WSJ newsroom mocks health care anecdotes
February 26, 2010 11:18 am ET by Eric Boehlert
And keep in mind this was in a news article. Yet more proof that Rupert Murdoch is slowing turning the Journal's once-sterling newsroom into Fox News Lite.
Picking up the right-wing blogosphere trend, which was to mock personal anecdotes told at yesterday's health care forum (shared mostly by Democrats), here's the straight-down-the-middle WSJ news headline:
Talks Suffer An Outbreak of Anecdotes
Gee, nothing loaded in that language, right?
Check out the lede [emphasis added]:
Thursday's health-care summit revealed a new malady: call it anecdote-itis.
Squeezed around a square table at Blair House, President Barack Obama and about 40 members of Congress scratched around for stories that would score political points.
And here's a nice tough, as the news article openly mocks the president:
The president, playing the part of Patient Zero, sparked the epidemic, recounting the time his daughter Malia was rushed to the ER with asthma after coming into the kitchen and telling her father, "I can't breathe, Daddy."
UPDATED: There's something deeply revealing, I think, by the media's tendency to mock yesterday's anecdotes, which of course were personal illustrations about people suffering serious health problems, and their struggle to deal with today's health care system.
In a sense, the so-called health care debate that's taken place over the last year or so should have always focused on those sorts of illustrative stories, but the press never really went there. The political press never had any interest in humanizing the story. The Beltway press much preferred to make health care reform a process story. (Who's got the votes? What's the latest polling data.)
So I guess it shouldn't be surprising that when some Democrats tried to use anecdotes to shed some light on health care reform, one media reaction was to mock the move.


















It's sort of like the War on Drugs. I remember vague stories about how terrible crack cocaine was in the 80s, but it didn't become an 'epidemic' in the eyes of the media until it started happening to white suburban kids. Even then, who gets jail and who gets treatment seems to follow very racial lines.
Why do you find it necessary to point out the obvious?
Shesh...some people and their incessant need to speak using facts, as painful as those facts are.
The distance between the revolting subversiveness of Wall Street, and Norman-Rockwell Americans of Main Steet seen through the window frame of George Lakoff:
---
Look through Lakoff's window and see people, subject.
Look throught the WSJ and see tyranny. OBJECT!