About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

The Palin press orgy: Who cares?

November 13, 2009 9:46 am ET by Eric Boehlert

Want a perfect example of how the Beltway press distracts itself with trivia at the expense of substance and news that most Americans actually care about? Look no further than the self-induced trance over the perennially unpopular Sarah Pallin and her book release. ABC's The Note breathlessly announces it's the most important political story right now, and The Note's colleagues certainly seem to agree.

From The Note [emphasis added]:

But this is Sarah Palin's world -- and that's really all we can see from our porches right now.

There may be no better example of the power and perils associated with the former governor of Alaska than what we'll see over the next week.

There is precisely one superstar in the Republican Party -- and she happens, by choice, not to hold elected office, or feel as if she owes much of anything to anyone in the party establishment. (And you thought tea parties might be dangerous?)

On this Friday the 13th, the Palin craze is starting a few days earlier than anticipated -- with Oprah and an early copy of the book coming before the Barbara Walters interviews next week.

And from ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who claims Palin's book release is the biggest to hit the Beltway in nearly 15 years:

Can she recapture the Palin magic that made her a political phenomenon?  Make herself a force beyond her staunch cultural conservative base? 

I suspect that Palin, like Powell, will ultimately decide that a race is not for her.  But the opportunity is there. No one else in politics aside from Obama can attract more cameras, mics and blog posts

What seems to be missing from the avalanche of coverage is any indication that people outside the professional Beltway class and her right-wing base actually care. I'm sure Palin's book, thanks in part to a cut-rate, give-away price, will end up on the best-seller's list. But authors do that all the time.

In terms of larger context, I'm not aware of any polling data that indicates Palin has a prayer of being elected president. In fact, the latest CNN survey finds that a strong majority of Americans think she is singularly unqualified to run the country. (i.e. She's relegated to Dan Quayle territory.) And of course, she's coming off her stint as VP candidate on the GOP ticket that lost an electoral landslide last November.

So I guess my question is, besides the larger and authentic one (who, besides journalists and GOP partisans, cares about Sarah Palin?) is, has the press ever treated an election loser the way it now treats Sarah Palin? Has the Beltway press ever turned an election loser like Palin into a political rising star, even though there's no evidence to suggest her stature has changed since last November's embarrassing thumping? (i.e. What "magic" is Stephanopoulos  talking about?)

Just more liberal media bias, I suppose.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by vwcat (November 13, 2009 10:05 am ET)
      9  
      see, this is the highlight of how the mainstream press is so out of touch with real people.
      How they live in 'teh village' and think that is all that matters. Then wonder why people hold them in such low regard and laughs at them. Next week Jon Stewart will have a wonderful time skewering them over their overblown affair with Palin.
      As far as I have seen, the people seem to love the president and really enjoy having him as such. But, the press has set out to help the rightwing take him down and they have 'clintonized' this man since Jan. 21st, nit piking their way across the year with constant put downs and complaints.
      One the other hand the press gorges on an orgy of Palin and flips over anything she tweets, says or movement she makes. And discusses it for days.
      The people outside the fringe base cannot stand her and dearly wishes the press would get over her and quit boring us about this air head.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:49 am ET)
        2 13
        You're an idiot. If a book is a #1 best seller and the media covers the book tour how is the media "out-of-touch" with real people?

        Can you explain that one?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (November 13, 2009 11:55 am ET)
          7  
          You're an idiot. When far right-wing groups buy thousands of copies of a book just to push it onto a bestseller list, the book has nothing to do with real people; it has to do with the far right.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:59 am ET)
            1 9
            Oh yeah...and your proof of that is where?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (November 13, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
              7  
              Proof that rightwing groups have bought many copies of this book?

              Uhhh, the fact that many of them are giving them away with paid subscriptions to the sites or publications? That these same groups are offering discounted books for virtually anyone? And average everyday people don't get subscriptions to those site, rightwingers do.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              3  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              3  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              2  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              2  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              2  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              3  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
              2  
              Hahaha just had to laugh at your name. Cheney2012 - you didn't get sick of Cheney being acting President when Bush pretended to be President for 8 years? In case you forgot, he ran the country into the ground.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
                2  
                Dammit my browser sucked and one double posted a billion trillion times
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MickD (November 13, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Actually that was almost like performance art.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by prtsimmons (November 13, 2009 7:17 pm ET)
                       
                    Yeah, normally a repeated post like that would be a bit annoying, but I kind of liked the refrain. Just keep repeating the truth until it sticks. ('Dick Cheney was the best Vice President ever - of Halliburton.' 'Dick Cheney re-wrote the constitution to ensure record-setting corporate profits.' 'Dick Cheney invented the fourth branch of government - the vice-presidency.' Pick one and repeat until the American public wakes up to the facts. )
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by Cheney2012 (November 15, 2009 10:35 pm ET)
                     
                  HA HA HA...I had to laugh at your abject stupidity.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
          5  
          Can you explain that one? (CheneyMMXII)


          Cheney, you'll swallow just about anything, won't you?

          Get Sarah Palin's
          Going Rogue: An American Life

          Just $4.97 — Save Over $24!
          (plus shipping)

          Incredible Special Offer!


          Does somebody need to explain basic economics to you? The people who bought these books up to trick you into thinking it was a bestseller are now trying to unload them on you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hoosier (November 13, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
            2 9
            You have to buy the subscription, dilrod. A lot different than saying the book is going for $4.95. And that book went to #1 a full month ago before the discounted pricing; a fact yuou faill to mention. You also fail to show any accounting whatsoever as too how many books have sold at what price. You're implying that the vast majority of her books sold at $4.95. You're even falsely calling someone else a dupe for not knowing this falsehood you claim with not one shred of supporting evidence.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Disputed Zone (November 13, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
              5  
              Yes! The cut-rate price for the book is an enticement to get the subscription, and as such doesn't reflect the book's true value, which is right up there with such treasures as the football phone.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 13, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
              3  
              You have to buy the subscription, dilrod. A lot different than saying the book is going for $4.95. You're implying that the vast majority of her books sold at $4.95

              In this competitive environment, some companies are more able to lower prices than other because they're secure.

