About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Glenn Beck throws a (political) party

November 22, 2009 4:41 pm ET by Zachary Pleat

Always one to prefer drama over substance, it was little surprise that Glenn Beck was nearly an hour late to his own rally in The Villages (a retirement community in Florida) on November 21. During the wait, Beck's patient and very non-diverse crowd was treated to supposedly live footage on giant video screens of him getting lost driving a golf cart to the rally. He admitted to have gone in a circle at least once, complaining that it took 50 minutes to drive just three miles. Soon afterward, his big tour bus pulled up alongside the crowd, and Glenn Beck took to the stage among loud cheers and applause.

Beck wasted little time before displaying his narcissism, declaring himself and all those present as the nation's "Constitution czar" just a few minutes into his appearance. He then tried to stir up the crowd with what appeared to be a reference to climate change, declaring: "The science is not settled. We will not sit down. We will not shut up. We will stand!"

Next, Beck decided to try to scare the crowd with the size of the national debt, throwing out big, impressive-sounding numbers like $12 trillion, the current level. Naturally, he did not mention that such numbers are far less scary with the proper context. When Beck brought up the projected debt 10 years from now, he seemed to acknowledge his own and Fox News' lack of credibility on this issue, saying that "Now, that's not from Glenn Beck and Fox News ... [that's] from WhiteHouse.gov." Beck then issued a call for all present to live within their means, declaring that "we must change our lifestyle, because our lifestyle is unsustainable." Beck continued to display his ignorance of how deficit-neutral legislation works, complaining that it's only "debt-neutral" because "somebody has got to pay for it."

Next, Beck continued on his crusade to expose the corruption in this country, though of course only corruption relating to anything and anyone connected to the Democratic Party, declaring that the $100 million in the Senate health care bill for Louisiana is a "$100 million bribe for one person's vote." Demanding that "The corruption must stop," Glenn invoked the case of former Congressman William Jefferson, and just like any good little political hack, he did not mention any Republican corruption problems. Beck then revealed that he was really concerned about this issue not because they are stealing from us, but our children.

As usual, Beck then brought up the example of the Weimar Republic of Germany. Glenn then tried to connect to his audience, saying that he knows "You're not the ones getting rich right now, you're not the one taking all of your money and buying precious minerals." No, it's Beck who is the one getting rich right now. (And better not let Beck's advertisers hear about his precious-minerals comment.) Beck then cited Nouriel Roubini to say that our country is building up an "asset bubble," which of course said will more or less mean the end of our economy when it collapses.

Beck then gave the requisite shout-out to Ronald Reagan, because as Beck put it, he always felt like Reagan was telling him the truth and treating him like an adult, even though Beck was a child at the time, and that he made it seem like there was always "hope on the other side." In that spirit of telling the truth, treating Americans like adults, and providing hope, Beck engaged the crowd in an analogy comparing America to the Titanic. Of course, Beck stated that it was the current administration that was "ramming it into the iceberg" with "health care, cap and trade, and stimulus." Beck used this analogy as a vehicle to get to the point of this whole rally, announcing that his plan for America will be like the lifeboats of the Titanic. After another shout-out, this time to the 9-12ers present, Beck continued this Titanic analogy to speak about why he created the 9-12 Project, which was so that nobody who sees what Beck sees is coming would feel alone.

Next, Beck explained the first step of his plan. He has formed a shadow cabinet to advise him on various issues including health care, defense, energy, education, and others, just like a political figure. Beck then astonishingly declared that "we need to start thinking like the Chinese", and announcing he would spend the next year with his shadow cabinet to create "a 100-year plan for America."

Beck then spent a few moments engaging in his famous emotional side, promising the crowd that if they followed him, they would be able to tell their children they did all they could for America. To do this, they could go to any of Beck's seven "education conventions" to learn "everything we need to know" such as an alternative history of the Statue of Liberty, and even community organizing, and of course Beck will "teach you how to be a politician" if you really want to run for office. (Will Beck train attendees how to quit before your first term as governor has expired, and improperly use your taxpayer-funded resources to put on a partisan political event, just like two of his favorite politicians?) Beck finished this plan up by taking an unsurprising potshot at ACORN, and announcing that he will organize voter registration drives, stating that "two can play at this game." Does that mean he will fire anyone who fills out voter registration forms fraudulently, yet turn in all voter registration forms as required by law in many states? Only time will tell.

