About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Tea Party leader and regular CNN, Fox News guest Mark Williams repeatedly calls opponents "faggot"

November 20, 2009 6:27 pm ET by Eric Hananoki

Tea Party Express co-chair Mark Williams, one of the most visible spokespersons for the tea party movement, has repeatedly called his political opponents "faggot" on his blog. 

In a December 26, 2007, post, Williams referred to former President Jimmy Carter as a "creepy little faggot": 

On January 27, 2008, Williams wrote that members of a Vermont town shouldn't be called "retard CHUDs" but "genetically defective, circus freak, tiny cranium, hairy-arm-pitted female & faggot alleged male biological train wrecks who totally make the argument for forced Eugenics":    

As we've noted, the Tea Party Express spokesman has also called President Obama and Jimmy Carter "Nazis," and referred to Obama as the "racist in chief."  Williams is a birther who has forwarded claims that Obama was born in Kenya.

Despite his history of incendiary rhetoric, Williams is a regular guest on Fox News and CNN.  For instance, Williams has appeared on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 at least six times in the past four months:  November 2, October 26, September 15, September 14, September 10, and August 13.  He also appeared on CNN Newsroom in August.  On the September 14 edition of American Morning, reporter Elaine Quijano referred to Williams as one of the "tea party leaders" who "disavow[ed] any racist views" by protestors. 

Fox News, which frequently cheerleads for the tea party movement, has hosted Williams on Fox & Friends (numerous times), America's News HQ, and Hannity.  Williams also appeared on Fox Business Network's Cavuto

The Tea Party Express recently bragged to supporters that it's received "great television news coverage" from CNN and Fox News, and specifically cited a Fox News interview with Williams.

Given Williams' history of smears and slurs, and his prominent position with the Tea Party Express, will the media continue to extend "great coverage" to Williams and his group?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 20, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
      7  

      Up behind the bus stop, in the toilets off the street, there are traces of a
      Killing on the floor beneath your feet. Mixed in with the pi$$ and beer are
      Bloodstains on the floor, from the boy who got his head kicked in a night or
      Two before.

      (Chorus)
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      You can't love who you want to love in times like these
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      Love how you want to love and love who you please

      In the pubs, clubs and burger bars, breeding pens for pigs, alcohol,
      Testostorone and ignorance and fists. Packs of hunting animals roam across the
      Town. They find an easy victim and they punch him to the ground.

      (Chorus)
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      You can't love who you want to love in times like these
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      Love how you want to love and love who you please

      The siren of the ambulence, the dead pan of the cops. Chalk to mark the outline
      Where the boy first dropped. Beware the holey trinity- church and state and
      Law. For every death the virus gets more deadly than before.

      (Chorus)
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      You can't love who you want to love in times like these
      Homophobia- the worst disease
      Love how you want to love and love who you please
      (repeat)

      Chumbawamba
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (November 20, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
      4  
      Hmm, thanks for sharing. It puts some things into perspective. About you last question, I hope it does result in a lack of coverage, but given how Fox rewards hatred, probably not.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fairliberal (November 20, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
        18
      So MMFA cites 2 examples , one in 2007 and one in 2008. What year is this?

      But of course the Obamanation's association with a racist reverend over a 20 year period is not significant. What hypocrisy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 21, 2009 1:51 am ET)
        9  
        "But of course the Obamanation's association with a racist reverend over a 20 year period is not significant."
        If we're talking about one's OWN words, no, it's not. Until you can quote Obama saying, "god damn America," all you've got are associations. Williams is being called out for his own words, not that of his pastor. How many times did Rev. Wright say, "god damn America?" How many media appearances has Rev. Wright made?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (November 21, 2009 8:37 am ET)
        6  
        So MMFA cites 2 examples , one in 2007 and one in 2008. What year is this? But of course the Obamanation's association with a racist reverend over a 20 year period is not significant. What hypocrisy.

        2007!??! I will not condemn something so ridiculously old---unless it's those probably racist things that may or may not have been spoken by that colored racist Wright when Obama was maybe or maybe not there, probably.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (November 21, 2009 10:11 am ET)
        2 2
        Somehow I didn't think you would get the irony of a guy who goes on about "tiny cranium biological train wrecks who make the case for forced eugenics" decrying the "racist in chief".
        Report Abuse
        • Author by hoosier (November 21, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
            8
          The irony is that people who call people 'Tea baggers', knowing full well they are degrading them by using a term for a sexual practice largely used by male homosexuals, think that is perfectly acceptable; but a crime to use the word 'faggot'.

          Both are wrong. Liberals never think they are, though.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fantagor (November 21, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
            4  
            Um, the teabaggers adopted this term without understanding the connotation.

            So blame their ignorance, not liberals, for becoming the "teabag movement", which, when you think of it, is a pretty dexterous thing to pull off unless there's a lot of jump around involved.

