Whopper of the day
March 10, 2010 3:32 pm ET by Jamison Foser
National Review's Rich Lowry asserts something "most liberals haven't said and can't admit to the public or to themselves":
They care about health care so much that they are willing to resort to any maneuver to pass it. Many liberals have portrayed it as practically an everyday occurrence that far-reaching, historic social legislation lacking 60 votes in the Senate is passed through the reconciliation process. This is nonsense. Why not say that an end this important justifies almost any means, and Republicans, in the same position, would probably do the same thing? This would have the ring of truth about it. But such a concession would add another political burden to a bill with plenty of them already. Better to pretend that nothing extraordinary is going on.
Of course, health care reform has already passed the Senate, having got the 60 votes in needed in order to do so. Reconciliation isn't being used to pass "far-reaching, historic social legislation," it is being used to pass comparably small changes to that legislation.
You almost have to be impressed by someone who is willing to be so completely misleading in order to criticize criticize other people for (supposedly) not telling the truth. Almost.

















Over and over and over again.
These people are disgusting and the media which is allowing them to foist this lie on the American public is just as disgusting.
I think you are confusing this with a bill which goes to committee. That's not what's happening here. This is one of the sticking points among the House members. They are worried that they will pass the less attractive, in their opinion, Senate bill, it will become law and the Senate will decide not to follow through with reconciliation.
At least that's what I've been reading and hearing.
Dummy. Yeah, far-reaching, historic legislation that has been in the making for over 60 years.
I'd point out the stupidity of your post, but it would be repetitious.
We need to teach these people the habit that arguments should be supported. Anything beyond that is too advanced.
I do prefer links to their facts, though. Many times, they aren't facts, just nonsense they picked up from a blog.