About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Fox, Inquirer allow Santorum to attack health care reform without disclosing he works for health care industry

March 10, 2010 2:29 pm ET by Eric Hananoki

Fox News and the Philadelphia Inquirer have repeatedly allowed former Sen.-turned pundit Rick Santorum to discuss health care without disclosing* that he serves on the board of directors for Universal Health Services, a Fortune 500 health care company headed by Republican and public option opponent Alan B. Miller. 

In April 2007, UHS appointed Santorum to its board of directors.  UHS describes itself as one of the "the nation's largest and most respected healthcare management companies, operating through its subsidiaries, acute care hospitals, behavioral health facilities and ambulatory centers."  In announcing the move, CEO Alan Miller said that Santorum "has a long record of accomplishment and leadership and will provide valuable advice to the board."

Miller is an active donor and participant in GOP causes.  He is listed on the board of directors for the Republican Jewish Coalition, and in the past two years has contributed $2,300 to John McCain's presidential campaign, $1,000 to the McCain-Palin victory fund, and a total of $2,000 to the Republican National Committee. 

Modern Healthcare reported in May 2007 that Miller "donated more than $5,300 to Santorum's campaigns between 1999 and 2006, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.  The Universal Health Services Employees' Good Government Fund donated $1,000 to Santorum's campaign during the 2000 election cycle, according to the center's Web site."  In October 2006, the Philadelphia Daily News reported that Miller hosted "a crab-legs-and-white-wine fundraiser" for Santorum with President George H.W. Bush at Miller's Gladwyne mansion. 

Miller regularly argues against the public option in the media, with appearances on CNN, Fox Business, Hannity (10/22/09) and the Wall Street Journal op-ed page, among others.  Miller recently appeared on the February 3 edition of Fox Business Network's Cavuto, where he was introduced by Neil Cavuto as hoping a "delay in health care will derail health care reform."  Miller remarked that he believed health care reform "is dead," adding, I think we have to thank the voters of Massachusetts. I would like to see some improvements made. I think we have a great system. I would have hated to see it thrown out or a public option, which would become a government program. I was very much opposed to that happening." 

Since January 1, Fox News contributor and "political analyst" Santorum has appeared on Fox News at least 13 times to discuss health care reform**.  On February 9, Santorum called Democratic health care reform "a government takeover of the health care system" which "does not try to improve the current system."  Santorum continued:

SANTORUM: Republicans and most Americans think that the current system is a good system that needs to be repaired and improved upon. That's not the basis of the bill that's before the House and the Senate right now. 

Santorum is also a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer, where he regularly writes about health care reform.  Santorum's most recent column called the Senate health care bill "deeply flawed" and advocated starting "anew with a clean slate."  In 2008, Santorum wrote that Obama supports "one-size-fits-all health-care policies that have been a disaster for patients and medical industries in Canada. Good-bye, American capitalism; hello, European-style socialism."  Like Fox News, the Inquirer does not disclose that Santorum works for a major health care company.

* A search of "Santorum AND Universal Health Services OR UHS" in Nexis under transcripts for Fox News in the past 3 years returned no results.  A review of Santorum's 2010 appearances on America's Newsroom, Fox & Friends, and America's News HQ -- which are listed below and not archived in Nexis -- returned no instances of disclosure.   

** On the Record (January 6, January 26, January 29, February 9, February 24, March 3, March 8), Hannity (January 5, January 18), America's Newsroom (February 23, March 8), Fox & Friends (February 27), America's News HQ (February 21).

Previously/Related:

Fox allows Tantaros to attack health care without disclosing ties

Fox News again allows Donatelli to attack health care bill without disclosing his conflict of interest

The Nation: The Media-Lobbying Complex

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Leftylib (March 10, 2010 3:10 pm ET)
         
      It amuses me how right wingers routinely dismiss any argument a liberal makes by simply pointing out that the person making the argument is a liberal. But of course, arguments from conservatives are never suspected of bias.

      In the right wing world:

      Liberal= Democrat

      Conservative= Non-partisan
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PADutch (March 10, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
         
      Hold on. Let me get this straight. Santorum, a former republican senator, is on the board of a company that regularly contributes to republican candidates and --this is the shocker people-- they're both against health care reform? AND --it only gets more surprising-- the company he's on the board of is a health care company?

      Oh my God! Thanks for the news flash!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oldliberal (March 10, 2010 6:50 pm ET)
         
      san-tor-um noun. [F. Frmr. Sen. Rick Santorum, famous bigot and homophobe.] 1. Frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that results from anal sex. 2. Rick Santorum.

      'nuff said.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by OOzinEvil (March 10, 2010 8:27 pm ET)
         
      So it's wrong when someone that works for the health care industry to disagree with the legislation, but ok when a union president agrees with it. Got it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (March 10, 2010 9:11 pm ET)
        1  
        When did that president get an option to be an uninterested comentator on this for so much media? Does he have a column as an unbiased comentator in a major newspaper chain?
        Do you understand the difference in the exposure here?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OOzinEvil (March 10, 2010 9:18 pm ET)
             
          I understand the difference. A lobbyist has more power than a commentator because he has Lobbyist has leverage.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by OOzinEvil (March 10, 2010 9:21 pm ET)
               
            Edit: A lobbyist has more power than a commentator because he has leverage.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grmce (March 10, 2010 9:37 pm ET)
              1  
              If I were to be employed by a company to present a certain opinion and then did so whilst portraying myself as a disinterested observer that would be dishonest.

              If I portrayed myself as an employee of that company then the presentation would be honest.

              It's really that simple.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (March 11, 2010 12:52 am ET)
              1  
              First a Union President may lobby, but that is far from his 1st job.

              Second a lobbyist rarely adds to the national debate.

              Third how much leverage does a union have with any Republican legislator, or blue dog democrat?

              Fourth how long a wait till the "liberal" media exposes the union as bribing a congress criter as a result of that supposed leverage being applied?
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Whispers (March 11, 2010 1:26 am ET)
        2  
        Is there a union president who has commented on the health care reform proposals while hiding the fact that he's a union president?

        Do you understand what the issue is here? Nobody is saying that Santorum shouldn't be allowed to comment on the issue. What Media Matters is saying is that Fox shouldn't pretend that Santorum is a disinterested observer.

        (BTW, you're going to have to explain how being a "union president" makes a person unfit to comment on health care reform. I mean, aside from the obvious fact that a union president is likely just a demonspawn from the lower reaches of hell just because of his association with something as obviously communist as organizing workers.)
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube Reddit