About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Pruden: Obama lacks "blood impulse" for what America "is about" due to "Kenyan father," "mother attracted to men of the Third World"

November 16, 2009 11:40 pm ET by Media Matters staff

From Washington Times editor emeritus Wesley Pruden's November 17 column (emphasis added):

So far it's a memorable trip. He established a new precedent for how American presidents should pay obeisance to kings, emperors, monarchs, sovereigns and assorted other authentic man-made masters of the universe. He stopped just this side of the full grovel to the emperor of Japan, risking a painful genuflection if his forehead had hit the floor with a nasty bump, which it almost did. No president before him so abused custom, traditions, protocol (and the country he represents). Several Internet sites published a rogue's gallery showing how other national leaders - the prime ministers of Israel, India, Slovenia, South Korea, Russia and Dick Cheney among them - have greeted Emperor Akihito with a friendly handshake and an ever-so-slight but respectful nod (and sometimes not even that).

Now we know why Mr. Obama stunned everyone with an earlier similar bow to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, only the bow to the Japanese emperor was far more flamboyant, a sign of a really deep sense of inferiority. He was only practicing his bow in Riyadh. Sometimes rituals are learned with difficulty. It took Bill Clinton months to learn how to return a military salute worthy of a commander in chief; like any draft dodger, he kept poking a thumb in his eye until he finally got it. Mr. Obama, on the other hand, seems right at home now giving a wow of a bow. This is not the way an American president impresses evildoers that he's strong, tough and decisive, that America is not to be trifled with.

[...]

But Mr. Obama, unlike his predecessors, likely knows no better, and many of those around him, true children of the grungy '60s, are contemptuous of custom. Cutting America down to size is what attracts them to "hope" for "change." It's no fault of the president that he has no natural instinct or blood impulse for what the America of "the 57 states" is about. He was sired by a Kenyan father, born to a mother attracted to men of the Third World and reared by grandparents in Hawaii, a paradise far from the American mainstream.

Previously:

Pruden: Obama is "our first president without an instinctive appreciation of the culture... whence America sprang"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (November 16, 2009 11:52 pm ET)
      18 2
      Omigod, it's hard to believe that anyone could actually 'go there'.

      It doesn't get much more offensive than that, does it? Personally attacking his parents, and suggesting that he has fatally flawed genetics because of that and then implying that his grandparents did a poor job of raising him while attacking the character of everyone in Hawaii at the same time?

      Wow.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rtwmd1230 (November 17, 2009 10:31 am ET)
        13 1
        This is the slimiest piece of racist filth to yet come from a supposed member of the MSM. If the rest of the press doesn't call the Times on this, they are equally culpable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by batbird (November 17, 2009 11:01 am ET)
          8 1
          The Washington Times is not generally considered to be main stream. Imagine a newspaper produced by the tea-baggers and you have The Washington Times. It has been just another media outlet for the right-wing Republicans ever since it was bought by the Sun Yun Moon way back when. You can expect this kind of crap from them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by brt (November 17, 2009 5:35 pm ET)
            1  
            Didn't Bush Sr. dump some heavy money into the Washington Times? I think I read that once.

            If I remember correctly, the WT was started by that Moonie guy.....
            Report Abuse
        • Author by terra gazelle (November 17, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
             
          There is a difference between the Washington Times and the New York Times..this is the Right wing Moony rag. Google Rev. Moon.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jkeithusmc (November 17, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
           
        I do not know what is worst, the ignorant racist that would write this garbage or the company that hires such morons? Any way you want to cut guys, Obama is our president for better or for worse. He was elected BY THE PEOPLE and for the people. So this is how we respect our elected leader, what a great nation we live in.....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (November 16, 2009 11:57 pm ET)
      15 2
      Dear Wesley Pruden

      Just curious... how sleazy do you suppose you need to go to be noticed by the lowest denominator of our society?

