Black helicopter alert! Hannity promises to "expose" Obama's "campaign" to "forfeit our national sovereignty" in new book
February 16, 2010 3:39 pm ET by MMFA Staff
From the Hannity.com description of Sean Hannity's forthcoming book, Conservative Victory: Defeating Obama's Radical Agenda:
In Sean's first new book in six years - he issues a stirring call to action. Hannity surveys all the major Obama players-from the president's affiliation with radical theology to his advisers' history of Marxist activism, repression of the media, support for leftist dictators, and worse.
He exposes their resulting campaign to dismantle the American free-market system and forfeit our national sovereignty. But he draws on the examples of Ronald Reagan and the GOP's Contract with America to show how conservatives can unite behind this country's most cherished principles and act now to get America back on the right track - while we still can.
Can't someone take out this commie bastard?
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at 03:15 PM
___________________
The above post was on FoxNation.com under a story about Van Jones. Now with Hannity's new book, the violent and hateful rhetoric towards anyone remotely associated with the Obama Admin will only get worse. I really believe Faux News wants to see someone get hurt- they are hoping for bloodshed.
For the past three months, Mr. Hannity has been telling his listeners about his plans to set America straight, to give Cons and Repubs direction on how to win back America(from who is still the question). Now, three months later, it is a BOOK which they must buy but SeannietheSissyBoy doesn't want them to have to buy it in hardcover(which wouldn't sell anyway). He demanded it be in softback cover. I really thought he was working on a real plan, not a real scam. He should include an 8-pack of Crayola crayons and add pictues to be colored.
And Sean, for you information, you better move up the release date because I am sure most of it will be MORE outdated when Newsmax buys their 200,000 copies.
Nice try silly man but your plan is a scam.
Socialized medicine? How is a health care plan without even a basic public option in any way socialist? A give-away to the private insurance companies I'll agree with but hardly socialist.
Tax increases? 95% of Americans received tax cuts under Obama and Obama's proposed increases on people making over $250,000 will take them back to the level they were under Clinton (what an economic hellhole we were in then!) and still considerably lower than they were under Reagan.
Increasing the size of government? Like two huge UNPAID FOR wars and an equally unpaid-for prescription drug program?
Tax and spend? As opposed to borrow and spend like the Republicans do? At least Obama reinstated pay-as-you-go after that fiscal conservative Bush and his Republican enablers in Congress got rid of it.
Be careful what you wish for!!!
OH WAIT...
Oh, and learn how to spell.
(I realize that, sometimes, when typing a response online, spelling errors occur. But when you are typing in a forum that allows you to preview what you wrote before posting it, then you have no excuse for rampant misspellings.)
This morning, I was listening to FOX "News" Radio, and they used the "rats from a sinking ship" analogy... and it was in their so-called "straight" news reporting. They report, we decide... yeah, right.
Such depth. Such eloquence. Such thought provoking observation.
There's no point in any further debate. Let's just shut it all down now. There's no way for us to counter such an argument.
Oh, except for how we count all the other arguments that spew from the loyal lap dogs of Hannity and Beck--with their own words, their lies, their over the top hyperbole, and, of course, their rabid ignorance.
As to where he gets his great abilities at prognostication, my initial guess would be spatilomancy. Not a pretty picture.
Democrats 5
Republicans 6
Try again.
This is a news flash?
But these same idiots thought is indictitive that the mini-off year elections in Virginia and New Jersey had the same result, despite the fact that this has been the pattern since 1985. And 1977. We progressives would call that a trend.
Geez, isn't it astonishing that independent voters are, well, independent? And that first-time voters might have more interest in a Presidential election that one for the governorship or the House?
Astonishing. Although not very surprising...
What socialist agenda? Obama is a centrist, at best, and leans right at worst.
I also find it hilarious that he can condemn someone for "supporting dictators" and then "draw on the examples of Ronald Reagan".
And what "radical" agenda Mr. Hannity? You guys keep saying that he's a radical, and yet, I'm not seeing any kind of radical agenda. Actually, the health care bill closely resembles the republicans' ideas from 1994 during the Clinton years (also part of the Contract with America remember that?). Back when republicans had ideas.
I all sincerity "GOP" and "Conservatives" offer NOTHING. But the Democratic Party must realize governing is their responsibility. Mr Hannity has only the power the Democratic Party surrender to him.
It is time. The Democratic Party has exhausted every possible excuse to avoid doing the right thing. The people voted for members of Congress to govern.
The members of the Democratic Party have run out of excuses, it is time. No more half-stepping, no more posturing. It is time to begin to govern.
Bring the major legislative action on Health Care to an "Up Or Down" vote. Should any piece of legislation be threatened with a filibuster, the Democratic Party response MUST be "Bring it to the floor." Give the piece of legislation an up or down vote.
No more 'sun was in my eyes and it was too dark to see, the world is flat no body likes me' excuses. Bring on the vote and govern!
The only threat to Democratic Party governing is Democratic Party refusing to govern. Democratic Party refusing to govern is not an option. Voters will reward the Democratic Party when they act as a governing party. So govern!
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
Really. How long can you tell these nutters that there's a radical who will change everything before they notice that really, not much has changed?