The Palin press orgy: Who cares?
November 13, 2009 9:46 am ET by Eric Boehlert
Want a perfect example of how the Beltway press distracts itself with trivia at the expense of substance and news that most Americans actually care about? Look no further than the self-induced trance over the perennially unpopular Sarah Pallin and her book release. ABC's The Note breathlessly announces it's the most important political story right now, and The Note's colleagues certainly seem to agree.
From The Note [emphasis added]:
But this is Sarah Palin's world -- and that's really all we can see from our porches right now.
There may be no better example of the power and perils associated with the former governor of Alaska than what we'll see over the next week.
There is precisely one superstar in the Republican Party -- and she happens, by choice, not to hold elected office, or feel as if she owes much of anything to anyone in the party establishment. (And you thought tea parties might be dangerous?)
On this Friday the 13th, the Palin craze is starting a few days earlier than anticipated -- with Oprah and an early copy of the book coming before the Barbara Walters interviews next week.
And from ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who claims Palin's book release is the biggest to hit the Beltway in nearly 15 years:
Can she recapture the Palin magic that made her a political phenomenon? Make herself a force beyond her staunch cultural conservative base?
I suspect that Palin, like Powell, will ultimately decide that a race is not for her. But the opportunity is there. No one else in politics aside from Obama can attract more cameras, mics and blog posts
What seems to be missing from the avalanche of coverage is any indication that people outside the professional Beltway class and her right-wing base actually care. I'm sure Palin's book, thanks in part to a cut-rate, give-away price, will end up on the best-seller's list. But authors do that all the time.
In terms of larger context, I'm not aware of any polling data that indicates Palin has a prayer of being elected president. In fact, the latest CNN survey finds that a strong majority of Americans think she is singularly unqualified to run the country. (i.e. She's relegated to Dan Quayle territory.) And of course, she's coming off her stint as VP candidate on the GOP ticket that lost an electoral landslide last November.
So I guess my question is, besides the larger and authentic one (who, besides journalists and GOP partisans, cares about Sarah Palin?) is, has the press ever treated an election loser the way it now treats Sarah Palin? Has the Beltway press ever turned an election loser like Palin into a political rising star, even though there's no evidence to suggest her stature has changed since last November's embarrassing thumping? (i.e. What "magic" is Stephanopoulos talking about?)
Just more liberal media bias, I suppose.


















How they live in 'teh village' and think that is all that matters. Then wonder why people hold them in such low regard and laughs at them. Next week Jon Stewart will have a wonderful time skewering them over their overblown affair with Palin.
As far as I have seen, the people seem to love the president and really enjoy having him as such. But, the press has set out to help the rightwing take him down and they have 'clintonized' this man since Jan. 21st, nit piking their way across the year with constant put downs and complaints.
One the other hand the press gorges on an orgy of Palin and flips over anything she tweets, says or movement she makes. And discusses it for days.
The people outside the fringe base cannot stand her and dearly wishes the press would get over her and quit boring us about this air head.
Can you explain that one?
Uhhh, the fact that many of them are giving them away with paid subscriptions to the sites or publications? That these same groups are offering discounted books for virtually anyone? And average everyday people don't get subscriptions to those site, rightwingers do.
Cheney, you'll swallow just about anything, won't you?
Get Sarah Palin's
Going Rogue: An American Life
Just $4.97 — Save Over $24!
(plus shipping)
Incredible Special Offer!
Does somebody need to explain basic economics to you? The people who bought these books up to trick you into thinking it was a bestseller are now trying to unload them on you.
In this competitive environment, some companies are more able to lower prices than other because they're secure.
BUT IT APPEARS EVEN THE MOST PROMINENT BUSINESSES ARE SCRAMBLING FOR SALES.
Walmart announced Thursday that it would sell its 10 most anticipated new hardcover books, to be released in November, for $10 each in effort to undercut Amazon.
Not to be outdone, Amazon lowered it's prices on these books to $9.
Walmart followed suit early Thursday evening, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The select books INCLUDE Sarah Palin's memoir "Going Rogue: An American Life". Sarah Palin Goes Down Cheap on Amazon: Just $9 for "Going Rogue," A $29.00 Book. WTF?...
(my bold and asterisks.Sorry, I can't put the font in red for you)
Yes, you have to buy something for free to take advantage of this spectacular offer. A subscription to the magazine of an online right wing propaganda outlet.