      Because with a sick op-ed like this one, you certainly are well on your way down into the slime of the rest of the right-wing media slugs!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (November 17, 2009 12:32 am ET)
      15  
      Obama has "a really deep sense of inferiority"??? Inferiority: code-word much?

      Beyond that, as much as I admire our president, I can't say I've ever noticed that self-esteem is much of a problem for him.

      One other thing: This has all the markings of a classic heads-I-win, tails-you-lose trap: If Obama doesn't bow, the same blowhards are caterwauling about how "arrogant" and "elitist" he is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 17, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        8 1
        They do cover their bases, Phred. He's the totalitarian anarchist, and a narcissist with an inferiority complex.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by roooth (November 17, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
             
          Yeah, and he's both an elitist and a sneaky Muslim terrorist! And both a Marxist and a Socialist - never mind the cognitive disconnect.

          I know - it's a desert topping AND a floor wax!!

          Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 17, 2009 12:55 am ET)
      10  
      Why the hell is who is mother was attracted to an issue?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NoSpinner (November 17, 2009 1:10 am ET)
      13  
      This is so far beyond the pale.

      We should initiate a boycott of everyone connected to this rag. That includes Tony Blankley.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by essbird (November 17, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        6  
        Just look for enterprises owned by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon and his Unification Church.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by essbird (November 17, 2009 11:46 am ET)
          1  
          http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/m/moonies/front_groups.htm
          Report Abuse
        • Author by roooth (November 17, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
             
          That's the real irony - the man behind this racist tripe is a non-white asian guy with a messiah complex.

          A non-American, non-white, self-proclaimed Jesus resurrected nutbag, selling white American bigots on even more hate and bigotry towards non-American, non-white guys. And the white bigots eat it up.

          Satan is laughing his ass off on this one.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (November 17, 2009 1:49 am ET)
      5  
      What is this "... he has no natural instinct or blood impulse for what the America of "the 57 states" is about." I thought America only has 50 States. Where did the other 7 come from? This shows the pile of c*** this column is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by machomaas (November 17, 2009 7:35 am ET)
           
        Obama accidentally said he had been to 57 states once on the campaign trail - check out snopes.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 17, 2009 9:05 am ET)
        1  
        Obama made a verbal gaffe and said something about the "57 states," and immediately corrected himself. It happens often to people whose minds are several words ahead of what their mouths are saying.

        Pruden thinks whom Obama's mother was attracted to is important because he's aiming for his base, the anti-miscegenation crowd like the Council for Concerned Citizens. Trent Lott said they had the values America needs to go forward. For Lott and Pruden, "going forward' means advancing to the 1940s.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by geetar59 (November 17, 2009 9:56 am ET)
           
        The "57 states" thing came from a slip-up Obama made during the campaign. At an appearance in Oregon, he said:

        "... it is just wonderful to be back in Oregon, and over the last 15 months we've traveled to every corner of the United States. I've now been in fifty .... seven states? I think one left to go. One left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit but my staff would not justify it."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by geetar59 (November 17, 2009 10:08 am ET)
           
        I was interrupted . . . anyway, the "57 states" comment became a cause celebre on the wingnut right because there are supposedly 57 countries in the Organization of the Islamic Conference (there are actually 60, but who's counting?) and this is yet more evidence that Obama is a SECRET MUSLIM!!!!one!!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by effort62look (November 19, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
             
          SECRET MUSLIM?? WHAT NOW I HAVE HEARD IT ALL! I think some people live in La-LA Land!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (November 17, 2009 11:52 am ET)
        5  
        He was making light of Obama's misspoken indication that he visited all 57 states during the campaign.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (November 17, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
          4  
          Did he misspeak, or did he just count the seven territories that have primaries? I haven't actually seen this quote in context.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (November 17, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
            6  
            Obama was tired, and had visited 47 states. He was getting ready to visit the 48th soon, and was talking about how many states he had campaigned in.

            So, thinking about 47, and thinking about there being 50 states total, he said "57".