After asking all those assembled to make plans to join him in Washington, D.C. "at the feet of Abraham Lincoln" next August on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's famous speech, Beck dispelled any rumors that he will run for political office, to the dismay of the crowd. He then made a pre-emptive strike against credible crowd estimates for his rally, saying that the crowd will be reported as "tens of thousands ... on the Mall." Incidentally, Media Matters has documented Beck's practice of inflating crowd sizes for the events that he promotes. Beck then promised that at the planned D.C. rally, the congressional representatives "will either come to us, or we will blow by them and put our own people in." Next, Beck declared that if what he demands will lead to the rise of a third party and destroy the two-party system, "so be it, they should to be destroyed."

Raising the fear that those in debt could be enslaved in the future, Beck called on everyone present to be an example for the country, to get out of debt and to not use violence - which he often feels the need to plead with his viewers to refrain from committing. He also called on his followers to be as religiously devout as the Pilgrims were when they landed. After all, as Beck said, "If He is on our side, who can stand against us?" Later on, Beck complained about South Park, Saturday Night Live, and The Daily Show mocking him. He then asked if everyone present was prepared to sacrifice everything for their children, to lose their jobs, their homes, to live like their grandparents -- or in many cases, their parents or even themselves - lived during the Great Depression, and nearly every hand in view shot up.

Beck concluded his rally by continuing with his Titanic analogy, then urging everyone to join him next year "as we take our country back, and usher in the next greatest generation of Americans." This was obviously no mere speech by a member of the media. This was a classic political rally, designed to rev up what is now undeniably Glenn Beck's political base to help him accomplish a political agenda. And it all leads to the question: Just how much political organizing is too much for Fox News?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 22, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
         
      I believe there should be a counter protest to stop this hate-spewer from soiling the memory of Dr. King's speech.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (November 22, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
      13 3
      The lines between "news", entertainment, politics, and outright calls for revolution are being blurred at FOX. How much longer will FOX be able to continue selling ad space to companies if their "news" commentators are out in public calling for armed insurrection against the government?

      "When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use. "
      Joseph Stalin

      This quote is applicable in a scary way to the actions of Beck. I am sure the kind of social chaos envisioned by Beck and his followers is not what the companies that continue to purchase ad space on FOX want, but since they continue to sell products they are willing to support FOX and people like Beck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achorn316 (November 22, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
      12 4
      If Beck is going to be a political figure, Fox News has a moral and ethical obligation to cancel his television show on their network.

      Giving an hour a day to a politician (without giving equal time) is against every journalistic ethic. If Fox News wants to keep what little credibility they have, they cannot allow Beck to be both host/commentator and politician.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by diamonds (November 22, 2009 8:33 pm ET)
        2 15
        This event has nothing to do with Fox. Just because some commentator takes up a position as a commentator - not a journalist - doesn't mean that they have to give up everything else! This was an event entirely sponsored by himself. Furthermore, being a commentator, he has complete editorial control of his program, with the caveat that he must commentate (a straight journalism program would in fact be in violation of contract).

        In short, there is no ethical obligation to do anything. None of his media including radio or television is journalism or news, any more than Colbert is news.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by achorn316 (November 22, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
          11 3
          Colbert is a parody of news, ON A COMEDY CHANNEL.

          If you are saying that Beck is comedy or parody or entertainment or whatever thats fine. He should then leave a NEWS CHANNEL, or are you admitting that Fox isnt a news channel?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by diamonds (November 22, 2009 11:55 pm ET)
            1 8
            Exactly. That is why I chose it as an example. Both shows are commentaries on the news, not journalism. Do not confuse the two. One is rooted in comedy, one is rooted in ideology, but that doesn't change the fact they are NOT journalism.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (November 23, 2009 12:33 am ET)
              9 1
              One is on a comedy network, one is on FoxNews!

