About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Paging The Daily Howler. Karl Rove takes a trip down the War-on-Gore memory lane

March 09, 2010 9:20 am ET by Eric Boehlert

As Media Matters noted in its fact-checking of Karl Rove's new book, the former Bush aide hit the motherload of misinformation with a paragraph that revived the 2000-era greatest hits about the Al Gore, the alleged exaggerator

Just try to count the Gore lies found in this one single paragraph: 

Over the past few decades, Gore had said that he had created the Internet, been the model for Love Story, led a crusade against tobacco, discovered the Love Canal chemical disaster, lived on a farm while vice president, never grew tobacco on his farm, didn't know that his visit to a Buddhist temple was a fund-raiser, faced enemy fire in Vietnam, and sent people to jail as a reporter. It was a compelling life story; unfortunately, none of it was true.

What's astonishing is that all these Gore lies have been thoroughly debunked. Like many, many years ago. It's common knowledge that this stuff is garbage. Yet here's Rove, ten years later, casually lying about Gore, secure in his knowledge that conservative readers of the book won't care that the claims are false, and apparently also secure in the knowledge that his publisher, Simon & Schuster's Threshold Editions, doesn't really care about fact checking and will publish whatever partisan tripe he types up. 

Media Matters set the record straight yesterday. But Bob Somerby at The Daily Howler has been doing the Lord's work regarding the War on Gore for the last decade, teasing out what the lasting significance has been in terms of our politics and our press. Maybe he could weigh in on just how astounding that single Rove paragraph is and what it represents about our public discourse. 

UPDATED: It will be interesting is to see how members of the chattering class deal with Rove's book, especially if they take the time to read it and see paragraphs like the one noted above; paragraphs that are literally built upon layers and layers of obvious falsehoods. Will the chattering class call Rove out, or play along? 


Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dogbreath (March 09, 2010 9:55 am ET)
      6  
      NeoCons and Republicans often attack those things that they themselves are guilty of. So the question becomes, does Carl have a crush on Gore?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ouroborus (March 09, 2010 10:42 am ET)
        5  
        Recall that these gutter-level tactics of attacking your opponent's strengths (despite your weaknesses on the same subject) are literally named after Rove. It should come as no surprise that he wrote an entire book filled to the brim with such smears and falsehoods.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by JamesA1102 (March 09, 2010 10:22 am ET)
      6 2
      Unfortunately Mr. Somerby is no longer doing the "Lord's work". He has gone over to the dark side. He now spends most of his time trashing Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and other liberal commentators while defending Republicans.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by funnymanpants (March 09, 2010 11:36 am ET)
        5 2
        >>He has gone over to the dark side. He now spends most of his time trashing Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and other liberal commentators

        I don't think you appreciate what Somberby tries to do, to get the media to deal with facts instead of invent stories. When Olbermann and Maddow act no different from O'Reilley, Somberby argues (correctly) that it hurts liberal causes. When we get into the game of exaggerating and fabricating, we lose, because we have the facts on our side.

        Somberby has also complimented Maddow a few times. She often does good interviews. Olbermann is awful.

        Somberby had done a good job pointing out what a bad job the press has done in explaining (or really not explaining) that the US is ranked 17th in the world in health care and pays double what other nations pay.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by JamesA1102 (March 11, 2010 8:07 am ET)
          1  
          To say that Maddow is no diffrent from O'Reilly is ridiculous. And if Somerby is so concerned about facts why does he spend most of his time attacking Maddow and Olbermann while ignoring all of FOX News, Morning Joe, Rush, etc.
          Reading the Howler the past year, you would never know they exist.
          He attacked Maddow for point out myths about the Healthcare bill and made the comment 'we don't know if these things are true or not' despite that Maddow had cited the facts proving they were untrue. He did the same thing when Maddow pointed out GOP hypocrisy for claiming the stimulus bill didn't created jobs while making opposite claims in their districts. Them making the claim 'we don't know if the stimulus worked or not'.
          The truth is Somerby was a PUMA who never got over Hillary Clinton losing in 2008 and now he is taking out his anger on Olbermann and Maddow.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (March 09, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
        3 1
        Baloney. He does not defend Republicans. He points out when ostensibly liberal commentators do a disservice to the liberal cause by misrepresenting facts and generally acting like jackasses. This is nothing new. Somerby has always called a fair game. I happen to enjoy both Olberman and Maddow but they sometimes come off as the liberal equivalents of Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly and Somerby is usually right when he calls them out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by JamesA1102 (March 11, 2010 7:56 am ET)
          1  
          No he does defend Republicans. He defended Sarah Palin and attacked David Letterman. He defend GOP hypocrisy for publically saying the stimulus failed while attacking Rachal Maddow for calling them out for it. And anyone who thinks that Maddow is equivalent to Beck or O'Reilly either hasn't watched her show or is just too partisan to admit that she's not.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Ecotopian (March 09, 2010 11:16 am ET)
      4  
      Regarding Eric's reference in the first sentence to Rove hitting a "mother load of misinformation." That should be "lode," as in ore deposit.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (March 09, 2010 12:42 pm ET)
           
