About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Lying your way into war? Apparently not a scandal.

December 30, 2009 12:38 pm ET by Jamison Foser

The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder wants to know what people think is "the best (or worst) Republican political scandal of the decade?"  Ambinder offers four choices:

Not mentioned?  The Bush administration lying its way into a war of choice, listening in on the phone conversations of Americans, torture, Abu Ghraib, putting an unqualified crony in charge of FEMA, the US Attorneys firing, outing a CIA operative to get back at her husband, etc.

I don't think Ambinder is unique in his view of what constitutes a major political scandal, not by any stretch of the imagination.  But when the political/media elite come to view the possibility that Larry Craig tried to pick up a guy in an airport as more scandalous than Abu Ghraib, warrantless wiretapping of Americans, or the dishonest march to war against a country that didn't attack us, we're in pretty bad shape.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 30, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
      8  
      I'll give Ambinder one bit of credit--one of the choices wasn't about sex...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (December 30, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
      14  
      Stop me when you think we have enough proof to definitively state that the U.S. press does not do serious, complex issues. They have all become TMZ & Fox News, obsessed with personal issues and he said/she said.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (December 30, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
        6  
        Exactly - if the issue can't be boiled down to one individual's personal flaws, rather than abuses of power or breakdowns of institutions, the media can't wrap their tiny little minds around it. History would have been so much different if only Shrub and Condi could have been caught schtupping on tape while plotting their invasion of Iraq.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rrastro (December 30, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
      1 24
      lame partisan hatcheting. these are only scandals if you buy mma explanation
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RKAllen (December 30, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
        12  
        You don't find it interesting though that three of the four scandals involve lurid affairs or sexual behavior? Why would they list those as "worst" scandals of the decade.

        I think even without partisanship, you and I together could come up with a dozen scandals that are more damaging to the Republicans than a few affairs and a Senator tap dancing in a men's room stall.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (December 30, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
        11  
        lame partisan hatcheting. these are only scandals if you buy mma explanation
        predictably weak partisan response. it's not a scandal if you buy wingnut explanation
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 30, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
          12 1
          mma explanation = things that actually happened, except on Planet Wingnut.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bongo Fury (December 30, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
               
            On Planet Wingnut,one must only criticize what one does not understand.Facts are not essential because opinions rule on that low oxygen planet.There is no need for bi-partisan agreements because everyone thinks the same.War is the main means of communications due to the conflict with the planet Oligarchy that believe only the ruling rich know what is good for the people.Due to this,the powerless lean to the low oxygen planet for "different" opinions that the Oligachs do not permit.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 30, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
        9  
        Okay, so when Ambinder does a list of Democratic scandals and includes Eliot Spitzer and John Edwards, that will be "lame partisan hatcheting" too? Oh, forget it--who am I kidding?...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mattcable250650 (December 30, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
          11  
          My list of Democratic scandals would mostly begin with "And they collaborated with Republicans when..." "And they remained silent when..." "And they failed to act when..."
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rrastro (December 31, 2009 6:50 pm ET)
            2
          yes it will be lame partisan hatcheting if he compiles such a list for demos only
          Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (December 30, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
        2  
        "lame partisan hatcheting. these are only scandals if you buy mma explanation"

        How would you explain them?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (December 30, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
           
        Partisan hatcheting?You and your ditto head buds have been non-stop on Obama and any one you choose in his circle.No matter how small and insignificant,the wing nuts will nit pick it.It's time Cheney and his lot get their due for war crimes and taking rights away with the so called "Patriot" act.If the Atlantic uses only sexual indisgression against the repugs,then their nut job party is getting off too easy.I live in small town America and weuns in the sticks have more common sense than any of your so-called intellectual conservatives(oxymoron).Why don't you clean up your act and join the human race before your your misplaced ideology destroys your sense of common decency.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (December 30, 2009 8:37 pm ET)
        1  
        "lame partisan hatcheting. these are only scandals if you buy mma explanation"

        If you've got a competing explanation (although I'm pretty sure you mean "definition" of scandal), by all means, offer it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rrastro (December 31, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
            1
          Not mentioned? The Bush administration lying its way into a war of choice, listening in on the phone conversations of Americans, torture, Abu Ghraib, putting an unqualified crony in charge of FEMA, the US Attorneys firing, outing a CIA operative to get back at her husband, etc.