              One is a parody of news commentary, one is commentary that's not parody.

              One is meant to entertain you. One is intended to inform you.

              If you can't see the difference between content on FoxNews and somewhat similar but in reality very different content on Comedy Central, then there's something very, very wrong with you.

              Oh well, we already knew that there was something wrong with you, based on your previous posts.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 23, 2009 9:13 am ET)
                   
                One is on a comedy network, one is on FoxNews!
                Or, in other words, they're both on comedy networks.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 23, 2009 9:35 am ET)
              3  
              Colbert--Comedy Central
              Beck--Fox NEWS [sic]

              Do you see the difference, diamonds. Colbert's show is not presented as anything but political, satirical comedy on a COMEDY NETWORK. Beck's program is presented as "fact-based" political commentary on a NEWS NETWORK. You may understand that it is commentary, but most of the IDIOTS who watch this man believe that they are hearing NEWS and FACT. One thing that they are NOT hearing is "conservative" ideology from him.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by epkklk851 (November 23, 2009 10:37 am ET)
                5  
                And if Glenn does start a political party, and Fox cross-polinates it with its other shows (a favorite tool) then Fox becomes the propaganda arm of this new party, and gives up any journalistic integrity or claims of impartiality. If Glenn creates a new party and Fox does not cancel his show, it is a serious breach of ethics.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (November 23, 2009 9:26 am ET)
          5  
          Beck--unlike Colbert or Stewart--is quite clearly starting a very serious political movement or organization with his "Plan", Education Centers, shadow cabinet and 9/12 Project. Not to mention his very serious blackboard diatribes against the Obama administration, and his calls to his audience for "action". He's using and will continue to use his Fox "News" show to promote his political movement. This goes way, way beyond just "taking a position as a commentator".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (November 23, 2009 10:22 am ET)
              6
            Your point being what, this is what makes the U.S. so great. He has every right to do the above. Unless you can show that he is breaking the law, too bad. You have two choices, try to build your own network, oh wait that is what MMFA does here.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 23, 2009 11:01 am ET)
              3 1
              Um, no, that wasn't the point of New Frontier's post. The point was that Beck is using a pretend "news" network to do what he's doing. Many of Beck's followers don't understand that they are not watching "news." Many of Beck's followers, like you, apparently can't differentiate between comedy/political satire and "news" any better than you can differentiate between the rantings of an insane demagogue and "news." THAT was the point.

              Most intelligent people from BOTH sides of the political spectrum understand the difference. Apparently, you don't.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (November 23, 2009 11:42 am ET)
              4  
              The posts above refer to ethical obligations. Why the hell are you using legality as a measuring stick?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (November 23, 2009 11:42 am ET)
              3 1
              He has the "right" to do it, but he doesn't have the right to do it and not be challenged on the appropriateness of it being done on what is supposed to be a legit news organization's dime when he's a representative of that supposed news organization!

              Our national debate is being poisoned by people like Glenn Beck with his toxic spew. We don't get to spend enough time talking about the real issues because we have to spend too much time fighting his nonsense and debunking his distortions and filling people in when he omits relevant info!

              No one has the "right" to claim more credibility than what they deserve.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by wdiazreb (November 22, 2009 11:22 pm ET)
           
        That's funny. You don't mension the other cable networks. You know the one that are real news, os have feeling running up there legs.Oh no thats fair and balanced reporting. Obviously you know nothing of morality or ethics. The lame stream media today is nothing more than a propaganda machine for this sorry administration.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Martha (November 22, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
      13 3
      Next, Beck explained the first step of his plan. He has formed a shadow cabinet to advise him on various issues including health care, defense, energy, education, and others, just like a political figure. Beck then astonishingly declared that "we need to start thinking like the Chinese", and announcing he would spend the next year with his shadow cabinet to create "a 100-year plan for America."
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Would someone PLEASE lock this guy up and throw away the key.....

