Beck pushes scary conspiracy theories about climate change
May 13, 2010 12:05 am ET by Matt McLaughlin
Referring to the climate change bill that was introduced in the Senate today, Glenn Beck repeatedly suggested on his Fox News show that efforts to address global warming are aimed at producing a "global government." It's the kind of fearmongering that we've come to expect from Beck, but it's worth looking more closely at a couple of his conspiracy theories.
Beck kicked off the show by posting an on-screen graphic that read: "What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?"
Beck later informed his viewers that the quote reportedly came from environmentalist Maurice Strong. Beck stated:
BECK: Now, I want to be very clear here, because we talked to the reporter that did this interview in 1990 up in Canada. And I want to be very clear: He [Strong] was fantasizing about a plot of a novel he was thinking about writing. Yeah."
Beck went on to state that Strong has never written any novels, then said:
BECK: You know what? He's been busy -- he's got this great novel idea, but he hasn't had time to do it because he's involved in collapsing the global economies into the hands of a global government. Isn't that interesting? It's almost like his book. Hmm. Maybe it's performance art."
See for yourself:
First, Beck ridiculously suggests that a hypothetical remark Strong reportedly made in 1990 shows he is "involved in collapsing the global economies into the hands of a global government." He doesn't quote Strong saying he wants to "collapse" industrialized countries; rather, Strong questions the morality of doing so if such an action were needed to save the world. But even Beck admits that the journalist who conducted the 1990 interview with Strong said Strong raised this hypothetical as the possible plot for a novel.
Now, Beck makes sure to indicate that he thinks Strong's reported quote represents not a hypothetical situation for the plot of a novel, but rather the reasoning behind a plot to establish a "global government." By coincidence, Beck's got his own novel coming out next month. Well, he says it's only a novel, but if we look at it through the same lens that he used to look at Strong's remark, a much more alarming picture comes into view. Blogger Will Bunch, a Media Matters senior fellow, reports that Beck has said the novel is "a story of America at time much like today where the people are confused and they're being lied to and they're not sure what's right-side-up and upside-down. ... And there's one part ... there's a group of people that plays a role called the Founders Keepers...This leads to a battle and a civil war, and life is upside down planet-wide." What if this isn't only the plot of Beck's novel, but also part of a plot to incite a civil war? Pretty scary, huh?
Earlier in his show, Beck stated that former Vice President Al Gore "said that the climate bill would bring about global governance":
This is another ridiculous distortion. In a speech in Oxford, England, on July 7, 2009, Gore noted that the House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey bill to address climate change. He stated of the bill: "[O]ne of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements." He was referring to standards for emissions that would be set globally in order to address global warming, not saying that some nefarious body would take over the world. But Beck's fevered rhetoric suggests the latter.
In pushing the idea that addressing climate change would produce a global government, Beck echoed a wild conspiracy theory that he and other right-wing media figures pushed last year.
It all sounds scary, but there's not much "there" there.

















Isn't this what Beck wants? Our economy to collapse so it can be rebuilt properly?
Who knew that both Beck and these imaginary conspiracy theorists he invented would want the same things!
He's said so often enough; the philosophy could be called "Charlie Manson economics". I think Beck literally wants to be the last man standing, after helping to generate his own financial helter-skelter.
Like Manson, his simplistic thinking, combined with the blinkeredness of an egomaniac cause him to overestimate his own power.
I wish his God would hurry up and rapturize his ignorant ass so I wouldn't have to listen to him anymore.
There, I fixed it.
http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2010/05/11/my-new-career/
WTF?
Was there some big science news I missed this week? Last I heard was this and this.
And what does Al Gore have to do with the science? He deals strictly with the politics of the issue and just uses the science to support his position. He doesn't make or shape the science in any way, shape or form.
What you missed:
1. There is nothing, no evidence, nada to suggest the science is in any way inaccurate or in question.
2. The one and only criticism to come out of the independent investigations is the idea that information handling needs to be different for this particular subject. Because unlike most other scientific endeavors, there is a group actively trying to misrepresent the data and having the data republished by those using it, even though it is all available from the primary sources anyway, will help cut down on the crack=pots and whack-jobs who just make stuff up because using those primary sources is just too complicated.
Not trying to be too harsh, but you'll notice that the hoax about the emails was pretty well de-bunked almost half a year ago. You have to understand it's pretty funny to see somebody still buying into "Climate Gate".
On the bright side, it looks like the Denial Cultists are tired of having their feeble arguments against the science of Climate Change laughed at.
I'm not saying that they've accepted reality, I'm sure many still make themselves believe that GW is a hoax, but notice where the emphasis is now; the threat of oppressive laws related to climate change, not so much trying to deny it.
I also notice the change at these threads. Any climate=related items used to have a gang of Denier trolls jumping on immediately with their "Climate-Gate" silliness and links to Inhofe's site. They don't seem as fanatical in their faith any more.
The Troglodytes have taken a similar approach to the debate about teaching evolution. They realized that they couldn't win the scientific debate, so they've been systematically taking over local school boards so they can shoehorn their superstitions back into the curriculum.
Bwahahahahahaha.
Glenn, let the record reflect: Whether it would make sense or not, whether it would be a good thing or a bad thing, global government or anything like it is not happening in your lifetime. Or your children's lifetime. Or your children's children's liftetime.
Seriously, what a lousy way to make a living. Shouldn't you be doing something useful, rather than preying on the fears and hatreds of a small minority?
Any legitimate publisher would outright reject a "novel" that contained a literary terd like that, or at least make the author change it... which is further evidence that Becky's books are subsidized by the GOP propaganda machine, just like Ann Coulter's.