About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Sorry, right-wingers, Whitehouse didn't call you all Aryan racists

December 21, 2009 4:29 pm ET by Matt Gertz

The right-wing media have spent the year BEGGING for progressive leaders to call them Nazis.

Back in April, media conservatives freaked out over declassified Department of Homeland Security report detailing potential increases in right-wing extremism. Ignoring the possibility that the election of a black president could have an actual effect on the radicalism and recruitment of actual hate groups - like, for instance, the Klan - the Limbaughs and Hannitys of the world were convinced that the report was actually aimed at them.

Then in August, Nancy Pelosi commented that protestors are "carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on health care." Sure enough, swastikas and other Nazi icons had appeared on signs carried by those protestors, who were suggesting that the Democrats' health care reform plans were reminiscent of Hitler's Germany. But the right-wing was sure that Pelosi was talking about them, and had been calling the protestors or opponents of health care reform "Nazis."

Now, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) is getting the same treatment. In a floor speech yesterday, Whitehouse criticized Senate Republicans' rampant obstructionism of health care reform efforts, specifically their refusal to support cloture on a defense appropriations bill in hopes of slowing down attempts to move to a vote on health care. Whitehouse stated that Senate Republicans were "desperate to break this president," adding "They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist."

From Whitehouse's December 20 floor speech (about 115 minutes in):

The lowest of the low was the Republican vote against funding and supporting our troops in the field in a time of war. As a devise to stop health care, they tried to stop the appropriation of funds for our soldiers. There is no excuse for that. From that, there is no return. Every single Republican member was willing to vote against cloture for funding our troops, and they admitted it was a tactic to obstruct health care reform. The Secretary of Defense warned us all that a "no" vote would immediately create "a serious disruption in the worldwide activities of the Department of Defense," end quote, and yet every one of them was willing to vote "no."

Almost all of them did vote no. Some stayed away, but that's the same as "no" when you need 60 "yes" votes to proceed. Voting "no" and hiding from the vote are the same result. Those of us on the floor see it was clear. The three of them who did not cast their yes votes until all 60 Senate votes had been tallied and it was clear that the result was a foregone conclusion. And why? Why all this discord and discourtesy, all this unprecedented destructive action? All to break the momentum of our new young president.

They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one.

Rather then assess the validity of Whitehouse's claims - do such people exist, and do they support Republcian senators? - the right-wing started screaming about how Whitehouse was accusing them all of membership in hate groups.

Washington Times blogger Kerry Picket got the ball rolling, providing Whitehouse's full comment but doing so under the headline, "Sen. Whitehouse: foes of health care bill are birthers, right-wing militias, aryan groups."  RedState's Erick Erickson took over from there, claiming that Whitehouse said that "If you oppose health care deform, you are a racist, hate-spouting, Aryan who roots for the assassination of Barack Obama" and "labeled everyone opposed to the legislation as racist hatemongers rooting for bullets against the President." The claim spread through the right-wing blogosphere from there, and just made the jump to Lou Dobbs' radio show.

What seems oddest about the right-wing media's obsessive claims that progressives are calling them Nazis is the implication that comparing your political opponents to Hitler and company is out of bounds. If the right really believes that such comparisons are beyond the pale, maybe its time for them to stop informing us how much Obama and his politics remind them of Hitler.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (December 21, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
      8  
      Yeah, yeah, we all know they'd paste his comments together to make it sound worse. Big deal.

      I LOVED his comments!! Spot-on ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (December 21, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
      6  
      Typical right-wing crapola...

      They've gotten so used to lying and distorting they can't stop now.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (December 21, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
      7  
      Not only did the white wing openly encourage these comparisons, They routinely showed up at their rallies. Going as far as organizing some of them.

      Hypocrisy as far as the eye can see!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (December 21, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
      11  
      As the hysteria against Whithouse gets fanned, Democrats ought to stand by him an acknowledge that the substance of his remarks is SPOT ON. But being Democrats, what will happen is that they will distance themselves from Whitehouse, and then force him to apologize for his "poor choice of words." Think Dick Durbin and Guantanamo and Nazis, or John Kerry and George W. Bush and getting us stuck in Iraq.

