About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

History profs: Beck's documentary smearing progressives is a "complete lie"; Beck's living in "alternative universe"

January 25, 2010 7:25 pm ET by Media Matters staff

In a Politico article headlined "History according to Glenn Beck," reporter Michael Calderone asked history professors what they thought of Beck's documentary on "the atrocities of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Ernesto 'Che' Guevara - 'the true unseen history of Marxism, progressivism and communism; as Beck described it."

In the article, Clemson professor Steven Marks called Beck's assertions "a complete lie":

Clemson University professor Steven Marks, author of "How Russia Shaped the Modern World," said that while Beck doesn't explicitly tie the left-wing totalitarian regimes of the past to contemporary liberals, that's what "he's hinting at here."

"No one in their right mind is going to defend Stalin or Mao or Che Guevara," Marks said. "The implication is that this is what's going to happen if Democrats get their way. This is just a complete lie."

Boston College professor Alan Wolfe said Beck "lives in a complete alternative universe":

Alan Wolfe, director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Life at Boston College, said that the film not only isn't accurate, but that Beck "lives in a complete alternative universe."

As an example, he said, Beck mentions how the Nazis supported programs like universal health care as evidence that their ideology may have more to do with the left than the totalitarian right.

Nazi Germany was "not evil because of their economic program," said Wolfe, which he noted included a few programs designed to promote public health.

"It was evil," he said, " because it aimed at the extermination of European Jewry."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 25, 2010 7:33 pm ET)
      12  
      Beck's so-called argument is like saying that good dental hygiene is the trademark of evil people because Charles Manson flossed and brushed his teeth twice a day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 25, 2010 7:52 pm ET)
      7  
      Not surprisingly, Beck relied on the wisdom of whack-job "historian" Jonah Goldberg to help push this crap. Dave Neiwart over at C&L has a great post on this as well.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (January 25, 2010 8:10 pm ET)
      9  
      Clearly, those professors are progressives and therefore cannot be trusted.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 25, 2010 8:43 pm ET)
        6  
        This will be Beck's defense of his historically challenged show. Wait, you'll see.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (January 25, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
      8 2
      Nazi Germany was "not evil because of their economic program," said Wolfe, which he noted included a few programs designed to promote public health.

      The fact that Beck (and the trolls who come here to defend him) don't get this is proof that conservatism has moved on to the next level: "Screw thirteen million innocent people, I got mine."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jose2 (January 25, 2010 9:12 pm ET)
        1 22
        So somebody else succeeded in life. This really upsets you.

        And now you want to take away from the person who can say "I got mine" and give it to the dropouts who think that health care is a right and they are the chosen ones.

        It is people like you who will either destroy America by emulating the Nazis or hopefully you will end up in the trash can where you belong.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (January 25, 2010 9:31 pm ET)
          8  
          Right. Progressives are Nazis. Or they emulate Nazis. Or Maoists. Or Stalinists. Or all of the above. Yup. You nailed it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by usp (January 26, 2010 2:47 am ET)
            6  
            you can't really even respond to these folks- too stupid to figure it all out. he's going to be rich any minute, as soon as the lottery thing comes through.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (January 25, 2010 10:24 pm ET)
          7  
          How are "we" emulating the Nazis again?

          Nobody pretty much in the history of this great country has even gotten close to doing such a thing, and due to our checks and balances, it should never happen.

          The guy above didn't say anything about being mad that someone else succeeded.

          Who are the dropouts that you're talking about? Did you know, probably not, that most folks who don't have health insurance don't have it, because they can't afford it. They work hard, but the places they work don't offer a plan. I'm sure you pay for yours 100% right? Yeah, probably not. Because like me, you probably have a company pay for MOST of your health insurace as part of your benefits package, and if you're self employed, you write it off at the end of the year as a business expense.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jose2 (January 25, 2010 10:32 pm ET)
            2 16
            The Nazis were mad at the Jews for being successful. You want to emulate the Nazis by taking away from the successful and give it to the dropouts / unsuccessful.