              BUT IT APPEARS EVEN THE MOST PROMINENT BUSINESSES ARE SCRAMBLING FOR SALES.

              Walmart announced Thursday that it would sell its 10 most anticipated new hardcover books, to be released in November, for $10 each in effort to undercut Amazon.

              Not to be outdone, Amazon lowered it's prices on these books to $9.

              Walmart followed suit early Thursday evening, according to The Wall Street Journal.

              The select books INCLUDE Sarah Palin's memoir "Going Rogue: An American Life".
              Sarah Palin Goes Down Cheap on Amazon: Just $9 for "Going Rogue," A $29.00 Book. WTF?...
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
              5  
              Hoosier, are you wingnuts getting dumber all the time, or are you just yanking us here. From my link;

              This book retails for almost $29 — but you can get it for only $4.97 plus $5.95 for shipping — with a *****FREE**** four month subscription to Newsmax magazine!
              (my bold and asterisks.Sorry, I can't put the font in red for you)

              Yes, you have to buy something for free to take advantage of this spectacular offer. A subscription to the magazine of an online right wing propaganda outlet.

              And that book went to #1 a full month ago before the discounted pricing; a fact yuou faill to mention.


              Follow along here, Hoosier. These are bought up in bulk, sometimes before the book is released to the public (do you ever wonder how books are called best-sellers before they're released? That should set off a normal persons BS detector).

              The groups who buy these up in advance (most likely the same people publishing them), obviously, don't need them sitting around a warehouse. They get rid of them by offering them as a "prize" to people stoopid enough to subscribe to a print version of a website for free, while paying 5 bucks plus 6 bucks shipping for a book tailored to people who don't read books.

              Is the little light bulb above your skull starting to flicker?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 14, 2009 8:39 am ET)
                  1
                You are correct chicken hauler. This is how the game is played. Just ask Bill & Hill. One month you're on the best seller list thanks to your ideological backers, the next month you're on the discount rack at B&N for $5.95.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by jpeagle21 (November 13, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
              1 7
              Hoosier, you are assuming that they care about details. They don't. Who cares that you have to buy a subscription to a magazine to get the book at that price or that Publishers do this all the time to help sell books as well as magazine subscriptions. Nah...all they want to do is post that the book sells for $4.95. "Don't you see how cheap they are selling her book just to inflate her numbers!!!???"

              These folks just want whatever makes conservatives look bad. Especially if that conservative is an attractive woman.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
                4  
                Wow- you really aren't very bright are you? As has been pointed out - the subscription is FREE.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Har ! No wonder the wingnuts aren't very good at selling books. Even books like Palin's that are probably at a reading comprehension level that might work for Hoosier and JPeagle..
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Oddly enough, analysis of Palin's speech's reading comprehension level is actually very high. What is interesting is the way it is measured. Apparently you have to have a pretty good comprehension level to even figure out what Palin is saying. For example (from one of the debates):
                    What I would do, also, if that were ever to happen, though, is to continue the good work he is so committed to of putting government back on the side of the people and get rid of the greed and corruption on Wall Street and in Washington,
                    Now according to language analysts, you would need about 6.3 years of college just to untangle and decipher what Palin just said. Considering Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh never even made it even half that far, there is no wonder they were completely smitten.

                    In short, speaking/writing at a high grade level does not always mean you are doing an effective job of communicating or are even very intelligent.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by jpeagle21 (November 13, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
                    4
                  Lets see who isn't smart. Here are the 2 offers from Newsmax. Maybe you should take advantage of one of them and get Sarah's book.

                  -This book retails for almost $29 — but you can get it FREE with shipping included with a one-year subscription to Newsmax magazine!

                  -This book retails for almost $29 — but you can get it for only $4.97 plus $5.95 for shipping — with a FREE four month subscription to Newsmax magazine!

                  So let's see. You forgot to mention that you get a free 4-month subscription. You know......a TRIAL subscrition. Something that many magazines give away for free to intice future subscribers. Too easy.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
                    3  
                    I was right!

                    How what you posted changes anything is beyond me.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jpeagle21 (November 13, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
                        5
                      My point is that they give the book as a discount to help boost their subscriptions, NOT to artificially boost Palin's book sales. Get it?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Yes - I get how woefully ignorant you are.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Lets see who isn't smart...Too easy (JPEagle)


                        Let's see, Newsmax makes two offers.

                        Offer #1: A FREE trial subscription (inflating their numbers) which gives you the opportunity to take a book off their hands for eleven bucks (Inflating Palin's numbers, and taking your money).

                        Offer #2: A one year subscription to Newsmax (inflating their circulation numbers and taking your money) which includes a free book (inflating Palin's numbers, and freeing up warehouse space for the next worthless bulk-buy of books)


                        Well done. Do you see who the sucker is in this deal? It ain't Newsmax.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 14, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
                             
                          Wow. The fact that this seems to confuse them should explain alot to us about some of the arguments they make here.
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 14, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
                       
                    Are you now trying to prove yourself wrong, jpeagle? Because you just did.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
                6  
                These folks just want whatever makes conservatives look bad. Especially if that conservative is an attractive woman.

