About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

ESPNOutdoors.com editor acknowledges "errors" and lack of "balance" in Obama fishing ban piece

March 10, 2010 3:42 pm ET by Media Matters staff

Following the lead of an ESPNOutdoors.com opinion writer, conservatives have in recent days advanced the outlandish charge that Obama "wants to ban sport fishing."  The ESPNOutdoors.com writer provided no evidence for his claim that a federal strategy "could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing," and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force's interim report on coastal and marine planning has proposed nothing of the sort.

Today, ESPNOutdoors.com Executive Editor Steve Bowman acknowledged that "we made several errors in the editing and presentation of this installment. Though our series has included numerous news stories on the topic, this was not one of those -- it was an opinion piece, and should clearly have been labeled as commentary."  Bowman added that "this particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary points of view."  From Bowman's piece:

ESPNOutdoors.com inadvertently contributed to a flare-up Tuesday when we posted the latest piece in a series of stories on President Barack Obama's newly created Ocean Policy Task Force, a column written by Robert Montgomery, a conservation writer for BASS since 1985. Regrettably, we made several errors in the editing and presentation of this installment. Though our series has included numerous news stories on the topic, this was not one of those -- it was an opinion piece, and should clearly have been labeled as commentary.

And while our series overall has examined several sides of this topic, this particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary points of view. We have reached out to people on every side of the issue and reported their points of view -- if they chose to respond -- throughout the series, but failed to do so in this specific column.

This series started in October and has included several updates on how the creation of that task force and its actions could impact recreational anglers. ESPNOutdoors.com should have made it clear to all readers that this was part of a larger series, and -- even though this was Montgomery's opinion, and those of the sources quoted in the column -- we should have taken more care to fairly represent opposing arguments.

We do feel it is our duty to cover issues surrounding outdoor sports to the best of our abilities, and given the nature of this task force and the potential impact on all fisherman, this was an appropriate topic to address for our audience. We take seriously the tenets of journalism that require we take an unbiased approach, and when we make mistakes in the presentation of a story or a column, it is our responsibility to admit them.

Any confusion on that part rests entirely on my shoulders as the executive editor of this site.

We have appended the original column to note that it was in fact a commentary, and we will institute more rigorous editing safeguards in order to prevent such issues in the future.

Previously:

Right-wing media eagerly spread absurd claim that Obama plans to "ban sport fishing"

Rush again pushes Obama fishing-ban conspiracy theory

Bolling and Fox Business run with absurd claim that Obama's going to "prohibit fishing"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by whatIthink (March 10, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
      7  
      Bull. Everytime I see an organization or public figure or politician offer up an "apology", I get annoyed. These people are not sorry for a G-D thing. They're only sorry they got caught. Like this recent flap. Are the editors at ESPNoutdoors.com sooooo inept that can't see something is opinionated commentary unless someone points it out to them? That the the fact the writer is claiming that Obama is going to ban fishing without a shred of evidence isn't enough to rouse their curiousity of whether it is a factual piece or just commentary? And if that's the case, what in hell are doing as editors in the first place. Just like when a politician says something clearly boneheaded, then "apologizes" for it, claiming it's not how they really feel. Either all these people are incredibly stupid and should not be in any sort of managerial position or they're incredibly shallow and will "apologize" only when backed into a corner. Either way, I don't believe one word from them when they "apologize".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (March 10, 2010 7:35 pm ET)
        4  
        You nailed it. The problem isn't just that they let it out in the first place - it's that in their apology, they fail to acknowledge that there are factual errors in it - not just that it's an opinion piece.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (March 11, 2010 12:36 am ET)
          2  
          Spot on. DD.

          "...This particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary points of view..." is one of the "apology" claims.

          That, in fact, is not the problem at all.

          The problem is that what the piece said is TOTALLY FALSE. It's made up.

          There cannot be any "on the one hand, on the other hand" or "some say yes, some say no" balance when one of those hands represents a complete falsehood.

          If it's BS, then don't run it.

          If you do run it, then admit that it was BS when you "apologize."

          Anything less is not an apology, it's an excuse.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by thaneb (March 10, 2010 4:40 pm ET)
      5  
      Great. Now they'll say unbearable pressure from the Obama administration forced the editor to do this. It's the smoking gun on this nefarious plot!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (March 10, 2010 5:46 pm ET)
        4  
        of course Obama just sent his anti-fishing thugs wielding baseball bats to the home of the editor for ESPN.com
        Report Abuse
        • Author by allanbrauer (March 10, 2010 6:17 pm ET)
             
          And then they forced some health care reform down his throat for good measure!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Freshorses (March 10, 2010 5:03 pm ET)
         
      I for one, am happy to see an explanation, and an apology for a misrepresentation. I have begun to fact check everything anyway, because most journalists now-a-days, aren't reporting truth, and if their misleading articles cause trouble, well, that's just all the better. When you retain your credibility by retracting your mistaken facts for opinions...you live another day. Refusing to acknowledge your deliberate deception gains you nothing in the end.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by toombsie (March 10, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
      4  
      "It clearly should have not been published because there wasn't an ounce of truth to any of it." - probably what Steve Bowman meant to say... right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by gbahan (March 10, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
           
        If you don't think this government is trying to close PUBLIC areas from fishing, your dilusional. It is already happening on the west coast. Government is testing the waters in the gulf of mexico and the difference is the fisherman down there care about it and won't let the government do whatever the hell they want to do.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Jose4 (March 10, 2010 6:16 pm ET)
        4
      In the same leak was a rumor to confiscate millions of acres of land. I guess there is no truth to that rumor.

      Your text to link here...

      Your text to link here...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (March 10, 2010 7:40 pm ET)
        3  
        Don't even bother clicking on these links. It's a troll post that has nothing to do with the topic. Please don't feed the troll or give his sites any more clicks.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rjvg50 (March 10, 2010 6:21 pm ET)
        2
      Obama should implement the ban and then remove it with great fanfare just before the election. Then he can issue an apology. And promptly re-implement the ban after the election.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Mr Blifil (March 10, 2010 6:40 pm ET)
        3  
        There will be more of this kind of thing from now on at ESPN. Day before the Superbowl I was watching NFL Live and the guest host was freakin' Elizabeth Hasslebeck, and yes, she did use the opportunity to criticize "the economy" meaning Obama.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by CuriousNecton (March 11, 2010 7:47 am ET)
         
      "this particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary points of view". How do you balance lies made up from whole cloth? "While unnamed administration sources continue to claim 1 + 1 = 2, the controversy continues...?"
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.