            Randy
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (November 21, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
              3  
              Yep...
              [http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tea-bag.jpg]
              Report Abuse
              • Author by hoosier (November 21, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
                  7
                pete592,

                Do you not feel just the slight bit of embarrassment that you post a picture of a boy not even close to high school age to mock for using a sexual term? Do you not see the perversion and borderline pedophilia in that?

                Seriously. It's sick. He looks like he's maybe 11 years old.

                You should be ashamed of yourself.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (November 21, 2009 8:00 pm ET)
                  5  
                  What a pathetic attempt to throw this back on me.

                  The only one who should be ashamed is the responsible adult who gave him the sign to carry in public where the media was sure to be present and ready to immortalize him. If it means that much to you, maybe you should see if anyone at Free Republic had anything to do this sign getting into the hands of a minor.

                  No, I don't see any perversion or pedophilia in posting a picture of someone who is fully clothed. Are you ****ing kidding me with this???
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by hoosier (November 22, 2009 7:03 pm ET)
                      5
                    pete592, you're justifying the use of a sex act to slur conservatives with a picture of a very young male who is using the term. Yes, that is sick and perverted on your part.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (November 22, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
                      2  
                      Justifying the use of a sex act? To slur conservatives? When did 'conservative' enter the equation? It wasn't invoked by me.

                      I have merely cited evidence that there were protesters who were foolish enough to use the term early on. That doesn't make me the one who is sick and perverted.

                      As I told you, if this term is so abhorrently offensive to you, especially when displayed by what appears to be a minor, then your beef lies with the person who created this sign and the person responsible for putting it into his hands.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (November 23, 2009 12:24 am ET)
                      1  
                      BTW, Rachel Maddow also compiled other examples of Teabaggers using the term.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by hoosier (November 21, 2009 7:36 pm ET)
                5
              Do you deny that you don't use the term as a slur that connotes a sexual practice used mainly by the homosexual community?

              I seriously doubt anyone who went to a tea party protest was thinking of the Urban Dictionary definition when they called themselves that, the few who did anyway. And once they heard liberals snickering about it, by and large the name promptly stopped.

              The fact liberals use it now with such glee is a testament to their nastiness and proof they have no problem with sexual slurs, so acting innocent of that charge because it's a name some of them used is no excuse for what your true intent is, which is to demean and snicker. No different than this guy using the faggot term. Both are wrong.

              Your self-absolution would be no different than this fellow saying "Hey, faggot is a name that gays use when addressing each other." Or someone excusing his calling an African American the N-word because other African Americans use that name when addressing other African Americans. This fellow is wrong to use the word, but so are you guys and this web site for using the "teabagger' slur. Hypocrites, in fact.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (November 22, 2009 12:42 am ET)
                2  
                Yes, we deny that we use the term to slur anyone in that kind of a way.

                See, unlike your side, we don't think homosexual behavior is bad, so it's not a smear to associate someone with that behavior, first off.

                Secondly, it's the darn teabaggers who called themselves that first. It's not our fault that they were unaware of the slang term. But it's only offensive if you think that homosexual behavior is offensive. We don't.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hoosier (November 22, 2009 6:59 pm ET)
                    2
                  No, DellDolly, either you don't see the point, or you're just being obtuse.

                  If I called you a c*cksucker, it'd be no different than you calling these people teabaggers, with the connotation you now admit you're using. The fact that the Urban Dictionary definition is a practice used mainly by homosexuals and you use it to slur Tea Partiers, means you don't mind using homosexuals as clubs to bash people you don't agree with.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by benjr (November 23, 2009 10:46 am ET)
                    1  
                    That is totally wrong. You wrote
                    The fact that the Urban Dictionary definition is a practice used mainly by homosexuals and you use it to slur Tea Partiers, means you don't mind using homosexuals as clubs to bash people you don't agree with.

                    It doesn't mean that at all. It means idiot teabaggers who adopted a name without knowing what it meant don't get a free pass on that name. How can you absolve the teabaggers of responsibility here? You want to call yourself something, you better know the connotations associated with that word.
                    This is not using homosexuals as clubs. First of all, while I think I'm in reasonably good physical shape, I highly doubt that I could pick up the averaged-sized homosexual man or woman and use him/her as a club. Second, while I can only speak for myself here, I use the term to mock the ignorance of the movement, and for me it has no homosexual connotations at all. Sexual connotations maybe, but not homosexual.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Ruby (November 22, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
                1  
                I became familiar with the term "teabag" during high school, when it was (allegedly) an act carried out by the boys on the swim team to their unsuspecting peers in the locker room.

                Homosexuals don't have a monopoly on "teabagging", and it's not even a strictly sexual act.

                It is also true that the term was first adopted by protesters themselves. The fact that their willingness to call themselves that elicited giggles from media personalities is really not anyone's fault. There are also examples of right-wing personalities, like Griff Jenkins, using the term in a way that utilizes the double entendre (with his "let's teabag the white house" comment).

                Furthermore, by this point, the term "teabagger" has, kind of amazingly, become a pretty commonplace entry in the political lexicon. Enough so to attract the attention of the Oxford American Dictionary as a potential new 'word of the year' entry.