            That's the whole story. He said 57. He meant 47. He was tired. The link above is to Snopes - they have the video.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 17, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
              1 6
              Wow. Really? Can I explain some dumb things the right has said as easily?

              He was tired. That will be the cover all for all dumb things said from this point forward.

              I mean if snopes said it was true!<roll eyes>
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mizani7 (November 17, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
                8  
                Do you honestly believe that the president thinks there are 57 states? Really?

                You really can't possibly believe that.

                Do you?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (November 17, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
                  4  
                  That's the killer comment WRT this issue.

                  Unless you think that Obama, born after we had 50 states, thinks we have something other than 50 states, it's clear that it was him simply misspeaking.

                  And since we know that he was talking about getting ready to go to the 48th out of 50 states, which means he'd visited 47, it's clear why he said 57.

                  And yeah, if you clearly know something, and you make an error like this, and it's clear that you were tired, any fair person would cut you some slack.

                  But, as we know, Obama's opposition isn't fair towards him. They're scandalous, unpatriotic scoundrels.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by effort62look (November 19, 2009 7:03 pm ET)
                 
              Thats sounds right! The only decent statement made out here so far!!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by sandtats (November 17, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
               
            He misspoke. It was at the end of the campaign and he was clearly tired, had bungled a few of his patent rally applause lines (was watching that day). He had at that point campaigned in 47 states, and mentioned that fact at each appearance, joking he had yet to visit Alaska, or his own Hawaii. He started to say that he was happy to report that he had now been to "all..." and he almost said 50, knew it was 47, and 57 came out. Unbelieveable that they would use this clear cross in synapses to accuse him of not being "one of us." How childish.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by dewwie (November 17, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
           
        Obama was the one who said he had visited 57 states campaigning and had two to go.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (November 17, 2009 1:58 am ET)
      9  
      Is this typical of Moonie Times' content? Or are they jumping the shark to spark interest in a newspaper that's gushing red ink?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Diosnomeama (November 17, 2009 1:59 am ET)
      1  
      I don't remember seeing any articles saying that Bush lacked sophistication and common sense because his dad coddled him his entire life.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (November 17, 2009 2:05 am ET)
      13  
      A stunning combo plate of racism, xenophobia, ethnocentrism and American exceptionalism, all accomplished in one paragraph.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ecotopian (November 17, 2009 2:08 am ET)
      10  
      I just added a comment at the Washington Times site indicating that Pruden's column was the most offensive thing I'd read in a long time. Then I read the other responses to his column. Unbelievably gross.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (November 17, 2009 7:01 am ET)
      11  
      This is not the way an American president impresses evildoers that he's strong

      Not sure when Japan became an Evildoer again. Didn't Pruden read about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? It was in all the papers, including his own.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by havbrush (November 17, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
           
        The Washington Times didn't exist then. It was just the twinkle in some wingnuts eye.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by sandtats (November 17, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
           
        Evildoers? LOL! Can't even get their U.S./Japan history straight. Some need to do their homework regarding post WWII Japan, apparently. Japan is probably our closest allie, along with GB, and the most peace loving nation/people in the world. As you say, remember Hiroshima, Nagasaki; my family certainly does.

        Japan doesn't even have a standing army, as per their Constitution, post WWII. Since the occupation there have been attempts by a few administrations to amend the Constitution and rearm, at the urging of the U.S. I might add. But in light of the Japanese people's history with war, their intense fear of war, re-armament won't happen.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 17, 2009 7:08 am ET)
      9  
      Not sure what to say, except this guy is one sorry excuse for a human being.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (November 17, 2009 7:34 am ET)
      8  
      This is utterly repulsive.

      WaPo = joke.

      End of.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (November 17, 2009 7:37 am ET)
        7  
        Oops! This is the Washington Times, my bad.

