About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

BREAKING NEWS: WH aide dresses way too nice

December 03, 2009 1:37 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Apparently that's what the party crasher story now revolves around, the fact that President Obama's social secretary, Desiree Rogers, wears designer dresses and, frankly, is a bit too full of herself.

That was certainly the take-away from the WashPost's thoroughly bitchy Wednesday profile by the newspaper fashion writer Robin Givhan. A classic hit piece, the Post article was loaded with venom and backed up by very few facts, and even fewer quotes. It was a classic hit piece in that prior to Wednesday, apparently the only person making the central charge in the article (i.e. that Rogers was "too busy basking in the limelight" to squash the party crashers) was the person writing the article; Givhan. Who then spent the entire article failing to prove the charge.

Noted Ta-Nehisi Coates at The Atlantic:

Here's a piece that will get you flunked out J-school. Robin Givhan barks at Desiree Rogers like she stole something--namely, her man--and makes the case for utter overuse of anonymous sourcing or, in some cases, no sourcing at all:

One of the oddest portions of the article was Givhan, who writes about fashion, criticized Rogers for caring too much about fashion: 

Early in her tenure, Rogers made a trip to New York City during February's fashion week. She sat in the front row of runway shows such as Donna Karan and smiled for the flock of photographers who descended on the striking Obama gatekeeper with her pixie cut, stylish wardrobe and high-altitude heels. She dabbled in a world of hipsters and art scene know-it-alls in her attempt to bring a contemporary gleam to the White House. And she seemed to thrive on all the attention. She has come across as a big-picture manager, not one focused on details.  

Readers were supposed to recoil in horror, I suppose. But note this nugget from the Chicago Tribune's Swamp blog, regarding the questions Givhan herself was asking the night of the WH state dinner:

A certain reporter was commenting on the attire that Rogers herself had donned for the occasion that night - a pale peach gown from the Japanese designer, Comme des Garcons.

...


The Post's own social correspondent, Robin Givhan, who was standing next to the print pool reporter working the dinner, asked Rogers that night: "Are you wearing Comme Des Garcons?"

"Of course," Rogers replied.

So, on the night of the state dinner, Post writer Givhan was very interested in which designer Rogers was wearing. But by Wednesday, Post writer Givhan, now penning a hit piece, had decided that nobody really cared which designer Rogers was wearing; except Rogers.

Sadly, that was not the end of the story. In fact, yesterday it seemed to gain momentum. Read this rather amazing back-and-forth from the WH press briefing. (Mediaite, has the video.) The reporter asking the loaded questions about Rogers (questions clearly inspired by the Post hit piece) was April Ryan from American Urban Radio Networks [emphasis added]. 

Q. Has there been any concern about Desiree Rogers’ performance prior to this instance?

Mr. Gibbs: No.

Q. No one has questioned the president or told the president that she is a very last-minute person, poor planner?

Mr. Gibbs: No, I think you — you all have been to and seen, either whether you’re part of a pool, whether some of you’ve been to receptions, the remarkable work that they have done in pulling off a lot of events here. The first family is quite pleased with her performance, and I’ve heard nothing uttered of what you talked about.

Q. Well, what about the issues of her being in fashion spreads early on in the administration? Did you put the brakes on that? I mean, that is — it’s been raised. It’s now public. It’s — you know, you saw it in the magazines, her pictorials. You saw her on the cover of –

Mr. Gibbs: There’s a — I get Sports Illustrated in my house.

Q. Was there a concern in this White House that she came out being, some might have called her the belle of the ball, overshadowing the First Lady?

Mr. Gibbs: I don't know who "some" are, but I've never heard that.

Q. It's been bantered around Washington. It's been in Democratic circles as well as Republican circles, by high-ranking people.

...

Q. Did she invite herself to this dinner or was she a guest? Did the president invite her or did she put her name [on the list.] Did she invite herself?!

