About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Alleged wiretap plotter O'Keefe tweets "I am a journalist. The truth shall set me free"

January 26, 2010 10:29 pm ET by Media Matters staff

From James O'Keefe's Twitter feed on January 26, 2010:

O'Keefe tweet

Previously:

ACORN Videographer Reportedly Arrested By FBI In Alleged "Plot To Wiretap" Senator's Office

The one word response for being arrested for an alleged plot to wiretap a senator's office

O'Keefe's Three Alleged Accomplices: Conservative Activists Dai, Basel And Flanagan

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 26, 2010 10:33 pm ET)
      11 1
      LOL...Yea, dude, you're a journalist alright...and I'm freakin' Thomas Jefferson. Get over yourself...you're just a right wing little pr1ck who thinks way too much of himself.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (January 26, 2010 10:33 pm ET)
      5  
      The D.A., on the other hand...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (January 26, 2010 10:37 pm ET)
      9  
      You are a criminal. Bars shall be your view.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (January 26, 2010 10:42 pm ET)
        7  
        A delusional criminal in my view. This guy apparently bought into all the right wing hype about him. I'll bet he seriously believes there will be such an outpouring of right wing outrage over his arrest that he'll be a hero before it's over.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RKAllen (January 26, 2010 11:00 pm ET)
          8  
          A delusional criminal in my view.
          Almost a Robin Hood complex. It's almost as if he is trying to use the defense that his actions, though illegal, are somehow honorable and therefore should not be punishable or at the very least should be easily forgiven.

          The thing is, this guy doesn't hit one place. He hits multiple places with the same M.O. Personally, I think it would be wise for any Federal Government offices that have had any kind of phone repair service done in the past few months to be screened and searched for potential bugs and wiretaps. In fact, it would probably be prudent to start with every member of the Senate and their offices first. The Senate members do not take to kindly to their security being compromised nor do they like their offices falling under securit scrutiny when a breach has been discovered.

          This may be considered a breach of National Security based on the hitory and pattern of O'Keefe's operations.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by progressiveright (January 27, 2010 12:25 am ET)
            6  
            Not just the Senate but all the members of the House as well.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (January 27, 2010 1:06 am ET)
            6  
            This WAS the defense of these fools when they violated Maryland law by audiotaping someone without their knowledge - that it was all for the greater good.

            No ACORN worker, on the other hand, was found to be guilty of ANY criminal offense.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bennoba (January 27, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
                 
              Although they were actually caught on camera trying to facilitate child prostitution.

              Doesn't that raise any red flags for you or are you cool with selling children for six?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by albertsenj (January 27, 2010 2:30 am ET)
          1  
          C'mon, give the kid (he's what, 24?) a break. He's been hanging around with Hannity and O'Reilly. With those 2 as role models what else would you expect?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:19 am ET)
        1 10
        Innocent until proven guilty. But I suppose for conservatives you'll make an exception, am I right?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RKAllen (January 27, 2010 12:26 am ET)
          6  
          Really? Be honest... did you give ACORN the same courtesy?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:41 am ET)
            1 9
            ACORN had more evidence against them than this. We know nothing about this particular case yet?

            We do know ACORN employees continued to help the apparent prostitute and pimp even after learning of the illegal deeds that would transpire. What do we know about this case? Nothing.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (January 27, 2010 12:50 am ET)
              7  
              Except that nobody from ACORN got arrested did they?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bennoba (January 27, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
                   
                Did you expect anything different from an 'internal' ACORN investigation?

                How the Justice Department didn't get involved is beyond me.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by RKAllen (January 27, 2010 12:59 am ET)
              6  
              All based on dubious and heavily edited videos... however, an independent panel had determined that no crimes on the part of the ACORN employees were committed. None. Zero. Nothing. ACORN to date has not be convicted nor charged with any crime at all, regarding the videos that O'Keefe has produced. Not... one... criminal... charge.

              What do we know about this case? O'Keefe has [b]already admitted [/b]that he has conspired with three other men to pose as fradulent repairmen to gain access to a United States Senator's Office... a crime on all by itself. We know that the men he conspired with were granted access to the main desks phone and was then given access to the main phone line room... breaching the security of a Federal Office through fraudulent means.

              We know that the Federal Government has officially charged all four of these men with some very serious crimes.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 1:12 am ET)
                  10
                It's actually very scary that you're fine with ACORN not being charged with attempting to help a prostitute find a house for underage hookers. Edited videos or not, the workers at ACORN didn't seem too alarmed with helping the fake prostitute.

