WND's Molotov Mitchell embraces Matthew Shepard revisionism
December 02, 2009 6:37 pm ET by Terry Krepel
WorldNetDaily video-maker Molotov Mitchell -- best known for smearing Sonia Sotomayor as an "anti-American racist" and the National Council of La Raza as "the tan Klan" -- peddles revisionist history on the Matthew Shepard case in his latest video.
First of all, like Harvey Milk, Matthew Shepard was not killed for being gay. After being robbed and beaten to death, his killer went on to try the exact same thing only on a straight guy 20 minutes later. The only reason he survived was because he had a bat and a friend with him. The liberals aren't interested in those facts. They didn't even care when Shepard's killers told ABC News that his murder had nothing to do with his lifestyle. And why would the killers lie? They had nothing to gain.
In fact, as blogger David Neiwert detailed at the time of the 2004 ABC interview, one of the killers, Aaron McKinney, mounted a "gay panic" defense at his trial -- which would seem to contradict the story Mitchell wants to hear -- and has changed his story multiple times. As the Matthew Shepard Foundation has stated, the ABC report omitted the contents of McKinney's in-custody interview a few days after Shepard's death. That transcript shows "an un-rehearsed and unemotional anti-gay account of the events before, during, and after leaving Matt tied to the fence," according to the foundation.
Further, as retired Laramie Police Chief Dave O'Malley told a Laramie newspaper: "Only three people know what really happened that night ... One of them is dead and the other two are known liars and convicted felons -- murderers."
Why would the killers lie, Mitchell asks? Because they're convicted murderers and known liars. And what do they have to gain? Sympathy from anti-gay activists like Mitchell.
Mitchell then goes into full anti-gay freak-out mode that the name of lynching victim James Byrd joined Shepard's in the name of the bill that added federal hate-crime protection to gays. The crimes that resulted in Byrd's death was "for real," Mitchell insists, "not some made-up Laramie Project stunt for political gain." Crank up that faux outrage, Molotov:
To exploit a modern-day lynching to score points with the gay lobby, to equate the true horror of Byrd's murder to their phony gay passion play, is unforgivable. Gay activists, how dare you cheapen his sacrifice? For that alone, you are unnatural. For that alone, you are deviant. For James Byrd alone, you are an abomination.
Oh, and he also sneeringly refers to President Obama as a "weak-kneed metrosexual."
Molotov has some issues. And this is merely the first of a two-part video.
I give you Mr. Molotov...
And chances are good that this guy's real name really isn't Molotov. For real? I thought these guys HATED commies, and here he is, naming himself after one that was not such a good guy.
That's the key phrase - does anyone except people are reading only the old testament use abomination?
There's no sanctions against homosexuality tht ever came out of Jesus' mouth. None. He said nothing about it. And most Americans are Christians, not Jews, so they have discarded the 'rules' in the Old Testament, right?
He's a sicko for sure.
I have several books (and videos) of how the Bible was created (one of the best is the book/series TESTAMENT), and since Saul (Paul) never met Jesus, his 'authority' is questionable IMHO. Somewhere (I have as many books as a small branch library) there is the book The Mythmaker, that points out that Christianity as we know it is mostly based on Paul's work, not Jesus.
I also separate the Christians (generous, tolerant, activist) from the Xians (judgmental, bigoted, tyrannical).
No, it is Molotov who is unnatural, deviant, and an abomination.