About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

More on the Fox-pushed Tea Party Express scam

April 14, 2010 2:42 pm ET by Matt Gertz

I noted a few months back TPM Media's report that the PAC that organized the Tea Party Express, a series of right-wing nationwide bus tours and rallies, had sent nearly two thirds of its spending during a recent reporting period right back to the GOP consulting firm that spawned it. Today, Politico's Ken Vogel provides more details of the Tea Party Express' operations, including the original memo from a consultant with the firm, Russo Marsh + Rogers, proposing its creation.

Vogel also reports that a substantial percentage of spending from the PAC, Our Country Deserves Better PAC, continues to flow directly into the coffers of Russo Marsh + Rogers. That appears to have been the intent from the beginning; Vogel reports that the firm's operative, Joe Wierzbicki, stated in proposing the Express that it could "give a boost to our PAC and position us as a growing force/leading force as the 2010 elections come into focus."

Since the Express' inception, Fox News has seemingly done everything in its power to provide that boost.

In the memo, which Vogel reports was issued "just days after" last year's April 15 tea parties, Wierzbicki lays out how the first Tea Party Express bus tour would operate, who would be invited to participate, and how they would build a fundraising campaign behind it. He also drops this little nugget (emphasis added):

The trick here is that once enough people are "buzzing" about this effort (the tour and campaign advertising, etc...) then we should hopefully start to get some mentions and possibly even promotion from conservative/pro- tea party bloggers, talk radio hosts, Fox News commentators, etc.

This seems as good a time as any to point out Fox News' consistent, full-throated support for the Tea Party Express since its creation. The network even embedded correspondent Griff Jenkins with the Express' first tour; his hard-hitting reporting included declaring its riders "the America that Washington forgot." Our Country Deserves Better PAC repeatedly used Fox's coverage to flog its own fundraising efforts. And notwithstanding the plethora of free media the Express got from the network, the PAC ran ads on Fox urging viewers to "Join the Tea Party Express" on its tours.

Most recently, Fox News provided all-day coverage of last month's kick-off rally for the Express' third national bus tour. Correspondent Casey Stegall provided reports from the rally in Searchlight, Nevada, which highlighted the "real energy you feel from" the protestors; back in the studio, Neil Cavuto declared, "God bless these folks." And of course, Fox News contributor Sarah Palin was on hand to provide the event's keynote address, which was carried live by the network.

The following image from the Fox News website The Fox Nation pretty much sums up the network's coverage:

will you join the tea party express II?

Reading the memo, one gets the feeling that the Express has succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of Wierzbicki and company. And they owe it all to Fox News, a network willing to throw journalistic integrity by the wayside to emphatically endorse a "grassroots movement" created to boost its founders' bottom line.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by txthinker (April 14, 2010 2:47 pm ET)
      33 1
      The Federal Election Commission, the FCC, and the IRS all need to investigate the ralationship between this bogus PAC and Faux News, a bogus news organization.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (April 14, 2010 3:23 pm ET)
      10  
      I agree and have often stated that the level of "in kind" airtime and promotion from the right wing for these causes and candidates needs investigated.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 14, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
        8  
        It supports what we liberals have been saying all along: Fuchs Noose is not a "news" network, it's a propaganda network, an extension of the GOP.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (April 14, 2010 3:23 pm ET)
      9  
      Hopefully, Rachel Maddow will have a ball with this on her Show tonight, LOL.

      Btw, we here at Media Matters always knew that Republicans joined the so-called Tea Party movement 'cause their name change from Republican Party to GOP did NOT fool Americans. Yeap, a majority of Americans do blame Republicans for destroying America's economy, and the only people who can NOT see it are those poor real grassroot Tea Partiers. Uh, oh. LOL.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (April 14, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
      11  
      Went to the Boston tea party today to gauge attendance. 5K at most, possibly 30% of the crowd anti-Palin. Twitterers are already estimating 13K made it.

