About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Andrew Breitbart: ACORN Stalker

November 23, 2009 4:10 pm ET by Brian Frederick

Breitbart's tired ACORN smear campaign took an even lamer turn today with BigGovernment's attempt to manufacture a "San Diego ACORN Document Dump Scandal." "Licensed" investigator Derrick Roach dug through the garbage of the San Diego office and found some sensitive documents. To be clear, the documents he purportedly found - a few of which BigGovernment provides in the post - contained sensitive employee and donor information and should have been shredded rather than just dumped in the trash dumpster so that such information couldn't be used by anyone else (e.g. rabid right-wingers with an ACORN obsession). 

That said, the information found in the documents BigGovernment provides in the post appears to be so inane that the only scandal promises to be if the conservative media actually continues to run with this tired charade. BigGovernment does promise that "[o]ver the weeks and months ahead, BigGovernment.com will continue to release information from this shocking document dump by ACORN, slowly revealing the ugly truth of ACORN: the fact that their stated mission of helping the poor and downtrodden is just a ruse and a cover for an organization that is highly partisan and highly political, and thus rotten to the core."  But if there was really anything that damning in the documents, would BigGovernment really wait weeks and months to release it?

And if the information Breitbart and crew found did show hard and fast evidence of anything criminal, isn't Breitbart ethically - if not legally - obligated to turn over such information to the authorities?

But Breitbart's investigation takes a turn toward the bizarre and downright creepy with what Roach claims is a video shot from outside the San Diego ACORN office, showing several purported ACORN employees talking around someone's desk.  Roach explains: "[T]he video clip, from the evening of the document dump, shows ACORN operatives clearly engaged in some kind of discussion - likely related to the activities of that evening." Activities of the evening? Like where to grab dinner and drinks? Or maybe they were discussing whether to see "Zombieland" or "Tyler Perry's I Can Do Bad All By Myself."  Who knows? But we can be certain that they were discussing something.

Breitbart should do one of two things (or both) immediately: Release everything to the public - tapes, (redacted) documents, etc. - and/or hand everything over to the proper authorities.  Unless, of course, it's all just smoke and mirrors...

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by all your eyes (November 23, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
      1 2
      "an organization that is highly partisan and highly political, and thus rotten to the core."

      Pot, kettle.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 23, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
        2 2
        I thought that was strange too. Anybody who's political and partisan is rotten? Maybe "thus" has a different meaning to those afflicted with Acorn Stalking Syndrome.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 23, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
          3 1
          I wish we had ACORN around during the cold war. As powerful as they are, they'd have totally kicked commie ass.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (November 23, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
          1

        Ex-ACORN official gets probation for voter registration plan

        Your text to link here...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Vulgivagos (November 23, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
      2 2
      "Pot, kettle"

      The only problem with that observation, is that Breitbart has never denied being a Republican/Independent or what ever he is.
      He has certainly never claimed to be bi-partisan, and I doubt he's ever said he was un-biased. He's on a "crusade" against a group he feels is wrong and corrupt.

      And don't forget, ACORN was up to its neck in scandals before Breitbart came along, Voter Fraud, Embezzling, and such. So of course its gonna be a big target to any one that thinks it deserves a little more scrutiny.

      But I must say I love how the liberals clap and applaud when Micheal Moore tries to trap, what he believes are, corrupt businesses and such. Then they boo, cry, and yell foul when its done to an organization that they back.... curious.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (November 23, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
        2  
        You may have a point but please be aware of the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud. Context is everything. I have had experience with ACORN and they have done good work in my community. As far as I know they are non-partisan. To be fair if there are problems in the organization they need to be rooted out so they can get back to their job of advocating for middle and lower wage workers because they don't have advocates as do multi-billion dollar corporations. If Breitbart's allegations turn out to be true then I will congratulate him on his good work but if this turns out to be a personal vendetta to punish a group that registers voters that tend to vote Democratic then we need to nail his ass to the wall. I wonder which it is and I will suspend my opinion until we find out which it is.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Vulgivagos (November 23, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
             
          Your right, my apologies, I meant to say Voter registration fraud.

