Newsmax columnist: Extending health coverage of dependents means youths "will be enticed to continue slacking"
March 15, 2010 12:54 pm ET by Media Matters staff
From a March 14 Newsmax column by Richard Grenell, who "served as the spokesman for the last four ambassadors to the United Nations -- John Negroponte, John Danforth, John Bolton, and Zalmay Khalilzad":
If President Barack Obama gets his trillion dollar healthcare bill passed this week by the Democrats in Congress, parents will be required to pay for their unmarried kids' healthcare coverage until the age of 26.
And Generation Y will be enticed to continue slacking, without a job, well past college graduation. While ski bums everywhere are cheering the news that the federal government will be forcing parents to pay for their health insurance through age 26, parents are questioning why the federal government is enticing a whole generation to stay unemployed.
America has always been a place where hard work is rewarded regardless of one's age, family status or educational background. If you have an idea you are committed to and make sacrifices to further the idea, you can be wildly successful in our capitalistic system.
In America, you can launch a multi-billion dollar computer company from your garage, you can grow up homeless and make it to Harvard and you can create a worldwide social networking movement while still in college.
But you can also be a slacker if you have the means to slack. Spending a year skiing, hanging out on the beach and surfing or traveling the world are options for the few lucky ones who have parents wealthy enough to pay for such endeavors.
But should the U.S. government encourage college kids to become slackers? Does Generation Y need any more encouragement to feel entitled? And should society guarantee a 5-year hiatus from responsibility after college graduation for millions of college kids?
While it is true that many college graduates today will be self-motivated to find a career, make their own money and contribute to society, Generation Y has been the most entitled generation in history. Should the American taxpayer tempt these kids further into believing that the American dream is easy to fulfill?Obama's healthcare bill is being celebrated on the slopes of Colorado and the surf shacks of California but is a dangerous precedent for future generations.
[...]
One could understand extending another entitlement program through age 26 in countries where the average workweek is 30 hours per week and vacation time is guaranteed at 8-10 weeks per year. But is this new proposal anti-American? We aren't supposed to reward people who don't work hard and make sacrifices to get ahead. And we aren't supposed to guarantee anything in America but a fair shot. America is a place where you prove your commitment to your family and your community through hard work and sacrifice. It is this ethic that we call American values.

















~
It doesn't matter that it's "already been taxed". When I buy something, the money I spend has already been taxed, but it is still subject to sales tax.
You fail.
By the way, I would support an exemption for working farms. But that could be done easily without scrapping the inheritance tax altogether.
The republicans fighting for its repeal don't give a rat's a$$ about people like you... they're out to protect their vast family fortunes.
You would not get taxed on anything up to 3.5 million in assets.
If he passed away in 2010, there is no estate tax at all.
The law, as it stands, is supposed to sunset in 2011.
Estate tax and limits
So, as it stands now, you'd be all good with your 2 million in assets through the rest of this year, unless Congress renews the law (which I honestly think they should) in 2011.
And, if we get republicans running Congress in 2011, count on it being renewed. I would hazard to guess that most democrats might vote for this as well.
FYI my father is alive and well!
As far as "punishing success", I disagree with that worn-out Rush Limbaugh talking point. Tax is the fee you pay for living in an organized society.
Before you get all huffy about the Government taxing your father's success, maybe you should look into what kind of help he got from the Department of Agriculture over the years. It might surprise you.
Because at the end of the day, that's what it really would be, a capital gains.
It's totally bogus and is only fearmongering on the part of rightwingers, as they so commonly do.
What about the value of my family business/farm?
Generally, the fair market value of such interests owned by the decedent are includible in the gross estate at date of death. However, for certain farms or businesses operated as a family farm or business, reductions to these amounts may be available.
In the case of a qualifying Family Farm, IRC §2032A allows a reduction from value of up to $820,000.
If the decedent owned an interest in a qualifying family owned business, a deduction from the gross estate in the amount of up to $1,100,000 may be available under IRC §2057.
