About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Beck pushes scary conspiracy theories about climate change

May 13, 2010 12:05 am ET by Matt McLaughlin

Referring to the climate change bill that was introduced in the Senate today, Glenn Beck repeatedly suggested on his Fox News show that efforts to address global warming are aimed at producing a "global government." It's the kind of fearmongering that we've come to expect from Beck, but it's worth looking more closely at a couple of his conspiracy theories.

Beck kicked off the show by posting an on-screen graphic that read: "What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?"

Beck later informed his viewers that the quote reportedly came from environmentalist Maurice Strong. Beck stated:

BECK: Now, I want to be very clear here, because we talked to the reporter that did this interview in 1990 up in Canada. And I want to be very clear: He [Strong] was fantasizing about a plot of a novel he was thinking about writing. Yeah."

Beck went on to state that Strong has never written any novels, then said:

BECK: You know what? He's been busy -- he's got this great novel idea, but he hasn't had time to do it because he's involved in collapsing the global economies into the hands of a global government. Isn't that interesting? It's almost like his book. Hmm. Maybe it's performance art."

See for yourself:

First, Beck ridiculously suggests that a hypothetical remark Strong reportedly made in 1990 shows he is "involved in collapsing the global economies into the hands of a global government." He doesn't quote Strong saying he wants to "collapse" industrialized countries; rather, Strong questions the morality of doing so if such an action were needed to save the world. But even Beck admits that the journalist who conducted the 1990 interview with Strong said Strong raised this hypothetical as the possible plot for a novel.

Now, Beck makes sure to indicate that he thinks Strong's reported quote represents not a hypothetical situation for the plot of a novel, but rather the reasoning behind a plot to establish a "global government." By coincidence, Beck's got his own novel coming out next month. Well, he says it's only a novel, but if we look at it through the same lens that he used to look at Strong's remark, a much more alarming picture comes into view. Blogger Will Bunch, a Media Matters senior fellow, reports that Beck has said the novel is "a story of America at time much like today where the people are confused and they're being lied to and they're not sure what's right-side-up and upside-down. ... And there's one part ... there's a group of people that plays a role called the Founders Keepers...This leads to a battle and a civil war, and life is upside down planet-wide." What if this isn't only the plot of Beck's novel, but also part of a plot to incite a civil war? Pretty scary, huh?

Earlier in his show, Beck stated that former Vice President Al Gore "said that the climate bill would bring about global governance":

This is another ridiculous distortion. In a speech in Oxford, England, on July 7, 2009, Gore noted that the House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey bill to address climate change. He stated of the bill: "[O]ne of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements." He was referring to standards for emissions that would be set globally in order to address global warming, not saying that some nefarious body would take over the world. But Beck's fevered rhetoric suggests the latter.

In pushing the idea that addressing climate change would produce a global government, Beck echoed a wild conspiracy theory that he and other right-wing media figures pushed last year.

It all sounds scary, but there's not much "there" there.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (May 13, 2010 12:34 am ET)
      2 1
      " Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?"

      Isn't this what Beck wants? Our economy to collapse so it can be rebuilt properly?

      Who knew that both Beck and these imaginary conspiracy theorists he invented would want the same things!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (May 13, 2010 12:57 am ET)
        4 1
        The Projection Imperative raises its bugeyed head to yodell another timless mating call to the faithless.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (May 13, 2010 11:22 am ET)
          1
        Isn't this what Beck wants? Our economy to collapse so it can be rebuilt properly?

        He's said so often enough; the philosophy could be called "Charlie Manson economics". I think Beck literally wants to be the last man standing, after helping to generate his own financial helter-skelter.

        Like Manson, his simplistic thinking, combined with the blinkeredness of an egomaniac cause him to overestimate his own power.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (May 13, 2010 12:56 am ET)
      2 1
      Oh let him have a little fun before his show gets cancelled or shipped off to Fox Business.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilot_rsg (May 13, 2010 2:10 am ET)
        1 1
        But you have to admit, cap and trade is a complete sham. He is right about that.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pilotx (May 14, 2010 12:45 am ET)
            1
          I don't think so. Maybe in its current form but corporations should have to pay to use our natural resources. If they don't pay we as taxpayers will. If you want to pollute then you have to pay to clean it up, seems fair to me.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by cbrockman71 (May 13, 2010 2:52 am ET)
      4 1
      How can someone with a personality this bad be a cult of personality?

      I wish his God would hurry up and rapturize his ignorant ass so I wouldn't have to listen to him anymore.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (May 13, 2010 10:54 am ET)
        3 1
        I wish his God would hurry up and rupture his ignorant ass so I wouldn't have to listen to him anymore.


        There, I fixed it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by cst (May 13, 2010 6:59 am ET)
        1
      I don't know if this is INTENDED to be a specific parody of Beck, but it sure hits the nail on the head...
      http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2010/05/11/my-new-career/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loyalfrog (May 13, 2010 7:16 am ET)
      1  
      Why do you still cling to science that has been debunked by it;s own people? Al Gore thanks you for his new home which he bought in one of the areas he claims will be flooded by rising waters. Does THAT not tell you anything. By all means enrich him some more.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rumpleteasermom (May 13, 2010 11:08 am ET)
          1
        Why do you still cling to science that has been debunked by it;s own people?