        And as we all know, the Washington Times would need to rise 63 levels of integrity to reach "joke" status. The Times can only dream of merely being a joke.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (November 17, 2009 8:19 am ET)
      13  
      Can't these clowns decide whether Obama is arrogant with a messiah complex or groveling with an inferiority complex? It can't be both.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 17, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
        4  
        Sure it can. It's like putting half your money on red, and the other half on black. A winner every time.

        Maybe I'll take out some ad space in the Moonie Times. I'll bet I could sell my sure-fire Beat the Casino method.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (November 17, 2009 8:56 am ET)
      9  
      The underlying point of all of these vicious attacks on President Obama has two goals. The first goal is to destroy his presidency by any means necessary. The second is to be able to say, "Look, we told you African Americans, LBGT persons, atheists, agnostics, and other people of color can't govern!" They want to be certain to drive the point home on the second goal to try to prevent it from occurring in the future. They are not willing to face the fact that this country is changing demographically and culturally.
      Mr. Pruden exemplifies both of these in his WT article.
      Being a person of color myself, I understand their goals, although they may never come right out and say them. It would be better if they did, but they won't because, underneath it all, they are the worst kind of cowards. These were the kids who bullied other kids, stole their milk money, and lied about it when their parents asked them about it, and their parents believed their version of events.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 17, 2009 9:06 am ET)
      5  
      Wow. I'll skip the obvious "it's not in his blood" stuff and look at the other stupidity.

      >>Now we know why Mr. Obama stunned everyone with an earlier similar bow to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, only the bow to the Japanese emperor was far more flamboyant, a sign of a really deep sense of inferiority.>>

      You figured all of that out from a bow, Dr Phil?

      >>It took Bill Clinton months to learn how to return a military salute worthy of a commander in chief; like any draft dodger, he kept poking a thumb in his eye until he finally got it.>>

      Is this juvenile shtick really the way an editor of a major paper writes?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by roooth (November 17, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
           
        When his boss is an extreme right-winger and the self-proclaimed return of the messiah, yes, it is.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by HellsKitchNYC (November 17, 2009 9:23 am ET)
      1  
      In addition to the racism, there's also the terrible editing.


      the prime ministers of ... Dick Cheney among them

      I was planning a vacation recently and considered going to Dick Cheney. Lovely beaches.

      Which leads to a pretty obvious question: who is the prime minister of Dick Cheney? Lynne? William Kristol?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (November 17, 2009 9:53 am ET)
      7  
      It's no fault of the president that he has no natural instinct or blood impulse for what. . .America. . .is about.

      Wow, just wow. The drops of blood argument in less than a year in office.

      The Washington Times = newsletter for the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (November 17, 2009 10:03 am ET)
      7  
      why is this not being made a big issue out of? Why is the press not slamming the Wash. Times for this sheer racist garbage?
      Is nothing too blatant, too disrespectful or so demeaning of our president by the rightwing that will stir the mainstream press to finally say 'enough!:
      They can spew treason and not a word is said. They can trash, lie and nothing is said. The rightwing pols can go overseas and undermine our foreign policy and demean this president to world leaders and nothing is said. And the rightwing can spew the most racist cr** and nothing is said.
      I am sick of the double standard and I am sick of the traditional press ignoring the highjinks of the right.
      They treat it as 'oh, the country is in a populist and angry mood'
      No. The country is being ginned up by the conservative media and having it fueled on the daily basis. The traditional media dares not call them out for creating this ugly mood and infecting the country with it's poison.
      Enough!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (November 17, 2009 11:33 am ET)
      7  
      Wes Pruden calls someone a draft dodger. He has the temerity to insist Democrats loathe the military and talks of "chickenhawks." Unbelievable! Wes Pruden had a chance to serve his country during a time of war. Instead he was a correspondent. I absolutely abhore people like him. People who insist that they are some kind of authority on patriotism, the military, and who is and isn't weak.