      Democrats almost never stand up against this kind of bullying -- instead, they favor the rollover, the apology, and the "we're looking ahead not backwards" press conference.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (December 21, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
        4  
        Absolutely right. No matter what a Republican says, you can count on every Republican in Congress to circle the wagons in his defense, and for the Democrats to quickly back down from any criticism- in fact, to turn the criticism on to those who would continue to "harp" on the Republican who "misspoke."

        When a Democrat says ANYTHING outside the placid, vanilla, accepted vocabulary of the Hill, you can count on both Republicans AND Democrats assaulting the "miscreant." And the Democrat ultimately apologizing for speaking the truth.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (December 21, 2009 6:03 pm ET)
          4  
          One day in the not to distant future, the Democrats will figure out in order to keep winning the Congress and the Whitehouse, they need to ACT LIKE DEMOCRATS not Republican lites.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by sleepy joe (December 21, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
        3  
        This is so true. Democrats never seem to stand up for themselves or each other. This is one the reasons why the Democrats are viewed as spineless.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Rhythm77 (December 21, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
         
      Conservative Media voices call Obama a SOCIALIST, and are more likely to compare him to STALIN than Hitler. Freakin liberals finally get the majority to pass a bill and they will take the opportunity to run over the will of the people to pass their legislation and attempt to lay a foundation of decrepit socialism. Repugnant.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (December 21, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
      3  
      foes of health care bill are birthers, right-wing militias, aryan groups


      Definitely not the words I would have chosen. I consider them selfish, misinformed drooling Troglodytes. But that's just me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (December 21, 2009 7:24 pm ET)
        15
      Oh the deep love of decent behavior by the democrat party in the senate. Oh the love of socialism, evidenced in this man's pomposity.

      No parsing here, but listen to the lovely, loving senator from Rhode island. In his words, a day of reckoning is coming....

      His despicable comments about opponents of obamacare in the senate start at the 1 hour 57th minute.

      Speaking truth to/about progressive and looking forward to November 2010.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (December 21, 2009 8:41 pm ET)
        4  
        Looking forward to losing.

        We will get out the vote and show up at the polls.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (December 21, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
            8
          nextstopcucamunga,

          With acorn's able assistance in registration and black panther voter intimidation, I'm sure.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikelartist (December 22, 2009 8:15 am ET)
            5  
            I will give you $1000 for every instance of "voter fraud" resulting in a fraudulent vote being cast with the help of Acorn. I will give you $10,000 per instance of one of those voter fraud accusations you wingnuts claim turned the election to Obama that results in a prosecution.

            You wingnuts screech about voter fraud every election but there is NOT ONE SINGLE case that resulted in a prosecution or a fraudulent vote.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (December 22, 2009 10:31 am ET)
            3  
            Do you EVER post ANYTHING that you haven't gotten from Fox, hate talk radio or freerepublic? If you would actually use your head and READ instead of just believing this crap, you might understand what I've been saying to you.

            Sheesh! Get a clue, buddy.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (December 22, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
               
            With acorn's able assistance in registration and black panther voter intimidation, I'm sure.

            You mighta jumped the shark into the sarcasm pool with that one. Are you really Colbert?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by MiG (December 21, 2009 8:54 pm ET)
           
        Thanks for providing the link, PC. I watched his entire speech, and agree with everything he said. I think you know he is spot on. Does that hurt?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Pianofighter (December 21, 2009 9:19 pm ET)
           
        No sh!t. I don't even think you read these articles. You just link to the same video and point to the same comments in that video that are already quoted above. What's the point? The point is : you're a fcuking troll. Do you ever get tired of it? I come to MMFA when I'm both bored and curious as to what's going on in Wingnuttia. Sometimes I think "Hey! Isn't there something better I could be doing than commenting here?...Reading a book, maybe?". I can't even imagine what a troll like you must feel. I sure hope they're paying you enough.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (December 21, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
        7  
        Hey, thanks for referring me to that video. Whitehouse was great. I started listening about 10 minutes earlier than you suggested. He does a fantastic job of summarizing and documenting republican dishonesty and obstructionism. He brought it forward expertly to relate it to what has happened recently in the current legislative battles along with his predictions of how it will play out. That's where his "day of reckoning" fit in. He was very clear how he meant it. He predicted that reform would pass and that the people would see its benefits and that the scary predictions of the republicans wouldn't come to pass. He predicted that the people would hold the opponents of health care reform responsible for their obstructionism.