Follow along here, Hoosier. These are bought up in bulk, sometimes before the book is released to the public (do you ever wonder how books are called best-sellers before they're released? That should set off a normal persons BS detector).
The groups who buy these up in advance (most likely the same people publishing them), obviously, don't need them sitting around a warehouse. They get rid of them by offering them as a "prize" to people stoopid enough to subscribe to a print version of a website for free, while paying 5 bucks plus 6 bucks shipping for a book tailored to people who don't read books.
Is the little light bulb above your skull starting to flicker?
These folks just want whatever makes conservatives look bad. Especially if that conservative is an attractive woman.
Now according to language analysts, you would need about 6.3 years of college just to untangle and decipher what Palin just said. Considering Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh never even made it even half that far, there is no wonder they were completely smitten.
In short, speaking/writing at a high grade level does not always mean you are doing an effective job of communicating or are even very intelligent.
-This book retails for almost $29 — but you can get it FREE with shipping included with a one-year subscription to Newsmax magazine!
-This book retails for almost $29 — but you can get it for only $4.97 plus $5.95 for shipping — with a FREE four month subscription to Newsmax magazine!
So let's see. You forgot to mention that you get a free 4-month subscription. You know......a TRIAL subscrition. Something that many magazines give away for free to intice future subscribers. Too easy.
How what you posted changes anything is beyond me.
Let's see, Newsmax makes two offers.
Offer #1: A FREE trial subscription (inflating their numbers) which gives you the opportunity to take a book off their hands for eleven bucks (Inflating Palin's numbers, and taking your money).
Offer #2: A one year subscription to Newsmax (inflating their circulation numbers and taking your money) which includes a free book (inflating Palin's numbers, and freeing up warehouse space for the next worthless bulk-buy of books)
Well done. Do you see who the sucker is in this deal? It ain't Newsmax.
So you admit that this makes conservatives and Palin look bad? Well at least you have that going for you. Perhaps you realize more than you let on.
Bigger than Obama's book? Or the many inside views of the Bush Whitehouse and what went wrong? If that were true it would only demonstrate how willfully dumb the public is.
I believe he forgot the line where he said: "that is, until next month when the next BLOCK BUSTER political tell all comes out".
But probably thats why I'm not a paranoid right-winger, because the actual ones appear to be drinking the gutted-moose flavored Kool-Aid.
Imagine, a whole FIVE CHAPTERS in "her" book about her being a victim and for this, she needed another person's name on the cover as a CO-writer!!
I believe we ALL know full well how insulting it is to OUR intelligence to even consider Palin in a position of power or decision-making concerning the lives and well being of American citizens . .
But Limbaugh's still in charge of who's a Republican and who's a RINO...
---------------------------------------
The Midnight Review
Mum Is The Word
Who cares about Sarah Palin? This is rich.
Every time the woman has sneezed the past year it takes up half of MSNBC's or CNN's news hole and half of MMFA's, Huffington and Think Progress bandwidth. And all of that with sexism, misogynist remarks and outright lies. And now she doesn't matter?
Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that. Nor do we want you to look behind the curtain at the White House or DNC where Soros and his money men are running the country. Look over here instead at our Asia trip and our Jobs Forum.
Maybe the media should find the political views and policy stances of Obama advisors as newsworthy?? That is more important than the Palin book tour, that's for sure. How about the covering up of Jihadists in the U.S. military. Is that news?
MMFA and the rest of you leftists wouldn't know a newsworthy event or story if it hit you square in the face.
Strange.
If you don't want the media obsessing over her, then try not obsessing over her yourself for once.
The fact is, you couldn't if you tried.
Hmmm...I never thought about it that way. MMfA criticizing the media for their obsession with Palin is actually causing the media to become obsessed. So the only way to stop the media's obsession is to stop criticizing them. You right-wingers are so smart. Why didn't MMfA think of that? Lol!
Sounds a little like being elected to the Senate in order to run for President, now doesn't it.
Which is precisely why it takes up half of MMFA's, Huffington and Think Progress bandwidth.
>>Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that.
Keep polishing, there must be something in there...
>>Nor do we want you to look behind the curtain at the White House or DNC where Soros and his money men are running the country.
Righties are worried about the influence of rich businessmen?
>>How about the covering up of Jihadists in the U.S. military. Is that news?
Perhaps if you could prove it.
You can't fight a battle of wits unless you are armed.