      Pruden is a sorry sack and a coward. If he respects the military sooooo much and feels he is worthy of commenting on other's being "draft dodgers" then he should have thrown down his pencil and pad and took up an M-14 in 65' and proved his mettle. Instead, he castigates others for doing essentially what he did. He asserts our President is inferior and weak because he bowed to the Emperor. since no other President has done this it is somehow proof of his assertion?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 17, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
        4  
        Well said, AChris. And remember, he never used the N word, so if any wingnuts pop up demanding people prove this is racist, don't waste your time.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roooth (November 17, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
           
        AND it isn't even true.

        There are pictures of Nixon bowing to Hirohito - the Japanese emporer we beat in WWII. Nixon bowed to him in the 60's.

        Eisenhower bowed to the French President.

        And, my personal favorite - George W Bush walking and holding hands with his mancrush, the Saudi King. And kissing him respectfully on the cheek. Not a word from the Right on that - and this was right after Saudis flew planes into the World trade Center.

        How is the Right not convulsing in shame at the thought of Bush's disgusting performance and two Republican presidents bowing to the French and the Japanese? Because they are demented shameless lying hypocrites - they don't even care if they get caught in their lies - they lie anyway.

        When they're caught, they just lie louder.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by 57chevy (November 17, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
           
        That is not true! Truman, Eisenhauser and Bush bow to others...look it up. Bush had the nerve to hold hands and KISS another man!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by arrow (November 17, 2009 11:45 am ET)
         
      I'm not an American so perhaps someone can explain to me the difference between Pres.Obama's bow and Pres. GW Bush's handholding and kissing of Arab leaders, especially Saudis. It is so difficult to grasp what is politically correct way to communicate the superiority of the USA these days.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bkxp5009 (November 17, 2009 11:54 am ET)
         
      So, let me see: Obama is inferior, miscegenated, ignorant, messiah, muslim sitting in a christian church for 20 years,born in kenya with an American birth certificate, peacenik,belligerent...add all the other contradictions here. This idiotic stew is concocted for republican small-brained consumption only. No democrat should take offense to such nonsense.
      Obama is all those contradictions, but cleaned the republicans' clock anyway?
      What does that tell you about the republicans?
      There's a reason why this kind of garbage works in the South, the region with the most illiterates, the most people without health insurance, and the worst schools.Need I say more?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wilsondg33 (November 17, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
         
      To All Terminate him right now !!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by glassone83 (November 17, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
         
      Sir,

      With all due respect, I can only believe that you wrote wrote for shock value. To believe otherwise would mean that there are still people in this country who are unable to learn lessons from history. You do not make me proud to be an American!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by martel (November 17, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
         
      Apparently, Eisenhower and Nixon didn't have that natural instinct or blood impulse either. They both found it necessary to bow...in Eisenhower's case, to Hirohito, who was the emperor who approved the attack on Pearl Harbor.

      Of course, Dubya must be lacking the blood impulse too. He may not have bowed to the Saudi king but he held hands with him and kissed him.

      Obviously, the writer is an idiot and racist as well as only a marginally competent propagandist. This bowing crap has been going on for thousands of years. The reality is that once the U.S. became a relatively weak nation under Reagan, the politicians running the 'gubmint' decided that we would pretend to be the rulers of the world and everyone would have to bow to us while we barely recognized their existence...which is why we are where we are in the world (struggling in two very minor wars with few friends who can be called upon for any purpose) right now.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snerd gronk (November 17, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
         
      Pruden has done a good job under DIFFICULT circumstances. Typing with one of them hoods on makes it hard to see good. Sometimes the holes don't line up right. But he was very 'prudent'. He got all his grammar good and he didn't make no spelling mistakes ... You gotta give Pruden his 'point'!

      Snerd
      Report Abuse
    • Author by martel (November 17, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
         
      Okay, people, aside from the idiotic content of the article in question, I've noticed that some who have left comments here aren't aware that the Washington Post and the Washington Times are not the same newspaper.

      The Washington Post is a marginally competent news source, and by that I mean that they get it right slightly more often than they get it wrong. This is a far superior performance to Focks Corp. or the Washington Times, though.