                So you admit that this makes conservatives and Palin look bad? Well at least you have that going for you. Perhaps you realize more than you let on.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by oldmaninblackforest (November 13, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
            1 7
            I suppose that didn't happen with the murderer, ted kenneys book?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
              4 1
              I don't think it was a surprise as there aren't that many Ted Kenney fans around.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
              4  
              Well it may have and it may not have. It sure would be nice if you weren't so apparently lazy and actually tried to come up with something like - oh, I don't know - evidence to make a point instead of just appealing to some hypothetical, general (and possibly false) sense of ideological equivalency.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
          6  
          CHENEY, If PALIN is so"in touch" with real people, how come she and gramps lost last year by over 10 million votes. Her book is a #1 best seller because it's being offered at a cut rate price,$4.95, and it's being bought in bulk orders by CONSERVATIVE organizations like the HERITAGE FOUNDATION.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 13, 2009 10:06 am ET)
      6  
      >>And from ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who claims Palin's book release is the biggest to hit the Beltway in nearly 15 years:

      Bigger than Obama's book? Or the many inside views of the Bush Whitehouse and what went wrong? If that were true it would only demonstrate how willfully dumb the public is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (November 13, 2009 11:35 am ET)
        2  
        >>And from ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who claims Palin's book release is the biggest to hit the Beltway in nearly 15 years:


        I believe he forgot the line where he said: "that is, until next month when the next BLOCK BUSTER political tell all comes out".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (November 13, 2009 10:08 am ET)
      8  
      If I were a paranoid right-winger, I would assume the Librul Media is hyping up Miss Sarah P. precisely because she would get destroyed by Obama in 2012.

      But probably thats why I'm not a paranoid right-winger, because the actual ones appear to be drinking the gutted-moose flavored Kool-Aid.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 13, 2009 11:19 am ET)
        5  
        Totally agree . .

        Imagine, a whole FIVE CHAPTERS in "her" book about her being a victim and for this, she needed another person's name on the cover as a CO-writer!!

        I believe we ALL know full well how insulting it is to OUR intelligence to even consider Palin in a position of power or decision-making concerning the lives and well being of American citizens . .

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tiredog (November 13, 2009 6:31 pm ET)
          4  
          Caribou Barbie wouldn't name the books she'd recently read...now, she's co-authoring a book? OMG.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (November 13, 2009 10:22 am ET)
      6  
      I work with a guy who likes Sarah. He thinks she is okay, authentic, and it is just character assassination that is making her look bad. (Yes, I am being serious, I am nearly quoting him.) She IS an authentic American. She does speak to and for a lot of people. My mother would have loved her (she was also charmed by Ross Perot! Blushing) The fact is, your favorite hairdresser, teacher, bank clerk, or real estate agent shouldn't be considered qualified to be President of the United States. I consider myself an educated and informed person, but I KNOW that I don't have what it takes to hold that office, I don't even have what it takes to work as an advisor to the person in the office. (But I would give my eye teeth to hang around and fetch coffee or make copies just to watch the real stuff happen. Man, what a ride that would be!)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 13, 2009 10:25 am ET)
      7  
      It's the cult of celebrity. Sarah is a tabloid quaking, facade shaking People Magazine glutting phony.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by srichardson (November 13, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
        5  
        And just dangerous enough to actually get elected by the right wing. The right wing often scream and cry about their freedoms being taken away, but the truth is that they are the ones who want to take our freedoms away. They do not tolerate people who have a differing opinion than their own. They do not tolerate families who don't look like their family. Look at the way Hannity and Beck and the other nutjobs treat people who call into their radio shows with differing views. They scream and demean them, never debate and just speak loudly so the dissenter can't get in any true facts. Palin and her draw on the right wing is something that we should take seriously bc if (God forbid) she would ever get elected, our country would change drastically.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (November 13, 2009 10:28 am ET)
      5  
      So Palin is chosen to be the running mate of John McCain, and during the process exposes herself as being completely ignorant of current events, past history, the Constitution, names of newspapers, what the role of the VP is in government, etc. and that made her a "political phenomenon"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (November 13, 2009 10:57 am ET)
        4  
        Yes, and her one espousement of the Veep's role was as part of the Unitary Executive nonsense. I was so happy to see Joe Biden shoot her down on that one! Can you imagine if Geraldine Jockette was actually in the job how easily show would have been swayed by her advisors? Or how easily Todd would have been swayed by her advisors.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 13, 2009 10:51 am ET)
      3  
      There is precisely one superstar in the Republican Party


      But Limbaugh's still in charge of who's a Republican and who's a RINO...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (November 13, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      6  
      Like Powell, Palin may realize a race is not for her? The only thing different is that Powell was not only qualified, but he was intelligent and rational, and I believe that if he ran for president, he could have been one of the greatest we would ever had, for he was a person who did not seek power, but could have had it handed to him... I would have voted for Powell...
      ---------------------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:05 am ET)
      2 14
      HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!

      Who cares about Sarah Palin? This is rich.

      Every time the woman has sneezed the past year it takes up half of MSNBC's or CNN's news hole and half of MMFA's, Huffington and Think Progress bandwidth. And all of that with sexism, misogynist remarks and outright lies. And now she doesn't matter?

      Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that. Nor do we want you to look behind the curtain at the White House or DNC where Soros and his money men are running the country. Look over here instead at our Asia trip and our Jobs Forum.

      Maybe the media should find the political views and policy stances of Obama advisors as newsworthy?? That is more important than the Palin book tour, that's for sure. How about the covering up of Jihadists in the U.S. military. Is that news?

      MMFA and the rest of you leftists wouldn't know a newsworthy event or story if it hit you square in the face.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hoosier (November 13, 2009 11:23 am ET)
        1 10
        This is a rather curious blog post, to be sure. It's the left-wing blogs that are feeding the very frenzy that this left-wing blog is now asking what all the fuss is about.

        Strange.

        If you don't want the media obsessing over her, then try not obsessing over her yourself for once.