            By using the government to punish success and reward failure there is no possible outcome other than total disaster, just like the Nazis.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (January 25, 2010 10:39 pm ET)
              8  
              No, no we don't. It's called a progressive tax, and it's how the folks who benefit the MOST from living in this country, giving back their fair share.

              Do you make more than $250k/year? Because if you don't, they you got a tax CUT.

              The Nazis were not MAD at the Jews for being successful, that's a bad reading of history. And even if they were, how does a slightly higher tax rate (rate rise of 2%) equate to sending millions of people to extermination camps? It's not even close, not even remotely close. Punishing success? You mean, going back to the tax rates of the Clinton years, you know, when the rich got richer, and we had a booming economy? Yeah, those were ROUGH times for the richer folks amongst us.

              What's wrong with our country trying to provide for the least of us? Nothing, nothing at all.

              But of course, you addressed nothing that I wrote before, so I'm sure you won't now.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jose2 (January 25, 2010 10:52 pm ET)
                4 10
                There is nothing wrong with having compassion for the down trodden.

                There is something wrong with using the government to be the great equalizer that takes away incentive to exert the extra effort required to achieve success.

                Government's job is to provide for a secure environment where you can work hard and reap the fruits of your labor.

                In America, if you cannot pay your debts you do not end up in debtors' prison. If someone has $300,000 in medical expenses they can declare bankruptcy.

                The only thing to address in your writing is the presumption that the successful are not responsible for the dropouts.

                There are churches and charities that can help with the human element. If you want to be an atheist it does limit the type of charity you can receive but I'm sure that if you seek you will find.




                Report Abuse
                • Author by mmfa.fan (January 25, 2010 11:17 pm ET)
                  10 1
                  I'm sorry, but anyone who says the Nazis were "mad" at the Jews or even makes offhand comparisons to the Nazis cannot be taken seriously.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Good Creon (January 25, 2010 11:18 pm ET)
                  8 3
                  You know jose2, the atheists I know are much more generous and charitable than the so called religious people I know, so you may wanna watch those jabs.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jose2 (January 25, 2010 11:26 pm ET)
                    3 10
                    That's great. When you need charity you can hang out with your atheist friends.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mrhebert74 (January 26, 2010 12:43 am ET)
                      7  
                      Furthermore, Creon, jose is rubber and you are glue! Also, he knows you are, but what is he? Also.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 1:54 am ET)
                      6  
                      I'm thinking jose2 is probably an atheist itself, albeit the Randbot kind who thinks all that compassion stuff Jesus advocated was gay.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by snewkirk (January 26, 2010 12:25 am ET)
                  7  
                  There is nothing wrong with the democratically elected government doing what the people want.
                  A democratic government's job is to do what the people want.
                  Let's tell them universal health-care is what we want. And if jose2 doesn't like it, he can get the hell out.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jose2 (January 26, 2010 12:16 pm ET)
                      1
                    There is nothing wrong as long as it's within the constraints of the Constitution.

                    In addition to reading the bills maybe Congress should be forced to read the Constitution.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 8:01 am ET)
                         
                      I'm sick of hearing that Universal health care is unconstitutional. Article IX states that the listing of rights in the constitution does not LIMIT the public to those rights and that if they should CHOOSE to recognize other things (read: health care for all!) as rights, then it's perfectly within their CONSTITUTIONAL rights.

                      Maybe people who repeat pundits about reading bills should read the constitution...how long did Republicans give for the Dems to read the Patriot Act?
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2010 12:29 am ET)
                  7  
                  Umm, first of all, I don't need any charity. I have not taken any money from anyone (except in the form of loans that I have paid back, and never had issues paying) since I graduated high school, and I'm doing quite well at this point in time. I am not rich, but I am comfortable upper middle class, with a good job with good job growth potential. Not sure where you got the idea that I needed help.

                  So bankruptcy is a great way out of owning someone tons of money? Yeah, not so much, since it destroys the rest of your life for another 10 years, at least, and then maybe, just maybe, your credit score can rebound enough so that ineed, you might be able to get credit back again. It takes, well, quite some time.

