The Fox Nation asks: "Are We Watching a Failed Presidency?"
November 20, 2009 10:41 am ET by MMFA Staff
From The Fox Nation, accessed on November 20:



Media Matters: On health care reform, the Fox News noise machine is cranked to 11
The media myth of Obama's "falling poll numbers"
How to annoy Glenn Beck in five minutes or less
|
|
||
![]() |
||
but for us Americans no we are not seeing a failed presidency. Nut thanks for asking.
Fox asks a fair question- one that every responsible news organization should be asking as well. The fact that Fox asks it shouldn't concern anyone if they disagree and are confident in why they disagree.
It is worth noting the distinct differences between the current political landscape, and that of 1993. First of all, the Republican party polls about 20 points lower than it did at this time in 1993. In that way, this season more closely resembles the midterms of 1934 than 1994. Also, in 1992, Clinton drew about 42% of a smaller, whiter electorate. Obama drew a solid majority of a larger, more diverse electorate. His political strength is much deeper than Clinton's. Also, there was a wave of Democratic retirements in 1994. That is not the case today.
The Democrats will probably lose some of their new conservative members in the House. They may gain some progressives through primary challenges though. The Republicans will pick up seats in the House, but I doubt they can recover as fully as they did in 1994. The scenario is just not as favorable to them as it was then.
And Obama is a cinch in 2012, save for an extraordinary external event that none of us wants to imagine. The Republicans don't have a candidate who can compete with him. Period.
I realize that Dubya had a terrorist attack and a war under his belt by this point in his presidency, but I really think that people need to lay off Obama until he's had some more opportunity. It's not like he has a magic wand that can fix everything.
But they didn't ask that fair question four years ago. So strange.
And of course the question isn't fair now because when you inherit a broken country, you get free mulligans for life. Anyone who doesn't like that rule should avoid breaking the country when they have power.
The reason you get free mulligans for life is because it's a two party system, and you should never, ever, restore powers to the boobs who broke everything to begin with. No matter what.
(And of course all of Obama's failures are for being insufficiently liberal.)
It's a leading question that Fox Nation has obviously already answered for itself, as have the fans of Fox Nation. It's what they want to see. They "want him to fail". "Are we watching a very successful Presidency?" would be just as leading a question, but, off course, you'd never see anything like that on Fox Nation.
But it's nice of the wingnuts to volunteer, showing up and posting here to prove that Fox is able to fool some Americans into thinking that their idiotic questions are "fair".
Oh no! He's trying to do a terrorist fist bump! Run away!
I think the president is doing an OK job considering what he had on his plate from his first day in the big chair.
Our culture is too ingrained on the idea of instant gratification that we somehow expect one man to solve all the country's ills before dinner.
Only if we're becoming a failed state.
Thankfully, most people's opinions are outside the bubble created by Murdock and Limbaugh.
The Fox Fans had a very good opportunity, for eight years, to watch a failed presidency. It was hard for them to see it, what with the saran wrap, duct tape and little American flags obstructing their view.
They meant to write: "Are We Doing Everything we Can to Ensure a Failed Presidency?"
There are people who get very limited information, and they seem very sure of themselves as they repeat whatever they've heard.
Look at Pointy's comment above. He didn't like what I wrote about the wingnut sites, so he did an "I'm rubber, you're glue" reflexive response, made up of nothing but his fantasies, and his inability to come up with an original thought.
These people are the perfect blank slates for right wing propaganda.
A lot of Republicans here consider themselves fiscal conservatives ( Proposition 13 disciples, or their offspring), and I've talked to many of them who were very turned off by Palin as the VP pick.
There are also a lot of members of the far right Christian cult here, they went for Palin in much greater numbers.
Regardless of the candidates, a good number of people I've met vote Republican because their parents did, or their friends do. I'm sure this happens in largely Democratic areas as well, but I'm just reporting what I see around me; People who aren't really very interested in politics, but vote GOP instinctively.