About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Judicial Watch hides facts in attack on Pelosi flights

February 01, 2010 5:52 pm ET by Terry Krepel

Judicial Watch has received much attention from the usual right-wing outlets for its recent mini-report claiming that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spent $2 million in taxpayer money on Air Force aircraft. The press release seems rather deliberately underwritten, suggesting that much, if not all, of that money was spent solely on Pelosi and her immediate family -- for example, their press release's headline states that Pelosi's "Military Travel Cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a Two-Year Period." But the release later discloses that the data is actually for "103 Pelosi-led congressional delegations" -- i.e., the congressional delegations set up through the Speaker's office, many of which included other members of Congress as well -- not her personal travel. WorldNetDaily, for one, took that bait.

Judicial Watch is also completely silent about the passenger lists for these CODELs -- perhaps because some of them include Republican members of Congress and their spouses. For instance, Judicial Watch highlighted a May 2008 CODEL to Israel and Baghdad that "included members of Congress and their spouses and cost $17,931 per hour in aircraft alone," as well as a copious stash of alcoholic beverages. Unmentioned by Judicial Watch was that Republican Reps. David Dreier and Adam Putnam were also on that trip (Republican Leader John Boehner was originally scheduled to go as well but later withdrew). Republican members also brought their spouses on Pelosi-led delegations to Europe in 2007 and Europe and India in 2008.

In highlighting how some of these Pelosi-related trips "included members of the House Speaker's family," Judicial Watch curiously fails to mention that family members traveling on Air Force aircraft are generally required to reimburse the government for the cost of flights and food, paying the price of a coach ticket on a commercial airline. Indeed, the authorizations from Pelosi's office for members of her family to travel on CODELs make clear that the "[t]ravel is on a reimbursable basis."

Also glossed over: Pelosi's predecessor as House speaker, Republican Dennis Hastert, also authorized members to bring family members on CODELs. Indeed, the Freedom of Information Act documents Judicial Watch posted to support its attack on Pelosi bear this out -- for instance, a request by Hastert for a 2006 CODEL to Greece, India, and Vietnam shows that of the congressmen going on the trip, all but one were Republican, and all but one brought their wives, including Hastert himself.

Even though Republican Hastert arranged and went on junket-esque CODELs, and even though Republicans were on numerous CODELs arranged by Pelosi, Judicial Watch sees fit to bash only Pelosi.

This appears to be nothing more than the latest round of smearing Pelosi as a prolific abuser of the House speaker's travel privileges. That falsehood-laden accusation was debunked.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (February 01, 2010 7:09 pm ET)
      1  
      I sometimes wish Pelosi were in a more vulnerable district in CA because she must not ever feel threatened by these attacks. She rarely ever fights back ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (February 01, 2010 7:53 pm ET)
      7 1
      And don't forget, Mrs. Pelosi was required to travel by military air because of her position as Speaker, something that was requested by Speaker Hastert after 9/11. Sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (February 01, 2010 8:17 pm ET)
      2  
      WorldNetDaily, for one, took that bait.

      I was just curious if the headline for the story was shoe horned between the "Birther" articles and the "Seed Bank" ads?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (February 01, 2010 9:58 pm ET)
      2 4
      -- Judicial Watch curiously fails to mention -- mmfa

      Just as mmfa fails to give a good accounting of congressional travel in this shallow rebuttal. Lets see the totals for all travel...both democrat and republican.

      The boondoggles by our employees...the congress...I'm sure would stagger the imagination. Foser wrote a nice analysis just a few days ago about the shallow and factless reporting by the media...and Judicial Watch and mmfa provide perfect examples of this shallow, partisan, gotcha reporting.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BurceCarson2008 (February 01, 2010 11:40 pm ET)
          2
        Well said!

        Best of all is the faux cover that the travel is "reimbursed," the members of congress pay the price of a "coach ticket" for a privately chartered airplane which costs taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. From the ballpark figures that they are "reimbursing" the government, it seems you often could not in fact even purchase a coach ticket at all. In fact, Rush Limbaugh actually mentioned on his show that the travel is reimbursed, because the reimbursement policy is such a joke - the price of a coach ticket for a private jet? That is an insult to our intelligence.

        To be clear, Republicans probably are just if not more culpable for high travel costs and abuse of congressional jets. It is ironic though that during the campaign, Palin got scorched for using state resources to buy a few coach tickets from Alaska, when she could have flown her children free on the state's private jet (which would have in fact cost the state much more as she would then not have sold the private jet and the state would have paid tens of thousands for fuel and pilots instead of a piddling amount for some coach tickets). But members of congress take their entire families internationally on what is truly a vacation? That gets a pass.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by RCT (February 02, 2010 2:00 pm ET)
         
      Could we all agree that the taxpayer should not have to pick up the tab for Congress member's families and for God's sake could they pay for their own booze?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by detroitlady (February 02, 2010 2:56 pm ET)
        2
      I love how MM glosses over the point of the story which is this...at a time when the government is spending more than it brings in...when the President is asking all of us to make sacrifices...Congress continues to believe it uses monopoly money. How can anyone justify the costs for food and liquor? Why are other federal employees forbidden from using taxpayer money for alcohol but Queen Pelosi and other R's and D's can?????? Maybe the Speaker does need to travel by AF planes but her staff can fly commercial!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad Wolf (February 04, 2010 6:52 am ET)
           
        Would you have 2 planes fly to the same place? Assuming your plan is adopted, you appear to suggest that the Speaker flies alone, and has to charter a seperate plane for her staff. In case you didn't notice, it takes the same amount of fuel, personnel, maintenance, etc. to fly one person as it does a full aircraft.

        As far as the liquor and food - how much are we really talking about? I'd like to see the actual amount spent one one of these flights.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.