Certain tax-paying Americans called THEMSELVES 'teabaggers.', reanna-mator. Scant few of them do anymore, and haven't for quite a while. At least, not since mature liberals took such delight in the sexual slur.
Liberals tell other liberals to grow some balls, too. By your logic then, Neil Boortz was perfectly ok to say that about Blanche Lincoln.
Shoot, even liberal women have told liberal women to grow a pair.
Can you explain why it' ok for liberals-even Democratic presidents- to call Americans "teabaggers", but it's not ok for a talk-radio personality to chide a Democratic Senator's bravery using a common slang term that's far less offensive than what the act of "teabagging" is?
There has been crass and ugly language coming out of Conservatives for decades, and dirty tricks, too. And it wasn't liberals who chose the teabag as a symbol or liberals who hung them from rear view mirrors or hats and posters. Ya'll did that to yourself, but I admit that I smirked something fierce when I found out what it meant. Now, I find the reference to having "balls" to be more sexist that dirty. Women don't, of course, and who says that courage can only be measured by having them. From what I have seen, most women are braver than men, better at dealing with pain and more adaptable, whereas most of the men I have known with "real balls" have just been obnoxious jerks, impressed with their appendages.
Oh my. Looks like Presidents Obama and Clinton lowered the bar last week when the referred to certain tax-paying Americans as 'teabaggers'.
It's quite likely because the tea party people are actually buying truckloads of tea bags and wearing tea bags on their tea-partying persons. Wear your tea bag proudly and unashamedly, as difficult as that must be.
Yes, but Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann informed everyone and made it quite clear what the sexual connotation of this word meant and liberals everywhere know what they are implying when they call people this demeaning slur.
By all means, please keep it up. Even encourage your president and ex-presidents to do it. Two down and one to go- have to keep working on Jimmy Carter. It reflects on liberals more poorly than it does the tea -partiers at this point. And it just makes it more of a joke when libs try to act like conservatives are the nasty ones when they complain about things like this comment by Boortz.
What about the right-wing personalities that used the term in a way that utilized the double entendre, such as Griff Jenkin's comment about "let's teabag the white house".
Why should everyone ignore the double entendre when the tea partiers themselves are applying it!?
Hoosier, you really do have difficulty with comprehension. Those "teabaggers" are the ones who started calling themselves "teabaggers." They were the ones running around with the tea-bag fringed hats at their ridiculous, corporate sponsored rallies screaming about stuff that made no sense whatsoever. Most of them, when asked, had no real idea what they were protesting.
They aren't conservatives, they are just loud-mouthed ignoramuses.
They never meant to have the sex act applied to them when they used it, which liberals now gleefully do, along with your current Dem president and ex-president. I know who did what and who said what, binxt. But you can't feign indignation at what Boortz said and justify calling regular tax-paying US citizens "teabaggers" with the connotation you do when you say it with any kind of moral cosistency.
You can't unless you're just another blatantly hypocritical liberal.
"They never meant to have the sex act applied to them when they used it"
True enough, but when taking delight in using the term 'teabaggers' I also have no reference to the sex act (wich You seem to be obsessed with), but only the stupidity of people who would give themselves a name and be so completely cluless about how to make sure they diddn't use a term any teenager would snicker at. Really proves the isolation and minority status of a group that claims to be so mainstream.
Nope, referencing stupidity. The proof is that I quoted You. The reason that term is seldom used is because people know what it means already. They aviod it to keep from looking ignorant. I lived in Fort Wayne during My Jr. High years and heard it then so We know this knowledge is available in Indiana. I do like Your logic - 'We stuck Our foot in Our mouth but You're the stupid ones because You pointed it out'.
Oh really, twseattle? If you knew that then why weren't you the first one to come forward with the association to the sex act? Whoever it was, Dave Weigel or some other blogger, didn't associate the term until well after the tea party protesters started using it, and even then, they bizarrely used the photo of a young boy to burnish the image.
No, you use it as a slur when the original tea partiers never did, and now you relish in saying it. It says more about you than it does anybody else. If you take pride in saying that people who used that term didn't realize the left would snicker about the sexual meaning, then so be it' it still doesn't absolve you of your perversity and vulgarity when you use it that way.
