So who's still advertising on Beck? November 23 edition...
November 23, 2009 6:18 pm ET by Media Matters staff
Eighty advertisers have reportedly dropped their ads from Glenn Beck's Fox News program since he called President Obama a "racist" who has a "deep-seated hatred of white people." Here are his November 23 sponsors, in the order they appeared:
- Rosland Capital
- Freije Treatment Systems (EasyWater Systems)
- Goldline International, Inc.
- Sony Music Entertainment (Susan Boyle, "I Dreamed a Dream")
- LifeLock
- Clarity Media Group (The Weekly Standard)
- 60 Plus Association
- American Advisors Group
- Warner Brothers (Invictus)
- The Jewelry Exchange
- News Corp. (The Wall Street Journal)
- Merit Financial
- The Foundation for a Better Life
- Rosland Capital
- Freije Treatment Systems (EasyWater Systems)
- National Review
- Hydroxatone

















FOX can afford to keep Beck 'till kingdomcome!
Basically, there are a limited number of advertising slots in a day so a boycott by premium paying advertisers effectively reduces the number of slots.
Well, give Beck time. He lost 80 sponsors for calling the President a "white-hating racist". His mouth is big enough; no doubt it will disengage from his tiny, twisted brain as it so often does, open wide again, and he'll lost another 80.
1) List of those who stopped sponsering Glenn Peckerhead, so they get publicity.
2) List of competitors who compete with the Glenn Peckerhead advertisers.
1) Need a list of companies that ended their support of Glenn Beck, so they get publicity as well.
2) Need a list of the competitors of the current Glenn Beck sponsors.
Beck...2.4 million
Big Ed...0.5 million
KO...0.8 million
Maddow...0.8 million
Beck continues to clobber the Big 3 liberal bell cows. I don't watch Beck and I certainly don't watch the liberal trio...but maybe mmfa could tell us who is advertising on their shows and what they pay.
Your post debates against nobody, or so you'll admit if challenged. It asserts nothing about the quality of Beck's program or about the quality of MSNBC's liberal programs, or so you'll admit if challenged. It has no connection to the fact that 80 A-list advertisers have abandoned Beck, far more than any other ad boycott, or so you'll admit if challenged.
It's time for you to own the fact that you think Beck's ratings mean he has a great show. There's no other reason to be such a fanboy.
Nope...I've never argued that Beck has a great show. In fact, I couldn't tell what kind of show he has because I don't watch it...making your assumption witless.
What I have pointed out is the impotent boycott led by CoC and mmfa...which has not damaged his ratings one bit. Has the boycott damaged his revenue? Couldn't say...and neither has mmfa...and don't bother putting out that unfounded report "from industry sources" promoted by the CoC.
What I own is my opinion that this debacle is nothing more than an inside the beltway catfight between competing partisan wonks...silliness personified.
Who sponsors a program makes a huge difference to people with outsized egos such as Beck. Imagine the ribbing he takes from Hannity and O'Reilly while sitting around the Focks lunchroom.
Having actual legitimate sponsors lends the imprimitur of legitimacy to a show - and Beck sadly lackes that legitimacy. We have actually reduced him to the third-rate, second-class citizen he has tried so hard to leave behind. This effort has returned him to that playground of his childhood where he was teased for being the only fifth grader with training wheels.
So your post debates against nobody, exactly as I said. Since you can't tell us what your post is for, I told you what it's for.
("impotent" of course means "unable to deprive Fox of free will")
You are leaving out the 300 million Americans who don't watch your girlfriend on Fox.
I don't really take that as an insult.
I hear the movie 'New Moon' had a record breaking boxoffice opening weekend. I guess that means teenage vampires are required to fix our political problems.