        The fact is, you couldn't if you tried.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (November 13, 2009 11:28 am ET)
          8  
          In case you didn't notice, this was in response to two blog posts from ABC, not the other way around. And in case that's not enough, Media Matters is never mentioned in either of them.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
          3  
          If you don't want the media obsessing over her, then try not obsessing over her yourself for once.

          Hmmm...I never thought about it that way. MMfA criticizing the media for their obsession with Palin is actually causing the media to become obsessed. So the only way to stop the media's obsession is to stop criticizing them. You right-wingers are so smart. Why didn't MMfA think of that? Lol!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 13, 2009 11:24 am ET)
        6  
        "Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that."
        More precisely, America has already seen enough to render its final judgment. How much more indication of "professionalism" do we need aside from giving up and quitting an elected office in a last-ditch attempt to cash in on 15 minutes? OK, I'll see it and raise you a line of sight to Russia from her house.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:44 am ET)
          1 9
          "How much more indication of "professionalism" do we need aside from giving up and quitting an elected office in a last-ditch attempt to cash in on 15 minutes?"

          Sounds a little like being elected to the Senate in order to run for President, now doesn't it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (November 13, 2009 11:50 am ET)
            8  
            Uh, no it doesn't. That's probably the most ridiculous and dishonest attempt at a parallel I've seen in quite a while, and I've seen some doozies written here before.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
            6  
            It sounds like being elected Governor and then abandoning the job to write a $4.97 book and be on Oprah.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (November 13, 2009 11:33 am ET)
        7  
        >>Every time the woman has sneezed the past year it takes up half of MSNBC's or CNN's news hole

        Which is precisely why it takes up half of MMFA's, Huffington and Think Progress bandwidth.

        >>Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that.

        Keep polishing, there must be something in there...

        >>Nor do we want you to look behind the curtain at the White House or DNC where Soros and his money men are running the country.

        Righties are worried about the influence of rich businessmen?

        >>How about the covering up of Jihadists in the U.S. military. Is that news?

        Perhaps if you could prove it.




        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:46 am ET)
            12
          Ah yes..the non-response, response.

          You can't fight a battle of wits unless you are armed.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (November 13, 2009 11:47 am ET)
          6  
          "Keep polishing, there must be something in there..."
          LOL. Exactly. She's already polished, given her MILF status among the male conservative species, but you can only polish the hood so much when it becomes apparent there's nothing under it.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 13, 2009 11:47 am ET)
        6  
        We don't want to see a more "polished and professional Palin"??

        Hey, let her bring it on. Anyone stopping her? Where's the conservatives, why aren't they putting her out there?

        You said it yourself. Everytime she sneezes she makes news. Why not prove every media outlet, other than fox, WRONG??

        Discuss policy changes in Afghanistan, Iraq; discuss the economy, health care instead of misinforming i.e. DEATH PANELS; try discussing any topic with knowledge, intelligence and without a partisan outlook . .

        You're being totally disengenous. She was attacked because she's a hypocrite and she's fake. You don't take funds away from 'safe sex ed' and put it into 'abstinence only' when you haven't preached about abstinence to your own daughter. What is the Palin policy, do as I say, not as I do?

        Yeah, I know you can preach to your kids and sometimes they don't listen, but ALL parents know what happens when you let your 16 year old daughter's boyfriend sleep at your house ["all the time"] and then not monitor the sleeping arrangements . .

        Hence, 'the baby' . .

        Do you think Ronald Reagan would have been elected if daughter Patty posed for Playboy fully nude BEFORE the election?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 11:58 am ET)
            9
          I never said anything about her being attacked, just being covered by the media. But now, MMFA doesn't think she is a story. Pretty silly don't you think?

          On a side point: Ever since Hillary ran for the Senate she was covered as a potential Presidential candidate. Any potential candidate is news. Can't you at least agree on that?

          I'm all for the policy discussion. Let's see: Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer. Do any of these morons discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook? Talk about being naive and disingenuous.

          How is she a hypocrite? Because her daughter made a mistake? That makes her a hypocrite? If she forced her daughter to have an abortion now THAT would have been hypocritical.

          "Do you think Ronald Reagan would have been elected if daughter Patty posed for Playboy fully nude BEFORE the election?"

          >> No probably not.

          But then again Bill Clinton -- one of your heores I'm sure -- was elected after carrying on an illicit affair with Genifer Flowers BEFORE the election. And that affair was of course well documented. I guess you Libs took it out on Hillary by denying her the nomination. Makes sense.

          It is hilarious, Republicans are held accountable for others' actions while Liberals can't even be held accoutable for their own actions.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by walstib (November 13, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
            5  
            Vitter.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by vhw28672478 (November 13, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
            2  
            You are wrong Palin is a joke
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 13, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
            3  
            "How is she a hypocrite? Because her daughter made a mistake? That makes her a hypocrite?"

            Legally Bristol Palin didn't make the mistake, HER MOTHER made the mistake. Bristol was a minor when she was impregnated. Palin allowed her minor daughter to share a bed with a man in HER HOME knowing full well the consequences. The hypocracy by Palin is the advocation and funding for 'abstinence only' working for others but not her own child.

            "But now, MMFA doesn't think she is a story. Pretty silly don't you think?"

            Totally agree. Palin is a non-story. She is getting media attention because she is pretty. If she looked like 'Kay Bailey Hutchinson' she would have had her 15 seconds of fame.

            I'm all for the policy discussion. Let's see: Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer. Do any of these morons discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook? Talk about being naive and disingenuous.

            I thought we were discussing Palin?? Because Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Schumer, according to you, do not discuss policy from a non-partisan outlook, it's okay for Palin to do the same thing? Why not show everyone that she does have the ability to lead, that she's well read and and knowledgeable of current issues?