          I dont see those as scandals just the usual - like sex with interns and making a political crony homeland security boss
          Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (December 31, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
            1  
            "The usual"? The usual what if not the usual scandal? If you deem "sex with interns" as "the usual", then how is it distinct from any of the "scandals" listed in the poll?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (December 30, 2009 9:28 pm ET)
           
        What is your excuse for defending every misdeed the repugs have done?Do you love war?Do you not like privacy?Is torture ok as long as is serves your ends?Is your ideology limited by what you echo?I've been checking you out and find you to be repugnant in your one way view and the way you treat educated posters.Why don't you just go on a dittohead site where you can have a hate fest with the rest of your one track mind buddies?You claim folks here are partisan,but you leave no disclaimer and have no data for your disclaiming.Grow a set.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (December 30, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
      3 1
      To be perfectly honest, this question is meant to be fun. Why crimp the fun by asking about something real and serious? Which is more of a threat to Mom and Apple Pie, Cronyism, Crony Capitalism, governmental incompetence, and undermining the Constitution compared to a couple of geezer who have yet to come to grips with their own gayness? At least the Abramoff Investigation was close to serious, but that only involved money (and a bunch of people living in an overseas territory, they weren't really Americans, afterall.)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (December 30, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
      8 1
      I voted for Sarah Palin secretly having Levi Johnston's child as the worst scandal... How could that NOT be?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (December 30, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
      13  
      When Lindsay Lohan's driving skills, Tiger's harem, the latest politician sex scandal, and Sarah Palin's book tour are "Breaking News", what else can one expect.

      If it wasn't for Jon Stewart, we wouldn't have any "serious" news at all.

      I have come to believe that the electorate gets the news it demands. And why I watch BBC.

      Thank goodness for MMFA. And Happy New Year to all.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (December 30, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
           
        Also try Mosaic on LinkTv.They do BBC and Al-Jazeera.Both Are excellent sources of real journalism and not faux nous blathering.Jon Stewart is indeed great.MMFA is important in the war on real information.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (December 30, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
      10  
      None of these rise to the level of the Mao Christmas ornament.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Samurai Cowboy (December 30, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
      11 2
      Hope about the bought and paid for corrupt U.S. Supreme Court illegaly appointing Bush as President?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by justdafacts (December 30, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
         
      Honorable mention: Michael Steele paying off--and taking care of--his friendsSandy Roberts and the convicted felon, Alan Fabian.

      - Steve Lebowitz, Annapolis
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (December 30, 2009 1:58 pm ET)
      5  
      Or the Abramhoff scandal or Duke Cunningham. You would think a story about defense contractors buying a senator's vote with hookers would be kind of relevant about now.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (December 30, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
      6  
      I agree that the dishonesty exhibited in the invasion of Iraq is far and away the biggest scandal. The fact that Bush ignored the information coming from boots on the ground and stuck with the by-then debunked intelligence in January and February of 2003 should be a horrific scandal.

      Only because the Dems were trying to give him the benefit of the doubt because they're decent guys and because the nation was attacked on 9/11 and because the Dems wanted to support the troops, that's the only reasons why it didn't become an impeachable offense.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rrastro (December 31, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
          5
        so when no weapons were found we should retreat? good thing you arent a general
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (December 31, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
          3  
          How bout, if there are no weapons found, don't attack in the first place.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (January 01, 2010 1:00 am ET)
             
          No, we never should have gone in, you idiot! We invaded in MARCH! What a dunce you continue to prove yourself to be that you don't even understand the reference to January and February.

          The boots on the ground were the UN Weapons Inspectors who not only visited ALL of the most likely places for Iraq to have stored or manufactured WMD's, and found nothing, but they also talked to many, many scientists, soldiers and politicians who would have known about WMD munitions, and they were told that Iraq hadn't had any WMD's for a decade, and had no ability to make any.