      Most of the crowd could not see Palin during her speech, due to the "wall of video cameras" in the way, and they turned down her microphone during the speech.

      The Palin appearance was not an appearance for the people there; it was for the cameras there.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (April 14, 2010 4:08 pm ET)
        6  
        Tell us more.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (April 14, 2010 4:57 pm ET)
          6  
          The crowd was really only there for Palin, whether they were for her or against her; her speech was about 20 minutes long, but as I had mentioned, a lot of the crowd could not hear her clearly.

          Pictures of the gathering show a pretty steady crowd, but it really only occupied a right triangle that was 300 ft by 400 ft by 500 ft (60,000 sq ft). There was some overflow, but it was pretty easy to get to at least the camera wall.

          Most importantly, I probably met only one minority who apparently sided with the Tea party crowd, and he had on a Hitler mustache.

          Stay classy.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (April 14, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
      7 1
      I think everyone should donate to my The World is Coming to an End PAC. Just make the checks out to Money Grubbers, Inc.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (April 14, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
        7  
        and can we buy your book at $9.99, or hear your speech at $25,000, or fly you on a jet at $100,000 - LOL.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 14, 2010 4:05 pm ET)
          5  
          World Nut Daily will give copies away for the price of a new subscription. LOL
          Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 14, 2010 4:03 pm ET)
      7  
      Well, well, well, where are all of the little repiggies who visit MMFA? You know, the ones we've been trying to tell that they're being used by Fuchs Noose and other corporatists?

      Score one for the progressives/liberals.

      No wonder Fuchs Noose viewers rate the lowest on knowing the truth about what goes on in our government.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jeremy Danials (April 15, 2010 12:09 am ET)
        2  
        Oh Yes! Cry, my little wingnuts! Cry harder! Your tears nourish my liberal heart! They feed my power! They taste of salt , shame, and sadness! More! I must have more!

        We always had this one.

        _________________________________________________________________________

        Remember, the TRUTH has a liberal bias!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Jeremy Danials (April 15, 2010 12:09 am ET)
           
        Oh Yes! Cry, my little wingnuts! Cry harder! Your tears nourish my liberal heart! They feed my power! They taste of salt , shame, and sadness! More! I must have more!

        We always had this one.

        _________________________________________________________________________

        Remember, the TRUTH has a liberal bias!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (April 14, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
      8  
      [http://michaelmanning.tv/blog/uploaded_images/fred-rogers-708512.jpg]

      Can you say astroturf? I knew you could.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rikntx (April 14, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
      1  
      Several points were brought up on MMfA's facebook page that I really had not given a great deal of thought to until I read it.

      News Corp. is a foreign owned entity. Yet they apparently have a tremendous amount of influence on US political affairs.

      Former The Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol was one of founding members of PNAC. The Weekly Standard, owned by News Corp., has been around longer (by a year), than FNC.

      An article in The Weekly Standard from July of 2007 touts Sarah Palin as the GOP's newest star. The piece was written by Fred Barnes a TWS editor and regular FNC contributor. He was also the only political commentator (out of 27) to pick John McCain to win the 2008 Presidential Election in a HuffPo piece from Nov. 2008, so he and Bill Kristol obviously have a good deal in common when it comes to forecasting the political future.

      Sorry, I digress. My point is there seems to so much more that is unseemly regarding FNC than distorting facts, outright lying and foisting what would otherwise be a fairly minor political movement upon the American public.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by grmce (April 14, 2010 5:51 pm ET)
        3  
        Actually, News was re-registered from South Australia to Delaware. Rupert Murdoch had to renounce his Australian citizenship and take up U.S. citizenship in order to retain ownership of Fox Television.

        Frankly, you're welcome to him, but I wish we could purge our media of his ownership. Here he owns almost all of the main city newspapers, from suburban "throwaways" to our national daily. This has a terrifying impact on working print journalists as well as a stultifying effect on news reporting and, most certainly, opinion.