                  Again, you didn't really address anything I wrote. The Nazis, not MAD at the Jewsish for being successful, they were "mad" at them for being, well, Jewish, and not of pure Aryan blood. And you were also comparing progressivism with Nazism, which, the 2 ideologies coulnd't be further from each other. Not even close in thought process. Oh, I know though, Nazi is short for National Socialist Party, and OOH, they said socialist, so that must mean they're a progressive liberal ideology.

                  Now, are you trying to tell me, because the Government might (they haven't done it) impose an additional tax on couples earning more than $300k / year ($250k for an individual), that this is somehow going to STOP being from being successful, or that people aren't going to want to get paid that much money because they'll have to pay slightly higher taxes (to run our country, not just for entitlement programs remember)? That's just a silly idea.

                  I never said I was an atheist either.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by snewkirk (January 26, 2010 8:29 pm ET)
                     
                  On a slightly off-topic note, being an atheist doesn't mean I can't go into a church. I'm actually quite confident that I will not burst into flames. I'm just saying...
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by leatherhelmet (January 26, 2010 1:07 am ET)
                1 10
                Clinton left us a recession.

                If the secret to a booming economy is raising the tax rate on the rich, then what have Obama and the Dem congress been waiting for??
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 1:50 am ET)
                  8  
                  Clinton left us a recession.

                  Revisionist history-- not just for the forties and fifties anymore!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (January 26, 2010 10:11 am ET)
                  1  
                  No, Clinton didn't "leave us a recession." That was pretty much Bush's recession, just as the recession which was left on Obama's doorstep was a Bush recession. It began in December 2007, but Bush refused to acknowledge it until shortly before the November 2008 election.

                  Keep up. [A hint: you'd probably know more about what is going on around you if you'd turn off Fox and READ.]
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by usp (January 26, 2010 2:53 am ET)
              6  
              The Nazis were mad at the Jews for being successful.


              wrong. do a little research
              Report Abuse
            • Author by wookie (January 26, 2010 9:13 am ET)
              2  
              Actually, the Nazis spent most of their time going on about how the "Jewish doctrine of Marxism" held Germans back from achieving greatness through the "triumph of the will". But, uh, whatever.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (January 26, 2010 10:09 am ET)
              1  
              The Nazis were NOT mad at the Jews for being successful. Hitler needed someone for people to hate . . . he already hated Jews, so it was natural for him to present Jews as the reasons for all of the problems which had befallen Germany. He painted them as un-patriotic, selfish, dirty vermin who were bent on destroying Germany. He "declared war" on the Jews. [Sound familiar? You just watched and believed a propaganda documentary which Goebbels would have been proud to present as his own.]
              Report Abuse
              • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 8:06 am ET)
                   
                Yeah, that's amazing: the greatest source of propaganda in our time gets to label everything else as propaganda...

                And folks like jose compare Obama's Democrats to Hitler's Nazis...even though the closest we've come to being like the Nazis was under the Bush administration when we invaded other nations on false ideological pretenses.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (January 26, 2010 12:04 am ET)
          5 1
          This person doesn't want to discuss the issue - he wants to derail the conversation from being about how Beck's assertions don't hold water to being about how Beck's arguments are PERFECT and WONDROUS!!!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snewkirk (January 26, 2010 12:20 am ET)
          6 1
          Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie!
          There I said it. And I meant it.
          First I took America from you, now if you don't mind, I'm off to destroy it!
          I will destroy America by demanding universal health-care !
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mrhebert74 (January 26, 2010 12:50 am ET)
          8  
          So somebody else succeeded in life. This really upsets you.
          God, did he ever nail it. The reason I want 31 million Americans to be insured who are uninsured right now is because of my resentment of successful people. I feel so ashamed...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 1:52 am ET)
          4  
          So somebody else succeeded in life. This really upsets you.

          No, what really upsets me is that people like you think the Holocaust is less egregious than an economic policy you don't agree with. What upsets me is that you are quite literally saying human lives mean less than your money.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by reanna-mator (January 26, 2010 7:50 am ET)
          4  
          You really think that anyone who is NOT a dropout should be able to afford their own overpriced, poor health care, huh?