          So, he had real factual information, and he had debunked intelligence ("intelligence" = educated guesses), and he went with the debunked intelligence instead of the factual information. That's what makes the invasion 100% wrong and unjustifiable.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Reinhard (December 30, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
         
      My favorite Bush scandals:
      Planting a gay stripper in the Press room as a "reporter"
      and
      Releasing three Gitmo detainees who recently conspired to blow up airplanes
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (December 30, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
      11 1
      My nominees for Worst GOP Scandals of the Decade:

      1 - Bush ignoring terrorism warnings prior to 9/11 attacks, concentrating instead on tax cuts for his wealthy friends.

      2 - Valerie Plame being outed as a CIA agent.

      3 - Bush Misadministration's handling of Hurricane Katrina aftermath.

      4 - Over 4,000 of our finest young men and women and countless Iraqis dying because of Bush's WMD lies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 30, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
        7  
        A list no sane person could find fault with. Wingnut teabaggers, on the other hand...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by darkheath (December 30, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
           
        I agree with this list, but would reorder it:

        1 - Bush ignoring terrorism warnings prior to 9/11 attacks, concentrating instead on tax cuts for his wealthy friends.

        4 - Over 4,000 of our finest young men and women and countless Iraqis dying because of Bush's WMD lies.

        3 - Bush Misadministration's handling of Hurricane Katrina aftermath.

        2 - Valerie Plame being outed as a CIA agent.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (December 31, 2009 6:01 am ET)
        4  
        WZWRITER,have to completely agree with you on that list.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (December 31, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
        2  
        Good List..says it all!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (December 31, 2009 7:33 pm ET)
        3  
        i'd like to add 2 more to that list:
        1,Afganistan,It was the right thing to do after 9/11,but the BUSHIES botched it.They tried to do it on the cheap by using CIA and AFGAN tribes instead of regular troops.When the American Commander on the ground requested 800 army rangers to block 3 mountain passes leading from Afganistan into Pakistan, his request was refused further up the chain of command, allowing Bin Laden and his people the opportunity to escape.
        2, Terry Schivo, the administration and the Political RIGHT used this families tradgity for political gain.For a Party that decrys GOVT intervention in personal matters they sure were quick to intervene to stop her feeding tube from being disconected. they wouldn't listen to the doctors on the ground and brought in their own "experts" to push their line that she had a chance. After the dust settled and an autopsey was performed on her it was discovered that her brain had shrunk to less than half it's size supporting what her Doctors had said origionally, that she was in a permanent vegitative state. But the administration and its RIGHT WING LACKIES wouldn't believe that because it didn't suit their position.They caused this family an untold amount of grief and sorrow and should be horsewhipped for it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (January 01, 2010 1:31 am ET)
          2  
          I have to agree with your addition of Terry Schiavo.

          She wanted to be able to control her own body, just like women who want to have an abortion want to control their own bodies, rather than the unborn fetuses or some other busybody!

          And how does the Republican Party resolve their stated purpose to not interfere with personal choices with interfering with Terry Schiavo's choices?

          Her parents wanted to worship a body that no longer housed the 'person' that Terry Schiavo had been. The tissue and bone and hair aren't the 'person'. The intelligence, the personality, the memories - that's what the 'person' is, and that was gone WRT Terry Schiavo. Someone needed to tell them that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (January 01, 2010 3:56 am ET)
            2  
            DellDolly,totally agree with you. It was despicable how HANNITY, LIMBAUGH and the rest of the RIGHT WING BLOWHARDS came on day after day trashing her husband and encouraging false hope for her Mom and Dad all to further their lunatic agenda. As i said earlier they should be horsewhipped.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (December 30, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
      6  
      Lying your way into war? Apparently not a scandal

      They call them scandals??? LOL! Man they need to do more research into the GOP. How about the weapons trades with Iran to release hostages? How about invade a country under false pretense, about weapons we gave them in the 1980's?