        As I've stated elsewhere, Murdoch himself does not micromanage his entire empire - it is physically impossible. He generally operates via trusted minions and exploits what he thinks is the political trend. It seems that in the 1980s, during his big expansion in the U.S., having become enamoured of Thatcher's Britain, he hitched himself to the Reagan Administration - always good at sniffing the breeze, uncle Rupert. What he didn't seem to realise was that in this case he was making a Faustian pact. In the U.K., having sniffed the breeze, he was able to switch to Tony Blair and New Labour. In the U.S. he has become a prisoner of the Extreme Right.

        There is a delicious irony for those of us who have watched his opportunistic career to see the biter bit, hoist by his own petard, swimming in his own excrement. Sadly, the damage he has already wrought is not worth the schadenfreude.

        Hopefully, the various U.S. authorities mentioned here will be able to take appropriate action. What is generally not mentioned is that News Limited (I prefer to use its original, local name and I appreciate the pun) is very much Rupert's creature. When he goes, the whole pack of cards will as likely collapse.

        The good news? He's not Silvio Berlusconi, although he does have significant holdings in Europe (as well as China).
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rikntx (April 14, 2010 6:15 pm ET)
          1  
          Thanks you for the correction. I feel that I am having a change of heart as to what News Corp. (or News Limited if you prefer) is. For a long time I have felt that News Corp. was the propaganda arm of the Republican Party and now its sub-movement, the Tea Party. I am beginning to feel that I have it backwards. The Republican Party and the Tea Party are wholly owned subsidiaries of News Corp. It seems that FNC (hence News Corp.) now defines for us what conservatism means, because moderate conservatives seem to be going the way of the Passenger Pigeon. If you are a conservative yet doing anything that smacks of moderation, you are then labeled a RINO. I cannot count the number of times during our most recent presidential election I heard or read John McCain labeled as such, yet a quick check of his voting record (save for his very brief "maverick" period) would show him to be nothing but a conservative.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by grmce (April 14, 2010 8:04 pm ET)
            1  
            Actually I believe that FNC has become the personal political organ of Roger Ailes (no less evil for having lost the Mephistophelian beard that he used to sport). The U.S. arm of News is far more extreme than the rest of the empire (and that's saying something). It is also doctrinaire and incapable of switching its support as circumstances might dictate.

            The whole U.S. operation is unlike the old time News Ltd culture. The danger is that it is infecting the rest of the operation as the workforce is being "globalised".

            Rupert has been "outFoxed" as evidenced by his disastrous appearance at your National Press Club recently - he didn't fully realise what was going on editorially.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by BobStreamMedia (April 14, 2010 5:32 pm ET)
         
      Media Matters should also investigate the so-called "Crash the Tea Party" group, because from the looks of it, it appears to be phony. The site is registered to "Ben Franklin" (i.e. a founding father), it has grammatical errors in it, not to mention the fact that it's a picture of text and not a real web page, and the Facebook group that it links to is an obvious attempt to create what looks like a stereotypical Liberal's profile (complete with being from San Francisco, fans of Olbermann and Maddow, Rage Against the Machine, and Howard Zinn's People's History.

      Smells like Tea to me.
      http://www.crashtheteaparty.org/

      Here's my blog post on it with screen shots of pertinent details:
      http://aprioriblues.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-do-you-know-that-crash-tea-party-is.html
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (April 14, 2010 7:16 pm ET)
      2  
      Not only Fox but, CNN as well. both have been reporting on the Tea Party Express like its some real legit operation.
      Cnn is just as guilty as Fox for promoting these nutcases
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Space-Pedestrian (April 14, 2010 7:28 pm ET)
        5
      One news outlet promotes it, the others minimize it, underreporting the attendance and highlighting dubious signs and the like. Have you nothing better to do?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (April 14, 2010 8:46 pm ET)
        2  
        "the others minimize it"