      The Washington Times takes great pains to appear on the surface to be the Washington Post, but is essentially the Loony-Tune News of the moonies (that's right, that famous American patriot Sun Myung Moon of airport beggar fame) apparently lifted from the reality distortion field of an unknown planet on the far right of the Andromeda Galaxy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by paul, here (November 17, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
         
      Mr. Pruden, truer words have NEVER been spoken.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Iaogirl (November 17, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
         
      Wow, people will stoop to all sorts of lows these days. Being from Hawaii, I am glad Wesley Pruden thinks we are "far from the American mainstream." If his nastiness is the American mainstream, I am glad I am not in it! I have been to Japan many times. Bowing is a sign of respect there. The more you respect a person, the lower you bow. President Obama is trying to show respect for the world after George Bush took a colossal dump on it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tas1936 (November 17, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
         
      Mr.Pruden's world view is ignorant, bigoted and disgusting. What American mainstream is he referring to?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jkeithusmc (November 17, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
         
      I do not know what is worst, the idiot that would write this racial and stereotypical garbage or the company that would employee such a person.
      Any way you want to cut Obama is our president. We was elected by the people and for the people and this is the kind of respect that he gets. What great nation we live......
      Report Abuse
    • Author by b1rd678351 (November 17, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
         
      It's interesting how Draft Dodger comes up when taling about Clinton, but Cheney's five deferrments are completely forgotten.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kuiw (November 17, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
         
      Wow, Wes so I guess u an attribute Obama's "stupidity" to his heritage or lack thereof. So what do you attribute the sheer idiocy of the Bush presidency to?? It took him only 8 years to completely destroy the economic heritage of a country that has been independent for all of 233 years.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DrBB (November 17, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
      1  
      I thought grunge was more of a late-80's early-90's kinda thing. Wesley apparently lacks the gut instinct for the appropriate pop cultural reference that real 'Muricans have.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Shabama (November 17, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
           
        Fortunately, our President Obama dosen't need to rely on Wes Pruden's
        "atta boy" to deem his actions appropriate. Perhaps Mr. Pruden will
        continue work on his upcoming MR. MANNERS TOME in silence... I'll bow
        to that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by snerd gronk (November 17, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
         
      Without an direct denunciation of this c(R)ude eugenics c(R)ap, one would have to say, Washington is 'behind the Times' ...

      Snerd
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Martinez1a (November 17, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
         
      I expected something better from someone at Media Matters. This is the worst piece of opinion journalism that I have ever read. It goes to show you that there are no boundaries to what opinion media will say to get an headline or two. Bring back the fairness doctrine and people like this will be forced to be held accountable or look for another type of work.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tlankford01 (November 17, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
         
      OMG WTF is this for real. I can not believe that this would make it to print. In addition this is proof of right wing editors manning the corporate bs passed off as news these days. What liberal media?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hawkflight (November 17, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
         
      Bowing in Japan is a matter of respect, certainly not groveling. To not bow would be an insult. It shows the world that our president is a statesman, something we haven't had in that office for many years.

      Sorry, Groveling just isn't a good word to use. Try again!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by irishbloke (November 17, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
         
      Oh you've got it so right, Mr. Pruden. My own grandfather was from Ireland, so fully one-fourth of me has absolutely no idea what this country is really about. That fourth of my blood impulse walks about in a non-american daze, sometimes mistaking the golden arches of McDonalds for frowns, or the Dunkin' of Donuts for the misspelling of the man's proper name, which we all know to be Duncan. Fortunately for me though, one of my other grandparents was from Poland, so when I'm not ganging up with four others of my kind to change a light bulb, I actually mistake my Irish non-american impulses for flashes of insight, as in the following . . . you are a dunce of the highest order. Bear in mind that this is the stupid part of me speaking.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rd1968 (November 17, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
         
      How does someone so ignorant of other cultures traditions and have the nerve to write something like this, and claim the president ignorant of the real world? Meeting the Emperor of Japan is the same as meeting the Pope, since his role through history until 100 years ago, was that of the spiritual leader of Japan.