So when the original tea partiers said things like, "let's teabag the white house" or "tea bag the dems before they tea bag you!"...they were not invoking the sexual connotations of that phrase?
That was a poster that a barely 12 year old boy was holding up that Dave Weigel used to somehow give the ok to liberals to use it against Tea Party protesters.
You really want to use a 12 year old buy to justify being crass and vulgar? That's who you want to get down in the mud with, grade school boys and their humor?
Good grief. And then act shocked that Neal Boortz says a woman named Blanche doesn't have any balls. Yoi and double Yoi.
So now the teabaggers were using kids to hold the signs adults wouldn't? You yourself said young kids used that term. So, by Your own statement, He knew what it meant. Or are You suggesting children were forced to hold signs they diddn't understand? What kind of group does that?
First of all, you keep saying the young man holding the sign was 12 years old. Can you cite some source to verify that claim?
For all you know that young man as 17 or 18. Deciding that you think he looks 12 does not mean he's 12.
And you're missing the point here. The protesters were the first ones to utilize the double entendre of the phrase. THEY made signs that said "teabag the dems" or said "teabag the white house" (and Griff Jenkins isn't 12). You can't trash "liberals" for acknowledging the sexual connotation when the tea partiers did it first.
I highly doubt that when Griff Jenkins said "let's teabag the white house", that he wasn't aware of the connotation.
Furthermore, the photograph that is credited with being the origina of the label "teabagger" for the protesters was posted by David Weigel, a conservative/libertarian columnist. The photo is of a young man holding a sign that says, "teabag the dems before they teabag you" (or something like that).
That photograph, as I said, is the origin of the "teabag" label for protesters. You can't possibly tell me that whoever made that sign was unaware of the connotation.
If the protesters willingly applied that label to themselves, then why should anyone ignore it?
"...tax-paying Americans?" Who doesn't pay taxes - babies, people in prison and the IC unit. Everybody else pays taxes - does that makes them special?
Or are you referring to income taxes? How do you know the teabaggers pay income taxes? Were they carrying around their cancelled checks, like that crazy town hall lady with her birth certificate in a ZipLoc bag?
I'm by and large most of the tea party protesters pay taxes and are law-abiding citizens with families and go to church and donate their time and money to worthwhile causes. They shouldn't be referred to by Presidents of the United States by a vulgar, sexual term like both Obama and Clinton did just because these folks disagree with their policies. And as liberals, this shouldn't make you proud that they did.
I suspect they feel that his egregious hate and spite justifies their moderate hate and spite. "Look! He does it, and he's known all over the country!" Also, having someone who shares their radical views and has a large audience might make them feel less alone. Thing is, no matter how much FOX and Beck and Limbaugh obsesses over them, they're still a tiny fringe minority of this country.
A Senator from Mississippi; born in slavery near Farmville, Prince Edward County, Va., March 1, 1841; was tutored by his master’s son; left his master at the beginning of the Civil War; taught school in Hannibal, Mo.; after the war became a planter in Mississippi; member of the Mississippi Levee Board; sheriff and tax collector of Bolivar County 1872-1875; elected as a Republican to the United States Senate and served from March 4, 1875, to March 3, 1881; was the first African American to serve a full term in the United States Senate; appointed Register of the Treasury by President James Garfield 1881; recorder of deeds for the District of Columbia 1891-1893; again Register of the Treasury from 1897 until his death in Washington, D.C., on March 17, 1898; interment in Woodlawn Cemetery.
Hmmm -- a former slave involved in politics in Reconstruction-era Mississippi. Trust me, Boortz -- this Blanche's balls were WAY bigger than yours.
ReplyReport Abuse
County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.
Kinda makes Boortz' reference to balls seem mild in comparison.
At the very least, it shows liberals are only concerned about crude language when conservatives use it against Democrats.
Liberals tell other liberals to grow some balls, too. By your logic then, Neil Boortz was perfectly ok to say that about Blanche Lincoln.
Shoot, even liberal women have told liberal women to grow a pair.
