About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Claiming health care bill "is unconstitutional," Huckabee compares individual mandate to poll tax

December 03, 2009 12:13 pm ET by Media Matters staff

From Mike Huckabee's December 2 Q&A with Christianity Today:

Would you vote for the health-care bill if the Stupak amendment [that bans funding for abortion] was retained in the final version?

Absolutely not. First of all, I don't have any confidence that the Democrats in the House plan to honor that in the long term, and secondly, if abortion wasn't even a part, it's still going to create huge deficits. It's a job-killing bill. It intrudes into an area of people's responsibilities and rights as citizens. I think the bill on its face is unconstitutional, in that it requires the purchase of a product for a person to exercise his or her rights as a citizen. We already decided that's unconstitutional when we outlawed the poll tax that required people to pay money in order to vote, because the Supreme Court declared that you can't make people pay money in order to enjoy the rights and benefits of citizenship. That's exactly what this bill does, and I think it's an outrage and an insult to the Constitution and to the citizens of the United States.

Previously:

Legal experts debunk conservative media's claim that health reform proposals are unconstitutional

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Publius39 (December 03, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
         
      If only Huckabee knew that the poll tax was actually ruled unconstitutional because it kept blacks from voting, and that he is pretty much comparing apples to oranges. Here in Michigan, we are required to buy car insurance, and if we don't have it we are subject to a fine. I don't see anyone complaining about the mandate in insurance coverage here, even though we pay some of the highest rates in the country.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 03, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
      1  
      INteresting that Huckabee mentions the only part of proposals that are unconstitutional, the abortion restrictions that spit in the face of the establishment clause, as the best part of something he's trying to call unconstitutional.

      Completely azz-backwards as usual, Huckleberry.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (December 04, 2009 8:42 am ET)
           
        I know some one in Arkansas...a Republican who fears Huck.

        As governor Huckabee mandated that all public schools monitor the weight of all school children, and then to notify parents if their children exceeded guidelines. You get a notification if your child is overweight.
        Got that?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (December 03, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
      1  
      I don't understand the analogy. How is mandatory insurance making you pay to enjoy the rights and benefits of citizenship? That's not to say I support that provision. Without a strong public option available to anyone who wants it an insurance mandate is nothing but a gift to the private insurance industry.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (December 03, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
      2  
      "the Supreme Court declared that you can't make people pay money in order to enjoy the rights and benefits of citizenship."
      I can opt out of paying for military protection? Really?

      I'd be surprised if Huckabee has actually read more than 5 pages of the bill to which he refers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (December 03, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
        2  
        I think Huckleberry has inadvertently implied that Healthcare is a "right".

        I think the recent shooting rampage by the guy he furloughed has crippled his political future anyway, but if he really thinks healthcare is a right, the Palinites are going to eat him for breakfast.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jsm201 (December 03, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
         
      How do abortion restrictions "spit in the face" of the establishment clause?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by stullivan (December 03, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
         
      I'M CONFUSED?!?!?!?!

      Mike H - "because the Supreme Court declared that you can't make people pay money in order to enjoy the rights and benefits of citizenship."

      Nice analogy if you have not idea what the F you are talking about.
      Poll tax unconstituional : paying to exercise right and benfit of citizenship

      HCR "Unconstitutional" : paying to .........

      Is he calling access to health care a right and benefit of citizenship? What am I missing?? I get the first part of his comment - that HCR would intrude on an idividual's right to purchase or not purchase insurance - even if I don't necessarily agree with it. But he loses me the next second - if you are forcing an individual to purchase something (poll tax) TO exercise their rights (vote) then affordable health insurance and not getting screwed by the insurance company is a RIGHT and you are being forced to buy insurance to exercise that right. SOOOO should health care be available to everyone without having to purchase it?

      Glad to know Preacher Mike is looking out for his flock and the sick and injured
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (December 04, 2009 8:32 am ET)
      1  
      I think the bill on its face is unconstitutional, in that it requires the purchase of a product for a person to exercise his or her rights as a citizen.


      I have the answer. No health insurance mandate necessary. When uninsured citizens show up at hospital ER's to exercise his or her rights as a citizen,--provide treatment--then send the bills to the RNC.

      Problem solved. Time for a nap.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.