          But I must say, when someone brings down the house on ANY business/organization its almost always some kind of person vendetta. Again, look at Moore, you think he truly cares about anyone but himself? Everything he does is a personal vendetta to make money. The whistle blowers at Enron wouldn't have done what they had done if they hadn't been screwed. You'd be hard pressed these days to find someone who is spending their own time and money to "root out corruption" for purely altruistic reasons. For Breitbart I'm sure he sees fame as "The Man Who Brought Down ACORN" or other such "Communist" Orgs.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 23, 2009 6:26 pm ET)
        1 2
        Come on. Are you seriously denying whose dirty work Breitbart is doing? What his agenda is? He's right in line with Hannity and friends, whose stated goal is to bring down the administration, and for whom no amount of dishonesty is too much in that quest.

        ACORN's primary mission is advocating for and assistance of the poor, including financial assistance and voter registration. That there may be problems in quality control, and in sufficiently vetting their staff, should not be construed as damning of the organization in general.

        And it's positively ludicrous the way that Hannity and the smear brigades have attempted, without basis in fact, to link Obama to the supposedly nefarious scheming of ACORN. It's patently absurd, and frankly quite embarrassing to watch this petty charade play out every night on FOX NEWS.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tough2BeRight (November 23, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
          1 3
          And your point is?

          Whose dirty work is Norah O'Donnell doing when she beats up on a 17-year old girl in line for a book signing?

          Of course Breitbart is from the right. What's wrong with that?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 24, 2009 12:47 am ET)
            2  
            Asking somebody if they understand the t-shirt they're wearing is considered "beating up" in your world ? Right wingers sure are delicate.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Vulgivagos (November 23, 2009 11:17 pm ET)
          1  
          I deny nothing, I'm sure he's going after an Organization that he believes is in opposition to his values. As far as "whose dirty work" he is doing, I'm sure if there is a link between him and the GOP it is much less of one, than say... ACORN and Obama... and we really think ACORN isn't being investigated just because they think that Breitbart is being run by the GOP, or FOX, or (enter right wing extremist nut job organization here).

          As far as Obama putting ACORN in the mess its in, or basically "OKing" the mess its gotten itself into, that I don't entirely believe. All I know about his link to them is he was their lawyer, and he's donated TONS of $ to them. But you can't dismiss the fact that there is obviously some rotten people within the organization. Does that damn ACORN in total? I don't know, I guess it depends on how high up the corruption goes. Although having one of their CEO's, or what ever the guy was, embezzling tons of $ doesn't bode well for them.

          My only question is that, is corruption ok as long as its within an organization that "helps the poor" but not ok when its in a big corporation? Personally, I think corruption is corruption regardless of company/organization. Because, with the exception to not having feature length "documentaries" it seems these folks are just the "Right's" answer to Moore. I mean, isn't this how Micheal Moore started? Although I'm not sure he did undercover work, but he would go to corporations and try to harass them, and show them in a negative light? To me it just seems Breitbart and the two kids seem to have just taken Moore's playbook, and expanded on it is all.

          BTW, I have not yet made up my mind on Breitbart, he does seem a bit shady, but that just may be my typical conservative skepticism. Ya know, "Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see."

          "...but that's just my opinion, I could be wrong..." --Dennis Miller
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (November 23, 2009 8:27 pm ET)
        2  
        The phrase used was, "an organization that is highly partisan and highly political, and thus rotten to the core".

        Breitbart just said that an organization that is partisan and political is THUS rotten to the core.