Hey, let her bring it on. Anyone stopping her? Where's the conservatives, why aren't they putting her out there?
You said it yourself. Everytime she sneezes she makes news. Why not prove every media outlet, other than fox, WRONG??
Discuss policy changes in Afghanistan, Iraq; discuss the economy, health care instead of misinforming i.e. DEATH PANELS; try discussing any topic with knowledge, intelligence and without a partisan outlook . .
You're being totally disengenous. She was attacked because she's a hypocrite and she's fake. You don't take funds away from 'safe sex ed' and put it into 'abstinence only' when you haven't preached about abstinence to your own daughter. What is the Palin policy, do as I say, not as I do?
Yeah, I know you can preach to your kids and sometimes they don't listen, but ALL parents know what happens when you let your 16 year old daughter's boyfriend sleep at your house ["all the time"] and then not monitor the sleeping arrangements . .
Hence, 'the baby' . .
Do you think Ronald Reagan would have been elected if daughter Patty posed for Playboy fully nude BEFORE the election?
On a side point: Ever since Hillary ran for the Senate she was covered as a potential Presidential candidate. Any potential candidate is news. Can't you at least agree on that?
I'm all for the policy discussion. Let's see: Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer. Do any of these morons discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook? Talk about being naive and disingenuous.
How is she a hypocrite? Because her daughter made a mistake? That makes her a hypocrite? If she forced her daughter to have an abortion now THAT would have been hypocritical.
"Do you think Ronald Reagan would have been elected if daughter Patty posed for Playboy fully nude BEFORE the election?"
>> No probably not.
But then again Bill Clinton -- one of your heores I'm sure -- was elected after carrying on an illicit affair with Genifer Flowers BEFORE the election. And that affair was of course well documented. I guess you Libs took it out on Hillary by denying her the nomination. Makes sense.
It is hilarious, Republicans are held accountable for others' actions while Liberals can't even be held accoutable for their own actions.
Legally Bristol Palin didn't make the mistake, HER MOTHER made the mistake. Bristol was a minor when she was impregnated. Palin allowed her minor daughter to share a bed with a man in HER HOME knowing full well the consequences. The hypocracy by Palin is the advocation and funding for 'abstinence only' working for others but not her own child.
"But now, MMFA doesn't think she is a story. Pretty silly don't you think?"
Totally agree. Palin is a non-story. She is getting media attention because she is pretty. If she looked like 'Kay Bailey Hutchinson' she would have had her 15 seconds of fame.
I'm all for the policy discussion. Let's see: Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer. Do any of these morons discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook? Talk about being naive and disingenuous.
I thought we were discussing Palin?? Because Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Schumer, according to you, do not discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook, it's okay for Palin to do the same thing? Why not show everyone that she does have the ability to lead, that she's well read and and knowledgeable of current issues?
Bill Clinton's affair may have been well 'documented' but there were no photos in Playboy, were there? A little different . .
Pretty presumptuous of you to speculate who my hereos are but, FYI, Dr. Christian Bernard is one of my great heroes!!
-granting no-bid contracts to their friends?
-using torture?
-wiretapping American citizens?
-wrecking the global economy?
-politicizing everything they touched, including the DOJ?
-lying about the necessity of invading a sovereign nation?
-etc.
The difference between Clinton and any republican is that he never pretended to be holier than thou. The Republican Party: compassionless, scam artists, party of no values, liars, hypocrites, adulterers, thieves, child m* o* l* e *s* t* e* r *s, etc. You name it, they do it.
The republican members of Congress are messing all over themselves because terrorists will be tried in NY. Why? Not because the terrorists may be found not guilty, but because they don't want Americans to find out that a gang of thugs occupied the WH for 8 years.
OK, Cheney, the sexism and misogynism are subjective,so we can just leave those in your fevered imagination, but do you have examples of the "outright lies"?
I'll check back if I need a laugh.
Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see Palin with a brain, who knows SOMETHING about world affairs, the Middle East, finance and energy, besides her lame, drill baby drill slogan!
Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see a Palin who actually READS the newspaper!
Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see a LESS juvenile, more mature Plain, who doesn't publicly respond to each and every little things Levi says!
Palin can write 5 chapter books (5 chapters?) till the cows come home, but UNTIL Palin gets a brain, she is an absolute waste of time!