        Please tell me, just how is that despicable? It looks to me as though he's predicting that things will go exactly as they are ideally meant to in American politics.

        Again, thank you for the link. My respect for Whitehouse has greatly increased.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (December 21, 2009 10:51 pm ET)
            7
          blindingthemwithscience,

          So the blog master erred in denying the statements by whitehorse were not about those that opposed the monstrosity of obamacare?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (December 21, 2009 11:00 pm ET)
            7  
            I'm not sure what you're asking. Whitehouse's statements speak for themselves, though I believe I gave a fair summary of them. The right wing descriptions of what he said that are listed above in the article DO NOT reasonably describe what Whitehouse said. He DID NOT generally describe opponents of health care reform as "birthers, right-wing militias, aryan groups." THAT is a lie.

            Try to learn to listen and read for comprehension. It helps.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (December 21, 2009 11:12 pm ET)
                6
              So who was he actually calling birthers, right-wing militias and aryan group members?

              I'll defer to your obvious supernatural skills of discernment to illuminate all of us...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 22, 2009 1:41 am ET)
                5  
                Q: So who was he actually calling birthers, right-wing militias and aryan group members?

                A: Birthers, right-wing militias and Aryan group members.

                He could have included idiots, but I guess that's implied.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by ScienceBuff (December 22, 2009 8:16 am ET)
                5  
                Here are his words:
                [The Senate republicans] are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist.

                Do you really have that much trouble understanding? At that point in the speech he wasn't even specifically referring to health care reform. He was talking about republican obstructionism and mentioned groups that joined them in attacking Obama. There is no honest way to look at those words and say that he was generally calling Obama's opponents birthers, fanatics, right-wing militias and Aryan groups. He was saying that those groups JOINED the republicans who were blocking Obama's efforts and trying to discredit him. It isn't deniable that they did. No one is even saying there was coordination, but they were working toward the same goal.

                It doesn't take any supernatural skills. It only requires that one have the ability to read for comprehension. Keep working on it and you might eventually achieve that. But I doubt it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (December 22, 2009 10:46 am ET)
                  3  
                  I wouldn't try to get PC to use his brain. I think it only works to record the false garbage he regurgitates. For some reason, he believes that if he heard someone he considers to be "conservative" say it, it makes him a conservative to believe it. Very sad.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (December 21, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
      4  
      Sheldon Whitehouse may not have called them racists, haters, or Aryan Master race groupies, BUT HE SHOULD HAVE!!

      For all the foaming at the mouth by these rabid right-wingers anytime even a vague reference of calling them what they are, they get even more rabid, whether it is directed at them or not.

      Guilty as charged? Perhaps they hate the idea of being called what they know to be, especially by a Democrat?

      So the way I see it:

      If the shoe fits...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 22, 2009 3:15 am ET)
        5  
        I'm glad MMFA posted this, I first saw it at Redstate in the item linked. Even with the dishonest headline, the out-of-context quotes and the editorializing at RS, it was obvious that Whitehouse said nothing close to what Erickson was pretending he said. OK, obvious to anybody but a small child or a RedState fan.

        Flashback to Jimmy Carter's quote about the " overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity" toward Obama (which clearly includes at least three degrees of separation from " criticism of Obama"), when the wingnuts were completely fooled into thinking that Carter had said that anybody who disagreed with Obama on anything was a racist.

        Lesson to Liberals : don't bother dumbing everything down for the far right, no matter how hard you try to make it safe for them to understand, they'll always go a little bit dumber.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 22, 2009 3:25 am ET)
          5  
          BTW, comments thread at redstate is hilarious. A bunch of misinformed meatheads at a site that immediately bans any dissenting opinions, talking about how they use facts to destroy libruls who dare to challenge them.
          Report Abuse