        WTF?

        Was there some big science news I missed this week? Last I heard was this and this.

        And what does Al Gore have to do with the science? He deals strictly with the politics of the issue and just uses the science to support his position. He doesn't make or shape the science in any way, shape or form.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by loyalfrog (May 13, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
          1  
          Yes if you didn't note the stuff that went on for weeks about the scientists falsifying their data and admitting it you need to google it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ssully (May 13, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
            1 1
            I've noted the 'stuff' being spewed from rightwing websites and global warming denialist blogs for years, include the 'Climategate' spew, but contrary to that spew, nowhere -- including in the reports of several official investigations spawned by the fake uproar -- was it confirmed that scientists 'falsified' data. Now please don't trot out the words 'trick' or 'hide the decline', it'll just show you're an idiot who thinks methods published and discussed openly in peer reviewed papers are evidence of something being 'hidden' or 'falsified'.




            Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (May 13, 2010 8:43 pm ET)
          1 1
          Oops, I posted this morning (below) that it looked like all of the Denial Cultists figured out they'd been suckered. I guess loyalfrog is a little slow even for a wingnut. I didn't think anybody was still clinging to the "ClimateGate" hoax.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rumpleteasermom (May 14, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
             
          Did you not read my links? Obviously not. You quite obviously payed lots of attention when the e-mail scandal first broke but lost interest when the rational investigations start publishing their findings.

          What you missed:
          1. There is nothing, no evidence, nada to suggest the science is in any way inaccurate or in question.

          2. The one and only criticism to come out of the independent investigations is the idea that information handling needs to be different for this particular subject. Because unlike most other scientific endeavors, there is a group actively trying to misrepresent the data and having the data republished by those using it, even though it is all available from the primary sources anyway, will help cut down on the crack=pots and whack-jobs who just make stuff up because using those primary sources is just too complicated.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (May 13, 2010 10:05 pm ET)
          1
        Loyalfrog, if you're serious and not just trolling, and are interested in learning more about the CRU email thing, here's an item from this site about it from December of last year.

        Not trying to be too harsh, but you'll notice that the hoax about the emails was pretty well de-bunked almost half a year ago. You have to understand it's pretty funny to see somebody still buying into "Climate Gate".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Andy Kreiss (May 13, 2010 9:19 am ET)
      2 1
      You have to appreciate the " us vs. them" mentality that the right is able to play on these issues. The same ignorant working stiffs who can simultaneously be told that they don't pay any taxes and are being overtaxed can be convinced that, as part of a "rich country", they're going to be robbed by freeloading poor countries.

      On the bright side, it looks like the Denial Cultists are tired of having their feeble arguments against the science of Climate Change laughed at.

      I'm not saying that they've accepted reality, I'm sure many still make themselves believe that GW is a hoax, but notice where the emphasis is now; the threat of oppressive laws related to climate change, not so much trying to deny it.

      I also notice the change at these threads. Any climate=related items used to have a gang of Denier trolls jumping on immediately with their "Climate-Gate" silliness and links to Inhofe's site. They don't seem as fanatical in their faith any more.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (May 13, 2010 9:45 am ET)
        3 1
        Silence can sometimes be an ill omen. Perhaps they've decided that, since they can't win in the scientific arena, they'll concentrate on seizing political power, so they won't have to hurt their brains with all that thinking. If the Teabaggers take back one house of Congress, you can forget about any progress on the Alternative Energy front.

        The Troglodytes have taken a similar approach to the debate about teaching evolution. They realized that they couldn't win the scientific debate, so they've been systematically taking over local school boards so they can shoehorn their superstitions back into the curriculum.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (May 13, 2010 9:35 am ET)
        1
      The principal threat to the republic is...Maurice Strong? An 85-year old environmentalist that not 1% of the population knows even, or ever, existed?

      Bwahahahahahaha.

      Glenn, let the record reflect: Whether it would make sense or not, whether it would be a good thing or a bad thing, global government or anything like it is not happening in your lifetime. Or your children's lifetime. Or your children's children's liftetime.

      Seriously, what a lousy way to make a living. Shouldn't you be doing something useful, rather than preying on the fears and hatreds of a small minority?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bow2china (May 15, 2010 8:20 am ET)
           
        name calling is all I see...Beck was right about the economy and Obama just keeps printing cash...circulation is up 3x ...so our dollar will be worth 33 cents.see the price of Gold?.USA will be long broke before any ice starts melting...keep spending and letting the police and teachers all get laid off...wheres the jobs????...who really believes we can afford healthcare and are we going to give to the illegals after Obama makes them all legal?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (May 13, 2010 9:49 am ET)
      1  
      "Founders Keepers"? Are you f***ing serious?

      Any legitimate publisher would outright reject a "novel" that contained a literary terd like that, or at least make the author change it... which is further evidence that Becky's books are subsidized by the GOP propaganda machine, just like Ann Coulter's.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.