        Yep, I'm still waiting for anyone to report that much of what tea partiers believe can be proven false in a few seconds. It's the stupidest protest of all time and we should keep careful track on just how many people are that stupid, and how they got to be so stupid.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Space-Pedestrian (April 15, 2010 8:15 am ET)
            3
          You can prove that the Federal deficit is not at an all time high? You can prove that Federal spending by the last two administrations did not break all records? You can prove that the next several generations of Americans will not foot the bill for all of this by carrying the burden of higher taxes? Did the VAT not come out of Nancy Pelosi's mouth this week? You're the one who is coming off sounding stupid.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (April 15, 2010 10:20 am ET)
            1  
            Why did these folks not start protesting when Bush was running up the "all time high" deficit? BTW, don't know if you saw this, but the defecit is down by 8% from this time last year. It would seem, that the true target of the tea partiers [most of whom have NO IDEA what the hell they are protesting except that there's a black man with a furriner's name in their WHITE House] is that black man with the furriner's name in their WHITE House. If they truly cared about taxes and the deficit [which for most of them, the ones who aren't on Social Security, is LOWER this year], they would have been protesting the previous administration. I was, where were you?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Space-Pedestrian (April 15, 2010 11:43 am ET)
                2
              You can't honestly believe that this is about race. That is the most disingenuous attempt to discredit the people who attend these events out there.

              I was no fan of the previous administration and their rampant domestic or war spending and was active in voicing my dismay. I am unaffiliated and owe no allegiance to any party. But you will not hear me attempt to malign an entire group of people with a broad brush of 'racism' or 'sexism'. Your partisan leaning clearly fogs your vision - this government spends too much for too little.

              The deficit is at a record and projects to grow at an incredible rate by all credible accounts. You can't pretend it won't.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by PurpleState (April 15, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
                1 1
                I don't believe it is about race, but I believe that the President being a different race makes it easier for people to accuse him of things.

                If the President were a white male, these complaints would not be as loud.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Space-Pedestrian (April 16, 2010 9:47 am ET)
                     
                  That is hard to say or quantify, and moreover, is completely beside the point. If it were Hillary would it be as loud? If it were John McCain would it be as loud? If not, because they're white? A female? A Republican?

                  People want to look for another reason why people are upset, but if you listen to them, it is almost entirely about government spending and the untenable debt that we have run up. Of course, you'd expect MMFA to undermine the Tea Party in order to discredit a credible threat to Democratic majorities - I get that - but misinformation runs both ways and MMFA is dangerously close to calling the kettle black.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (April 15, 2010 6:21 pm ET)
               
            You aren't a real tea partier. If you were, you'd believe that your taxes are going up, that Obama just passed socialized medicine, that Obama is taking away your constitutional rights, that Obama's policies tripled the deficit, and that unlike Obama, Bush did nothing wrong enough to protest.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by roverflash (April 15, 2010 9:31 am ET)
        2 1
        The Tea Party gets too much coverage. The whole "grassroots" claim is a hoax, which the story above explains, and the movement has yet to even put a candidate in office, as far as I'm aware. Meanwhile, other rallies in America for (or against) a bazillion other things are largely ignored by the media. It's a double standard. I agree with some of the Tea Party's principles (we would be stupid not to), but that doesn't mean Fox News needs to be drooling over every single cookie-cutter protest. It's ridiculous. It's not that I want the Tea Party silenced; I want the media to re-think what's really important to cover.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (April 15, 2010 10:24 am ET)
           
        BTW, you apparently have missed the point of this post. The "Tea Party Express" is a GOP sponsored/Fox promoted FRAUD designed to bring in disgruntled and uninformed REAL tea partiers. Those people who are riding around on the buses are being fed and housed by GOP strategists. Has nothing to do with any grassroots organization at ALL.

        BTW, I don't watch Fox . . . how do I know so much about them?
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.