About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Frank's lesson from spread of universal voter registration falsehood: "[B]e very skeptical" of "right-wing propagandists"

February 04, 2010 4:31 pm ET by Media Matters staff

In a February 3 statement on the House floor, Rep. Barney Frank responded to false claims that circulated in the right-wing media that he had planned to introduce a bill on universal voter registration.

Media Matters for America documented how the claim originated with Wall Street Journal writer John Fund and spread to other right-wing media figures and outlets, including The Washington Times, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck.

In his floor statement, Frank recounted how the falsehood spread through the right-wing media: "It begins with a lie from this editorial writer from The Wall Street Journal. It is then a lie repeated by all of his right-wing colleagues."

In concluding his remarks, Frank stated: "I hope people will take from this the lesson to be very skeptical when these right-wing propagandists - Limbaugh, Beck, or The Washington Times, or The Wall Street Journal editorial board -- propagate these vicious smears."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by txthinker (February 04, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
      9  
      Thank you, Congressman Frank. :-)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
        18
      So what if the lie then?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
          18
        what is the lie then....TYPO
        Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (February 04, 2010 7:10 pm ET)
        2  
        So what if the lie then? - seahawks

        Don't you mean to say "What, me worry?".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Disputed Zone (February 04, 2010 4:51 pm ET)
        3  
        Looking for some action?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
        9  
        If that was even true, he would be doing it with former Sen. Craig. Please, just because you don't agree with what someone says doesn't mean that a logical rebuttal to the argument is to resort to a petty, immature, and ignorant Ad Hominem attack. All it does is show the lack of class and analytical thought you posses.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
            16
          These libs insult Rush, Beck, Hannity, me and anyother conservative All the time. Don't you read?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by vhw28672478 (February 04, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
            3  
            They are a major joke
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
            4  
            Don't you read?

            Projecting much?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 5:17 pm ET)
            8  
            Yet another weak argument. "Everybody else does it, so I can do it too." I just graduated from college, and elementary school is years behind me. I have vast reading, writing and analytical reasoning skills. I can have a healthy and polite debate without making fun of someone else, and if they are right and I didn't agree with what they say, you know what? I change my view.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (February 05, 2010 10:12 am ET)
            1  
            These libs insult Rush, Beck, Hannity, me

            Wow. Delusions of grandeur. You put yourself as low as Beck & Co.

            and anyother [sic] conservative All [sic] the time.

            Our insults are based on facts. You really should try it sometime.

            Don't you read?

            So says the poster child for illiteracy. My goodness, you are underwhelming.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 06, 2010 9:41 pm ET)
               
            seabags, RUSH,BECK,HANNITY,and the rest of the CONSERTVATIVE nutjobs that constantly lie,smear,and hate anyone that disagrees with them deserve all the insults thrown at them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 06, 2010 9:41 pm ET)
               
            seabags, RUSH,BECK,HANNITY,and the rest of the CONSERTVATIVE nutjobs that constantly lie,smear,and hate anyone that disagrees with them deserve all the insults thrown at them.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (February 04, 2010 5:13 pm ET)
        3  
        Where's the lie you ask? You just said one.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (February 04, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
      3  
      Perhaps I'm a little ignorant on this topic, it's actually the first I've heard of it.

      What's wrong with everyone being registered to vote? Are they afraid illegal immigrants will vote or something?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 4:54 pm ET)
          17
        If they are illegal they shouldn't be here. And find me somewhere in the Constitution where they can vote? You know, that thing Progressives hate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dradeeus (February 04, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
          6  
          I don't think illegal immigrants should vote. I'm genuinely asking for the major concern over Universal Registration.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (February 04, 2010 7:13 pm ET)
            7  
            The major concern is that the more people who vote, the more Democrats win. Which is why the nutjobs have been suppressing and purging voter rolls for the past 20 years. A large, knowledgeable electorate is their biggest enemy.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Midnight Kevin (February 05, 2010 2:00 am ET)
          3  
          I think "conservatives" hate the constitution. Why do you think they want to amend it to stop gay marriages? Because they do not agree with the original wording...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 4:57 pm ET)
        6  
        They're afraid of voter fraud committed by illegal immigrants and ACORN, which simply hasn't happened. They're creating a fake crisis to impose more personal controls by the government on people. I have a feeling that if Universal Voter Regisration were enacted, you would see voters being turned away, or not counted correctly by ideologues that want to sway a race, and they would probably be from the right ie. Bush v. Gore.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 4:57 pm ET)
        6  
        They're afraid of voter fraud committed by illegal immigrants and ACORN, which simply hasn't happened. They're creating a fake crisis to impose more personal controls by the government on people. I have a feeling that if Universal Voter Regisration were enacted, you would see voters being turned away, or not counted correctly by ideologues that want to sway a race, and they would probably be from the right ie. Bush v. Gore.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (February 04, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
          14  
          That's what their pretending to be concerned about. What really concerns them is the fact that higher voter turnouts tend to favor Democrats.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 4:53 pm ET)
      11 1
      Rep. Frank sees what the right is trying to do and is calling them out for it. It's the same reason why we gave Gitmo and the Patriot Act. The right is excellent at scaring the hell out of people so much that they slowly give up their rights to government, and in doing so, we move closer to a totalitarian society. The threat of radicalism usually doesn't come from the left, it comes from the right.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
          16
        You mean like forcing people to buy health insurance just to live...... that kind of totalitarin society?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by marco21 (February 04, 2010 5:20 pm ET)
          13 1
          Forcing people to buy health insurance just to live? WTF? Please use English here, not wingnut.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Publius39 (February 04, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
          10 1
          Yes, buy health insurance so that when you need it, you have it ready. Yeah...that's totalitarian... Why is it you wingnuts always complain about legislation that will help people, but sit idly by while the government strips you of real rights. I don't mind having to buy health insurance, because I would use it to it's full ability. But, where were you when the government passed the Patriot Act? Where were you when the president cut taxes for the top wage earners who didn't need it? Where were you when the government gave a huge handout to Big Pharma, Big Ag, and bankers that continue to treat the market like a casino? Where were you when the previous administration blew our surplus and lied to get us into wars that they failed to handle on a massive level? I'll tell you where you were; you were waving your little flag saying "god bless America' while your very freedoms were being stripped from you. I love this country, and I fought for it in Iraq, but it's people like you who make this country bad and make other countries hate us.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
          6  
          Nobody was forced to buy anything! You could pay a fee of $750 instead of buying insurance. I guess your reading comprehension kept you in the dark on that little detail?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
            1 11
            You still have to pay to breath air then.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 6:24 pm ET)
              1 10
              It's either buy insurance or pay the government. That is your FORCED to do one ot the other. Find that in the Constitution.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by seahawks123 (February 04, 2010 6:29 pm ET)
                1 10
                It's a mute point now that we have 41 Senators.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 6:43 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  As are all your points!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (February 04, 2010 8:03 pm ET)
                  8  
                  First, it's a "moot" point, not "mute". Second, it's "you're" not "your". Sorry, just those words are some of my pet peeves, glad to help by the way.

