About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Glenn Beck: A Vatican-approved, "wildly important" warrior against forces of "great darkness"?

April 22, 2010 8:11 pm ET by Ben Dimiero

Capping a week in which he attempted to explain the "plan" he "think[s]" God wants him to "articulate," Glenn Beck informed listeners of his radio show today that "an individual" at the Vatican purportedly told him that we are entering a "period of great darkness" and that Beck himself was "wildly important" to the upcoming struggle.

Glenn Beck frequently paints himself as fighting on behalf of "good" against the forces of "evil." Beck has said that "the opposition side" (aka progressives) could turn America into a force for "great and powerful evil." 

Some other examples:

  • Last August, during a paranoid rant about the Obama administration supposedly trying to destroy him, Beck said that there is "evil at play" in the administration.
  • Discussing a report about euthanasia in Canada, Beck tried to scare his listeners about health care reform by stating that "eugenics is starting all over again," and saying a "great and powerful evil is here."
  • While lying about Democrats supposedly "using water as a weapon" for health care votes, Beck claimed that the Dems were "so far past the line of evil." 
  • In his epic meltdown after passage of the health care reform bill, Beck got Biblical, saying that "the fruit of this tree is extraordinary evil." 

Beck also frequently implores his audience to "fall to their knees" and pray for a variety of reasons. Last September, Beck told his listeners to pray to prevent a Satanic "perversion of the country." After passage of the health care bill, Beck appallingly said that "it's like 9/11 all over again except we didn't have the collapsing building," and that everyone should pray. 

He has told his listeners to "pray that Obama moves to the center," then asked them to pray for his protection from the "uber-left" if he does so. Similarly, Beck once told his listeners that "this game is for keeps" with "the left", and asked them to "pray for protection."  And he once told his viewers to "fall to your knees" and "thank God every day for the people at Fox" airing his show.

Which brings us to today. 

Today, Beck used two outrageous recent stories to launch into his latest religious-tinged discussion. The first was the deplorable story of a teenager high on oxycontin that ran over and killed an elderly woman with her van. The second was a despicable story from the UK, in which Daily Mail columnist Virginia Ironside advocated letting "nature decide" whether premature babies should survive. Crazy stuff, to be sure - but Beck used this to launch into an attack on the idea of "progress." (Right after he explained how "an individual" at the Vatican informed him of his importance, that is). From his radio show today:    

BECK: We are entering a - we are entering a dark, dark period of man. Um, I was, um, I was in the Vatican, and I was surprised that the individual I was speaking to knew who I was.  And they said: 'Of course we know who you are.  What you're doing is wildly important.  We're entering a period of great darkness, and if good people don't stand up, we could enter a period unlike we have seen in a very long time.' 

It was odd to stand in the Vatican and hear those words.  Of all places that would understand the Dark Ages.  We are dealing with people who want to deconstruct the world.  They say they are for progress, but their progress is to deconstruct.  Their progress is to go backwards.  Instead of inventing our way out of something.  Instead of heralding achievement and merit, they destroy it.  Instead of respecting life, we devalue it. 

Of course, Beck doesn't clarify whether the "individual" he talked to was a Vatican official or a tourist from Omaha, but the impression he wants to give his listeners is clear: the Vatican itself has identified Beck as "wildly important" in the coming "dark, dark period of man."

You may see the ongoing debate in our country about health care reform, financial reform, and a variety of other issues in terms of how they will affect our policy decisions. Glenn Beck envisions things on a slightly larger scale - with himself at the center of it all. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (April 22, 2010 8:18 pm ET)
      6  
      Good thing Glenda isn't wanna them megalomaniacs like President Obama.
      ~
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achorn316 (April 22, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
      10  
      Beck has completely lost his mind. It's not in doubt anymore. This whole story is most definitely bullcrap.

      I'm sure that it was just one of the many voices in his head.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by PremisedPerfect (April 23, 2010 12:49 pm ET)
           
        Glenda is perfectly sane. This is an act. He has admitted that this is an act. Irresponsible and cynical as hell but it is an act. The sad thing is that so many people actually believe everything that this guy says.