        Eric virtually always needs a proofreader. Send an email to MMFA. We posters can't fix it, and Eric doesn't seem to read the comments and then fix his grammatical errors.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rusty hinges (March 09, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
        1  
        Perhaps he was referring to a different type of "load"-in which case it is correct.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 09, 2010 11:42 am ET)
        6
      faced enemy fire in Vietnam,


      Gore gets credit for volunteering (politically motivated as it was) and for being in country (shortened as it was, 5 months, normal duty 12 months). Facing enemy fire? In Bien Hoa sitting at a typewriter? About as believable as [url=faced enemy fire in Vietnam,]Hillary[/url] coming under sniperfire in Bosnia!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 09, 2010 11:45 am ET)
          2
        The one didn't make it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vhw28672478 (March 09, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
        1  
        What you a joke Bush is a joke
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian in FL (March 09, 2010 1:50 pm ET)
        3  
        Can it be proven either way? No. Bien Hoa's US air base came under VC mortar attacks from time to time while Gore was stationed there. That is a proven fact.

        The worst part is that this criticism (of a man who did not avoid serving in Vietnam, Al Gore) was coming from a 3-year draft dodger who never served in the military at all (Karl Rove). Gore could have used the same student deferments people like Rove or Cheney used, but didn't. He also could have joined the National Guard to avoid being sent to Vietnam, but chose not to.

        Gore also does not brag about his service.

        From wikipedia:

        Of his time in the Army, Gore later stated, "I don't pretend that my own military experience matches in any way what others here have been through. I didn't do the most, or run the gravest danger. But I was proud to wear my country's uniform. And my own experiences gave me strong beliefs about America's obligation to keep our national defenses strong."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 10, 2010 2:38 pm ET)
          1  
          Gore could have used the same student deferments people like Rove or Cheney used


          Don't forget Clinton, Bill Bradly, Howard Dean, Al Franken, Dick Gephardt, Dennis Kuchinich, Chris Mathews, Bill Richardson, Henry Waxman, and last but not least Joe Wilson (Valarie Plame's deplorable husband).

          As I said (it obviously went over your head), good on Gore for wearing the uniform. The Army needs typesetters too.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Nona Nym (March 09, 2010 12:00 pm ET)
      2  
      If by "chattering class," you mean the mainstream and even "liberal" punditry, then the answer is that it's very unlikely they'll do anything other than play along.

      Eric, if you've kept up with the War on Gore via the Howler, then you know the fundamental truth is that it was waged by the mainstream, while liberal pundits either "played along" as well or just said nothing about it.

      Although they no doubt possess in spades the hypocrisy required to now attack Rove's lies about Gore, I think the chattering classes for the most part prefer to let bygones be bygones, especially when it's the likes of Rich, Dowd, Huffington, Matthews, et alia that are most responsible for currency gained by these hideous lies and attacks on Gore.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (March 09, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
      4  
      I think this is the most important part of what MMFA said.

      "...and apparently also secure in the knowledge that his publisher, Simon & Schuster's Threshold Editions, doesn't really care about fact checking and will publish whatever partisan tripe he types up."

      This is shameful behavior on the part of any book editor/publisher.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (March 09, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
      4  
      It is nothing short of amazing how the "right" has revised history and how many of its followers repeat this kind of stuff.

      Between FoxNews and right wing radio, the amount of misinformation is staggering.

      Nixon would never have had to resign if he had the advantage of todays media.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 09, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
      2  
      Will the chattering class call Rove out, or play along?

      Some professional liar (Republican Stragegist) was on with Schuster today lying his a** off about the Iraq War. I'm afraid this book will be keeping MMFA busy for a few weeks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 09, 2010 9:30 pm ET)
      1  
      "It's common knowledge that this stuff is garbage."

      Actually it's very uncommon knowledge. Almost nobody knows that the media elected Bush in 2000. If people knew that, the media would hardly get any ratings at all.

      That sort of thing is a lifetime ban in other professions.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.