      How does showing respect to a foreign leader or monarch denote weakness? These other people listed should be chided for their lack of respect or protocol a foreign nation. A sign of weakness? I think not.

      This is just another article that demonstrates the ignorance that permeates a section of our society still. 40 years after we supposedly learned better and matured past this kind of idiocy as a society.

      This irritates me so bad i can't even keep my thoughts in order to write. I will have to try this again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zeropointenergy (November 17, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
         
      Simply seems like bad advice from protocol handlers. I see no need to make a quantum leap into racist assumptions about the President's family or his mother's taste in men. Your assumptions are a much more disturbing transgression, than any democratic leader's nod to an emperor. Perhaps you are the one with "a deep sense of inferiority", rather than the President? His "Blood impulse"? -- What is a blood impulse? I think you may have to pull out your Aryan Brotherhood dictionary.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by denmarkvesey (November 17, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
         
      this drivel from Pruden should be know surprise,,,,it is he who was sired by the head of the WHITE CITIZENS ASSOCIATION in arkansas in the 1950s when anti civil rights movements peaked...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lede39571545 (November 17, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
      1  
      Hey, just read it and move on. This fool is wallowing in his racist, jealous anger and the President just keeps on moving down the road and garnering respect and admiration from the nations of the world. LOL.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by somnabulist (November 17, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
         
      disgusting. why am I not surprised to read such vulgarity from a rag like this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coach1 (November 17, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
         
      One of the nice things about America is that we have room for, welcome, protect and tolerate people like this Pruden person. It is indeed sad that he stoops to the level of personal and familial criticism of the holder of the esteemed office of The President of The United States of America. What a small minded, narrow, and schoolyard comment he makes. I think it says more about him and his capabilities than about our President who is trying to practice that promise to the world of offering an open hand to those who can unclench their fist to receive it. Pruddy, baby, grow up!.........How does it feel, Pruddy?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by brt (November 17, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
      1  
      This "commentary" is so offensive, I intend to write each and every one of their advertisers why I am boycotting their product.

      This cannot be ignored.

      I also intend to write a letter to the editor.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Llovebins (November 17, 2009 7:20 pm ET)
         
      Thanks, for bringing this article to our notice. It is rather sad, and shameful that journalist would reduce themselves to such a low grade.
      The president trips abroad should be a celebration of our national pride. N0 one nor any citizen should consider his trip otherwise.

      I am shock that this journalist had disgrace himself with this article.

      I will write give him my piece of mind. His article is Very very tasteless. Our president deserves better.

      I am shammed of Washington Times, for publishing this artice.

      This is just a sad day.

      As the saying goes!! "Uneasy lies the head that wears the grown" I am praying to my God almighty for our president to be a success story.

      May God bless him; his family; and our nation. Amen!!1
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tiffany78 (November 17, 2009 9:12 pm ET)
         
      This surely isn't an actual article, is it? Wow, I am truly stunned by the ignorance of this writer. Mr. Pruden (if it's socially acceptable to call you that), you are an idiot. Enough said.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Clacked (November 17, 2009 11:21 pm ET)
         
      Excuse my language but Pruden is an ass. "Blood Impulse", this is the worst type of bigotry and racism. "Blood Impulse", the nazis had a term for this "Blut und Boden".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by funkblast7 (November 17, 2009 11:23 pm ET)
         
      I'd like to know if Mr. Pruden is a Christian. If so, I'd like to know if he strives to be Chist-like. And if so, I wonder if he feels that humility is part of the Christian ethos. I certainly do.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dominicastar (November 18, 2009 6:18 am ET)
         
      This is truly the first time I am truly offended by a racist comment. I mean I am really, really angry! You can criticise the president, I’ll agree and disagree where I see fit, but to actually be so racist in your comments; to write it down; to have it reviewed by an editor and have it published – this is very offensive and I’m livid!
      Report Abuse