          I only wish that were true. It must be truly blissful to live in such a warm, protective bubble of ignorance and naivete.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 26, 2010 10:06 am ET)
          2  
          No, jose2, it is people like Beck who are destroying America by filling low-information people like you full of the lies he presented in this false "documentary." Beck has a long history of MAKING CRAP UP in order to boost his ratings. At one radio station, he pulled off a ginormous gag that culminated with a public outcry. He convinced his listeners that a HUGE underground theme park was being built in their city. He talked about the progress for MONTHS, gave an opening date and the location. On the opening day, people drove to the location, only to find out that they had been "punked" by Beck. Beck thought it was funny as hell that people were so stupid that they BELIEVED his crap. Guess what he thinks of you?

          The "theories" he is using at the moment come from the off-the-wall rantings of a man named Cleon Skousen. Skousen, before he died, was considered a dangerous nutjob by the FBI AND by the Mormon Church. He was fired from at least one job for "acting like a dictator." This guy is Beck's "hero."

          I'd suggest that you turn off Fox and research the CRAP that Beck said "isn't taught in our schools." Beck doesn't know about it because he is an uneducated Zoo Radio DJ trolling for ratings. Looks like he fooled you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jose2 (January 26, 2010 12:30 pm ET)
              1
            If Beck said that Obama was the anointed one who was going to lead the faithful into the promised land you would believe it.

            Later you would be screaming public outcry when you found out it wasn't true.

            I I heard Beck say something like that I would laugh.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 8:12 am ET)
                 
              Yeah, but Beck filled your head with all kinds of other nonsense and you didn't know to laugh...

              And where does this right-wing talking point of media appointing Obama the Anointed One even come from? The only people I've ever heard say that are Fox clones.

              I hope MSNBC does for the next Republican president what Fox has done for this one: "The Republicans' MESSIAH has promised to bomb the mid-east into conformity...didn't they read 'Thou Shalt Not Kill'? This fascist, totalitarian, neo-Nazi, bomb-crazed, death-camp-building, anti-Christ-ian so-and-so..."
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Thehaymarketbomber (January 27, 2010 3:17 pm ET)
             
          "somebody who succeeded in life."

          A lot of these people "succeeded" in the same sense as did the guy who broke into your house and stole your TV without being caught.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by punkin (January 26, 2010 7:47 am ET)
        2  
        I believe that this is the base difference between liberals and conservatives. When a liberal says "I got mine" their next words are "what can I do to help you?" but when a conservative says "I got mine" their next words would be something like "gee, you didn't get yours? well darn, too bad, but I got mine"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (January 26, 2010 10:22 am ET)
          2  
          but when a conservative says "I got mine" their next words would be something like "gee, you didn't get yours? well darn, too bad, but I got mine"

          I always thought that went:

          "I got mine, now keep your hands off of it!"




          "From those, to whom much has been given, much is expected."
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jose2 (January 26, 2010 12:41 pm ET)
            3
          A liberal says "What can I take from someone else and give to you?"

          That is how they buy votes and what got us into this mess.

          There is a big difference.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 8:15 am ET)
            1  
            Got news for you: most "liberal" politicians ALSO make enough that they'd be affected by taxes "on the rich", so when Democratic senators and presidents push such things, they're giving of their own money too, as well as that of the other people who've profited BECAUSE OF THIS NATION and who can afford to give something back. At least as much as they gave pre-Bush.

            And it's still better than they way Republicans are bought and sold.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (January 25, 2010 9:18 pm ET)
      1 11
      "No one in their right mind is going to defend Stalin or Mao or Che Guevara," Marks said. "The implication is that this is what's going to happen if Democrats get their way. This is just a complete lie."

