his long history of using his CNN platform to spread hatred,
fear, and conspiracy theories. Dunn leaving the White House was long-expected
and doesn't take effect until the end of the month; Dobbs leaving CNN was
unanticipated and effective almost immediately -- he announced he was leaving at the top of his final broadcast, and his staff was reportedly told he was on his way out only hours before yesterday's show.
And of course, there's this little tidbit from today's New
York Times: "Months ago the president of
CNN/U.S., Jonathan Klein, offered a choice to Lou Dobbs ... [he] could vent his
opinions on radio and anchor an objective newscast on television, or he could
leave CNN."
Luckily, CNN already has the graphics made up for its Reliable Sources segment on Dobbs leaving
-- they just need to swap Dunn's head for Dobbs'











Media Matters: On health care reform, the Fox News noise machine is cranked to 11
The media myth of Obama's "falling poll numbers"
How to annoy Glenn Beck in five minutes or less




Standing on a launching pad with his rocket ship at the ready, Mr. Dobbs addressed a crowd of dozens who came to wish him a safe trip and godspeed.
"People of Earth, farewell," he said. "My work here is done."
In his farewell speech, Mr. Dobbs acknowledged the irony of his being an alien but insisted that he had been on Earth legally.
Framing his move as a response to the urging of "some leaders in media, politics and business," Dobbs struck a populist tone, attempting to position himself as a political leader who would mount a campaign "to overcome the lack of true representation in Washington, D.C." He said that public debate was now defined by "partisanship and ideology" and that he would continue to speak out "in the most honest and direct language possible."
Continue? Don't you have to be doing something already to continue it?
Here's a clear sign that Dobbs doesn't have a clue, despite apparently being a smart man.
As for Anita, I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if she got pushed out just like Van Jones. As soon as Beck or someone mounts a campaign against someone in the administration, instead of standing up to them Obama just gets rid of the problem. I guess he is choosing his fights wisely, but you'd like to see more of a backbone sometimes.
When Obama was promising me transparency, little did I know he really meant the crystal clear spin produced by his full blitz propaganda machine. Wish I had my vote back?
The "Obama voter" (cough cough) is very concerned.
Like,
- What was "racially-charged" or hateful about questioning Obama's 'documents'? The mere fact of the question, or something more?
- Why was it hateful to say the selection of Sotomayor was pandering to hispanics? It's his opinion, and whether it's true or not is debatable, but it's not out of the question. Or does Media Matters think they're the sole arbiter of what constitutes an 'acceptible' opinion? Hopefully not, because obviously (I hope), that would be not only dangerious, but sick.
So, perhaps someone here could add some insight, at least those couple of items. Did CNN drop him in part because of Media Matters' efforts? Hard to tell. Did Media Matters push for such an outcome merely because he represented radical opposition to views that Media Matters finds acceptible? Also hard to tell. But maybe someone here could clear that up with a well-articulated explanation to the contrary.
Yeah, that couldn't possibly be racially charged. Every time a new president is elected we go through a time where every crazy white person screams that we need to see their actual long-form birth certificate. And that they need to pet it and kiss it. Please. Such foolishness. Grow up. This new Beck way of pretending you're only asking questions fools no one with any level of independent thought.