Now why would that be???
lol
Do you come to this site for news? That would be your 1st mistake. See, this site critiques the media. They aren't practicing journalism, they are providing analysis of "right wing misinformation".
So, to clarify, this post is regarding ABC's coverage of Sarah Palin.
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
Sometimes that makes me sad. But mostly, I just laugh my a$$ off...
Correction: MMFA does stories on the media's orgies over her.
MMFA does hit pieces, plain and simple. They want to pretend they have the only journalistic integrity left, when that couldn't be farther from the truth.
You reply by pointing to an MMFA story on media writer Lynn Vincent's anti-gay and anti-Democratic's writing.
So where's all the stories MMFA does "on Palin", rather than on the media (Vincent)?
And that is the problem. She is a story only as long as the media continue to treat her as newsworthy.
Of course, I don't have much hope of this cycle stopping, it is how the media works.
I don't see Pat Buchanan or Newt Gingrich as having an opinion that is current to the U.S. at this time, they are old pols who are past their times but; you still see and hear from them constantly.
Part of what MMFA does it point out these types of issues.
And attack and bash the politicians they don't agree with.
And attack and bash the politicians they don't agree with.
What is your point?
Everyone is partisan about something.
Depending on the web site I go to, the "topic of the day" is either going to save or destroy the world.
I guess if you don't like the opinion expressed here you don't have to point your browser at the site.
She sure seems to get your goat !
Truth seems to hurt you "green eyed" folks.
Bush and Co. treated them like crap and they all rolled over for him and were in awe of Rove's 'genius'.
Cheney did not speak to them for 8 years and they all go gaga when he show is utter lack of class by attacking the new prez.
Palin plays the poor victim of the media and they all go crazy trying to prove they don't hate her to Palin and the rightwing.
They act like she is some big hollywood star who dines to even acknowledge them and they all swoon.
If they are republican, nasty and lack class then the press deems them wonderful and goes over board in their feting of them. Republicans who are nasty are like the bad boy of the media's imagination to swoon over.
Bush and Co. treated them like crap and they all rolled over for him and were in awe of Rove's 'genius'.
Cheney did not speak to them for 8 years and they all go gaga when he show is utter lack of class by attacking the new prez.
Palin plays the poor victim of the media and they all go crazy trying to prove they don't hate her to Palin and the rightwing.
They act like she is some big hollywood star who dines to even acknowledge them and they all swoon.
If they are republican, nasty and lack class then the press deems them wonderful and goes over board in their feting of them. Republicans who are nasty are like the bad boy of the media's imagination to swoon over.
Ultimately though, I hope Palin keeps getting trotted out. Independents, moderates, and intelligent conservatives already recognize that she is a show pony and won't vote for her. This helps ensure that the PNAC/hyper-religious "base" remains in political exile as long as she is in the mix.
Leftys are in a real dilemma, on the one hand they pray Americans ignore her to lessen a threat to their grab for power and desire to move the country towards Cubamerica. But leftys understand that Americans don't come close to adhering to the tenets of socialism/progressivism and to attack her will only draw attention to how unamerican the lefty agenda is and how close conservative values reflect the patriotism they believe in. To attempt to denigrate her will only reveal the vastness of the divide between the values of the left and of Americans.
What to do, what to do? So in this blog they complain about media attention that has been given to her but yet on the media matters (for very little) in another thread, the complaint is about who assisted her in writing her book knowing that they will only attract attention to her by taking such action. What to do, what to do? It's got suck to be mm(fvl)and/or a progressive.
Speaking truth to/about progressives, all the while giving a shout out to dr. joe medicine crow! >:o
As to the rest of your post, the standard talking points sans facts are duly noted (Cubamerica, unamerican lefty agenda, conservative values = patriotism, values of the left versus "Americans", speaking "truth" to progressives).
Hey, you could be one of Sarah's speech writers.
Divisiveness,war mongering,intolerance,class warfare also are anti- American!!Calling every attempt to solve problems some type of radical "ism" is not the American way either.The push to go backwards and find some mythical lost American utopia that never existed is not a plan for improving the country!!
Your impugnment of left-wingers nationality and patriotism is digusting, immature, offensive, and not the least bit surprising.
Speaking truth to/about conservatives who arrogantly declare they are the only true Americans.
http://www.theweek.com/article/index/102830/Sarah_Palins_coin_controversy
Ah, plowedcon, once again you're baffled by your own inability to entertain two thoughts.
