Where's the outrage over Mark Halperin's photoshopped picture of Mary Landrieu?
November 27, 2009 1:59 pm ET by Jamison Foser
Maybe you thought that the recent outrage from the right over Newsweek's use of a photo of Sarah Palin in a running outfit meant conservatives are finally coming to understand that sexism has no place in the news media. And maybe you thought all the attention the mainstream media paid to the controversy was a sign that they, too, are beginning to see the light -- and not simply another example of them asking conservative media critics how high they should jump. Well, if you thought that, you'd be wrong.
Take, for example, Newsbusters. The right-wing media critics were all over the Newsweek/Palin controversy. But they haven't said a word about Mark Halperin doctoring a photo to portray Mary Landrieu as having semen in her hair.
But Newsbusters certainly isn't alone in ignoring Halperin's vicious portrayal of Landrieu. Do a Nexis search for news reports containing the words "Halperin" and "Landrieu" in the past week, and you'll get exactly one result: a blog post by Michael Tomasky. And this comes immediately after the media uproar over the Newsweek Palin cover.
Now, you might think the difference in attention is because Newsweek made the mistake of putting the photo of Palin on its cover, while Halperin's photoshop of Landrieu appeared only on Time's web page. On the other hand, Newsweek used a photo Sarah Palin voluntarily posed for in order to promote herself, whereas Halperin doctored a photo of Mary Landrieu to make it look like she had semen in her hair. So, let's call it even, shall we?
And, no, the disparity can't be explained by the fact that Beltway journalists love Mark Halperin, creator of ABC's insider gossip sheet The Note. Glenn Beck called Mary Landrieu a prostitute, and the media didn't give a damn. And when I say Beck called Mary Landrieu a prostitute, I don't mean that he hinted that Landrieu might do legislative favors in exchange for campaign cash. I mean he literally called her a "prostitute."
Progressive political figures like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi have been on the receiving end of sexist media treatment for years, and conservative media critics like Newsbusters don't give a damn. Nor does much of the mainstream media. The lesson? Newsweek's treatment of Sarah Palin was, indeed, sexist -- but many of those who criticized it don't really care about sexism in the media. They care that a Republican was the target, and that Republicans were upset.

















Also, CNN's Howard Kurtz on Reliable Sources reported on Fox's hypocrisy but demonstrated his own by ignoring Halperin's offensive photo. Kurtz and Halperin both work for Time Warner.
That aside, the point of the article is dead on: Nancy Pelosi receives MUCH more abuse from radio yakkers and Fox than Palin does, yet only attacks on Palin are seen as objectionable (I just wonder where MMFA and others were when Hillary was being savaged.) And Laura Ingraham, with her endless "Pelosi/Botox" snarkage, has nothing on Stephanie Miller, who has comics on to make fun of Pelosi ALL THE TIME.
There's plenty of sexism on both sides.
It's always bending over backwards to please the right and all these excuses for them. But, it's always disapproval for everything the dems do.
Just compare the media with Bush in his first year and look at the savaging they have been doing to Obama
First year? How about the first six years?...
when did it become accepable to lie? not just "white lies" of omission or stretching the truth to fit an agenda, but out right lies?
Just look at the top of the party and their most of their spokesman, most of them from McConnell and Rush on down are gay and they actually think they're fooling everyone!
There it is...