      Beck is completely unhinged, delusional , absolutely divorced from reality and he is becoming worse, not better.

      Beck is definitely a danger to himself.............he can't even find his way around a retirement community in a golf cart!!

      Maybe he'll just wander into traffic one day......sigh.



      Report Abuse
      • Author by achorn316 (November 22, 2009 5:35 pm ET)
        11 2
        his shadow cabinet are the voices in his head.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Major Tom (November 22, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
          13 1
          I, for one, would Love to know who associates with him.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by timetravler100 (November 23, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
            1 1
            You can bet that whoever they are, they aren't America-hating communists like Obama associates with.

            But then, I guess if you're an America-hating communist, other America-hating communists are viewed as good peeps.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Major Tom (November 23, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
              1  
              Normally I'd just give you a thumbs down and move on, but I have to ask. Do you really believe people in the administration, and/or people that support Obama, hate America? I mean really man, I have travelled quite a bit, and I don't hate this country. What, outside of what the Glenn Beck's and Limbaugh's of the world say, makes you believe that anyone, especially the president (who has a truly uniquely American life) would hate the United States of America? Isn't more likely that we merely have different ideas on what benifits people most? Surely you don't think all liberals, progressives are self hating Americans. Doesn't it seem more natural that there are simply aspects where we see room for improvement? I mean this country didn't start perfect with slavery, women as second class citizens, etc... Why is it so hard to swallow that this country, albeit one of the best, if not hands-down the best, in human history, is still not yet perfect? Hate is a strong word, and very inappropriate in describing how I, and my friends, feel. It seems almost irrational when you say something so absolute... It certainly misjudges a sizable portion of our nation.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by timetravler100 (November 23, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
                1  
                YES! Obama and the hard-core leftists view this country with contempt and animosity. You didn't know? Start listening!

                For starters, look at the pictures of Obama during the campaign...he was the ONLY one on stage not covering his heart during the playing of the national anthem, and again on stage during the ceremony for the slain soldiers at the Ft. Hood shooting.

                Obama travels the world saying that America is an "arrogant country". He stated that America has gotten its wealth from "exploiting the third world" and is a "racist country". He said the American midwest is full of people who "cling to their guns and religeon and have animosity toward those that are different from them".

                Obama has said that the supreme court needs to consider cases from the position of minorities (a racially charged position?!?), and Jeremiah Wright. Obama's pastor and mentor for 20 years, says that the US is a "racist" nation.

                I'm running out of time. Do some reading and learn more. Just a tip...if you want real information, stop reading CRAP from Media Matters.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Major Tom (November 24, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
                     
                  Well while that is all very interesting, I don't see those (ahem) subjective statements, and observations to be proof of anything but your own self assuredness. I admit that the "clinging to guns and religion" comment was uncalled for... whether or not I agree with his is irrelevant, he shouldn't have said it (He said it in PA, not the midwest BTW). And I do think the SCOTUS needs to consider minority positions, in addition to majority positions... But I don't see any of your gripes as being actual evidence of anything... And I'd love to see your complaints with MMFA when you get more time, and have google at your disposal. Sorry for your bitterness, which is apparent. But at least you have your guns and your bible to go home to... LOL... J/K lighten up. I mean Sarah Palin and Beck have said far worse about Democrats...
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (November 22, 2009 6:14 pm ET)
         
      This sounds a lot like the Glenn Beck Cult. Of course Fox will not do anything about this except promote it as people against liberal spending, Obama, Pelosi, and blah blah blah. But when Glenn starts going after Republicans to destroy the two party system then Fox will have to do something about him.