      Now those are some scandals!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (December 30, 2009 5:31 pm ET)
      4  
      Well, I wouldn’t consider lying into war a scandal... it’s more of a crime. But it's still obvious that they want to ignore even mentioning such a thing because wing nuts hate it when their past is brought up. You see how much they freak out when bush is talked about? They want us to only talk about Obama and his socialism. But weren’t they still talking about Clinton years after bush took office? Hell, aren’t they still mentioning him to this day? A wing nut’s logic and hypocrisy knows no bounds.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (December 30, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
        2  
        Sorry about all the weird symbols... damn spell check. :\
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (December 31, 2009 2:34 am ET)
          1  
          Well, MMFA should have software that doesn't freak out with slightly varying apostrophes and quotation marks either!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by serg99 (December 30, 2009 8:54 pm ET)
         
      its sad but true at lest we know a few nations out there would arrest bush and his criminal freinds if they set foot on there soil
      Report Abuse
    • Author by deeman (December 30, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
         
      A scandal...how about the scandal...I'm talking the mother of all scandals...The big kahuna...THE BIG ONE!!!!

      Don't ask what...just think, muse for a minute. What is the elephant in the room? The freakin' giant, unsustainable, recovery defeating DEFICIT.

      Now, before you get your panties in a wad, I, a life-long Democrat, am not laying the problem at any parties' feet. I am looking forward. It's for the Republicans, Democrats, Independents, 3rd party, any party to shoulder the responsibility for. The scandal is that our government hasn't.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2009 11:43 pm ET)
         
      We're not to sit here and pretend that only the Republicans have scandals, are we ? Let's see we have Dan Rostenkowski, James Trafficant, Roland Burris and the mystery of the Senate seat sale, Tony Rezko, Chris Dodd, Charlie Rangel, Princess Nancy and her very own special Speaker of The Shack travel agency, and many other horrid stories of the federal government's abuses of power.

      Shouldn't Media Matters be about cutting through partisan garbage and getting at the truth ?

      By the way, I'm not a Republican, I'm a Libertarian and I'm not excusing the Republicans for their corruption, either/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (December 31, 2009 12:54 am ET)
         
      Unrelated but important.Limbaugh is in a Hawaii hospital with serious chest pains.Though he is a target of necessary ridicule here,he is still kind of human.The true venom belongs to Beck and the rest of the phonies at faux nous.Rush will get by and I hope he mellows out when he's ok.Kindness is liberal.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (December 31, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      1 10
      listening in on the phone conversations of Americans-Foser


      I love how this little bit of "misinformation" is still being quietly pushed forward to smear the Bush Admin.

      What? You didn't get the memo either Jamie?

      Why The Unprecedented Barry has EXPANDED the Warrantless Wiretap provisions. They even set a higher legal bar to sue!

      Go ahead and include it Jamie, but remember, full disclosure!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (December 31, 2009 10:58 am ET)
           
        It's wrong if Obama's doing it, too. Unlike simple-minded wingnuts, liberals and progressives don't make their leaders objects of worship.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (December 31, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
        4 1
        Evidently you either didn't read the article of have reading comprehension issues. Mr. Foser didn't compile the list. He was only reporting on Ambinder's list, and what does and does not constitute a scandal. You're way off base on this one.

        As a retired teacher, I was always required to address my students by their preferred names and to avoid addressing them by any other moniker. This is a lesson you still have to learn regarding President Obama. I know you use it as a sign of disrespect and/or to delegitimize him, but it has the opposite effect: you come across as someone not deserving of respect, and someone who is petty, vindictive, delusional, and not really interested in America's well-being, only your own.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (January 01, 2010 1:38 am ET)
             
          I have some teenagers as neighbors, and the other day I heard one of the kids telling another girl, who looks 'black' to me, that she should call her herself something besides 'black' because she has some white ancestors.

          I told the girl that the 'rules' have changed, and she gets to decide what she's called. No longer is it the right of others to determine if someone is black just because they have 1/16th african-american blood in them, or whatever that silly rule was! That rule, in retrospect, makes the people who made the rule and supported its existence, look petty, vindictive, delusional and not really interested in America's well-being, and only interested in their own well-being.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.