        Then, again, the tea party crowd is not exactly known for curiosity or critical thinking. Idiots at the Beck intellectual trough.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Louise08902 (April 23, 2010 2:38 pm ET)
        1  
        And what do we do on the day when he ends his television show's hour-long evangelism by telling his viewers to shoot policemen and attack the City Hall or local Planned Parenthood?



        Or leads his Aug 28 "Restore Our Honor" army into attacking the White House and the Capitol?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (April 22, 2010 8:33 pm ET)
      6  
      When will people who represent these organizations, who Beck claims share his delusions, speak out and denounce him?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (April 22, 2010 9:07 pm ET)
      13  
      If indeed such a conversation took place, he probly misheard. I speculate that the "individual" said: "you are weirdly impotent."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Tania (April 22, 2010 9:47 pm ET)
         
      On Virginia Ironside wanting nature to take its course: this is not a PROGRESSIVE position but one taken by religious wackos just like Beck. Taking every example of bad behaviour to be 'progressive' in origin is MY view of what is evil.

      Some very quick evidence of Mr Beck's innate evil:

      1. When he was working the radio circuit in the 90's, he heard a rival announcer (and former good mate) and his wife had suffered the tragedy of a miscarriage. What's the most evil thing you could do in that situation? Well, Glenn rang her up live on air whilst she was still recovering from her ordeal and tormented her about it, you know 'your hushand cant even make a baby' etc. I mean really really over the top degrading awful stuff. THAT'S EVIL!

      2. When Mr Beck confused euthanasia for eugenics (you know even though they are opposing ideas in every way) deliberately, he took a call from a very distraught woman, in fear of her life. She genuinely believed, you could hear it in her voice, that Obama was going to kill her because she was injured. She actually started outlining an argument for why she was worthy of living 'I may not be able to work, but my kids love me and I'm a good mum' - that kinda stuff. It was heartbreaking. Instead of doing the responsible thing and admitting his extreme distortion and exaggeration, he allowed her to go on in fear, and touted himself as her protector, the progressives as the ones trying to hurt her. The ironic part is that progressives want to help the poor woman and give her welfare because she cannot work, and give her educational opportunities because she clearly had limited intellectual resources. Mr Beck openly states that he wants to ABOLISH all the initiatives that would help this poor woman. Again, this is pure evil to me.

      I could go on and on with more and more examples...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (April 22, 2010 10:29 pm ET)
      10 1
      To be honest, I don't give a rat's ass if this is true... it doesn't mean a thing. Does "an individual at the Vatican" have inherent credibility or integrity, just because he's part of the Catholic hierarchy? Really? No, not really.

      The Catholic Church is one of the most successful scams in history. They've amassed an obscene fortune by sucking money from the pockets of the ignorant, the gullible and the insecure throughout history. The Pope sits in one of the most impressive palaces in the world; his minions control a massive pile of money, and what, exactly, has "The Church" done to earn any of that?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Les Philling (April 22, 2010 11:27 pm ET)
        6 1
        There have been many Catholic clerics who've done a lot of good all over the world for the poor and sick for very little material compensation, with their own well being often at risk.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (April 23, 2010 1:32 am ET)
          9  
          That is true. There are individuals in all religions who do good for others. It does not change the fact, however, that the Catholic Church has amassed a great fortune for itself by exploiting the natural human fear of death. They used that wealth to build this palace for their king.

          [http://www.ship-of-fools.com/mystery/2000/Pics/StPetersRome.jpg]
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Louise08902 (April 23, 2010 2:36 pm ET)
               
