About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

High schoolers reading explicit material is news to the right

December 04, 2009 2:50 pm ET by Matt Gertz

The Right-wing has rushed to attack Kevin Jennings because the organization he used to run lists several books with sexually explicit passages among those they recommended for adolescents. Aside from the fact that GLSEN's list specifically recommends that adults review the books themselves before selecting them for youths, the conservative media's argument is undermined by the fact that numerous books that are often assigned to high school students and are considered classics contain similar material.

For example, during my tenure at a public high school, I read the following books from an American Library Association list of "Banned and/or Challenged Books" that have been cited for sexual content:

  • The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald, "Challenged at the Baptist College in Charleston, SC (1987) because of 'language and sexual references in the book.'"
  • The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger, challenged or removed from several schools due to "sexual scenes," "sexual references," "depict[ion of] premarital sex," "lurid passages about sex," and "sexual exploits experienced in the book"
  • The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck, "Challenged in the Greenville, S.C. schools (1991) because the book uses the name of God and Jesus in a 'vain and profane manner along with inappropriate sexual references.'"
  • Beloved, Toni Morrison, "Challenged in the Sarasota County, Fla. schools (1998) because of sexual material."
  • The Lord of the Flies, William Golding, "Challenged in the Waterloo, Iowa schools (1992) because of ... lurid passages about sex."
  • 1984, George Orwell, "Challenged in the Jackson County, FL (1981) because Orwell's novel is 'pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter.'"
  • Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck, "Challenged at the Jacksboro, Tenn. High School (1991) because the novel contains 'blasphemous' language, excessive cursing, and sexual overtones."
  • Native Son, Richard Wright, Challenged or banned in various districts because it was considered "sexually explicit," "sexually graphic," and for "sexual content."

We also read Gunter Grass' Cat and Mouse, which is not on the ALA's list, but contains an extremely vivid scene of group masturbation.

On the other hand, most of the sexual content in the above books is of the heterosexual variety. Perhaps that is why the conservative media isn't as worked up over them.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by neon desert (December 04, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
      8  
      We cannot allow our high-schoolers to read explicit material. It might lead them to comprehend certain episodes of "South Park".

      Plus, we need to keep them ignorant about sex so that they won't get pregnant...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (December 04, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
        1  
        Did you ever see the movie "Saved"? It was so deliciously sacrilegious that my family bought three copies. The thing is, when I tried being a born-again Christian 35 years ago, I experienced a lot of the same stuff.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (December 04, 2009 4:47 pm ET)
          1  
          Never saw it, that I recall. But your recommendation puts it on my list for a good Fri. night rental. Maybe a double-feature, teamed with Religulous.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (December 04, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
            1  
            Haven't seen Religulous, but I have thought about it. And from what I heard, it would make an excellent double feature. Pass the popcorn!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by coldteablues19577325 (December 04, 2009 8:23 pm ET)
        1  
        "We cannot allow our high-schoolers to read explicit material. It might lead them to comprehend certain episodes of "South Park"."

        Oh my stars and garters!!! Sigh ... ;-)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (December 04, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
      5  
      Let's consider some simple math:

      How many books are high school students assigned to read during the four years? A couple dozen?

      How many unsupervised hours will they spend watching cable and surfing the Internet?

      I don't think John Steinbeck is the problem.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 04, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
      2  
      You forgot Thomas Hardy's Tess of the D'Urbervilles.

      I had to read that pile of impossibly complicated diction in High School. I'm told there was some hot, steamy sex in there. I could never find it, but then I couldn't get through two sentences without consulting the dictionary three times, so I'm sure I just missed it!

      ----------------------------------------------------------------
      Lousy book, despite the sex!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jason10006 (December 04, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
      2  
      "1984, George Orwell, "Challenged in the Jackson County, FL (1981) because Orwell's novel is 'pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter.'""

      REALLY!!?!?!?!? Its the single most ANTI-communist book ever written, second only to his "Animal Farm" and including Atlas Shrugged. What idiot wanted this banned?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (December 04, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
        2  
        Yes, that made me snicker, too. However, I still remember the scene where Winston visits the prostitute and he realizes she is really old under her make-up. That is still one of the grossest images that I have ever read. (Eighth Grade, not part of a class.)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by raynfala (December 04, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
        2  
        1984? Pro-Communist?

        That's a reading-comprehension-fail, right there...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 04, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
          2  
          Yeah, I think the conservative book banners sort of tipped their hand by seeing 1984 as Pro-Communist. It's been years since I read it, but I don't recall it being much about any economic system, but about the oppressive government of any totalitarian regime, left or right.

          But even the beginning of the Wikipedia summary shows how they might have been fooled;

          Nineteen Eighty-Four (also 1984), by George Orwell, published in 1949, is a dystopian novel about the totalitarian régime of the Party, an oligarchical collectivist society where life ... is a world of perpetual war, pervasive government surveillance, public mind control, and the voiding of citizens' rights. In the Ministry of Truth (Minitrue), protagonist Winston Smith is a civil servant responsible for perpetuating the Party's propaganda by revising historical records to render the Party omniscient and always correct, yet his meagre existence disillusions him into rebellion against Big Brother, which leads to his arrest, torture, and conversion.


          Aside from the word "collectivist", it describes and maligns a right wing dream world. By process of elimination, Orwell must have been a lefty, and, therefore, pro-Communist.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (December 05, 2009 9:24 am ET)
            2  
            Is it any wonder the righties are so confused? It's just like "The Colbert Report", which can be taken as either an extremely funny, very broad parody (by the left)or an accurate portrayal of a right wing hyperventilating blow hard (wingnuts).

            Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (December 04, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
      2  
      Wait... How is 1984 "pro-communist"!?

      Also, I'd like to challenge all of these books sexual luridness compared to what they see&hear about in school and on TV in one day. I'm sure the median American high schooler experiences more sexual references etc in the average day in school and on TV then all the books they'll read in high school combined!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (December 04, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
      1  
      HAHA! Cat And Mouse was a great book. Why did they keep eating the bird crap though? I don't remember any lurid passages about sex in Lord of the Flies though. Maybe someone at the ALA is projecting their own fantasies about little boys running around half naked.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (December 04, 2009 8:36 pm ET)
      4 1
      The right has been complaining about these books for years. They claim the books are blasphemous, pro-communist and/or sexually explicit.

      That's not the problem. What they really fear is the ideas presented in these works. Ideas like questioning the status quo and caring for those with the least.

      To them, there is no greater danger.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 04, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
        1  
        I believe you've nailed it, WK.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynxxnyl (December 05, 2009 2:19 am ET)
           
        These books ~are~ sexually explicit, some of them describing sex acts involving kids as young as 6. Compared to the books listed above, these ones actually are pornographic.

        I can't believe I'm supporting right wing idiots =(
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.