                  Show me where in the Constitution that you have to buy car insurance? Oh, that's not in there either, but yet, we have to do that.

                  It IS in the Constitution that you have to pay the Government (ie, taxes).
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 06, 2010 9:53 pm ET)
                       
                    magnolia,show me where in constitution you have to wear seat belts or travel at a certain speed limit,but we still have to.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 6:47 pm ET)
                12 1
                OK, I'll play that game.

                Find a carrot in the constitution! You can't? Wow, no more cole slaw for you then.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (February 04, 2010 10:54 pm ET)
                  6  
                  Better yet, find me where in the Constitution where it expressly states that as an individual in the United States of America that you get to own a gun.

                  Doesn't appear anywhere in there funnily enough.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 6:36 pm ET)
              4 1
              No, you wouldn't! You would have to pay the fee even if you were to hold your breath. If you need proof of this, then for God's sake: On 3 hold your breath...

              1...2...3...
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (February 04, 2010 5:03 pm ET)
        9  
        Right on Barney,
        He shoves it right back in their faces.

        Conservatives then do what they do best: Whine and then run and hide behind their mother's apron.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (February 04, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
        9
      What's this?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiG (February 04, 2010 7:02 pm ET)
        7  
        It is a letter to Rep. Mark H. Schauer D.MI from a confused constituent who believed the hoax. Thanks for providing proof that people are willing to believe the hoaxes created by the RW. I appreciate your support for Frank's statement. I didn't know you had it in you!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (February 04, 2010 7:08 pm ET)
        5  
        Do you see Barney Frank's name on the legislation?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (February 04, 2010 7:31 pm ET)
        7  
        Since you can obviously post a link.


        Please post a link to the actual bill that was going to be submitted in January, especially since it is now Febuary.


        BTW What the heck kind of "proof" is a letter to a Mich. congressman from someone in Lansing?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (February 04, 2010 8:09 pm ET)
        7  
        MagCynic -

        Thanks for linking to that letter. It was hilarious!! I especially liked this part:
        The problem with our voting process does not involve difficulty of registration, it involves people voting under others' identities other than their own, and multiple times and in multiple districts.

        Please Mr. Letterwriter, tell us just where this is happening and how much is happening. Surely you have multiple examples of this to show us.

        And then he followed up with this:
        This legislation seeks to solve a non-existent problem and creates many more problems that are very real indeed.

        This is so funny on so many levels it's hard to know where to start. I mean, there's the imaginary legislation he mentions. Then there's the imaginary problems he believes the imaginary legislation will create. But the best part is when he claims the imaginary legislation will address nonexistent problems when it's the problems he believes in that are nonexistent.

        Was that letter really meant to be taken seriously?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 04, 2010 10:57 pm ET)
          5  
          Of course it was, it was his PROOF that this non existent legislation truly exists out there, just because someone wrote a letter about it, it must be true. HAS to be true.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (February 05, 2010 3:16 am ET)
          2  
          The problem with our voting process does not involve difficulty of registration, it involves people voting under others' identities other than their own, and multiple times and in multiple districts.


          Please Mr. Letterwriter, tell us just where this is happening and how much is happening. Surely you have multiple examples of this to show us.


          Your text to link here...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bpollen (February 05, 2010 4:26 am ET)
               
            Ann Coulter is hardly a source for anything other than specious and vile proclamations.

            BUT... a woman's prison movie with Ann Coulter, Michelle Malking, Michelle Bachmann, and Sarah Palin might actually be a productive use of their time.
            Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.