      Gee, I seem to remember a poster in an Obama campaign headquarters somewhere that had a picture of Che on it, like he was a hero or something. So, Beck may be telling the truth, because either Mr. Marks is lying, or Obama's supporters are crazy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWUSS (January 25, 2010 10:18 pm ET)
        4  
        Obama did have a lot of supporters. There was probably one of every kind in both camps
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 25, 2010 10:32 pm ET)
        8  
        Except, that the flag in question was at a volunteer office, set up by, you guessed it, volunteers, and had no Obama campaign oversight.

        NOT a Obama campaign headquarters...

        Don't let the truth get in the way though.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mrhebert74 (January 26, 2010 12:48 am ET)
          7 2
          It doesn't matter whether it was an official Obama office or not. The point holds: an Obama supporter had a poster of Che, so clearly it is a lie to state that no one in their right mind is going to support Che! Can't you moonbats follow a simple logical argument?

          ;)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (January 26, 2010 10:25 am ET)
            1  
            It doesn't matter whether it was an official Obama office or not. The point holds: an Obama supporter had a poster of Che, so clearly it is a lie to state that no one in their right mind is going to support Che! Can't you moonbats follow a simple logical argument?


            Loosely defined:
            Because someone had a poster of Che on the wall, this PROVES that they support terrorists and a Socialist/Communist/Facist agenda.

            Based on the above:
            Anyone who wears a "Che" t-shirts supports the above.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mmfa.fan (January 25, 2010 11:19 pm ET)
        7  
        Severely reaching on that one, edrossinoelwein9669.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (January 25, 2010 10:17 pm ET)
      7  
      Any from the University of I Don't Know?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (January 26, 2010 12:41 am ET)
        6  
        Wasn't that where Palin went to school for awhile, oh wait, that was the University of Idaho.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rossinsr (January 25, 2010 11:09 pm ET)
         
      Smells like Air America around here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fairconservative (January 25, 2010 11:11 pm ET)
         
      Listen I don't agree with Beck that President Obama and his administration are hellbent on making this nation some sort of progressive communist paradise but many of you criticize Beck simply to criticize him.

      The truth is nearly all the facts about the evils of communism in his documentary were correct. I know it often hurts progressives to admit to the evils of communism but it should never lead them to deny the truth.

      Communism has never been good for a single nation that has attempted it. The communist regime in the Soviet Union collapsed. I like to give Reagan alot of credit for that but most liberals prefer the theory that it was the communist government itself that was at fault. Cuba is backward and an economic wreck. North Korea is a frozen isolated hell when compared to its capitilist neighbor to the south. China is becoming a capatilist mecca.

      Any true liberal should rail against communism, a philosophy that promotes the good of the many over the rights of the few. (Though in all actual situations the many ends up being a few party members at the top of the food chain). This conservative is liberal on that point, the rights of the individual are paramount.

      Forget who made the documentary concentrate on its content. Communism is simply wrong and leads to a mentality that excuses the murder of some for the greater good of others. An evil mindset worthy of contempt and certainly worthy of revisiting in a time (20+ years from the fall of the berlin wall) when many seem to have forgotten its core concepts and the evils it visited upon this world.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (January 26, 2010 1:05 am ET)
      1 12
      Excuse me Professor Marks, but Che is a hero of the left.
      Obama's famous charicature is based on the one of Che.
      To say no one in their right mind is going to defend Che is one of the dumbest comments I have ever read.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 1:49 am ET)
        7  
        Obama's famous charicature [sic] is based on the one of Che.

        Bizarre, unsourced assertion win! Have a cookie.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by OldCon (January 26, 2010 6:29 am ET)
          7
        No no. Nobody on the left defends Che. Nobody wears teeshirts with his face on it. No, there wasn't a Che poster in any of the Obama election offices. And just because there was a Mao ornament on the white house Christmas tree, that's not defending Mao. And just because Obama's mentor when he was a kid, what was his name, Frank? Just because he was a communist, that doesn't mean Obama leans that way. Noooooo, none of that.......
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (January 26, 2010 8:11 am ET)
          1  
          You seriously need to check the kool-aid you drink.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MickD (January 26, 2010 8:18 am ET)
          2  
          Old Con is obsessed with symbols.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2010 8:22 am ET)
          6  
          OldFart,

          See, there is this thing called Pop Culture... maybe you've heard of it... and young people latch onto certain iconic images. The Che photograph was one of those. Wearing a Che T-shirt makes some people feel "cool" and rebellious. 99% of them don't even know who Che was or what he did. Che has no more political meaning for these people than Spider Man or Britney Spears. They just like the image.