            Bill Clinton's affair may have been well 'documented' but there were no photos in Playboy, were there? A little different . .

            Pretty presumptuous of you to speculate who my hereos are but, FYI, Dr. Christian Bernard is one of my great heroes!!

            Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (November 14, 2009 1:26 am ET)
            1  
            If you want to talk about accountability, when are Bush and Cheney going to stand trial for:
            -granting no-bid contracts to their friends?
            -using torture?
            -wiretapping American citizens?
            -wrecking the global economy?
            -politicizing everything they touched, including the DOJ?
            -lying about the necessity of invading a sovereign nation?
            -etc.

            The difference between Clinton and any republican is that he never pretended to be holier than thou. The Republican Party: compassionless, scam artists, party of no values, liars, hypocrites, adulterers, thieves, child m* o* l* e *s* t* e* r *s, etc. You name it, they do it.

            The republican members of Congress are messing all over themselves because terrorists will be tried in NY. Why? Not because the terrorists may be found not guilty, but because they don't want Americans to find out that a gang of thugs occupied the WH for 8 years.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
        6  
        Every time the woman has sneezed the past year it takes up half of MSNBC's or CNN's news hole and half of MMFA's, Huffington and Think Progress bandwidth. And all of that with sexism, misogynist remarks and outright lies


        OK, Cheney, the sexism and misogynism are subjective,so we can just leave those in your fevered imagination, but do you have examples of the "outright lies"?

        I'll check back if I need a laugh.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
          4  
          You know, Cheney, the only thing more boring than a troll is a lazy, incompetent troll. You're here for my amusement, at least go to the trouble of backing up your lies with some more outlandish lies. When you cut & run, it embarrasses hard-working right wing trolls everywhere.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
        4  
        CHENEY, You have just proved that you are as dumb as your namesake.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 13, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
        3 1
        Perhaps because we will see a more polished and professional Palin? No, America, you don't want you to see that.


        Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see Palin with a brain, who knows SOMETHING about world affairs, the Middle East, finance and energy, besides her lame, drill baby drill slogan!

        Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see a Palin who actually READS the newspaper!

        Perhaps, but I seriously doubt, we'll see a LESS juvenile, more mature Plain, who doesn't publicly respond to each and every little things Levi says!

        Palin can write 5 chapter books (5 chapters?) till the cows come home, but UNTIL Palin gets a brain, she is an absolute waste of time!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by OBRon (November 13, 2009 11:16 am ET)
         
      Ummm... to answer your own question, evidently YOU do.

      Now why would that be???

      lol
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (November 13, 2009 11:35 am ET)
      1 8
      Yeah, so unpopular and inconsequential that MMFA continues to do stories on her.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 11:58 am ET)
        7  
        Yeah, so unpopular and inconsequential that MMFA continues to do stories on her.
        - kydem

        Do you come to this site for news? That would be your 1st mistake. See, this site critiques the media. They aren't practicing journalism, they are providing analysis of "right wing misinformation".

        So, to clarify, this post is regarding ABC's coverage of Sarah Palin.

        Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
          6  
          Thank you, Old Ben. This appears to be very difficult for the wingnut mind to grasp. It's like saying if cops are so anti-crime, they should stop focusing on it by trying to find criminals.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
            5  
            I just can't fathom how many wingnuts show up here demanding that this website "cover" some story they'd like to see covered.

            Sometimes that makes me sad. But mostly, I just laugh my a$$ off...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
              5  
              And thanks for understanding my very badly-written thought. Of course, I meant that if cops were anti-crime, they wouldn't spend so much of their work days looking for criminals.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
        3  
        Yeah, so unpopular and inconsequential that MMFA continues to do stories on her.

        Correction: MMFA does stories on the media's orgies over her.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (November 13, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
          1 4
          Really? Tell me what media coverage this story is about: http://mediamatters.org/research/200911130011

          MMFA does hit pieces, plain and simple. They want to pretend they have the only journalistic integrity left, when that couldn't be farther from the truth.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
            4  
            Above you claimed MMFA does stories "on her [Palin]." To which I replied, no, MMFA does stories on the media.

            You reply by pointing to an MMFA story on media writer Lynn Vincent's anti-gay and anti-Democratic's writing.

            So where's all the stories MMFA does "on Palin", rather than on the media (Vincent)?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
            4  
            Reading for comprehension is the issue that just won't die for wingnuts.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (November 13, 2009 11:46 am ET)
      4  
      No one else in politics aside from Obama can attract more cameras, mics and blog posts


      And that is the problem. She is a story only as long as the media continue to treat her as newsworthy.
      Of course, I don't have much hope of this cycle stopping, it is how the media works.

      I don't see Pat Buchanan or Newt Gingrich as having an opinion that is current to the U.S. at this time, they are old pols who are past their times but; you still see and hear from them constantly.

      Part of what MMFA does it point out these types of issues.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (November 13, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        2 9
        "Part of what MMFA does it point out these types of issues."

        And attack and bash the politicians they don't agree with.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by walstib (November 13, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
          6  
          Vitter.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (November 13, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
          3  
          "Part of what MMFA does it point out these types of issues."

          And attack and bash the politicians they don't agree with.


          What is your point?
          Everyone is partisan about something.

          Depending on the web site I go to, the "topic of the day" is either going to save or destroy the world.

          I guess if you don't like the opinion expressed here you don't have to point your browser at the site.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
          4 1
          No CHENEY, MMFA just exposes the multipul lies and misinformation that come from the RIGHT WING on a daily basis.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
          4  
          And attack and bash the politicians they don't agree with.
          No one on the right ever does that.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NowApologize (November 13, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
      1 3
      For a bunch of folks not worried about Sarah Pailin ....
      She sure seems to get your goat !

