About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

WSJ newsroom mocks health care anecdotes

February 26, 2010 11:18 am ET by Eric Boehlert

And keep in mind this was in a news article. Yet more proof that Rupert Murdoch is slowing turning the Journal's once-sterling newsroom into Fox News Lite. 

Picking up the right-wing blogosphere trend, which was to mock personal anecdotes told at yesterday's health care forum (shared mostly by Democrats), here's the straight-down-the-middle WSJ news headline

Talks Suffer An Outbreak of Anecdotes

Gee, nothing loaded in that language, right? 

Check out the lede [emphasis added]: 

Thursday's health-care summit revealed a new malady: call it anecdote-itis.

Squeezed around a square table at Blair House, President Barack Obama and about 40 members of Congress scratched around for stories that would score political points

And here's a nice tough, as the news article openly mocks the president: 

The president, playing the part of Patient Zero, sparked the epidemic, recounting the time his daughter Malia was rushed to the ER with asthma after coming into the kitchen and telling her father, "I can't breathe, Daddy."

UPDATED: There's something deeply revealing, I think, by the media's tendency to mock yesterday's anecdotes, which of course were personal illustrations about people suffering serious health problems, and their struggle to deal with today's health care system.

In a sense, the so-called health care debate that's taken place over the last year or so should have always focused on those sorts of illustrative stories, but the press never really went there. The political press never had any interest in humanizing the story. The Beltway press much preferred to make health care reform a process story. (Who's got the votes? What's the latest polling data.) 

So I guess it shouldn't be surprising that when some Democrats tried to use anecdotes to shed some light on health care reform, one media reaction was to mock the move. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (February 26, 2010 11:32 am ET)
      3 1
      In all fairness to the WSJ, Mr. Boehlert, somebody does need to talk about the process, the 'how' if you will, that health reform will happen. Besides, anecdotal evidence, while it does put a human face on the problem, is not considered scientific. The individual stories are really pointless, because it's not as if anyone were actually dying or anything. I mean, anyone important. You know what I mean by important: wealthy, white, and Faux Con. (/snark)

      It's sort of like the War on Drugs. I remember vague stories about how terrible crack cocaine was in the 80s, but it didn't become an 'epidemic' in the eyes of the media until it started happening to white suburban kids. Even then, who gets jail and who gets treatment seems to follow very racial lines.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (February 26, 2010 12:07 pm ET)
        1  
        The_Cat...

        Why do you find it necessary to point out the obvious?

        Shesh...some people and their incessant need to speak using facts, as painful as those facts are.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dlg57 (February 26, 2010 12:52 pm ET)
          3
        Good point, Cat. One might add that the bill they want to pass won't actually go into effect until 2014. Way after the 2012 elections. In the meantime we will all be paying for it for the next four years. What about all the sad stories of the people who will die due to lack of healthcare during the next four years? If we are in such a big hurry to pass the bill, why the long wait?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mattcable250650 (February 26, 2010 11:54 am ET)
      4  
      Reminds me of the Dan Quayle story on his being asked about abortion. As long as it was an entirely abstract story about people he viewed as cardboard cut-out stereotypes, he could give standard-issue anti-abortion talking points. As soon as someone humanized the issue by making it about how he would react if it was his daughter who wanted an abortion, he immediately gave a solid, thoroughly respectable pro-choice answer. Quayle did America a great service that day by showing us how certain groups really view things.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (February 26, 2010 12:16 pm ET)
      3 1
      Seems to me that whenever the right wing noise machine mocks actions by Dems & libs, it means those actions are successful and a good move. Score one for the Dems this time ...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dlg57 (February 26, 2010 12:55 pm ET)
          2
        Uh, not usually. It usually means they are SO ridiculous and outlandish and in-your-face arrogant, that one can only laugh and say "you've GOT to be kidding!"
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dlg57 (February 26, 2010 12:48 pm ET)
        4
      Ok, even if you have a letter written to every single congress member it doesn't even add up to 1% of our population. Even though these are very sad stories that deserve our compassion, should we really change an entire health care system based on these stories? It isn't the actualy story they are mocking but the use of so many stories instead of actual substance on the issues. Each time the Republicans came up with an idea it was shot down with some sort of story, but no one ever addressed any of the Republican solutions. Instead, they obfiscated, played word games, told sad stories and name called. Real constructive. When John McCain asked the President about the more than 60% of the nation that wanted them to start over, instead of addressing that, he belittled him, telling him to stop campaigning. McCain's answer was weak. He should have said "Mr. President, that was rude and uncalled for. How about you actually address the issue I just brought up and YOU stop campaigning".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 26, 2010 1:17 pm ET)
      5  
      The only anecdotes I remember hearing up to yesterday were stories about people in the UK and Canada who had (or claimed to have had) problems with their govt run healthcare systems. The right sure seemed to think those were relevant even though no one was proposing anything like either the UK or Canadian system.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (February 26, 2010 1:55 pm ET)
      1  
      Vomitous.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Meremark (February 26, 2010 2:21 pm ET)
      2  
      -
      The distance between the revolting subversiveness of Wall Street, and Norman-Rockwell Americans of Main Steet seen through the window frame of George Lakoff:
      ---
      Health Means Life; Health Means Freedom, by George Lakoff, CommonDreams.org, February 23, 2010.

      Life and Freedom are moral issues. It is time for Democrats to talk about health in those terms, beyond just policy terms like health insurance reform, bending the cost curve, types of exchanges, etc.

      Health means life. If you get a major illness or injury and cannot get it treated adequately, you could die. And tens of thousands do.

      Health means freedom. If you have a serious illness or injury and cannot get it treated, your freedom will be limited in many ways. Your physical freedom: you may no longer have the freedom to move around. Your economic freedom: you may not be able to work or your medical bills may impoverish you. Your emotional freedom: you will not be free to live a happy life.

      Health is therefore a moral issue of the highest order. And it is a patriotic ....


      Look through Lakoff's window and see people, subject.
      Look throught the WSJ and see tyranny. OBJECT!
      Report Abuse