When an employee gets his paycheck, he receives an amount of money AFTER a bunch of taxes have been taken out of it.
He then pays his electric bill. Whatever part of that payment is profit for the electric company gets taxed.
He also gives money to the local grocery store. They too pay taxes on whatever 'income' they have, which is money received minus costs of doing business.
Well, a relative who inherits money or property from someone has NO costs - all that money is 'income'. And so the person receiving it has to pay taxes on it.
The taxes I pay as an employee don't exempt any money I give to others from ANY further taxes.
This is a ridiculous argument that's been debunked countless times!
I love when Right Wingers cite these kinds of examples, as if these are the usual -- and recommended -- ways people succeed in America.
I'm pretty sure anyone who is around 21-26 years of age doesn't really need more incentive to slack off than they already have. OK, I shouldn't say, most, but there are plenty out there. Heck, I've got friends who are in their 30's that are still slacking off.
SEC. 2714. EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT COVERAGE.
-- A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage that provides dependent coverage of children shall continue to make such coverage available for an adult child (who is not married) until the child turns 26 years of age. --
I don't see where parents are required to pay for anything. Grenell could have written an article about American work ethics and values and left out the drivel about health care coverage...instead of this Hannityesque load of horse apples.
The people in the US military bust there asses so dumbasses like yourself can run off at the mouth. We work for our money we don’t sit at home and collect checks. There is also the minor difference of maybe having to die for your country. You should be publicly flogged for calling the member so f the US military welfare mommas. I grantee that I have done more in my 10 year in the military that you have done in your entire worthless life.
How would you know what is unneeded? If we don’t keep developing superior jet fighters the rest of the world will catch up. But hey I guess that what most liberals want a diminished US military. We are the lone remaining superpower for a reason. We R&D superior weapon systems. What plains should we fly if not the F-22. And F-35?
Isn't it intellectually inconsistent to argue that we can't afford to insure everybody, but we can afford to spend billions on plains that only work about 60% of the time?
The F-15, even though it is old, is still the baddest plane in the sky (aside from the Raptor). As in, nobody else has a plane that can match that.
We bought planes basically we didn't have a requirement for. Nobody had built anything even near the Eagle, but we spent lots of money on planes that we didn't need.
For Highlighter, we already have a fighter plane that is superior to what everyone has, and it's called the F-15 Eagle. The only folks in the world who fly better than we do are the Israelis, and they're our friends. I think the F-35 should have been the only new plane developed, as it can go across many different service segments.
The billions dropped on the F-22 could have been better used to do things such as, build more MRAPs for the guys on the ground. Provide better body armor/faster for the guys on the ground. Improve their main weapon (the M-4) so it works better in desert and high mountain environments. Maybe work on new camo patterns that actually work. And so on.
Join the army your get free college! That’s what I did. But I guess you would rather just give them the money for doing absolutely nothing!
Umm yes they do lots of politicians’ have kids in the army.
WTF does Working American mean anyway?
If decent working class folks want a better life they need to get a skill that will enable them to obtain that better life. No one is going to or should just hand it to them!
None of them have immediate family members who went to war. None of the people listed went to war. In fact every single one of them (except for Hannity, who wasn't old enough), went to extraordinary lengths so that someone else would go to fight the war they supported.
Spare us your speeches about who goes to war.
Sen Tim Johnson
John Ashcroft
Sen Christopher Bond
Duncan Hunter
Joe Wilson 3 sons in the military
James Web
John Mcain
John Kline
Joseph Biden
Jim saxon
Ike Skelton
Todd Akin
Sara Palin\
Get the picture yet?
Sen Tim Johnson
John Ashcroft
Sen Christopher Bond
Duncan Hunter
Joe Wilson 3 sons in the military
James Web
John Mcain
John Kline
Joseph Biden
Jim saxon
Ike Skelton
Todd Akin
Sara Palin\
Get the picture yet?
The post you replied to didn't mention voting for war, but those who start wars.
Our wars have historically been fought by others, not the sons and daughters of politicians.
It's the hypocrisy, not the service. Make a note of it.