      Truth seems to hurt you "green eyed" folks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (November 13, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
      4  
      The media as a whole needs to go into the therapy.
      Bush and Co. treated them like crap and they all rolled over for him and were in awe of Rove's 'genius'.
      Cheney did not speak to them for 8 years and they all go gaga when he show is utter lack of class by attacking the new prez.
      Palin plays the poor victim of the media and they all go crazy trying to prove they don't hate her to Palin and the rightwing.
      They act like she is some big hollywood star who dines to even acknowledge them and they all swoon.
      If they are republican, nasty and lack class then the press deems them wonderful and goes over board in their feting of them. Republicans who are nasty are like the bad boy of the media's imagination to swoon over.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (November 13, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
        2  
        Very well said.The media is indeed covering everything in opposition to the president/democratic agenda(ie Palin).Every looney conspiracy theory,outlandish attack gets covered no matter how ludicrous it may be.Just because Limbaugh,Boehner,Dobbs,Bachmann, Dick Cheney,McConnell,Liberman,Palin,Rove,Beck,Orly Taiz,Liz Cheney,say it doesn't mean its newsworthy every time or valid at all!! They should be asking why something from Right Wing Talk radio today is on Fox 'News'tonight and coming out of elected Republican mouths the next day..Can everyone say Dithering!!!We are not getting fair coverage on any issues important to the American people because of lies,distortion and bias.How many Democrats or Medical professionals are on TV explaining finer points of the healthcare legislation?They have to mainly spend time correcting the longlist of misinformation which should have been debunked right away by the media .Instead the media covers the opposition voices so much ,when they do get around to correcting or adding more details or perspective..its too late to change the misperception..ie Death Panels,Government take over,etc...I see letters written to the local newspaper that show this..the same terms,the same talking points.and use of outrageious conspiracy theories...Just today I read that Obama is more concerned about creating a dictatorship by not spending stimulus money until 2010 and 2012 to influence elections those years!!!!Really??!!Another letter said that making a decision on Afghanistan is above his pay grade like Abortions!!..Geeee that person must have gotten assurance from Karzai that its a good idea to send in more troops and he will take care of them and send them home real quickly with some Afghan money in their pocket to pay for their services.!!!Its little wonder that polls show what they show do.The media lets negativism and lask of facts drive opinion rather than intelligent debate!!!Why is no one asking the hawkish war escalators why its ok to lose more lives and spend money that way but not to get more people insured and prevent avoidable deaths.Why are pro-life concerns not extended beyond being a fetus!??Why are congressmen with most donations from insurance companies so against reforming health insurance ( which is all the legistaion really is- Insurance regulation).Nobody asks them directly when they are criticising on air!!!Maybe that's why Palin only twitters in her criticism and attacks so far....somebody like Katie Couric might ask her a real question this time!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (November 13, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
      3  
      The media as a whole needs to go into the therapy.
      Bush and Co. treated them like crap and they all rolled over for him and were in awe of Rove's 'genius'.
      Cheney did not speak to them for 8 years and they all go gaga when he show is utter lack of class by attacking the new prez.
      Palin plays the poor victim of the media and they all go crazy trying to prove they don't hate her to Palin and the rightwing.
      They act like she is some big hollywood star who dines to even acknowledge them and they all swoon.
      If they are republican, nasty and lack class then the press deems them wonderful and goes over board in their feting of them. Republicans who are nasty are like the bad boy of the media's imagination to swoon over.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (November 13, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
      3  
      MMFA can and should keep doing their job in pointing out the beltway bias (remember all that Lieberman and Edwards coverage after they were losing VP candidates? Yeah, neither do I).

      Ultimately though, I hope Palin keeps getting trotted out. Independents, moderates, and intelligent conservatives already recognize that she is a show pony and won't vote for her. This helps ensure that the PNAC/hyper-religious "base" remains in political exile as long as she is in the mix.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
      1 6
      Actually, it's the leftys who care. Because they fear her ability to rally the conservatives in this country.

      Leftys are in a real dilemma, on the one hand they pray Americans ignore her to lessen a threat to their grab for power and desire to move the country towards Cubamerica. But leftys understand that Americans don't come close to adhering to the tenets of socialism/progressivism and to attack her will only draw attention to how unamerican the lefty agenda is and how close conservative values reflect the patriotism they believe in. To attempt to denigrate her will only reveal the vastness of the divide between the values of the left and of Americans.

      What to do, what to do? So in this blog they complain about media attention that has been given to her but yet on the media matters (for very little) in another thread, the complaint is about who assisted her in writing her book knowing that they will only attract attention to her by taking such action. What to do, what to do? It's got suck to be mm(fvl)and/or a progressive.


      Speaking truth to/about progressives, all the while giving a shout out to dr. joe medicine crow! >:o
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tbone (November 13, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
        5  
        Apparently you didn't read my post right above yours. If Sarah's the GOP's best hope. . . .

        As to the rest of your post, the standard talking points sans facts are duly noted (Cubamerica, unamerican lefty agenda, conservative values = patriotism, values of the left versus "Americans", speaking "truth" to progressives).

        Hey, you could be one of Sarah's speech writers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (November 13, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
        5  
        She can rally a right wing ultra-conservative evangelicals..but she can't rally a brooad enough base of support to get elected nationally.She didn't with an established moderate like John McCain ..she sure isn't going to do it on her narrow credentials as the top of the ticket!I bet she couldn't get elected Senator from Alaska!!!Hmmm...Maybe not even Mayor of Wasila again!!!

