NRO's Whelan hits Elena Kagan for being a bad driver
May 10, 2010 12:01 pm ET by Jamison Foser
National Review's Ed Whelan throws the kitchen sink at Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan:
In addition to her kicking military recruiters off Harvard's campus during wartime* and being paid for a comfy position on a Goldman Sachs advisory board, this passage (from this article) nicely captures Elena Kagan's remoteness from the lives of most Americans:
Kagan ... is such a product of New York City that she did not learn to drive until her late 20s. According to her friend John Q. Barrett, a law professor at St. John's University, it is a skill she has not yet mastered.
Now, my first reaction to that was shock that Whelan would actually criticize a woman nominated to the nation's highest court for being a bad driver. I can only assume Whelan is now hard at work on a follow-up post portraying Kagan as bad at math.
But that was quickly followed by annoyance at the silly regional warfare Whelan is trying to provoke by painting Kagan as an out-of-touch New Yorker. First, as Matt Gertz notes, that's a mindless smear of millions of residents of New York City (and, by the way, the kind of geographic bigotry conservatives would rage about if it were directed at Southerners or Midwesterners.)
I was also amused by Whelan's linking of not learning to drive with being a subway-riding city-slicker. See, though I (barely) learned to drive when I was 16, I never got around to getting a driver's license and haven't driven a car since my learner's permit expired shortly thereafter. But I didn't grow up in mid-town Manhattan; I grew up in a town of about 300 people -- a town with no gas station, no stop lights, no ... well, no anything. The nearest movie theater, for example, was about 20 miles away. But I didn't have a car, or the money to buy one. Getting a driver's license would have been a largely symbolic exercise. (Since then, I have lived in Washington, DC, where driving is not particularly necessary.)
To be sure, most people I knew growing up -- and most people I know now -- know how to drive. But I'm quite certain that there are plenty of other adults who have negligible driving experience not because they are the embodiment of the conservative caricature of a limo-riding New York City elitist but because they couldn't afford to drive. And I'm quite certain you can find people like that in small cities and towns throughout America. Whelan reveals his own elitist assumptions when he links a lack of driving experience with purported big-city elitism.
* No, Whelan isn't telling the truth: Kagan did not "kick[] military recruiters off Harvard's campus."

















So, if you're accelerating from a stop light, but you'll never get to the posted speed limit because you're turning soon, as soon as you stop accelerating, you should put on your turn signal. If you're going really slowly, then you don't need to put your turn signal on 500 feet before that turn - if you're going really fast, you need to have that turn signal on well before you're 500 feet from your turn.
The whole idea needs to be that you indicate your actions in time for the drivers around you to react appropriately! It does little good to use them after you've already hit your brakes - you should let the driver following know WHY your brake lights are coming on, and you should do that right BEFORE you hit your brakes.
You're likely just collateral damage.
Frankly, I'd like to know what Whelan's driving record is like. For comparison's sake, I got two speeding tickets in 1983, my first summer of driving, and nothing since (not that I haven't deserved some, mind you!). I've been in one accident, when another driver made an illegal left turn right in front of me back in 1997. I usually drive about 20,000 miles a year. I have a chauffer's license, routinely score 100% on tests, and have been entrusted many times to drive my church's bus.
Okay, Whelan, how good a driver are you?
I don't think that the lack of a driver's license in most cases or lack of extensive driving experience means that one is an elitist.
I am baffled as to why anyone would think this is something that should be mentioned in judging this nominee.
I know that's difficult, but just play along.
Now, if someone were to try to use her poor driving to attack her, is it too much to ask that there be some actual research to see whether she'd ever...oh, I don't know...run over a group of school children while clipping her toenails behind the wheel?
But I guess we're just supposed to trust her "friend's" word.
Geez.
As for Kagan's not driving, I've only been to New York once, and even I know that there are plenty of people there who don't drive. Traffic is the pits, parking a car is expensive, and the subway, taxis and buses provide daily transportation for a majority of New Yorkers.
I wouldn't drive a car if I didn't have to.
I didn't own a car till I was thirty years old. Buses, friends, bicyles, and motorcycles got me to that point.
On the other hand I think everyone who can should spend a couple years with an aircooled 911 as a daily driver. With its every move it will demand that you pay attension to what you and it are doing.