                Back on topic, I wonder why it was so easy for a bunch of kids to gain access to the main phone room of a federal building. That scares me more than the ACORN story even.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by RKAllen (January 27, 2010 1:38 am ET)
                  5  
                  You are grasping at some very sad and slinder straws.

                  It's actually very scary that you're fine with ACORN not being charged with attempting to help a prostitute find a house for underage hookers.
                  I would be more concerned if you could show me one single case where a house of postitution had been determined to be financed or assisted in financing by ACORN. In this whole country, and the 100's of thousands of people that ACORN has helped through home loan assistance, why is the only case that they are being accused of assissting a prostitution interprise is a fake and made up one? All based on a low level interview, with a series of low level employees, and a heavily edited and illegally made video of those interview sessions presented as evidence.

                  You also seem to want to ignore the fact that a police report had been filed on behalf of one of the offices and another employee got in touch with a Federal officer in human trafficing.

                  At absolute worst, a few employees are guilty of giving some really bad financial advice.

                  Back on topic, I wonder why it was so easy for a bunch of kids to gain access to the main phone room of a federal building. That scares me more than the ACORN story even.
                  You're right. There should be questions into how they got such access. Why were they allowed to go so far without providing any proof of identification and given access to their communications center? Should we be concerned about other offices? Have they been breached and should we consider security seeps of all federal offices? She we consider new security messures to insure the safety and security of our elected officials? Perhaps a Congressional hearing to discover just how high this breach of our security goes? Who funded it? Who planned it?

                  Yeesh! This could get expensive now that I think about it... you sure you want to go down this road?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 11:11 am ET)
                  1  
                  ACORN was cleared of any wrongdoing.

                  As for the ILLEGAL videotaping of the ACORN employees, this little twerp hasn't had to answer for that, yet.

                  These dumba**es BROKE THE LAW . . . they were caught in the commission of a crime. Why are you defending them?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (January 27, 2010 1:11 pm ET)
                  1  
                  It's actually very scary that you're fine with ACORN not being charged with attempting to help an imaginary prostitute find a house for imaginary underage hookers.

                  Oh, the imaginary outrage!!!
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bennoba (January 27, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
                   
                The ACORN videos were available in their complete form. They were not heavily edited as you claim.

                The 'independent' panel was an 'independent' ACORN panel.

                What are these 'very serious crimes' they have been charged with?

                By all means have your point of view but at least be honest.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 27, 2010 1:43 am ET)
              5  
              ACORN had more evidence against them than this.


              I don't throw them around too freely, but...

              LOL !
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 11:14 am ET)
                 
              Seriously? ACORN was caught in the commission of a crime? No, they weren't. No crime was committed in those ridiculous videos. O'Keefe and his gang of really stupid criminals, on the other hand, were CAUGHT IN THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME; specifically, entering a federal office under false pretenses with the intent to commit a felony. They were CAUGHT in phony telephone company repair uniforms, a listening device and a cell phone video of their activities. They ADMITTED involvement. Cheesh, man, are you one of these Keystone Kops' dads?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 27, 2010 12:41 pm ET)
                   
                I'm still fascinated reading the posts from the suckers who were tricked into thinking O'Keefe's ACORN "expose" was a story.

                They've convinced themselves that there were actual child prostitutes, and seem unable to separate the pervy fantasies of O'Keefe from reality.

                You'd think that needing to use the words "supposed" and "apparent" in referring to all of their "evidence" towards ACORN being involved in any criminal activity would tip off even the most zombified Foxfan.

                I really expected the ThoughtCrime Police to be a lot more competent when they finally showed up.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (January 27, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
                 
              ACORN had more evidence against them than this. We know nothing about this particular case yet? - Mag