            I agree with you about the true nature of the Church as an enterprise. There are priests who are among the gullible, of course. The most gullible believers of all would be exactly the sort of people that would want to become priests. They do good works, live in poverty along with their parishioners, and provide a charitable front for the greater organization.
            Local parish priests who abuse members of their congregation and steal from them have simply found out the true nature of the Church's true business. They can effectively blackmail their superiors into a pact of mutually beneficial deception.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (April 23, 2010 10:44 am ET)
        2  
        Does "an individual at the Vatican" have inherent credibility or integrity, just because he's part of the Catholic hierarchy?
        The "individual at the Vatican" was probably a janitor...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (April 22, 2010 10:38 pm ET)
      5  
      The dark side clouds everything. Impossible to see the future is.
      [http://media.canada.com/074dfb0f-a99d-4640-9732-cc12e712ec59/yoda.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rikntx (April 22, 2010 10:42 pm ET)
      9  
      Beck is beginning to sound more and more like a David Koresh type.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (April 22, 2010 11:08 pm ET)
      7  
      Glenn Beck:
      We are entering a - we are entering a dark, dark period of man. Um, I was, um, I was in the Vatican, and I was surprised that the individual I was speaking to knew who I was. And they said: 'Of course we know who you are. What you're doing is wildly important. We're entering a period of great darkness, and if good people don't stand up, we could enter a period unlike we have seen in a very long time.'
      Your lying ass got called out on the freakin' View for God's sake, for lying about a chance meeting that you had with Whoopi Goldberg and Barabra Walters. Whoopi called you on it to your face and called you a, "lying sack of dog mess."

      You actually expect us to believe that some source from the Vatican has told you, a Mormon, that you are an integral part of the coming battle for good versus evil?

      You, sir, are bat crap crazy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (April 23, 2010 12:51 am ET)
        5  
        Beck never said it was a source from the Vatican, just somebody who was there at the same time talking to him. Do they have a sanctuary for homeless schizophrenics? If so, it seems natural that one of them would strike up a conversation with Nostradumbass.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jarossiter (April 23, 2010 10:15 am ET)
          3  
          It was somebody from the church of....I can't remember.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by okiepoli (April 23, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
             
          I was thinking along the same line.

          If Glenn was in the Vatican, what are the chances that some other whacko might be there too.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pbg (April 23, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
             
          Did he look like Donald Sutherland?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (April 22, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
      1  
      God is talking to Glenn? Now the Vatican...? Who's next...Tiger Woods? Oprah...?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (April 23, 2010 1:37 am ET)
      4  
      I'm sorry... is such an endorsement from the Vatican even an endorsement worth boasting about?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 2:06 am ET)
        26
      It does make absolutele sense. THe struggle against Obama truly is a struggle of good versus evil. Obama is trying to destroy everything.

      I am not saying that he is (I don't know), but Barry does indeed beat many of the hallmarks of "The Beast". No, Barry doesn't have 666 on his forehead, but he fits many of the other descritions of the anti-Christs. I read the Book of Revelation often and it scares me how our current circumstances are so similar to the time before the Trials depcited in Revelation.

      I do not know whether Barry is the anti-Christ, but I do think Barry is an evil man. I believe Satan is working through Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by darkmass (April 23, 2010 2:41 am ET)
        8 2
        I believe Satan - Bobby Jindal fan
        From your lips to God's ears.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by KurtisMae (April 23, 2010 2:46 am ET)
           
        The struggle against idiocy IS truly a struggle.

        I'm not saying you're an... oh wait, yes I am. Because you do bear many of the hallmarks of an idiot. I read "Sports Illustrated" often, and it scares me that the Un-American league is considering getting rid of the designated hitter.

        I don't know whether Frank is the pro-Chris, but I do think he is a fan of Bo-Wheevils. I believe Stan is working his way through the Angel's lineup.

        Yea-verily!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cst (April 23, 2010 7:04 am ET)
        14 2
        We've been cutting you too much slack. You're not just a fool... you're the kind of fanatic that ends up with blood on his hands.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (April 23, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
          4  
          Who's we - the people who don't know enough to NOT feed him by acting like he's actually capable and interested in having a back and forth conversation?

          Because I've been recommending for weeks that we simply briefly debunk what he says, mock him, then tell others to NOT feed him.

          He's just out to get negative attention. He almost certainly doesn't ACTUALLY believe what he has written here - he's simply out to 'inspire' replies to distract us from the other things we SHOULD be paying attention to.