          In other words, you're full of crap.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by OldCon (January 26, 2010 8:58 am ET)
              5
            Yes that's right, I'm full of crap and it's just those crazy kids and pop culture. Yes, you're so right, NOBODY on the left, including not one congressman or should I say congress person, has never ever praised Castro or Chavez either. Nope, that never happened. Only in revisionist crazy right wing alternate world. Yes, yes, you've shown me the light, I'm sorry for my opinions and beliefs because if you say I'm full of crap then I must concede. So where do I get my Che teeshirt???
            Report Abuse
          • Author by OldCon (January 26, 2010 9:19 am ET)
              6
            So when the skin heads start dressing their kids in hitler teeshirts they can claim it's just "pop culture" and they're just kids trying to feel "cool" and "rebellious", as you say. I should just shut up and ignore it if we start seeing hitler teeshirts.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by NothingButTheTruth (January 26, 2010 10:07 am ET)
              1  
              I guess the OBVIOUS difference would be that Hitler's horrid past has been taught in every American school since the 50s or earlier. While Che is...well...to be honest, I'm a tutor and ex-Middle/High School teacher, and I had to Google him to even find out who the guy is or what he did.

              Yes, uncovering my ignorance, but it proves my point. The kids don't know.

              The bigger point to me, is that I've only seen maybe two of those t-shirts worn in my entire life, so I'm wondering why this is such a big deal in the first place.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by OldCon (January 26, 2010 10:53 am ET)
                  2
                I've seen many images of Che, on shirts, in the media, on celebrities. I'm sure there is plenty of ignorance when you see kids wearing shirts with Che's image. But you have to wonder if it's ignorance or pop culture, as nerz says or do the people wearing these images believe he's a hero??? I don't believe it's all ignorance.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 8:30 am ET)
          2  
          Nobody wears teeshirts with his face on it.

          No one in any position to shape policy.
          And just because there was a Mao ornament on the white house Christmas tree, that's not defending Mao.

          When I "defend" someone, I normally don't put rouge on them. Might, uh, might wanna research somewhere other than Big Andy Blartblart's vanity sites, there, troll.
          Just because he was a communist, that doesn't mean Obama leans that way

          Because every kid who went to Catholic school is a priest. And maybe, MAYBE you should read up on his civil rights work before resorting to the same lazy, borderline-racist red-baiting. If Barack Obama was a communist, he wouldn't be making EVERY DECISION with special care not to defy the corporate overlords.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (January 26, 2010 9:49 am ET)
          1  
          Don't you feel kind of lame that you always have to cite foriegn figures to demonize American liberals?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 8:20 am ET)
               
            Ha ha! Hilariously true! If they're so bad, why can't you use one of them?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2010 8:36 am ET)
      6  
      As for the Nazis being "mad" at the Jews for being successful... what a stupid remark.

      Fact is, the German people were "mad" at the Jews because they were bombarded with propaganda demonizing the Jews. It was a Propaganda campaign remarkably similar to the one Glenda is feeding the Troglodytes right now.

      That's what makes this whole thing so bizarre.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NothingButTheTruth (January 26, 2010 10:15 am ET)
        1  
        I agree.

        An unbiased look at Fox News and their propaganda shows direct similarities to what the Nazi's did to gain prominence. Demonize them and then blame what you just did to them...on THEM. Hold them to some higher standard (than you've ever been held) and demonize them more when they can't sustain that level.

        Baffles my mind how people just blindly believe Fox News' crap. How do you just make up news? That channel is like the Twilight Zone on speed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MaineiacMan (January 26, 2010 10:58 am ET)
        2
      It isnt "if Democrats get their way"....its "if the socialist wing of the Democrat party gets thier way". Real democrats are waking up.
      Report Abuse