Wow. Just, wow.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Pinhead (December 03, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
      13  
      If newspapers want to save money maybe they should fire all their fashion writers. What a completely useless topic and a waste of ink and paper.

      There, I said it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (December 03, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
        2
      Mr. Gibbs: There’s a — I get Sports Illustrated in my house.

      It can't be for Peter King's gushing of northeast NFL teams like the Giants and Patriots...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (December 03, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
      2  
      Perhaps the DC Villagers need to find out what actual AMERICANS care about instead of just reading their own internal pundit rantings and using those as questions for the WH along the lines of ... "some have said" ... This is really quite a joke.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boulderhippy (December 03, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
        1
      Most people I know that make $113,000 a year can't afford designer clothes. And the left threw a fit over Sarah Palin's clothes.


      P.S. MMFA censor,

      I can understand a brief period of time to post newcomer posts. The time you actually take appears to be more in line with censorship.
      How many posts does it take to be enough? Your message that comes up everytime I post doesn't quantify it. If you would like to let me know my status on this site, you have my e-mail address.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (December 03, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
      2  
      I would last about 5 minutes doing Gibbs job. Like trying to talk to kids about adult stuff when all they are interested in are puppies and kittens.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (December 03, 2009 6:54 pm ET)
         
      Oh where, oh where has the real Journalists gone? Oh where, oh where can they be? Are they happy to look like 'real' Journalists? Or, are they just sad 'cause we ALL know they're not? Oh where, oh where can they be. Oh, wait. Mr. Jon Stewart applause, applause, applause, LOL.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (December 03, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
         
      How can she afford designer clothes on her paltry $113,000/yr salary?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by apauline (December 03, 2009 9:12 pm ET)
           
        How much do you know about her? OBVIOUSLY, NOT ENOUGH! She was married to a MILLONAIRE and she left a job in Chicago that paid her more than a quarter of a million dollars. That's how she can afford designer clothes and anything else she wants or her teenage daughter wants.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (December 03, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
           
        113K/year is paltry? Or are you just kidding? Sometimes, I can't tell.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (December 04, 2009 12:29 am ET)
          2  
          Who cares. He's not here to say anything nice, anyway.

          Besides, I thought the real Oscar the Grouch made fun of Fox News recently on Sesame Street, didn't he?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (December 04, 2009 7:37 am ET)
             
          tongue in cheek, just ruffling feathers of those like mk####. don't know many in private industry with a similar title making 6 figures.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by rikyrah (December 04, 2009 3:13 am ET)
           
        because she was a millionaire before coming to Washington.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (December 04, 2009 7:29 am ET)
      1  
      this story was repeated on "morning joe". the morning panel, with republicans mort zuckerman, mika brzenzski, and of course "joe", all attacked rogers' attire. it was followed with a hit story by norah odonnell, who seemed to "want" to blame desiree rogers for her role in the "uninvited guests"-gate. so much for a liberal msnbc.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Delilah (December 04, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
         
      Re: April Ryan: Great. Another insecure, jealous A.B.W. --- the last thing we need in a press pool is a A.B.W. more worrying about another woman's clothes and weave. Jeez. get a grip. What Ms. Rogers wears is her business and she can buy what she wants whether she has a $30000 salary or a 6 figure salary. for some people it's about what they believe they are WORTH, not what someone else assumes they can afford. We focus on other people's personal wallets too much. How do we know someone didn't buy that outfit for her or that she had it in her closet for a while? Some people don't buy clothes as often as they are accused of doing so but rather they invest in classic (non-faddish) attire made with good fabric that last for years.

      Either way, there were more important things to be concerned about than fashion. This sounded more like a "she took my man" issue. Idiot.

      (And don't accuse me of being racist...I am black) and April was juvenile and out of line. This was a press conference about REAL issues not a fashion police/red carpet thumbs up or down discussion. She doesn't need to be in a press conference but on a sofa with a self help guide to self esteem watching The Real Housewives of ATL eating bon-bons.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.