The problem with the media attention is that she was (and is) a media creation. She is an embarrassment to all but the most stunted far-right zombies, a cult figure built entirely of emotion and appearance, completely lacking substance.
The item about her book being cobbled together by yet another wingnut Svengali is just more evidence of her phoniness. The contradiction you see is entirely in that ant farm between your ears.
The only thing that really sucks about being a liberal is knowing that millions of my fellow Americans have critical thinking skills comparable to yours, and their votes count the same as mine. But the laughs you provide almost make up for that.
Trying to explain truth to truth -resistant wingnuts, and giving little American flags to guys & gals from our Cuban border to the Russian border, you betcha!
Well jeepers, we'll have to just wait and see how many threads are woven in the coming days regarding the former governor, imploring those mind dumb robots to stop paying attention to her.
Co-author schmo-author, who cares...it's all phoney, right?
Speaking truth to/about progressives and very much troubled by cost in carbon footprints of getting all those flags to those patriotic tikes from sea to shining sea. :<
Your synaptically challenged friends,
plowedcon and his pal, dr. joe medicine crow
x's & o's
Oh yeah, it's gotta be fear!
71% of those questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday morning believe the former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential nominee is NOT qualified to be president, with 29% say she does have the credentials to serve in the White House. CNN Poll: 7 in 10 say Palin not qualified to be president...
Palin's favorable rating of 40% is the lowest for her since she became widely known.
Palin could compete for the 2012 nomination because she is still widely liked by Republicans, 69% have a favorable opinion of her while only 25% view her unfavorable, BUT she may have difficulty succeeding in the GENERAL ELECTION, given that Democrats have a overwhelmingly negative opinions of her and INDEPENDENTS view her MORE NEGATIVELY than positively. Sarah Palin See Favorable Ratings Slide...
So just relax and let her destroy the conservative movement!
Speaking truth to/about progressives, whilst shouting out to dr. joe medicine crow and giving props to Mrs. Palin.
Hahahahaa. If Media Matters didn't matter, y'awl wouldn't care what was said here.
Don't worry, maybe dr. joe medicine crow's bro will turn things around yet. In the meantime, all the non-caring non-attention about Mrs. Palin's lack of authentic appeal pointed out by media matters (for very little) and by the socialist-progressives is a strong indication that we have nothing to fear!
In the meantime......
progressives continue to whistle past the graveyard.
Speaking truth to/about progressives with a shout out to the alinsky-nator, commie instigator.
You bet. "Here lies the Republican Party-Survived by the Teabaggers".
Hey PC, don't be mad!
YOU were the one who said Palin could re-energize Republicans, I just simply proved your point!
The ONLY people excited about Sara "lipstick on a pig" Plain ARE about 52% of Republicans!
THIS liberal lovesssss Sara "lipstick on a pig" Plain.
ANYONE who can energize ONLY half of her base, while completely turning off the rest of the country sounds like the perfect Republicans candidate for 2012!
Object-of-ridicule (that she's brought on entirely by herself), yes. Object of "hate", no.
I recall Palin's announcement as Vice-Spokesmodel for the GOP's 2008 product as one of the most enjoyable days of the past few years. I encourage all of you Real Americans to support Sarah of the North, or even better, find somebody who represents your "in touch with what's happening" values even better, Glenn Beck, maybe.
Keep running these pinheads, and if it doesn't work out, convince yourselves that you need to find somebody slightly less qualified to win over people like you.
As long as people who love people like Sarah Palin can keep telling themselves they're not well below average, the laughs will keep coming.
You might even say I love Palin. Anybody who can cripple the already sputtering GOP like she's done is ok with me.
This site reports on the media's promotion of the conservative agenda.
The media is devoting a lot of time to this nothing, has-been, joke of a political candidate.
Can you do the next step by yourself, or should I make some finger puppets for you?
art whistling through the proverbial graveyard progressives. >{o
The more you whine about Sarah, the more Americans see what they have to do to save the country from socialist-progressives.
With a shout out to dr. joe medicine crow, speaking truth to/about progressives.
ouch with ALL CAPS. That's just plain mean. ;<
Couldn't you instead just give me the media matters (for very little)'s Palin treatment? You know, just ignore me.....but with lots of non-appeal defining attention? :(
With props to my homies.....
The fact is that just about anyone with name recognition can top the book charts since Americans buy so few real books by real writers.
Well obviously you do MMfA! Please, pile on at will!