About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Apparently, today is "Unintentionally-Revealing Comments Day" on MSNBC

November 16, 2009 3:30 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Earlier today, MSNBC's Pat Buchanan and Andrea Mitchell had an exchange that nicely illustrates much of the media's fundamental misunderstanding of what the word "authentic" means:

BUCHANAN: When I went into New Hampshire, I went down to a basement store, and they said "Get rid of the Florsheim shoes and the blue suits and the red ties.  We're gonna go get you what we call North Country Clothes: brand-new sweaters that look very old and all that stuff."  You saw me up there, Andrea.

MITCHELL: I know, you were authentic, Pat.

Old sweaters are not more "authentic" than Florsheim shoes and blue suits.  Nor are they less "authentic."  They're both just clothes.  Yet Andrea Mitchell thinks that Pat Buchanan wandering into a New Hampshire store and, on the advise of some unspecified "they," discarding his typical outfit in favor of new sweaters that are designed to look old was a mark of authenticity.

(It goes without saying that if Al Gore told precisely the same story Buchanan told, he would not be praised as having been "authentic.")

And just a few minutes ago, Politico's Andy Barr was on MSNBC, talking about the AP fact-checking Sarah Palin's new book:

This fight with the AP she's got going on is kind of funny ... It seems like they really took that slam from her personally, and in that fact-check they're really maliciously going after her, kind of point by point.

"Maliciously"?  This is the state of modern political journalism: When a news organization fact-checks false claims by prominent Republicans, a reporter calls it "malicious."

Me?  I'd call it "journalism."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by worrierking (November 16, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
      9  
      So checking her facts "point by point" is malicious?

      I didn't know that.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (November 16, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
        3  
        How many people are maliciously foregoing the fact checks on Obama and the Democrats? ...They should be so lucky as to have that level of malevolence directed at them...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (November 16, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
      12  
      Wearing clothes to make you look like something you're not is "authentic"? I would call it dishonest, myself.

      Journalists checking a celebrity's book for factual errors is "malicious?" I'd call it their job.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 17, 2009 11:21 am ET)
        1  
        Wearing clothes to make you look like something you're not is "authentic"? I would call it dishonest, myself.

        I'd call it "Halloween," personally. Then again, considering it's Pat Buchanan, maybe it's an even worse horror movie.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 16, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      2  
      Not sure I see the similarity in those 2 examples other than using words incorrectly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jurgan (November 16, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
      4  
      Old sweaters are not more "authentic" than Florsheim shoes and blue suits. Nor are they less "authentic."

      I'd say new sweaters made to look old are pretty unauthentic. You're wearing new clothes and pretending they're old. I hate when I see that at stores like Hot Topic- brand new clothes advertising TV shows from the mid-80's, made to look ratty as though the wearer had had them all along.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (November 16, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
        3  
        oh boy, I wear sweaters that really are that old! I no longer am tattered and out of it--I'm now hip! And authentic!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (November 16, 2009 4:03 pm ET)
      3  
      Take it one step further: It is only "malicious" to fact-check REPUBLICANS.

      Do you recall the same sort of "personal attack" meme when the AP fact-checked Obama's speeches to Congress this year?

      Didn't think so ...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (November 16, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
        3  
        Poor Sarah, checking for facts and finding none. Can't a rifle toting fake pregnancy mama get some respect here. Respect her for her celebrity!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jurgan (November 17, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
             
          fake pregnancy

          No, do NOT go there. That was a lie and we don't need to encourage it. Even if you don't care about telling the truth for its own sake, repeating proven falsehoods is one of the quickest ways to lose credibility.

          Or, at least, it should be. This site suggests that's not always true, but let's try to be better than that.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 16, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
      2  
      A painting can be "authenticated" by an expert. One's appearance merely is.

      But to play dress-up to please an audience does mark one as a "fraud".

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bdnera (November 16, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
      3  
      She could have saved everyone the trouble and published it as a work of fiction.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 17, 2009 8:38 am ET)
        2
      No, you could dress Al up in just about anything (remember the monks robe he wore panhandling for clinton) and he wouldn't be "authentic"!

      As for the AP fact checking....they should start with Al's tome. Independent research has found numerous inaccuracies in that.

      I wont hold my breath though.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 17, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
           
        As for the AP fact checking....they should start with Al's tome. Independent research has found numerous inaccuracies in that.


        Looks like you want to change the subject Tbone.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.