        Divisiveness,war mongering,intolerance,class warfare also are anti- American!!Calling every attempt to solve problems some type of radical "ism" is not the American way either.The push to go backwards and find some mythical lost American utopia that never existed is not a plan for improving the country!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 13, 2009 2:24 pm ET)
        5 1
        One thing I can agree with is the lack of necessity in denigrating Palin. She does more than enough damage for the right almost every time she opens her mouth. The NY-23 race is only the most recent example.

        "the divide between the values of the left and of Americans"
        Your impugnment of left-wingers nationality and patriotism is digusting, immature, offensive, and not the least bit surprising.

        Speaking truth to/about conservatives who arrogantly declare they are the only true Americans.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 2:24 pm ET)
        5  
        I think you should take your considerable skills and put them to work helping simple Sarah figure out who moved "In God We Trust" to the edge of the dollar coin!!!

        http://www.theweek.com/article/index/102830/Sarah_Palins_coin_controversy
        Report Abuse
        • Author by hoosier (November 13, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
            5
          'Look over there!', Old_Benjamin. Bright, shiny things.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 13, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
          4  
          Oh my goodness... does Palin's vacuousness literally have no limit? I sure hope the next person to interview her asks her point-blank about this one: "Who exactly were you blaming for the moving of 'In God We Trust' on the new dollar coins?" That should be several more shovelsful of dirt on her political grave.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
        4  
        It's got suck to be mm
        It's got to suck to see your once great, white Presidential hope quit her Governorship, be justifiably ridiculed by the right and left, all for a five dollar book. Very sad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
        5  
        So in this blog they complain about media attention that has been given to her but yet on the media matters (for very little) in another thread, the complaint is about who assisted her in writing her book knowing that they will only attract attention to her by taking such action.


        Ah, plowedcon, once again you're baffled by your own inability to entertain two thoughts.

        The problem with the media attention is that she was (and is) a media creation. She is an embarrassment to all but the most stunted far-right zombies, a cult figure built entirely of emotion and appearance, completely lacking substance.

        The item about her book being cobbled together by yet another wingnut Svengali is just more evidence of her phoniness. The contradiction you see is entirely in that ant farm between your ears.

        The only thing that really sucks about being a liberal is knowing that millions of my fellow Americans have critical thinking skills comparable to yours, and their votes count the same as mine. But the laughs you provide almost make up for that.

        Trying to explain truth to truth -resistant wingnuts, and giving little American flags to guys & gals from our Cuban border to the Russian border, you betcha!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
            5
          dearestchickenslayer,

          Well jeepers, we'll have to just wait and see how many threads are woven in the coming days regarding the former governor, imploring those mind dumb robots to stop paying attention to her.

          Co-author schmo-author, who cares...it's all phoney, right?

          Speaking truth to/about progressives and very much troubled by cost in carbon footprints of getting all those flags to those patriotic tikes from sea to shining sea. :<

          Your synaptically challenged friends,
          plowedcon and his pal, dr. joe medicine crow
          x's & o's
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 13, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
        5  
        Actually, it's the leftys who care. Because they fear her ability to rally the conservatives in this country.

        Oh yeah, it's gotta be fear!

        71% of those questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday morning believe the former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential nominee is NOT qualified to be president, with 29% say she does have the credentials to serve in the White House. CNN Poll: 7 in 10 say Palin not qualified to be president...

        Palin's favorable rating of 40% is the lowest for her since she became widely known.
        Palin could compete for the 2012 nomination because she is still widely liked by Republicans, 69% have a favorable opinion of her while only 25% view her unfavorable, BUT she may have difficulty succeeding in the GENERAL ELECTION, given that Democrats have a overwhelmingly negative opinions of her and INDEPENDENTS view her MORE NEGATIVELY than positively.
        Sarah Palin See Favorable Ratings Slide...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
          1 6
          For gosh sake pearlsbeforeswine, your capitalization and bold font seems to belie your 'lack of fear'. If she didn't matter, to you or media matters (for very little), then lefty world wouldn't be all kerfluffeled!

          So just relax and let her destroy the conservative movement!

          Speaking truth to/about progressives, whilst shouting out to dr. joe medicine crow and giving props to Mrs. Palin.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
            5  
            If she didn't matter, to you or media matters (for very little), then lefty world wouldn't be all kerfluffeled!

            Hahahahaa. If Media Matters didn't matter, y'awl wouldn't care what was said here.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
            5  
            Well, I don't know about all liberals. I can only speak for myself. I am afraid that Palin might become president. Not because she is so well-qualified or intelligent or that she even has a coherent position on anything. Far from it. Simply considering the US has elected George W. Bush previously, I see a precedent for the possibility of electing another relatively unmitigated disaster yet again.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
                5
              closedcranium,

              Don't worry, maybe dr. joe medicine crow's bro will turn things around yet. In the meantime, all the non-caring non-attention about Mrs. Palin's lack of authentic appeal pointed out by media matters (for very little) and by the socialist-progressives is a strong indication that we have nothing to fear!

              In the meantime......
              [http://chowderheadbazoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345282f769e2010535c59fc3970c-500wi]

              progressives continue to whistle past the graveyard.

              Speaking truth to/about progressives with a shout out to the alinsky-nator, commie instigator.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by New Frontier (November 14, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
                   
                progressives continue to whistle past the graveyard
                You bet. "Here lies the Republican Party-Survived by the Teabaggers".
                Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 13, 2009 9:28 pm ET)
            3  
            For gosh sake pearlsbeforeswine, your capitalization and bold font seems to belie your 'lack of fear'. If she didn't matter, to you or media matters (for very little), then lefty world wouldn't be all kerfluffeled!

            Hey PC, don't be mad!

            YOU were the one who said Palin could re-energize Republicans, I just simply proved your point!

            The ONLY people excited about Sara "lipstick on a pig" Plain ARE about 52% of Republicans!

            So just relax and let her destroy the conservative movement!