              So, you admit that you do not believe in innocent until proven guilty unless it is someone you agree with politically? Amazing. Re-read your last two posts. Your partisanship is shameful. Party over principles, right?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by progressiveright (January 27, 2010 12:27 am ET)
          6  
          I accept that he is only accused right now but he has a pattern developing. The ACORN investigation used illegal methods and now this. Once is a coincidence and twice is suspicious.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (January 26, 2010 10:43 pm ET)
      6  
      Let's see some journalism then.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (January 26, 2010 10:46 pm ET)
      7  
      Freedom being a Socialist federal penitentary.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snewkirk (January 26, 2010 11:02 pm ET)
      5  
      How cute, he thinks he's in a movie. Cliche & all. I can't wait to see how this one ends.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2010 11:11 pm ET)
      4  
      The truth is going to get O'Keefe put into jail actually. Have fun in the federal prison. And, if you were smart, you'd shut the f' up, until after the trial. You must not have a very smart lawyer.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WorldViewer (January 26, 2010 11:13 pm ET)
      3 1
      Forgive me for drawing a blank on such a well-known quote, but who originally said "the truth shall set you free"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 26, 2010 11:37 pm ET)
      1  
      A T. Prachett variation, "The truth shall make you Fred."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (January 26, 2010 11:48 pm ET)
      4  
      The truth shall set me free
      Actually it might have been the $10,000 bail that did it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (January 27, 2010 12:13 am ET)
      4  
      Dude really missed the limelight. he knew his edited ACORN video was yesterday's news and he was hurting to get something new to edit.

      Next up: Prison Showers Exposed: Inside with O'Keefe
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:18 am ET)
        10
      Wiretapping, huh? Did the guy have any actual equipment to even wiretap anything? Me thinks not.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RKAllen (January 27, 2010 12:38 am ET)
        8  
        From the Associated Press
        A federal law enforcement official said one of the suspects was picked up in a car a couple of blocks away with a listening device that could pick up transmissions. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the information was not part of the FBI affidavit.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:42 am ET)
            11
          That's not wiretapping equpiment at all. I can buy a "listening device" that can hear 300 yards away off the internet and it's perfectly legal.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by RKAllen (January 27, 2010 12:49 am ET)
            7  
            Wasn't suggesting that it was illegal or not. Wasn't even suggesting that it was being used for the purposes of bugging the Senator's office. I was responding to your assertion that no equipment had been found. Obviously a piece of equipment, that can be used for the purposes of bugging the Senator's office, has been reported to have been found by a federal official.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 11:09 am ET)
               
            MagCynic, he BROKE THE LAW. It is ILLEGAL to enter a federal office under false premises with the intent to commit a felony. They were attempting to bug the telephones and the "journalist" was making a video of the entire thing on his telephone.

            Face it, the little twerp got caught in the commission of a federal crime and ADMITTED it.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (January 27, 2010 4:14 pm ET)
                 
              Gotta give Mag some credit. He is the only right-winger that is quite so partisan as to actually come here and try to defend a man who allegedly enters a United State Senate office under false pretenses in order to wire-tap their phone. He is taking this party over country nonsense to the very end. You have to admire his gumption.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (January 27, 2010 12:26 am ET)
      5 1
      Wonder who O'Keefe was being a journalist for. Maybe we can get O'Reilly to kidnap him and have him waterboarded.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (January 27, 2010 12:52 am ET)
      4  
      I'm waiting for Fox to begin a legal defense fund for this guy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marge (January 27, 2010 1:14 am ET)
      5  
      The truth shall set him free???? Even if there was the worst criminal organization going and this person broke into their office to wiretap, he would still be arrested and if found guilty, and was caught in the act he would be guilty and go to jail.

      I am not a lawyer but even I know you can't just go to a person's office, house or place of business and break in and get off scott free. Is this guy nuts or does he think his co-conspirator's daddy will get them all off.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jen7 (January 27, 2010 1:21 am ET)
      5  
      Wait, didn't the affidavit say he admitted it?? If he admitted it, what truth will set him free? Confused.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (January 27, 2010 1:56 am ET)
        4  
        The truth that he doesn't have enough grey matter to get as far as he did?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by okiepoli (January 27, 2010 10:40 am ET)
         
      You all have it wrong.

      Pres. Bush set the precedent (and retroactively amended the laws) that warrantless wiretapping was OK. In fact, Pres. Bush made a lot of things OK. (As a personal aside, the only thing that's keeping me from 'rendering' my neighbor to 'interrogate' him about my ladder is that he also borrowed the drill I was going to threaten him with.)

      I think O'Keefe's mistake was that he didn't dress-up as a NSA agent and wave around phony exigent letters to get records. Worked well the last time.

      /sarcasm
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 11:06 am ET)
      1  
      Oh, please. Journalists don't enter federal office buildings under false pretenses to commit a felony.

      Last I heard, you're looking at up to 10 years and a 250,000 fine.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.