      Finally, if being a czar is so bad...then why is Beck calling himself one? I guess it goes back to the whole 'if we do it is cool but if you do it its bad' mentality. Someone better tell Fox that they're employing a czar!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LittleFuzzy (November 22, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
      20 2
      his plan for America will be like the lifeboats of the Titanic


      That is:
      - Not enough of them
      - will rescue most of the super-rich, some of the rich, few of the middle class and poor, and less than a quarter of the government(crew)
      - few in the "lifeboats" will make any attempt to help others

      Beck in a nutshell
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 22, 2009 6:22 pm ET)
        8 2
        Best comment in a long time Fuzzy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by achorn316 (November 22, 2009 9:51 pm ET)
        7 2
        Beck thinks he is the Titanic...

        too bad hes really the iceberg.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (November 23, 2009 10:25 am ET)
        3 1
        God, this is a dangerous man. He is so similiar to Adolph Hitler it is not even funny. Don't let yourself be fooled. There is nothing more important to this man than to become more and more powerful. He must feed his narcissism. He wants to be a leader, a ruler, a "decider." He wants it and he wants it badly. We must hope the conditions never arise for middle America to actually take notice of this guy. He is bat$h!t crazy, narcissistic, delusional, paranoid, and did I mention bat$h!t crazy?

        Read Hitler's early speeches and compare them to Becks diatribes. The similiarities are striking.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (November 23, 2009 10:34 am ET)
          3 1
          You get the same creepy feeling he gives me. He is a very sick man. I had a friend who said that there would never be a fringe extremist in the U.S., instead, she said, our demagogues come for the center/populist stripe. I think she is right. We would never follow (en masse) someone with KKK type views, or someone like an Ayatollah, but we could follow someone who appealed to God, Guns, the Soldiers, and Family Values and that is what is happening here.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by miked420 (November 22, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
         
      During the "Glen Beck announces education convention" video, Glenn talks about holding the conventions in different parts of the country. He says: "..Up at Glenbeck.com you can actually vote for what city you want it to be in... cuz... quite honestly, I don't think I need to spend much time in Manhattan..." (crowd laughs).

      Why Glenn?? Cuz that's where 9/11 occurred?? I wish someone would have asked him that just to see his reaction and how stupid he would have looked and felt.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Wildworld (November 22, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
         
      If he's so patriotic, why do we need to start thinking like the Chinese? What's wrong with our systems?

      What's worse is that he has a following. I thought people were smarter than that. So sad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (November 22, 2009 8:38 pm ET)
      10 3
      I caught most of the video on YouTube. I found it horrifying. It is very clear that Glenn intends to launch a political group and somehow take office. He is planning on indoctrinating his followers. Hitler started in beer halls. Huey Long is the closest we've had in the U.S. to this kind of populist demagogue. What must Glenn say or do that is so clearly seditious as to result in his loosing his audience? How many people will get hurt before his falls from grace? The game is afoot, and it is a dangerous one. If he is disgraced he can take his money and live the rest of his life, but what about the others, who risk their jobs or savings if they follow him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by diamonds (November 22, 2009 9:16 pm ET)
        3 14
        What about Obama, who by the time he was inaugurated attracted the (iirc) single largest crowd of people in history? That isn't populist? In any event, there is nothing wrong with populism by itself, it simply means someone is... oh, popular. Obama is popular. Sarah Palin is popular. Glenn Beck is popular. Hitler was popular. Jesus was popular. Popularity by itself says nothing about good or bad, or even about those in opposition, it just shows that they are good at what they do, and nothing more.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by draftedin68 (November 22, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
          8 1
          Please diagram the above...

          The word "populist" was used as an adjective, not a noun.