          So, stop replying yourself. And stop others from feeding the troll if you're the first (or one of the first) person to identify a troll post!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mmfa.fan (April 23, 2010 7:18 am ET)
        4 3
        How does your church being full of pedophiles fit into your grand narrative?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 2:28 pm ET)
            6
          My Church is not full of pedophiles. The few rogue priests are not a condemnation of the Church and most ceraily do not invalidate any of her teachings. It is merely an attempt by the devil to undermine the Church.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheDayV (April 23, 2010 3:16 pm ET)
            3 2
            You're an attempt by the devil to undermine the Church.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ChockoRocko (April 24, 2010 2:15 am ET)
               
            Celibacy is a moronic human construct. Sexual energy WILL be released. The point of all the lawsuits against the church is not because of a 'few rogue priests' or the criminal behavior of those priests, but that the church deliberately covered up those crimes IN DOZENS OF COUNTRIES by not reporting those CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN to the police and by helping PEDOPHILES escape justice by HIDING THEM USING CHURCH RESOURCES. Your church is full of pedophiles, sir, they are just being hidden from you by the patriarchy.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (April 23, 2010 3:37 pm ET)
          1  
          The incidents of the infamous 2002 scandal in the American Catholic Church numbered 11,000 reports over a 50 year period. Most of them having taken place in the 1960-70s. Fewer than 5000 priests out of 110,000 priests were accused. A full third of the incidents can be traced to 150 priests. There are 70 million Catholics in the U.S. Reports of abuse for the last few years have to levels of the 1950s. This article states that abuse by Protestant clergy is as bad or worse than the Catholic Church. There is also evidence to suggest that abuse by public school teachers is even more widespread, even though it goes virtually unreported.

          http://dannimoss.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/protestant-clergy-abuse-equals-or-exceeds-catholic-clergy-abuse/

          http://www.sesamenet.org/

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (April 23, 2010 4:33 pm ET)
               
            I think the point being is that the supreme leaders of the Catholic Church PROTECTED the pedofiles. Which means that people like Sean Hannity, by association, bragging about his Catholicism, and now Glenn Beck, believe in protecing pedofiles (using the Jeremiah Wright logic). Glenn Beck is not a good person. He is a fraud, sucking money and grabbing at straws. He has no philosophy other than ego and greed. Even right wing Mark Levin knows this. He is a shyster and he goes where the money is and right now it's in fear. THe 9-12 project, the PLAN, the EVIL DAYS - he'll say anything to keep people watching. His knowledge of history is absoltuely pathetic and far DUMBER than a fifth graders - worse, because he just LIES. And now he's doing the biggest rating scams of all - making it seem like THEY are AFTER HIM! Man is a fraud. Elmer Gantry. Lonesome Rhodes.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (April 23, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
              1 1
              About two weeks ago, I spent hours defending the Catholic Church from cheap shots. I tried to make the point, apparently ineffectively, that cheap shots like this make all Catholics look bad. I am a good Catholic, I defend my Church, I was accused of protecting pedophiles and demonizing the victims (when I only wanted them to be treated for their abuse.) I am very hurt when I see someone saying that the Catholic Church "is full of pedophiles". It isn't just a problem of the Catholic Church, and at the time of most of the abuses, teachers and Protestant clergy were probably protected by their organizations, too. Part of the reason for these stories and the snarky remarks and cheap shots has to do with a long-standing anti-Catholic bias in the United States. Most people are unaware of the facts, and are merely repeating things they have heard. The Catholic Church has been treated like Fox treats a Liberal Democrat.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mmfa.fan (April 24, 2010 1:05 am ET)
                   
                It's astonishing that anyone would try to minimize the problem by saying "fewer than 5000 priests" have been accused of such a horrific crime. I mean really, you're attributing anti-Catholic bias to me for pointing out the obvious? It's hardly a cheap shot.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 24, 2010 1:51 am ET)
                     
                  When a lawyer molests a child it is not used to attack the profession in general.

                  When an isloated rogue priest molests a child liberals use it to attack the Church as an institution.

