What bothers me about the coverage of the Uganda law is the almost exclusive focus on the 'death penalty' provisions. While these are obviously the worst in their effect on individuals, other proposals in the law are, incredibly, worse in their effect on 'civic society.' They include

    extraterritoriality -- which allows Ugandans in other countries to be arrested, detained, transported and tried in Uganda for actions committed there
    landlord provisions -- which penalize landlords with jail terms for renting to gays, not only forcing gays into homelessness, but requiring landlords to observe what occurs in their own properties
    in whatever way possible
    advocacy penalties -- which penalize people who speak in favor of LGBT people -- presumably including arguing for repeal of the bill -- which at least would punish forms of political activity and newspaper campaigns against the bill (I am not sure if Uganda has a 'Parliamentary immunity' clause, if not, even introducing such a bill might be punishable)
    and, worst of all, punishing friends and family members -- INCLUDING PARENTS -- who do not 'turn in' gays


These provisions are only reminiscewnt of the totalitarianisms of the 30s, only today technological advances make them far easier to be applied.

I am seriously worried that, should the 'death penalty' provision be removed -- as it may be as a 'bargaining chip', activists would retire in triumph, ignoring the other, more serious provisions that remain and would fail to realize exactly how wrong the statement was that "... if the offending sections were sufficiently modified, the proposed law would represent an encouraging step in the right direction."