Can you explain why it' ok for liberals-even Democratic presidents- to call Americans "teabaggers", but it's not ok for a talk-radio personality to chide a Democratic Senator's bravery using a common slang term that's far less offensive than what the act of "teabagging" is?
This thread isn't about what certain American's once called themselves. It's about a coward accusing someone else of cowardice.
It's quite likely because the tea party people are actually buying truckloads of tea bags and wearing tea bags on their tea-partying persons. Wear your tea bag proudly and unashamedly, as difficult as that must be.
By all means, please keep it up. Even encourage your president and ex-presidents to do it. Two down and one to go- have to keep working on Jimmy Carter. It reflects on liberals more poorly than it does the tea -partiers at this point. And it just makes it more of a joke when libs try to act like conservatives are the nasty ones when they complain about things like this comment by Boortz.
Why should everyone ignore the double entendre when the tea partiers themselves are applying it!?
They aren't conservatives, they are just loud-mouthed ignoramuses.
You can't unless you're just another blatantly hypocritical liberal.
True enough, but when taking delight in using the term 'teabaggers' I also have no reference to the sex act (wich You seem to be obsessed with), but only the stupidity of people who would give themselves a name and be so completely cluless about how to make sure they diddn't use a term any teenager would snicker at. Really proves the isolation and minority status of a group that claims to be so mainstream.
And you are referencing the sex act. You most definitely are.
No, you use it as a slur when the original tea partiers never did, and now you relish in saying it. It says more about you than it does anybody else. If you take pride in saying that people who used that term didn't realize the left would snicker about the sexual meaning, then so be it' it still doesn't absolve you of your perversity and vulgarity when you use it that way.
That was a poster that a barely 12 year old boy was holding up that Dave Weigel used to somehow give the ok to liberals to use it against Tea Party protesters.
You really want to use a 12 year old buy to justify being crass and vulgar? That's who you want to get down in the mud with, grade school boys and their humor?
Good grief. And then act shocked that Neal Boortz says a woman named Blanche doesn't have any balls. Yoi and double Yoi.
For all you know that young man as 17 or 18. Deciding that you think he looks 12 does not mean he's 12.
And you're missing the point here. The protesters were the first ones to utilize the double entendre of the phrase. THEY made signs that said "teabag the dems" or said "teabag the white house" (and Griff Jenkins isn't 12). You can't trash "liberals" for acknowledging the sexual connotation when the tea partiers did it first.
Furthermore, the photograph that is credited with being the origina of the label "teabagger" for the protesters was posted by David Weigel, a conservative/libertarian columnist. The photo is of a young man holding a sign that says, "teabag the dems before they teabag you" (or something like that).
That photograph, as I said, is the origin of the "teabag" label for protesters. You can't possibly tell me that whoever made that sign was unaware of the connotation.
If the protesters willingly applied that label to themselves, then why should anyone ignore it?
Or are you referring to income taxes? How do you know the teabaggers pay income taxes? Were they carrying around their cancelled checks, like that crazy town hall lady with her birth certificate in a ZipLoc bag?
How do you know that? Did ClusterFox say it so it must be true?
If these protesters are too stupid to research a name before they use it - well, now they know, don't they?
Hoosier: You're still a liar and a moran.
Because they don't understand history.
Neal, if you don't know a Blanche with balls, then clearly you're not aware of US history:
Blanche Kelso Bruce:
A Senator from Mississippi; born in slavery near Farmville, Prince Edward County, Va., March 1, 1841; was tutored by his master’s son; left his master at the beginning of the Civil War; taught school in Hannibal, Mo.; after the war became a planter in Mississippi; member of the Mississippi Levee Board; sheriff and tax collector of Bolivar County 1872-1875; elected as a Republican to the United States Senate and served from March 4, 1875, to March 3, 1881; was the first African American to serve a full term in the United States Senate; appointed Register of the Treasury by President James Garfield 1881; recorder of deeds for the District of Columbia 1891-1893; again Register of the Treasury from 1897 until his death in Washington, D.C., on March 17, 1898; interment in Woodlawn Cemetery.
Hmmm -- a former slave involved in politics in Reconstruction-era Mississippi. Trust me, Boortz -- this Blanche's balls were WAY bigger than yours.