                  Of course it is anti-Catholic bias. I am not saying it isn't tragic for the victims, but it is not nearly as widespread as the liberals would have you believed. It is a thinly veiled attack on Catholicism.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by ChockoRocko (April 24, 2010 2:30 am ET)
                       
                    When the church knows about, yet chooses to COVER UP A SUSTAINED PATTERN OF REPEATED SEXUAL CRIMES AGAINST INNOCENT CHILDREN, the church becomes responsible for the perpetrators' behavior. When that pattern repeats itself over and over and over and over and over in many different countries, there is no way you can sustain your specious analogy, and moreover, (as lawyers might say), the excuse "everyone else is doing it and getting away with it" is total crap. I thought the Catholic Church as an institution professed to possess some sort of moral authority, which you have oh-so-readily surrendered in favor of your last-ditch defense-of-the-church, arguing the institution is still virtuous due to its supposed adherence to doctrine. Well, sir, had those priests used their time to study said doctrine instead of committing DECADES-LONG PATTERNS OF SEXUAL CRIMES AGAINST INNOCENT CHILDREN, this discussion would not have become necessary.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by epkklk851 (April 24, 2010 11:19 am ET)
                  1  
                  It's only about 1% of the population of priests; there is a problem within the Protestant clergy that is as great or greater and it isn't being addressed, at all. It's about 10% there, but you didn't say Protestantism is full of pedophiles, and that is the difference! Why are you not condemning them, the problem in schools is also about 10-15% of teachers are abusing students, but you didn't condemn public schools as being full of pedophiles, only my church. Where are you on those issues? Yes, you are pointing out the obvious, but only for Catholics, who have been targeted for centuries for being different. In the 1800s, people used to go from town to town giving speeches about the evil monasteries and convents that were rife with orgies. It usually turned out that they weren't Catholics and had never been to a monastery or convent, they were just crazy. Then there are the freakazoids who call the Church the Whore of Babylon and that the Pope is 666, and the people who call us "wafer worshippers", "beadmumblers", and "papist trash". Why do you hold Catholics to a different standard than you hold Protestant clergy and teachers?
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (April 23, 2010 7:38 am ET)
        3 1
        Go away, fraud.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (April 23, 2010 8:22 am ET)
        4 1
        It does make absolutele sense. THe struggle against Obama truly is a struggle of good versus evil. Obama is trying to destroy everything.

        It only makes sense to paranoid schizophrenics.

        If you and Glenn would go back on your meds all those little voices in your head would go quiet.

        BTW I always thought Simply Sarah had more hallmarks of the anti christ than Obama. Do you believe Satan is working to destroy the world through her. Or do the voices in your head tell you otherwise?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 2:29 pm ET)
            5
          If you want to know who Gov. Palin is, it is Queen Esther. She is the person who will try to save us.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheDayV (April 23, 2010 3:17 pm ET)
            1  
            And then?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonesjax2374 (April 23, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
            2  
            DO NOT insult the Jewish people by the anti-semitic Palin as Ester comparison, please.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:46 pm ET)
                1
              Palin anti-Semitic?!?! She loves Israel. She had an Israeli flag in her gubernatorial office.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by nativeofsf (April 23, 2010 5:45 pm ET)
            1  
            BJ, you definitely are a piece of dreck...
            your reward is strangulation. --> Devarim, yud-gimel/vav <--

            Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (April 23, 2010 8:29 am ET)
        7 2
        The struggle against Obama truly is a struggle of good versus evil. Obama is trying to destroy everything.
        Quiz: Who spoke those words?

        a) Bobby Jindal fan
        b) Osama Bin Laden
        c) Kim Jong il
        d) all of the above
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RKAllen (April 23, 2010 8:51 am ET)
        14  
        It's time for the posters at MMFA to start ignoring your posts and avoiding conversations with you. After reading several of your posts over the past few days, it is clear that you are using phrasing and terminology (i.e. President Palin, Barry, etc.) with the sole intent of being antagonistic and derailing the topics of conversation. I really could care less if you mean the things you say anymore, because your delivery has alterior motives that have nothing to do with wanting an honest conversation about things.

        We can't ask you to leave, but we can act like you aren't here.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Whispers (April 23, 2010 10:06 am ET)
          5  
          Are you sure we can't ask him to leave?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (April 23, 2010 12:58 pm ET)
          1 1
          You've got that right.

          And because some people don't get that yet, responsible posters who DO understand that need to briefly debunk what he says, mock him, and then tell others to not feed the troll post.