            THIS liberal lovesssss Sara "lipstick on a pig" Plain.

            ANYONE who can energize ONLY half of her base, while completely turning off the rest of the country sounds like the perfect Republicans candidate for 2012!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
        3  
        PC,rally what the 25%base that she appeals to, that is about it. actually PC i hope she is your parties nomminee in 2012,it will mean 4 more years for us in the WH and more seats in congress.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Media Mumblings (November 13, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
      1 7
      Who cares? Lol. This from a site that seems to be bubbling over with a myopic hatred for the woman. I don't agree with her on a great many social issues and some economic issues too, but I don't hate her for it no more than I personalize by polical/economic differences with Obama. Much of the left seems to be transfixed by political personalities of the moment. The mainstream media is no exception in this regard. If a person intellectualizes issues, principles and ideas, he won't care who the ever-changing political personalities of the moment are. Why don't you guys just move on and channel your hatred into something a bit more productive than politician hating.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 13, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
        5  
        When you say "left", do you mean "liberals" "classical liberals" "socialists" or "communists". I have trouble following your posts given your penchant for nomenclature parsing.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
        5 1
        a myopic hatred for the woman
        I'd bet my life that there isn't a single soul here who "hates" Palin.

        Object-of-ridicule (that she's brought on entirely by herself), yes. Object of "hate", no.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (November 13, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
          4 1
          No, I don't hate her, but I will admit that she annoys me worse than a mosquito bite I can't scratch! The woman just draws the worst right out of me. I admitted last night that I spend half the time she's on wanting to smack the smirk off of her...her, and Carrie Prejean. ARGH!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
            4 1
            I don't hate Palin. Wingnuts just like to accuse others of "hating" stupid things that they love, just because we notice that they're stupid.

            I recall Palin's announcement as Vice-Spokesmodel for the GOP's 2008 product as one of the most enjoyable days of the past few years. I encourage all of you Real Americans to support Sarah of the North, or even better, find somebody who represents your "in touch with what's happening" values even better, Glenn Beck, maybe.

            Keep running these pinheads, and if it doesn't work out, convince yourselves that you need to find somebody slightly less qualified to win over people like you.

            As long as people who love people like Sarah Palin can keep telling themselves they're not well below average, the laughs will keep coming.

            You might even say I love Palin. Anybody who can cripple the already sputtering GOP like she's done is ok with me.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (November 13, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
              4  
              "Vice-Spokesmodel for the GOP's 2008 product" I just love this description! It's like the "fancy pagent walking" thing that Tina did! I perfect skewer. Thank you for reminding me that she was so funny. Yes, one must have a sense of humor about these things. It really is funny. Michele Bachmann has this affect on me, too. Really, it is just the media saturation and Carrie Prejean who have gotten under my skin in the last few days. I need to go back to laughing instead of trying to scratch that annoying itch. (I was home sick for two days this week and watched Fox, and it has just ruined my outlook.)
              Report Abuse
    • Author by jpeagle21 (November 13, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
      1 4
      Yet the headline story on your web page is about Sarah Palin's book. If she is such a non-story who has no chance at becomming President, why put her as your headline? Fools.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 13, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
        3 1
        OK, one more time today, then I'm done;

        This site reports on the media's promotion of the conservative agenda.

        The media is devoting a lot of time to this nothing, has-been, joke of a political candidate.

        Can you do the next step by yourself, or should I make some finger puppets for you?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by NMFreelancer (November 13, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
         
      Sarah Palin was not, is not, and will never be, ready for Prime Time. Sarah cannot handle scrutiny. Sarah is a quitter. Sarah and Carrie Prejean must have taken whining lessons at the same beauty school. I could go on and on, but, really, Sarah Palin is not worth the strain on my typing fingers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
      1 5
      Geez, seems like a lot of harumphing for someone that doesn't deserve anyone's attention or for someone that will bring down those evile republicans. Me thinks thou........
      [http://chowderheadbazoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345282f769e2010535c59fc3970c-500wi]

      art whistling through the proverbial graveyard progressives. >{o

      The more you whine about Sarah, the more Americans see what they have to do to save the country from socialist-progressives.

      With a shout out to dr. joe medicine crow, speaking truth to/about progressives.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 13, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
        5  
        someone that will bring down those evile republican
        Names on the tombstones: "Palin", "McCain", "House", "Senate", "Presidency", "Sanford", "Huckabee", "Jindahl", "Dobbs", "2008", "2010", "2012"... Makes me feel like whistlin'...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (November 13, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
        2 1
        Lol. You are so blatantly self-serving. You apparently prefer the media not be criticized by anyone for their Palin obsession. Sucks to be you, I guess.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 5:25 pm ET)
        3 1
        PROUDCONSERVATIVE=COMPLETE FOOL.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 5:48 pm ET)
          1 4
          windyreb,

          ouch with ALL CAPS. That's just plain mean. ;<
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 13, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
            4  
            PC,if the shoe fits.....
            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (November 13, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
              1 5
              tornadicpinstriper,

              Couldn't you instead just give me the media matters (for very little)'s Palin treatment? You know, just ignore me.....but with lots of non-appeal defining attention? :(

              With props to my homies.....
              [http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/09A92hs3ms4ET/610x.jpg]
              Report Abuse
    • Author by SpacePedestrian (November 13, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
         
      Nothing whips the left into a frenzy more than Sarah.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by j238 (November 14, 2009 8:20 am ET)
         
      Actually, the high rank on Amazon is unrelated to the giveaway price on newsmax.

      The fact is that just about anyone with name recognition can top the book charts since Americans buy so few real books by real writers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 14, 2009 8:30 am ET)
        1
      The Palin press orgy: Who cares?


      Well obviously you do MMfA! Please, pile on at will!
      Report Abuse