        If Breitbart doesn't deny being partisan and political, then he's admitting to being rotten to the core. By his own logic.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (November 23, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
      3  
      I wonder if the acorn employees were discussing who the idiot was that was videtaping them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 23, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
      2  
      I think it's fitting that the guy who dug around in ACORN's garbage is named Roach.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (November 23, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
      1  
      Breibart has become a crying petulant child who's own bloated sense of self importance is eclipsed only by his monumentaly backward ideas of what a "free press" should be.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CathyCeep (November 23, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
      2  
      Sorry, but this doesn't look good for ACORN and the attorneys general. Brown and Holder need to investigate now - Breitbart has planned ACORN/media reactions and is releasing accordingly. The more stuff that comes out, the worse we look.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by all your eyes (November 23, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
        3 1
        The worse we look? I assume you're talking about Breitbart, O'Keefe and Giles, who look more dishonest and less relevant every time they appear on Hannity spewing lies over doctored video tape?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (November 23, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
        3  
        Unless of course.........wait for it.......there were no crimes committed. Trust me, if they do an investigation of ACORN then Breitbart will move onto other targets that the GOP deems hurtful to their chances of winning in 2010 and 2012. Look at the Whitewater investigations, they cost us millions to learn Clinton had inappropriate relations with that woman. Do you really want to waste tax money on an investigation that may lead nowhere? Don't get me wrong, if he releases the tapes and there are illegal activities going on then by all means prosecute to the fullest extent of the law but if the best thing you have is a couple of employees talking about a hypothetical crime that was so outlandish I doubt the ACORN people thought they were serious then I can't go along with that. How about the billions of no bid contracts and misallocation of money that went on in Iraq? I say investigate that first and if there is time then look into the 53 million that went to ACORN.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (November 23, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
        3  
        Investigate what?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Miles (November 23, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
      1  
      Shouldn't someone be worried about the facts in this case? Destruction of evidence when under investigation is a criminal matter.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 24, 2009 12:54 am ET)
        2  
        I don't think Breitbart is accused of destroying any evidence, just withholding it. I'm not sure he's even under investigation yet, as stalking laws aren't usually enforced until the stalker does something really crazy, but I agree, authorities should be investigating Breitbart, and keeping an eye on his whereabouts. He seems to be getting a little weird.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 24, 2009 11:33 am ET)
          1  
          I suspect that when it comes time for Breitbart to actually produce his evidence, it will disappear as effectively as those billions of dollars in Iraq. Then, Breitbart will claim that his office was ransacked by ACORN employees, who took everything incriminating, not to mention all the W's off his keyboard.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by JoeCollins (November 23, 2009 6:54 pm ET)
      1  
      I praise Andrew for bringing us the truth, especially since the old style print media seems determined to ignore any story that casts President Obama (and his Democratic minions) in a negative light. Andrew is doing today what Woodward and Bernstein did a few decades ago . . . hard, investigating journalism. I can't wait to see what Andrew uncovers next.

      Mediamatters . . you do NOT matter.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MeanMrSpicyMustard (November 23, 2009 7:55 pm ET)
      1  
      Make sure you watch the video. It's critical evidence that people at ACORN are, in fact, engaging in verbal communication with one another. As we all know, verbal communication is often how totalitarian regimes begin.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 24, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
           
        100 % correct, Mr. M. I'm sure the average genius who reads Breitbart has enough critical thinking skills to realize that no totalitarian regime in history has ever been started without verbal communication.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by CitizenK (November 23, 2009 9:40 pm ET)
      1  
      If Brian Frederick had been paying attention, he would have caught Breitbart on KFI radio last night, describing why he plans to drip these documents out in dribbles.

      The papers document many aspects of corruption, not the least of which is that they were dumped illegally -- illegally because they contain personal info like SSNs and other data, but also illegally because they were dumped in the middle of an investigation.

      In the past, ACORN has done nothing but lie, and Breitbart and Co. have done nothing but tell the truth. And Media Mutters will stand idly by, mocking and jeering, but contributing nothing of substance to this story.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 24, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
           
        The papers document many aspects of corruption, not the least of which is that they were dumped illegally...


        There are actually papers found in the trash that say they were put there illegally? You guys are really going off the deep end, aren't you?

        Look out ! Over there! ACORN !!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jerhad (November 24, 2009 9:08 pm ET)
             
          So Sanders, what if a non-profit group that supported Republicans was being investigated by the California Attorney General and dumped 20k documents before the investigation? I'm sure you'd be defending them, right? If all Breitbart are credit applications and personal records, then yes, it was illegal (the documents they already disclosed publicly were not legally disposed of by state and federal law) and very careless but certainly not a major "scandal" to prove corruption. However, we don't know yet what is included in all of the documents. If documents are eventually released which do prove some kind of illegal activity, will you recant your statements? Will MediaMutters? Um, no.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.