          And here's a hint - replying like that is NOT feeding the troll.

          Feeding the troll is replying as though you think the person is actually interested in having a conversation, a debate. Briefly debunking what they say is ONLY done to soothe others who think that the nonsense from the troll shouldn't go unchallenged and to stop the troll from being able to claim that no one was able to debunk what they said.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 2:30 pm ET)
            4
          What is an "alterior" motive?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheDayV (April 23, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
            3 1
            "descritions", "depcited", "ceraily": All words you've used within your last 4 posts. Take it easy, there, champ.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:48 pm ET)
                 
              Those are typos. Alterior is not a typo.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mmfa.fan (April 24, 2010 12:59 am ET)
                   
                It's a typo of "ulterior", idiot.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by TheDayV (April 24, 2010 9:39 am ET)
                   
                "Bobby Jindal fan" seems like a typo, too. I'm thinking what you meant to type was "Knuckledragging Mouthbreather" or "Knee-Jerk Troll". It could go either way, really.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (April 23, 2010 9:43 am ET)
          1
        Yes, we understand what you believe. Now understand that we know you require psychological help.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cookieknits (April 23, 2010 10:52 am ET)
           
        The anti-Christ and the Beast are two separate beings. Read the Book of Revelation again, BJ fan, if you ever have in the first place.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (April 23, 2010 12:21 pm ET)
        3 1
        THe struggle against Obama truly is a struggle of good versus evil.
        Obama being the good, and his opponents being the evil.

        Hey, BJF - have they started deportation proceedings against you yet?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 2:32 pm ET)
            3
          You can not deport a US citizen who was born and raised here.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by txthinker (April 23, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
            1  
            They SHOULD deport one who hates America as much as you do....

            Why don't you use your Irish passport one more time and leave?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 24, 2010 1:52 am ET)
                 
              So when you disagree with our next President, by your logic you should be deported.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Rsw58 (April 23, 2010 3:03 pm ET)
        4  
        BJ Fan, you know I have often wondered if you are just an average guy who is pulling our leg by pretending to be a wacko wingnut or if you really are as big of an idiot as you appear to be. (I'm still trying to decide but it is hard to believe that anyone could be as dumb as you are.)
        Ok I'd love to know how Obama--or "Barry" as you disrepectfull call him--fits "many" of the desciptions of the Beast found in Revelation. (Oh by the way, I think the book of Revelation is just a fairy tale but I am still curious as to how you came to your conclusions.) And why is Obama "evil" in your mind? Is it because he wants health care for all? Is it because he wants to get rid of the world nukes? Is it because he thinks that gays should have the same rights as other Americans? What horrible things has he done? Inquiring minds want to know! :-)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pbg (April 23, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
           
        You know, if he is the Antichrist, you're screwed.
        1) because the Antichrist only shows up after the Rapture. So if he's here, you missed that bus.
        2) The Antichrist is destined to prevail. He WILL unite all the countries in the world under one government. Not every country but the US of A. He DOES sweep all before him.
        And unless you're a converted Jew, you don't make it to Armageddon. The 144,000 are the only humans left at that point.

        If he isn't the Antichrist, you're breaking theNinth Commandment. If he is, you're doomed no matter what you do.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:49 pm ET)
            1
          Except that I have a plenary indulgence. I haven't the slightest worry.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mmfa.fan (April 24, 2010 1:00 am ET)
               
            No wonder Protestantism emerged. Keep believing in your sky-fairy, caveman.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by TheDayV (April 24, 2010 10:05 am ET)
               
            If I were you, I'd be worried that once you got to the Pearly Gates, St. Peter would say "I've never heard of a plenary indulgence", seeing as it's not in scripture, and send you packing.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Will Fuqua (April 23, 2010 2:50 am ET)
      1  
      It's rather odd how so many Catholics support Glenn Beck even though he's a Mormon. The beliefs of those two religions are vastly different from one another and conflict with one another.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by reanna-mator (April 23, 2010 8:09 am ET)
      4  
      You've gotta give Glenda credit: when he has delusions of grandeur, he thinks big.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pamom (April 23, 2010 8:30 am ET)
        2  
        "Make the lie so big", wasn't that one of the Nazi tenants? Beck is a sick man, it's gone past funny, past dangerous, into just plain sad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by timesthree (April 23, 2010 9:06 am ET)
         
      Odd is definately the word for Glenn Beck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lute (April 23, 2010 9:26 am ET)
         
      I imagine Mr. Beck (as you are wont to do) that your wild importance to the grand scheme is that you will be sacrificed
      to the cause by one of your fervant followers who believes that your ascension will hasten the rapture & his own glory in the New Kingdom.