                I will say, however, that I do believe the initial onslaught of frat boy humor that erupted after the "tea party" thing first surfaced was immature and pretty embarassing. A couple of off-color jokes I could have handled, but certain media personalities went a little over board and I was disheartened to see journalists I really do respect, like Andersen Cooper (who did, actually, later apologize) engage in that behavior.

                But yeah, "teabagging" or "teabagger" is a phrase steeped in comedy. "F*ggot" is a phrase steeped in hatred and a history of discrimination. They are not the same, and there is no comparison.

                Also, interesting point of information--the photo posted above by pete was actually originally posted online by David Weigel, a conservative/libertarian journalist (I think he contributes to the NY times) and that photo is actually credited with being the origin of the "teabag" label. Also, Weigel is also credited with coining the phrase "birther" as a label for those who believe Obama was not actually born in America. This David Weigel character has contributed a lot to the lexicon of American politics in the past year!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hoosier (November 22, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
                    3
                  You're kidding me, right. The term 'teabagger', the sexual connotation, was coined by Dave Weigel using a photo of a barely teenage boy.

                  That is sick and perverted on Weigel's part. Exploiting sixth graders to justify middle school behavior on the part of liberals.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (November 23, 2009 12:02 am ET)
                    1  
                    Someone gave this 'barely teenage boy' the sign containing the sexual connotation to hold up at a public protest where members of the media would be present. That's where your anger should be focused, at the source.

                    You're attempting to project onto others the irresponsible actions of the adult(s) who 'exploited' a 'sixth grader' into publicly leveling sexual insults at members of congress.

                    The 'sixth grader' is fully clothed, which negates your silly accusations of perversion, sickness, and pedophilia.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (November 21, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
            2  
            If you're going to protest wearing a hat adorned with teabags without thinking of the possible ramifications, don't blame others for the inevitable tidal wave of cheap shots...
            [http://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/dsc02701.jpg][http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3608/3444686355_faec655bf7.jpg][http://media.naplesnews.com/media/img/photos/2009/04/15/Tax_Day__7_t160_160.jpg]
            Report Abuse
            • Author by hoosier (November 21, 2009 7:41 pm ET)
                4
              Cheap shots, pete? The way you use it is far more than a cheap shot. It's a slur using a sexual connotation, and nothing less than that. You're calling that is the same as calling someone a faggot is a cheap shot. There's no way you can justify it as being anything less serious than calling someone a faggot.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (November 21, 2009 10:09 pm ET)
                1  
                I am not offended by Williams' use of the term 'faggot.' Nor do I consider it funny or clever. My beef lies with the "liberal" media's willingness to provide a platform for someone who engages in such juvenile behavior. I do not expect or demand that anyone who routinely addresses the Teabaggers as 'Teabaggers' to be given the same platform as Williams has been given.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (November 21, 2009 7:23 am ET)
      3  
      I'm amazed that this tea party movement is even considered or regarded as a political movement. The amount of cash and air time these uninformed people receive/raise is stunning. I've encountered a few of these misnathropes and it was no picnic. I was called a leftie liberal communist nazi, (always a fav) I was told I have no respect for my country, Obama is dope and no change...Fox news rules and on and on. I was so stunned at this verbal attack I couldn't speak. And what started this vitriol?... I was wearing my Stanford University T-shirt. Their obvious misplaced rage seems to be spinning out of control, and I hope they crash and burn soon, but something tells this will not be the case. The elections in 2010 could get real ugly.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hoosier (November 21, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
          4
        I seriously doubt someone started calling you those things because you were just standing there wearing a Stanford T-shirt and minding your own business.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jjamele2880 (November 21, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
          5  
          Who cares what you think? You've already told us that you regard a photographed of a fully-clothed minor holding a sign as "perversion" and "borderline pedophilia." I'll ask my mailbox for it's opinion and get a more intelligent response than the one you could offer.

          Go buy a vocabulary, moron.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by benjr (November 23, 2009 10:47 am ET)
            1  
            Well said. I don't understand why hoosier comes here and posts anything. He/she clearly doesn't want to have a rational conversation, so what's the point?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (November 21, 2009 9:04 am ET)
      6  
      thank you MMFA for exposing this man for what he is. i sensed a real anger and rage from mark williams, and this proves my intuition was correct. it's fitting that he's affiliated with dick armey, given that armey called barney frank a "faggot" as well. the media is soooo fascinated with the "alleged" corruption of acorn, yet there's no media interest in the hateful rhetoric from the republican tea party movement. where are the media stories about the hate groups that are aligning themselves with the tea party movement??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 21, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
      3  
      Faggot? What, is this person ten years old?

      Immaturity is conservatism's biggest cross to bear. But it's one they bear willingly.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (November 21, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
        2  
        I have found that the most common trait among people who use the word "faggot" is a deep-set insecurity about their own sexual orientation. People who are comfortable with their own sexuality don't hate gays, and people who don't hate gays don't use the term "faggot." Period.
        Report Abuse