          Please read slower.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (November 23, 2009 6:47 am ET)
          7 2
          I taught government. When populist is used, it has a particular meaning. It is not merely a large quantity of public affection or regard. It is an appeal to a large group, who may or may not understand what is being talked about. For instance, Glenn does a shout out to Reagan, but Reaganomics is generally credited as being at the root of our current economic crisis. You can't cut taxes by half, and increase spending without creating massive debt, and that is what has happened over the last 30 years. President Obama was and is an acknowledged politician. He was running for office. He talks about service to his country. His language is inclusive. Glenn Beck is an uneducated entertainer who has spent his life in pursuit of public adulation and power. He has spent the last 15-20 years finding a story to sell his audience. He is at heart a hateful, angry man who abused his body and mind with countless years of addictions. He looks to crackpots and conspiracy theorists for his information and he lies brazenly and shamelessly. He has a national audience and no office to force some responsibility onto him (like McCarthy) that makes him the single most dangerous member of his ilk ever to threaten the American people. No good will come of this, none at all. You don't have to believe me, sit back and watch see what happens, aid and abet him if you insist. But you are helping evil.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (November 23, 2009 9:33 am ET)
          5  
          Popularity by itself says nothing about good or bad
          This isn't popularity by itself. There's populism (Obama), and then there's populist demagoguery (Beck). Like showing "Obama" (the "white-hating racist") pouring gasoline on Americans and then lighting a match.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (November 23, 2009 10:33 am ET)
          6 1
          Glenn Beck is not "popular." Barack Obama is "popular." Glenn Beck is liked amongst 1-2% of the population. He is liked amongst fringe thinkers, bigots, conspiracy theorists, bunker builders, etc. etc.

          Popularity does in fact say much about good and bad sir.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by timetravler100 (November 23, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
               
            Barak Obama is an America-hating communist, a white-hating bigot whose associates are fringe lunatics like William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright.

            Popularity does in fact say much about how clueless the masses are.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by pecst1 (November 23, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
             
          (iirc) single largest crowd of people in history?

          Think about what you're saying there. You might be mistaken
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Ruby (November 22, 2009 9:07 pm ET)
      10 3
      Beck is such an incredibly disingenuous person.

      If anyone really, truly believed even HALF of what Beck says, they'd sure as heck be doing more about it than yapping like a chihuahua on Fox news or talk radio.

      You can bet your butt if I thought we were truly headed in the direction Beck says we are, I'd be ready to take some serious action. If Beck really believes even a fraction of his conspiracy theories, and all he's doing about it is organizing shindigs at retirement communities, then he's really a terrible coward.

      So he's either cowardly and insane or completely shameless, greedy, and morally bankrupt.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (November 22, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
        8 1
        No either, no or.

        I'm gonna go with all five of the above.

        I could add more, lots more, but all of yours are in the top ten.



        Report Abuse
      • Author by achorn316 (November 22, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
        7 3
        I dont know if Beck really believes this or its an act for money and power.

        Sometimes I think hes a true believer, but if someone actually thought these things, he wouldnt be living in America... he would have left a long time ago.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (November 23, 2009 10:19 am ET)
        1 4
        Read the NY Times, the just put a story out that says the same that Beck has talked about, and for you all on the left it must true it the NY Times said it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (November 23, 2009 10:54 am ET)
          3 1
          If Beck, O'Reilly, and Limbaugh came out tomorrow and changed their minds about the NY Times, there is no doubt in my mind that you would as well. You parrots are so transparent and shallow. Don't you see? People like Beck count of people like you. They know that what they say on their radio show will, by osmosis, become your point of view; which of course you regurgitate to your friends, co-workers, etc., etc.

          The point is: do you read the NY Times daily? If so, think about this, how many of Beck or O'Reilly's listeners do? very few of those outside the NY area I would submit. So, some guy in Greenbow Alabama isn't affected in any way by some piece in the NY Times. But, as a right wing radio listerner and follower, he forms this judgement about the NY Times and how dangerous it is for this country and he hasn't even read the d@mn thing? He forms this opinion because some narcissistic blow hard tells him this is the way to think. Talking about dumbing down America. Right wing radio and Fox News is the world's worst.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 23, 2009 11:38 am ET)
          2  
          Read the NY Times, the [sic] just put a story out that says the same that Beck has talked about,

          Provide a link if you want to be taken seriously. I frankly doubt that even the most rabid right-winger at the Times is as delusional as Beck.

          and for you all on the left it must true it the NY Times said it.