      (I wonder if these staunch republicans realize the irony in the slave state the Rapture will bring, and the fact that there will be no USA any more?)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rsw58 (April 23, 2010 10:16 am ET)
      3  
      When did Beck go to the Vatican?? I am going to assume that IF this story is true that the person he talked to was just some tourist because I can't imagine a Vatican official coming out and saying that to him.
      Of course Beck WANTS his listeners to think it was a Vatican official. It would show just how important Glenny is. "Wow Martha did ya hear that? Even the Vatican knows about Glenn!! Glenn is going to save us all! Yup! Yup! Yup!"
      Truly the man's ego is out of control. He'll probably be starting his own cult soon. He'll be "Dear Leader". (This will happen once his ratings slip enough that they will can his show. But his die-hard believers will still flock to him where ever he goes.)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BobStreamMedia (April 23, 2010 10:18 am ET)
         
      Beck needs to bolster his Catholic demographic. Evangelicals eat from his hands, so he's set there, and he'll be even more popular as he continues to prophesy. In the midst of the obvious and well-deserved decline of the Catholic Church, Glenn Beck sees a desperate demographic looking for a champion. I look for him to pander to them more in the coming weeks, since there will be many disillusioned Catholics looking for someone who will stand up for them and tell them that their professional child molestors in leadership are the persecuted, and that "liberals" are to blame.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bullwinkle (April 23, 2010 10:58 am ET)
         
      If anything refutes the existence of God, it is Glenn Beck!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mr Blifil (April 23, 2010 11:22 am ET)
      3  
      Look this schtick is just obvious. Take a theme from anywhere in today's discourse. Imagine what Howard Beale would say about it (refraining from the incisive criticism of corporate power), type it up and kill some air time.

      This is not rocket science folks.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by papa bear3 (April 23, 2010 2:14 pm ET)
        1  
        I think the expression is "dead air" and he gave us a lot of it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Indy (April 23, 2010 11:58 am ET)
      3  
      Add one part corporatist hack + one part religious hack = Whala! Instant fascist clown hack ready to serve for any get together of simple minded tastes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by armendale (April 23, 2010 12:25 pm ET)
           
        Can a secular humanist liberal commie demonic socialist like myself still get into heaven if I convert to GOPianity, watch only FOX NEWS, and accept Glenn Beck as my lord savior?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (April 23, 2010 3:03 pm ET)
      1  
      A La the Emporer's New Clothes:
      is all this (and scores of other examples) not proof enough, by now, that Beck is mentally ill?
      Not that I have a problem with that per se... only that it is not acknowledged publicly
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coldteablues19577325 (April 23, 2010 3:12 pm ET)
      1  
      Is he shooting for an award for his mantle this year? Jeesh, I couldn't stomach listening to his on air 'performance.' How can people fall for his schtick? Lonesome Rhodes indeed!! I just threw up in my mouth a little listening to his tripe. Yuck!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (April 23, 2010 3:46 pm ET)
         
      Did it ever occur to any of you that maybe the Vatican did tell him that he was "wildly important" in this coming "dark, dark period of man" because he was recognized as being the source or an aide of the darkness? Maybe they want to do an exorcism. But that is curious, when did he go to Europe? When would he have visited the Vatican in the last year? Is is just more of his lies?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by secularhuman (April 23, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
         
      The ``individual'' ``at the Vatican'' in Beck's mind.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Peter Principle (April 23, 2010 7:12 pm ET)
         
      Glenn Beck always makes me think of the wisdom of Hughie Long, who, when asked if fascism could ever come to his country, replied: "Sure, but here they'll call it anti-fascism."
      Report Abuse