About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

UPDATED: Tea Party convention hosts Palin and bans the press. Except Palin employer Fox News

January 14, 2010 3:26 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Media message from the right wing: If you don't give the Tea Party "fair coverage," then you will be banned from covering its convention.

And who says the conservative movement doesn't hold journalism in contempt?

As we noted this morning, next month's Tea Party convention featuring Sarah Palin will essentially be closed to the press. Unless, that is, you work for Rupert Murdoch (Fox News and WSJ), or a fringe, far-right site like Townhall, WND, or Breitbart. According to Tea Party planners, those are the only "journalists" who will be allowed in next month.

Considering that Palin is now on Fox News' payroll, the cabler's exclusive status at the Palin convention presents a rather Manwich-sized conflict of interest, no?

Meanwhile, Politico's Michael Calderone adds more context:

Event organizer Judson Phillips told POLITICO that the first priority is to have a working convention, and that press is a secondary concern. Initially, he said, the "game plan was to deny media access."

But with limited space, he said, the organizers "picked some groups that we had some contact with."

When asked if ideology was part of the criteria in choosing, Phillips said "no." Also, I specifically asked why the Journal was selected as opposed to other news outlets that applied, including POLITICO.

Calderone reported that a WSJ spokesman didn't have a comment regarding whether the newspaper would cover the convention, given how every other mainstream news outlet had been banned. If the Journal actually accepts the credentials under the current conditions, then I don't think there will be any doubt left about whether or not  Murdoch's newspaper really operates as a professional, nonpartisan entity.

UPDATED: What do editors at the conservative Weekly Standard and National Review have to say about this situation? As working journalists, are they OK with the Tea Party excluding journalists? And how do they feel about being banned by organizers? Doesn't feel so good, does it?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rkcomments (January 14, 2010 3:31 pm ET)
      3 1
      Surprised? Not!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mr. Katanga (January 14, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
      4 2
      Where's Jake Tapper? Shouldn't he be leading a charge against the same News org. he defended a few months back?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (January 14, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
      2 1
      When asked if ideology was part of the criteria in choosing, Phillips said "no."
      Hahahahaha.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (January 14, 2010 4:40 pm ET)
        1 3
        I just love watching these conservative dingbats dig an even deeper hole for themselves.

        Rock on! to your little tea party!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 14, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
      3 3
      A bunch of amateurs... How could any rational person put their trust in such a bunch of amateurs who aren't dealing with reality. These people have about as much chance of electing someone to high office as someone would have turning this country into a communist dictatorship. It's laughable...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 14, 2010 4:04 pm ET)
      2  
      Our resident WITH'ers love gloating about left-wingers "lacking the political courage" to be on Fox News. Right back at ya.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by whatIthink (January 14, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
      2 2
      Who got credentials? I STILL don't see any members of the press that are allowed to attend the convention.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boxkicker (January 14, 2010 4:23 pm ET)
         
      I am going to the rally where Palin is speaking! I am a huge fan and I hope she will have a bright future in American politics....she is smart and strong and wears darling high heels, I just love her!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sjw (January 14, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
         
      And Fox will of course blame the lack of coverage by the other stations as proof of the "liberal media".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brian in FL (January 14, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
      1 3
      This is a picture of what the Tea Party would do to America. They are not about "freedom". They are not about the Constitution. They are a far-right movement who would ban any non-far right voice if they had their chance.

      Also, I hope all the mainstream media who defended Fox News' political activism are satisfied. Now they are banned as well, and only Fox News is allowed to cover the Tea Party convention. Only the activist "news" channel is allowed. Great job mainstream media dolts. Defending Fox News sure has worked out great for you.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by I Love Communism (January 16, 2010 6:37 pm ET)
           
        Care to provide any evidence for your assertions?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Mustang98 (January 16, 2010 12:59 pm ET)
           
        Most of you people must have amnesia or just seletively forget what you want. So the Tea-Party goers (I will go this year) have a problem with other media outlets who do nothing but call them Tea-Baggers, joining in on their convention? Where was your problem with the WH shutting out Fox for MOST of 2009, and of course the ever so infamous direct attack on Fox from the White House? There is only one word I have to use when describing most people here, and i'm sure most of you would agree it fits...liberal. It is not a derogatory term by any means, but when you have Chuck Schumer and Chris Matthews ignore the true purpose of the people at a Tea Party and result to the liberal way, name calling, why on earth would people invite those people to cover their private event? It's like saying SEIU and Acorn would invite Fox to their exclusive dinner parties for the elites of the US....laughable I know.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by No One #2 (January 16, 2010 6:13 pm ET)
         
      So wait, a private organization invites a private citizen to speak, and chooses to allow some media in but not others. I don't see the problem here. Only the jilted ones that didn't get in, or have a axe to grind and a political point to make have a problem. Like the FAR LEFT Media Matters bloggers.
      Report Abuse