          Spare us your projections. Not only is the Times a frequent offender for your side (haven't you figured out the search feature yet?), that lemming-like quality is a characteristic of the far right, and always has been. "Dittoheads," anyone?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pecst1 (November 23, 2009 3:54 pm ET)
          1  
          What?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bnurse9786 (November 22, 2009 9:14 pm ET)
         
      All I keep thinking when I see Glen Beck is the movie "A Face in the Crowd" with Andy Griffith, only Andy wasn’t as crazy as Beck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mmharris438182 (November 22, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
         
      I didn't know Glenn Beck was such a fan of communist thinking. I wonder if he includes Chairman Mao with the Chinese that he thinks we should emulate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SoloPocono (November 23, 2009 1:42 am ET)
         
      This madman, who defines the term "projection" in most everything he says, scares the hell out of me. I can see "diamonds" now, so I'll respond before he/she does. Beck's revisionist history is bad enough, but he, himself is taking advantage of the most frustrated, vulnerable people in today's society. He preys on the unemployed millions with his own promises of "change", while people, not knowing any better, are following him to the edge of the cliff. He's nothing but a mouth piece for his corporate masters, asking his followers to give everything up to "follow him"-while at the same time, supposedly representing so-called "Christian" values, preaching how horrible these "owned" politicians are.
      What scares me is that he DOES have a following, and although "preaching" like some religious leader, he has the full support of a so-called "news" station, supposedly lending his madness some semblance of credibility.
      He's no more than a combination of Charles Manson and Adolph Hitler-leading his followers over the cliff-where he'll join them as soon as his "Masters" are done with him.
      "Re-education"??!! My God people, WAKE UP!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlh (November 23, 2009 9:23 am ET)
         
      Wow. I loathe Beck as much as anyone, but to write things like "and just like any good little political hack..." really crimps any credibility going on here. Just look at how silly the right looks when they use spiteful smarmy rhetoric like that.

      We need to win on the high road, not get dragged into the much with them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (November 23, 2009 10:17 am ET)
      1 4
      Wow, it was not a 100 million bribe, it was 300 million.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 23, 2009 11:06 am ET)
        2  
        Actually, it wasn't a bribe, but you will believe whatever you are told on Fox because you think that's the "conservative" thing to do. Considering the very small number of people who actually watch Fox when taken into context with the population of the country as a whole, did you ever wonder why more REAL conservatives don't watch it? It's because it's GARBAGE and has nothing whatsoever to do with conservatism. REAL conservatives prefer truth and REAL news. REAL conservatives understand the difference between fact and propaganda. Apparently, you don't. That's sad.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (November 23, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
             
          Don't you love it with people like Markbfoot proclaim to not get their opinions from righ wing radio jocks and somehow in this large universe of ours they seem to have the same ideas and somehow use the same words? It is amazing isn't it?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 23, 2009 11:43 am ET)
      2 1
      He also called on his followers to be as religiously devout as the Pilgrims were when they landed. After all, as Beck said, "If He is on our side, who can stand against us?"

      That's getting downright surreal. Beck is a Mormon, and thus believes, among other silliness, that he will eventually be promoted to Godhood with a planet of his own. Had that cult existed at the time of the Pilgrims, the latter would have shunned them big-time.

      He is not on your side, Beck, and the sooner you realize it, the better.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 23, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
      4 1
      Maybe Beck should try reading the Contstitution before he declares himself Constitution Czar.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by timetravler100 (November 23, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
      1  
      Beck's right about one thing. The "Cap and Trade" bill and its associated attempt to surrender sovereignty of the US to form a global government are against the constitution of the United States.

      ANY elected officials who work to undermine the security or surrender sovereignty of the United States to ANY other regime, global or otherwise is TREASON against the United States constitution!

      ANY elected US official guilty of treason of this sort should be tried and HANGED!

      We have the RIGHT to our own country! We have the right to NOT be invaded! We have the RIGHT to live as free people without fear of the dictate of a global monstrosity!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (November 23, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
        1  
        We have the RIGHT to our own country! We have the right to NOT be invaded!


        Wow! The Iraqis should could have used some of that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Malignant Hate (November 24, 2009 8:26 am ET)
         
      Ok well here I am , you all seem to bash the messager , Let me boil this down to what really matters.

      What right does the goverment have to tell me what is best for me and force me to do this thing.
      Report Abuse